PM 585 Week 4 Developing and Communicating the Schedule Example

Reviewed by Davina Cresswell, MBA · University of Phoenix · Updated

This PM 585 Week 4 example develops a schedule for a repetitive field project and tailors how it is communicated to boards, crews and residents. University of Phoenix PM 585 asks for schedule development and communication in Week 4, and PM/585 rewards MBA students who choose a scheduling technique that fits the work and who know that a schedule nobody reads protects nobody. The project is Allegheny Ridge's lead line program from earlier weeks, with 60 construction blocks, nine crews at peak and a paving season that ends in November. The paper builds the activity network for one block, finds its critical path, uses line-of-balance scheduling for the repeated blocks, levels crew and inspector demand, protects the plan with buffers and sets out four schedule views for four audiences.

CoursePM 585 Project Scheduling and Value Management (PM/585)
Week4
Paper typeGraduate schedule development paper
Lengthabout 1,157 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PM 585 Week 4

1

Sixty Blocks, Nine Crews and a Paving Season: Developing and Communicating the Schedule for a Lead Line Replacement Project

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

PM/585: Project Scheduling and Value Management

Week 4 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The water authority, its schedule, crews and dates are composites written for a model paper.

What this part is doingThe title lists the three things the schedule must fit together.
2

Allegheny Ridge Water Authority, the composite utility followed in PM 585, has scoped its first lead line program, broken it into 60 construction blocks and estimated about 2,230 crew-days of work with nine crews at peak. This paper turns those pieces into a schedule and plans how different people will see it.

Scheduling One Block

Each block follows the same sequence. Activities, typical durations and predecessors:

A. Mail notices to residents: 1 day; starts the block.

B. File the state one-call utility locate request and wait for marks: 3 business days; after A.

C. Obtain the street opening permit: 10 business days; starts with A.

D. Confirm access agreements and schedule visits: 5 days; after A.

E. Excavate and install replacements, about 40 lines: about 42 crew-days for one crew; after B, C and D.

F. Inspect each replacement: within one day of each installation; runs alongside E.

G. Temporary trench patching: alongside E.

H. Final pavement and sidewalk restoration by the paving contractor: 6 days; after E is complete and patches have settled for 14 days.

I. Block closeout, records and resident letters: 2 days; after H.

The longest path runs through C, E, the settling period, H and I: 10 + 42 + 14 + 6 + 2, or about 74 working days from first notice to closeout for one block. Permits, not locates or access, set the start of installation, so permit applications are filed three weeks ahead of each block.

What this part is doingWorking the single-block network first shows the logic that will repeat 60 times.
3

Why Line of Balance

Repeating the block network 60 times in a conventional Gantt chart would produce hundreds of bars that hide the real question: are installation crews and the paving contractor moving through blocks at compatible rates? Arditi et al. (2002) reviewed line-of-balance scheduling for repetitive construction and noted that it shows production rates directly and helps keep crews working continuously, while also pointing out practical challenges such as handling different rates and non-typical units. Line of balance plots blocks on one axis and time on the other, with each activity drawn as a line whose slope is its production rate.

The Line-of-Balance Plan

Installation crews each complete one block about every 8.5 weeks. With eight crews starting in April and a ninth added in July, the installation line advances about 4.1 blocks a month in spring and about 4.6 in summer. The paving contractor, with two paving crews, can restore about 6.5 blocks a month. Because paving is faster, its line would catch up with installation and then stall; the plan therefore starts paving in June, after enough blocks have settled, and schedules it in two concentrated campaigns, June to July and September to early November, so the contractor works continuously. The plot shows that 30 blocks are installed in the first season and about 28 restored before the November deadline; the last two are patched and restored in April.

A crew waiting for the crew ahead of it is a cost; a crew running into the crew ahead of it is a hazard.

Resource Calendars and Weather

The schedule uses resource calendars rather than a simple five-day week. Installation crews work Monday to Friday, with Saturdays available for catch-up at overtime rates. The paving contractor works only when air temperature is above about 40 degrees Fahrenheit and pavement is dry, which in western Pennsylvania makes early April and late November unreliable. Asphalt plants in the region typically close for the season in late November, so the paving calendar ends there regardless of the contractor's availability. Building these calendars into the schedule moved the realistic end of the first-season paving campaign two weeks earlier than a plain calendar suggested.

Dependencies Outside the Project

Several dependencies sit outside the authority's control. The city streets department plans its own repaving program, and where a street is scheduled for repaving the authority moves that block earlier so that new pavement is not cut. A gas utility is replacing mains in two neighborhoods; those blocks are sequenced to follow the gas work. The schedule records these external dependencies as milestones owned by other agencies, reviewed monthly with them.

Leveling Inspectors

The authority has three inspectors. With nine crews each installing about one line a day, inspectors face about nine inspections a day across scattered sites, plus paving inspections. The first plan bunched all eight block starts into the first week of April, creating a peak of 16 inspection events on some days as crews finished their first, slow lines together. Staggering block starts by two or three days per crew reduced the peak to about 9, within the three inspectors' capacity at roughly three each a day.

Buffers and Uncertainty

Herroelen and Leus (2005) surveyed approaches to scheduling under uncertainty and distinguished reactive approaches, which repair a schedule after disruptions, from proactive approaches that build robustness in advance, including buffers. The authority uses both. Proactively, each crew's sequence carries a two-week buffer before the end of September, and the paving campaign carries a three-week buffer before the asphalt plants close in late November. Reactively, two ready-to-start blocks with permits and access agreements in hand are held in reserve so that a crew blocked by access refusals can move rather than wait.

