MGT/445 Organizational Negotiations sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Davina Cresswell, MBA · Organizational Negotiations · University of Phoenix · Free custom samples in 24–48h

MGT/445 builds negotiation skills for the workplace. Five weekly samples cover negotiation fundamentals, distributive and integrative strategies, stakeholder interests, conflict management and negotiation across cultures and online.

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. MGT/445 is Phoenix’s Organizational Negotiations course. It provides an overview of negotiations in organizations, including processes and strategies, stakeholder interests, applying concepts to the workplace, conflict management and emerging trends in global and technology-mediated negotiation. Searches like "mgt/445 week 3 assignment example", "MGT445 sample paper", and "MGT 445 week samples" land on this page.

What MGT/445 is really about

Managers negotiate constantly, with suppliers, employees, partners and other departments. MGT/445 introduces the difference between claiming value and creating value, preparation with BATNA and reservation points, principled negotiation focused on interests and techniques for managing conflict and cultural differences.

Students typically prepare a negotiation plan, analyze a case using negotiation concepts, reflect on a practice negotiation, map stakeholders' interests and address a workplace conflict.

What MGT/445’s assessments ask for

Instructors look for thorough preparation, interests distinguished from positions, strategies matched to the situation and reflections that apply concepts honestly. Many sections include a role-play or simulated negotiation, followed by a reflection that compares the plan with what actually happened and names one skill to improve. Strong reflections are honest about mistakes, such as anchoring too low or conceding too early, and link each lesson to a concept from the readings.

Where students lose points in MGT/445

Students lose points when plans lack a BATNA, when every negotiation is treated as win-lose or when cultural differences are ignored. Reflections that only narrate events also score lower. Treating concessions as the only tool, instead of trading issues of different value, is another common weakness.

The MGT/445 drawers

Wk 1

MGT/445 Wk 1 assignment example

Wk 1 usually introduces negotiation processes. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 2

MGT/445 Wk 2 assignment example

Wk 2 typically compares distributive and integrative strategies. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 3

MGT/445 Wk 3 assignment example

Wk 3 often analyzes stakeholder interests. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 4

MGT/445 Wk 4 assignment example

Wk 4 commonly addresses conflict management. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 5

MGT/445 Wk 5 assignment example

Wk 5 closes with negotiating across cultures and technology. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

University of Phoenix revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a MGT/445 sample the right way

Describe the negotiation or conflict in your assignment; a free draft follows with a BATNA and interests mapped for each side.

How these samples are written

The discipline behind every paper here: instructions are the outline, worksheets get filled exactly, decks get outlined slide by slide, and the one-course-at-a-time rhythm means your one course gets the whole desk. Send your week's instructions with a request and the sample matches them, revisions included.

MGT/445 questions, answered

What is a BATNA?

The best alternative to a negotiated agreement, what a party will do if no deal is reached.

What is integrative negotiation?

Negotiation that seeks to create value by finding options that meet both sides' interests.

What is a reservation point?

The least favorable terms a negotiator will accept before walking away.