MPH 602 Week 2 Media Coverage Analysis Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This MPH 602 Week 2 example analyzes how local outlets in the recurring composite Colorado county covered drug overdose, coding 120 news stories from 2022 through 2025. University of Phoenix MPH 602 examines how media shape public understanding of health issues, and in week two MPH/602 students typically analyze the volume, framing, sources, solutions and language of coverage and compare it with the evidence. The APA 7 paper follows the method of a national study of 673 news stories that found opioid misuse more often framed as a criminal justice issue, with fewer than 5% mentioning treatment expansion. A randomized study found that calling someone a substance abuser, rather than a person with a substance use disorder, led clinicians to see more personal blame and support punishment. State overdose data provide the accuracy check.

CourseMPH 602 Public Health Communication and Advocacy (MPH/602)
Week2
Paper typeMedia coverage analysis
Lengthabout 1,152 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramMPH
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for MPH 602 Week 2

1

Arrests, Seizures and a Few Rescues: A Content Analysis of How Local News Covered Overdose in a Southern Colorado County Over Four Years

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

MPH/602: Public Health Communication and Advocacy

Week 2 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The county, its news outlets, the sample of stories, coding results and quotations are composites written for a model paper; state data and research findings come from the sources cited.

What this part is doingThe title names the dominant story types the analysis found, previewing the result.
2

In March, a local television reporter called the county health department for comment on a large fentanyl seizure by the sheriff. The public information officer realized she could not remember the last time a reporter had asked the department about overdose prevention rather than a crime. The department decided to analyze how local media had covered overdose. This paper presents that analysis.

Why Coverage Matters

News coverage shapes what the public and policymakers believe causes a problem and what should be done. If overdose appears mainly as crime, audiences may support arrests over treatment and naloxone and may see people who use drugs as threats rather than neighbors at risk.

The Sample

The team searched the archives of the county's daily newspaper, a weekly Spanish-language paper, one television station and a public radio station for stories from January 2022 through December 2025 containing overdose, fentanyl or naloxone. Of 214 stories found, 120 were randomly selected, 30 per year, stratified by outlet.

What this part is doingRandom selection within each year prevents a single busy month from dominating the sample.
3

The Coding Scheme

The coding scheme was adapted from a national study of opioid news coverage, which used a structured instrument to measure causes, solutions, consequences and depictions of people who misuse opioids (McGinty et al., 2016). Categories included the primary frame, criminal justice, public health or personal tragedy; causes named; solutions named; sources quoted; and terms used for people who use drugs. Two coders coded 20 stories together to agree on rules, then coded the rest independently, discussing disagreements.

Coder Agreement

On a test set of 20 stories coded separately, the two coders agreed on the primary frame for 17 and on sources quoted for 19. Disagreements mostly involved stories that mixed an arrest with a family's loss; the coders agreed to code the frame that took up the most space in the story.

Finding One: Volume

Coverage rose in 2022 and 2023 with fentanyl seizures and fell in 2024, then rose again in 2025. Coverage tracked law enforcement announcements more than overdose deaths: the busiest months for stories were those with major seizures, not those with the most deaths.

Finding Two: Frames

Of 120 stories, 71, or 59%, used a primarily criminal justice frame; 31, or 26%, a public health frame; and 18, or 15%, a personal tragedy frame. Stories built around seizures, arrests and prosecutions dominated.

Finding Three: Causes and Solutions

The most frequently named cause was drug trafficking, in 64% of stories. The most frequently named solutions were arrests and seizures, in 58%. Naloxone appeared in 22% of stories, treatment with medication in 9% and fentanyl test strips in 4%.

Finding Four: Sources

Law enforcement officials were quoted in 63% of stories, prosecutors in 21%, health officials in 18%, family members of people who died in 14% and people who use drugs or are in recovery in 6%.

Finding Five: Headlines and Images

Headlines amplified the criminal justice frame: words such as bust, seized and dealer appeared in 38% of headlines. Television stories most often showed tables of seized pills and handcuffed suspects. Only four stories showed a naloxone kit, and none showed a person administering it.

Two Stories Compared

Two stories from the same week in 2023 show the difference. One television story led with a record seizure, quoted the sheriff and ended with a warning that fentanyl is everywhere. A radio story the same week followed a mother who had reversed her son's overdose with naloxone, quoted a physician on treatment and ended with where to get free kits. Both were accurate; only one gave audiences something to do.

Finding Six: Language

Stigmatizing terms, such as addict, junkie or abuser, appeared in 41% of stories, mostly in quotes from officials. Person-first terms appeared in 12%.

The National Pattern

The county's coverage mirrors national findings. An analysis of 673 news stories from 1998 to 2012 found that although experts deemed opioid analgesic misuse a public health crisis, the news media more often framed it as a criminal justice issue, with illegal drug dealing the most frequently named cause and law enforcement the most frequently named solution, while fewer than 5% of stories mentioned expanding treatment (McGinty et al., 2016). A decade later and a thousand miles away, the local news was telling the same story.

Why Language Matters

Words carry judgments. In a randomized study, 516 clinicians read a vignette describing a person as either a substance abuser or having a substance use disorder; those who read substance abuser agreed more that the person was personally culpable and that punitive measures should be taken (Kelly & Westerhoff, 2010). If trained clinicians respond this way, general audiences may respond more strongly.