Milestones

Key milestones: first-season construction start, April 7; ninth crew mobilized, July 7; 1,200 replacements complete, October 31; first-season paving complete, November 21; second-season start, April 6; all 2,400 replacements complete, October 30 of the second year; final paving, November 20; project closeout, January 31.

What this part is doingMilestones are tied to dates the funding authority and city already track.
4

Four Views for Four Audiences

Board of directors: a one-page milestone chart and a line-of-balance summary showing blocks installed and restored against plan, updated monthly.

Crews and inspectors: a two-week look-ahead listing each crew's addresses by day, updated every Friday, with blocked addresses flagged.

Residents: a block calendar on the authority's website and door hangers 14 days and 2 days before work at each address, showing the expected day, the hours water will be off and a hotline number.

Funding authority: a monthly summary of replacements completed, spending and milestone status in the required format.

The current standard notes that schedule information should be presented in forms suited to each audience's needs and that visual tools can improve understanding (Project Management Institute [PMI], 2021).

Keeping the Schedule Current

The scheduler updates actual progress every Friday from inspector records, redraws the line-of-balance plot and flags any crew whose line falls more than two weeks behind. Changes that move a milestone go through change control from Week 1.

Conclusion

Scheduling the lead line program meant first understanding one block's network, where permits and the settling period drive the critical path, and then using line-of-balance planning to keep nine installation crews and a paving contractor flowing through 60 blocks. Leveling inspectors, buffering the paving deadline, holding ready-to-start blocks and tailoring four schedule views to four audiences turn the schedule into a working tool.

5

References

Arditi, D., Tokdemir, O. B., & Suh, K. (2002). Challenges in line-of-balance scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(6), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:6(545)

Herroelen, W., & Leus, R. (2005). Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(2), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.002

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.

What the PM 585 Week 4 instructions ask

The fourth PM 585 assignment usually asks graduate students to develop a project schedule and a plan for communicating it. Prompts may ask for an activity list with dependencies, a network diagram or Gantt chart, identification of the critical path, resource loading and leveling, schedule compression or buffers, milestones and a communication approach that presents the schedule appropriately to different stakeholders. Some versions ask about scheduling methods for special cases such as repetitive or agile work. Build on the WBS and estimates from earlier weeks, show the logic and the resulting dates and support your choices with journal research on scheduling, cited in APA format.

How this PM 585 Week 4 example is built

Our model paper first schedules a single block in detail: notices, the one-call utility locate, permits, excavation and installation, inspection, patching, pavement restoration and closeout, with their durations and dependencies. The critical path runs through permits, installation and restoration. Because the same sequence repeats 60 times, the paper then uses line-of-balance scheduling, which plots each crew's progress through blocks over time so that installation crews and restoration crews do not collide or sit idle. Inspector demand is leveled by staggering block starts. Buffers protect the November paving deadline. The communication section shows four views: a milestone chart for the board, a two-week look-ahead for crews, a block calendar for residents and a monthly summary for the funding authority.

PM 585 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go

Graduate graders weigh both technique and judgment on this paper. High-scoring work shows a complete activity network with dependencies and durations, identifies the critical path correctly and chooses a scheduling method suited to the work, such as line of balance for repetitive tasks. Credit goes to resource leveling with a clear rationale, buffers or compression explained with their risks and milestones tied to commitments. The communication plan should match schedule views to audiences and update cycles. Research on scheduling methods and uncertainty strengthens the argument. Readable figures or lists, consistent dates and correct APA formatting complete a strong submission, along with a short note on how often each view is refreshed.

PM 585 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid

Gantt charts with no dependencies are a common weakness, since they make the critical path invisible. Show which tasks must finish before others start. Another frequent issue is ignoring resources: a schedule that assumes unlimited inspectors or crews looks fine until the first week. Load and level the scarce ones. Students also schedule repetitive work as one long bar, hiding the flow between crews; use a method designed for repetition. Some papers present one schedule to everyone; a board, a crew and a resident need very different views. Finally, explain how the schedule will be updated and who sees the updates. If your network diagram is confusing, a tutor can help you simplify it.

Related PM 585 sample papers

Other PM 585 week samples

More MBA sample papers

PM 585 Week 4 questions, answered

What does PM 585 Week 4 usually cover?

It usually covers developing a project schedule, including activities, dependencies, the critical path, resource leveling, buffers and milestones, and communicating the schedule in suitable forms to different stakeholders.

Where can I find a free PM 585 Week 4 sample paper?

The Week 4 paper above schedules a lead line replacement project with a block network, line-of-balance chart and four schedule views, at no cost to the reader.

What is line-of-balance scheduling?

A scheduling method for repetitive work in which each activity's progress through repeated units, such as blocks or floors, is plotted over time so crews flow at compatible rates without interfering.

What is resource leveling?

Adjusting the timing of activities so that demand for a limited resource stays within availability, usually by using float, which can extend the schedule if critical activities are delayed.

How should a schedule be communicated to different stakeholders?

By tailoring the view: summary milestones for executives, detailed short-term plans for workers, simple calendars for affected residents and progress summaries for funders.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.