DNP 752 Week 7 Project Abstract and Poster Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This DNP 752 Week 7 example prepares the project abstract and scholarly poster for a DNP applied project, with the full poster text and presenter notes set out below in APA 7 style. Presenting results through a poster is one of the outcomes named for University of Phoenix DNP 752, coded DNP/752 in the catalog and whose title is DNP Applied Project III, so doctoral nursing students usually draft the abstract and poster in week seven. The sample gives a 250-word conference abstract for a clinic pilot that added distress screening and nurse follow-up to diabetes care, then the text of each poster panel from the title banner through the take-home message, with a short note on layout and a spoken script for the two-minute walk-through that poster sessions expect. Guidance from a DNP poster development article shapes the choices. The DNP poster keeps one message front and center.

CourseDNP 752 DNP Applied Project III (DNP/752)
Week7
Paper typeAbstract and poster (panel text with presenter notes)
Lengthabout 878 words, 3 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramDNP
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 752 Week 7

1

Distress Check and Response: A Nurse-Led Diabetes Distress Pathway in a Community Health Center (Poster Text and Presenter Notes)

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

DNP/752: DNP Applied Project III

Week 7 Assignment: Abstract and Poster Presentation

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The health center, staff and figures are composites written for a model paper.

What this part is doingThe title gives the pathway a short name a viewer can remember and states plainly what the document holds.
2

Conference Abstract (250 words)

Background: About one in three adults with type 2 diabetes experiences diabetes distress, which is tied to adherence and glycemic control, yet primary care often screens only for depression. Purpose: To test whether a clinic could screen routinely for diabetes distress and have nurses follow up on positive results. Methods: Over 12 weeks, medical assistants offered a two-item screener at diabetes visits; a positive result led to the full 17-item scale and a nurse care manager response chosen to fit the subscale that scored highest. Three improvement cycles refined the workflow. Measures were screening rate, follow-up within 14 days, change in distress at 12 weeks, rooming time and staff ratings. Results: Screens were completed at 81.4% of 231 eligible visits, rising to 93% in the final cycle. Of 61 positive screens, 85.2% received timely contact. Among 44 patients reassessed, distress fell by 0.54 points on a 1 to 6 scale, and those in the high range fell from 20 to 9. Staff rated the pathway acceptable and appropriate. Rooming took 1.5 minutes longer. Conclusions: Nurse care managers can deliver distress follow-up within routine primary care with modest added time. Distress fell among patients followed up, though without a comparison group part of the change likely reflects regression toward the mean. The clinic has adopted the pathway.

What this part is doingThe abstract uses the manuscript's numbers exactly and fits the word limit, so the poster, abstract and manuscript tell one consistent story.
3

Panel 1: Title Banner

Distress Check and Response: Asking About the Weight of Diabetes in Primary Care. Author name, DNP candidate, University of Phoenix College of Nursing. East side clinic, community health center.

Presenter note: Point to the subtitle first. "We were asking about mood but never about diabetes itself."

Panel 2: Background

One in three people with type 2 diabetes carries diabetes distress. Distress, more than depression, tracks with adherence and A1C. Our clinic screened 93% of patients for depression and none for distress.

Presenter note: Keep to these three facts and move on.

Panel 3: Purpose

Add a two-item distress screen with nurse follow-up to diabetes visits, then count screens, timely calls and the shift in distress scores across one 12-week season.

Panel 4: Methods

Four steps drawn as boxes with arrows: (1) medical assistant offers two questions on a tablet at rooming; (2) a score of 3 or more opens the 17-item scale; (3) the care manager reads which part of distress is highest; (4) a matched response: problem-solving, a talk with the clinician, family support or a behavioral health introduction. Beneath: "Three improvement cycles, weekly run charts, Friday huddles."

Presenter note: Trace the arrows with a finger. The matched response is what makes this more than a screen.

Panel 5: Results

Chart 1: weekly screening rate on a run chart, climbing from 61% to 93%, with the three cycles marked. Chart 2: paired bars showing distress at entry, 3.02, and at 12 weeks, 2.48, for 44 patients. Three figures in large type beside the charts: 85% contacted within 14 days; high distress 20 to 9 patients; 1.5 minutes added to rooming.

Presenter note: If a visitor remembers one chart, it should be the run chart, because it shows the screening rate jumping each time the team changed the workflow, not each time staff were reminded.

Panel 6: Conclusions and Implications

Nurse care managers can make distress follow-up routine. Where the screen sits in rooming matters more than reminders. Before spreading, plan for behavioral health capacity and Spanish-language follow-up.

Presenter note: Mention the limitation in one sentence: no comparison group, so part of the drop in distress would have happened anyway.

Take-Home Box

Ask about the weight of diabetes, not only about mood, and give nurses a plan for the answer.

Layout Note

The poster uses a three-column layout at 48 by 36 inches, a title in 90-point type, headings in 44-point and body text no smaller than 28-point, with two colors from the university's palette and generous white space. Christenbery and Latham (2013), writing for DNP students, recommend a consistent message, a clear focus, a logical format and a design pleasing to the eye, and they caution against crowded posters; the take-home box and the two charts put those principles into practice. References and acknowledgments sit in small type at the bottom right, with a QR code linking to the manuscript.