What this part is doingCiting an experiment moves the language finding from preference to evidence.
4

Checking Coverage Against the Data

State data offer a reality check. CDC's provisional counts show Colorado's yearly overdose toll reached its high point in 2023 at 1,926, dropped by nearly 300 the next year and then climbed again to 1,819 in 2025, with deaths involving stimulants rising alongside fentanyl (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2026). Local coverage rarely mentioned stimulants, and stories in 2024 celebrating seizures did not note that deaths had fallen partly because of naloxone and treatment expansion.

Missing Voices

People who use drugs, people in recovery, treatment providers and harm reduction workers were rarely quoted. Spanish-language coverage was more likely to quote family members and health workers, suggesting a different approach worth learning from.

A Social Media Snapshot

A brief look at the county's most followed community pages found posts about overdose were shared most when they involved arrests or local deaths, and comment threads often blamed people who died. Posts from the health department about naloxone drew few shares. The department's social media strategy will need to borrow what works in local news: named people and specific stories.

Lessons for the Department

The department will share the findings with local editors in a short meeting, framed as information rather than criticism. It will also offer reporters a roster of spokespeople, including physicians, a peer recovery coach and a family member willing to speak; send a style guide on person-first language; pitch stories on naloxone rescues and treatment; and provide data briefs when seizures are announced, so coverage includes prevention.

Limits

The sample excludes most social media, where many young adults get news, and it cannot show how audiences actually interpreted the stories. Coding involves judgment, although two coders reduced bias. Four years may not show long-term trends.

Conclusion

Local overdose coverage from 2022 through 2025 was dominated by crime frames, law enforcement sources and stigmatizing language, while naloxone, treatment and the voices of people affected appeared rarely. National research shows the same pattern and experimental evidence shows why language matters. Comparing coverage with state data revealed missed stories. The department now has a plan to offer reporters the sources and stories that a public health frame requires.

5

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). VSRR provisional drug overdose death counts [Data set]. data.cdc.gov. https://data.cdc.gov/d/xkb8-kh2a

Kelly, J. F., & Westerhoff, C. M. (2010). Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21(3), 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.10.010

McGinty, E. E., Kennedy-Hendricks, A., Baller, J., Niederdeppe, J., Gollust, S., & Barry, C. L. (2016). Criminal activity or treatable health condition? News media framing of opioid analgesic abuse in the United States, 1998-2012. Psychiatric Services, 67(4), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500065

What the MPH 602 Week 2 instructions ask

The second MPH 602 assignment typically asks students to analyze media coverage of a health issue. Prompts may ask students to select a sample of news stories or social media posts, develop a coding scheme, analyze frames, sources quoted, causes and solutions presented and language used, compare coverage with the evidence and discuss implications for public understanding and policy. Some versions specify a number of articles. Meet that number and explain how you sampled. Strong papers describe the sample and coding clearly, report findings with numbers, compare frames with what research recommends, notice who is quoted and who is missing and draw practical lessons for public health communicators.

How this MPH 602 Week 2 example is built

A reporter's call asking the health department to comment on a drug seizure, and the realization that the department was rarely quoted on overdose, opens the paper. The sample of 120 stories from two newspapers, a television station and a radio station is described, along with a coding scheme adapted from national research. Findings cover volume over time, dominant frames, causes and solutions, sources quoted and language used. National findings on criminal justice framing and a randomized study of stigmatizing terms guide interpretation. Coverage is compared with state overdose data. Lessons for the department's communication close the paper, including a plan to share the findings with local editors.

MPH 602 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

The media coverage week is typically graded on a clear method, accurate findings and thoughtful interpretation. Graders look for a defined sample and time frame, a coding scheme with categories for frames, causes, solutions, sources and language, findings reported with counts or percentages, comparison with evidence and published media studies and implications for communicators. Research on news framing and stigmatizing language strengthens interpretation. Noticing whose voices are missing, and why, earns credit. Checking coverage against data also earns marks. Orderly sections and exact references earn the last points. Analyses that summarize a few stories without a coding scheme usually score lower; skipping the comparison with data also costs points.

MPH 602 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid

Many MPH 602 Week 2 papers summarize a handful of articles and call it an analysis. Define your sample: which outlets, which dates, which search terms and how many stories. Build a simple coding sheet with categories such as frame, cause named, solution named, sources quoted and terms used for people. Code every story the same way and count. Then compare what you find with the evidence: is the coverage accurate, are effective solutions mentioned and are affected people heard? Use published studies of media framing to interpret patterns. Finally, turn findings into concrete steps for communicators, such as offering spokespeople or story ideas, and plan to repeat the analysis later to see whether coverage shifts.

Related MPH 602 sample papers

Other MPH 602 week samples

More MPH sample papers

MPH 602 Week 2 questions, answered

What does MPH/602 Week 2 usually ask for?

The second communication paper typically asks students to analyze media coverage of a health issue, coding frames, causes, solutions, sources and language and comparing coverage with evidence.

Where can I find a free MPH 602 Week 2 sample paper?

You can read the overdose coverage analysis above without charge; a margin note explains each coding category. Tell us the issue you are analyzing; your opening paper is free.

How do news media frame opioid problems?

A national analysis of 673 news stories from 1998 to 2012 found opioid analgesic misuse more often framed as a criminal justice issue, with fewer than 5% of stories mentioning expanded treatment.

Does the term substance abuser increase stigma?

In a randomized study of 516 clinicians, those who read about a substance abuser, rather than a person with a substance use disorder, agreed more that the person was to blame and should be punished.

What is a news frame?

The way a story presents an issue, including which causes and solutions it emphasizes, which shapes how audiences understand the problem and what they think should be done about it.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.