What this part is doingThe layout note turns published poster guidance into specific sizes and choices, which is what reviewers check on the printed poster.
4

Two-Minute Script

"Our clinic screened almost everyone with diabetes for depression but never asked about diabetes distress, which affects about a third of patients and tracks with blood sugar control. We added two questions at rooming. A high score opened a longer questionnaire, and a nurse care manager called within two weeks with a response matched to what was driving the distress. After three rounds of changes, 93% of visits included the screen. Distress dropped among patients we reassessed, though some of that would have happened anyway. Staff found it acceptable, and it added a minute and a half to rooming. The clinic has kept it. The lesson: ask about the weight of diabetes, and give nurses a plan for the answer."

References on the Poster

The poster cites the scale and screener sources and the reporting guideline in its reference strip (Fisher et al., 2008; Ogrinc et al., 2016; Polonsky et al., 2005).

5

References

Christenbery, T. L., & Latham, T. G. (2013). Creating effective scholarly posters: A guide for DNP students. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 25(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00790.x

Fisher, L., Glasgow, R. E., Mullan, J. T., Skaff, M. M., & Polonsky, W. H. (2008). Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(3), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.842

Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(12), 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411

Polonsky, W. H., Fisher, L., Earles, J., Dudl, R. J., Lees, J., Mullan, J., & Jackson, R. A. (2005). Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: Development of the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care, 28(3), 626-631. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.3.626

What the DNP 752 Week 7 instructions ask

DNP 752 Week 7 usually asks students to prepare an abstract and a scholarly poster presenting the DNP applied project. The abstract typically follows a conference format of about 250 to 300 words with background, purpose, methods, results and conclusions. The poster assignment asks for a professional layout with a title, author and affiliation, and concise sections for background, purpose, methods, results with visuals, conclusions, implications and references, sized for print or electronic display. Many sections also ask for a brief narration or presenter script. Because the poster counts toward the program's dissemination outcome, clarity for a viewer who has never seen the project matters more than completeness. Some programs require the final file as a PowerPoint slide set to poster dimensions.

How this DNP 752 Week 7 example is built

The sample starts with the conference abstract, written to a 250-word limit and matched to the manuscript's numbers. The poster text follows panel by panel, the way a viewer's eye moves across a three-column layout: a title banner, a background panel of three sentences, a purpose statement, a methods panel with the pathway drawn as four steps, a results panel built around one run chart and one before-and-after chart, and a conclusions panel with three bullets. A take-home message sits in a box at the bottom center. Each panel has a presenter note explaining what to point to and what to say. A layout note covers font sizes, color and white space, drawing on published poster guidance for DNP students, and a two-minute script closes the paper.

DNP 752 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go

Poster rubrics tend to reward a clear, single message, visual organization and accuracy. Faculty look for all expected sections, results presented with charts rather than dense text, readable fonts at a distance, and a design that guides the eye. The abstract is often graded separately for structure, word limit and consistency with the manuscript. Some rubrics include the oral presentation or script, scoring whether the student can explain the project in a few minutes to a general audience. Professional appearance, correct author and affiliation, and cited references complete the grade. Posters that reproduce manuscript paragraphs in small type usually score lower than posters that use fewer words, larger visuals and a take-home message a viewer remembers after walking away.

DNP 752 Week 7 help: mistakes to avoid

The most frequent mistake is putting too much text on the poster. Viewers spend seconds on each panel, so keep sentences short and let two charts carry the results. Another mistake is an abstract that does not match the poster or manuscript, often because numbers changed after the abstract was written; check every figure. Students also choose small fonts and busy backgrounds, which make posters unreadable from a few feet away. Use one clear message and repeat it in the title, conclusions and take-home box. Include the author's credentials and program affiliation correctly. Finally, practice the two-minute talk aloud, because at a poster session most visitors ask for the short version and leave before the long one ends.

Related DNP 752 sample papers

Other DNP 752 week samples

More DNP sample papers

DNP 752 Week 7 questions, answered

What does DNP/752 Week 7 usually ask for?

Many sections ask students to prepare a conference-style abstract and a scholarly poster presenting the DNP applied project, often with a short presenter script.

Where can I find a free DNP 752 Week 7 sample paper?

The abstract, poster panel text and presenter script above form this week's free sample, with notes on layout. For a poster built from your own project, the first custom version is free.

How long is a DNP poster abstract?

Most conferences limit abstracts to about 250 to 300 words, structured as background, purpose, methods, results and conclusions.

What makes a good DNP poster?

Published guidance for DNP students stresses a consistent message, clear focus, logical format and a clean design, with charts carrying the results and minimal text.

How long should a poster talk be?

Plan a talk of about two minutes that covers the problem, what was done, the main result and the take-home message, with more detail ready if the visitor asks.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Request this one custom, free · All DNP 752 week samples · All courses