| Course | MGT 445 Organizational Negotiations (MGT/445) |
|---|---|
| Week | 1 |
| Paper type | Negotiation process analysis |
| Length | about 1,078 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Business |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGT 445 Week 1
Preparing to Negotiate a $14 Million Concrete Supply Contract: The Negotiation Process at Harbor Point Concrete
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
MGT/445: Organizational Negotiations
Week 1 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Harbor Point Concrete and all deal terms are composites written for a model paper.
Harbor Point Concrete, a composite ready-mix company in Tampa, Florida, operates eight batch plants and a fleet of 140 mixer trucks and employs 420 people. A national general contractor is building a 12-story hospital tower in the region and has invited Harbor Point and one competitor to bid on supplying about 72,000 cubic yards of concrete over 22 months, worth about $14 million. Harbor Point's sales director will lead the negotiation. Most negotiations are decided before anyone sits down, by how well each side knows its own limits, its alternatives and what the other side really needs. This paper plans the negotiation process.
The Stages of Negotiation
Negotiation typically moves through preparation, relationship building, information exchange, bargaining, closing and implementation (Lewicki et al., 2020). Each stage has its own tasks, and skipping preparation is the most common and costly error.
Positions and Interests
Fisher et al. (2011) distinguished positions, what each side says it wants, from interests, the underlying needs behind the positions. The contractor's position will be a low price per cubic yard. Its interests include reliable delivery for large pours, consistent quality for structural concrete, payment terms that match its cash flow and a supplier that will not cause schedule delays costing thousands of dollars a day.
Harbor Point's Costs
Harbor Point's variable cost for the hospital's mix, including cement, aggregates, admixtures, delivery and plant labor, is about $158 per cubic yard. With an allocation for fixed costs and a reasonable margin, its normal price for a project of this size is about $205 per cubic yard.
Harbor Point's BATNA
If Harbor Point does not win the hospital contract, its best alternative is to sell the capacity to other projects. Tampa construction is busy, and the company estimates it could sell most of the volume to smaller projects at an average of about $198 per cubic yard, though with more scheduling complexity. This alternative sets its walk-away point.
Reservation Point and Target
Given its alternative, Harbor Point's reservation point, the lowest price it will accept, is about $188 per cubic yard, below the alternative's price because the hospital contract offers steady volume and lower selling costs. Its target is $203. Its opening offer will be $212, leaving room for concessions.
Estimating the Contractor's Position
The contractor's alternative is the rival supplier, whose last comparable bid was reported at about $196. The contractor also values Harbor Point's two plants near the site, which shorten delivery times. Its reservation point is likely around $205 to $208 for a supplier it trusts, and its target is probably below $195.
The Zone of Possible Agreement
If Harbor Point will accept $188 and the contractor will pay up to about $206, the zone of possible agreement runs from $188 to $206. The final price will depend on how each side uses information and concessions.
Making the First Offer
Galinsky and Mussweiler (2001) found in experiments that first offers act as anchors that pull final agreements toward them, and that the party receiving the offer can weaken the anchor by focusing on the other side's limits. Harbor Point will make the first offer at $212, justified with its delivery capacity, quality record and proximity to the site.
Exchanging Information
Thompson (1991) found that negotiators who asked about the other side's priorities reached better joint outcomes, yet many failed to ask. Harbor Point will ask about the pour schedule, quality requirements, payment process and the contractor's biggest worries before discussing price.
Planning Concessions
Concessions will become smaller as the price falls: from $212 to $208, then to $205 and finally $203, signaling that Harbor Point is nearing its limit. Each concession will be exchanged for something, such as faster payment or a commitment on total volume.
Relationship Building
The sales director will meet the contractor's project manager and superintendent before formal bargaining and offer a tour of the nearest plant. A good relationship reduces later disputes during 22 months of deliveries.
Strengthening the BATNA
A negotiator's power depends heavily on the alternative. Before the meeting, Harbor Point's sales team will firm up its alternative by collecting letters of intent from three mid-size projects that could absorb some of the capacity. A documented alternative makes it easier to hold firm near the target and to walk away calmly if the contractor insists on a price below $188. Without that work, the walk-away point would be a guess, and guesses tend to drift downward under pressure.
Who Is at the Table
Negotiation teams need clear roles. Harbor Point's sales director will lead and make offers, the quality manager will answer technical questions about mix designs and testing and the controller will be available by phone to confirm the effect of any change in payment terms. Agreeing beforehand that only the sales director makes concessions prevents the team from giving away value in side conversations. The contractor will likely send its procurement manager and project superintendent, whose interests differ: the first cares about price, the second about delivery.
Cement Price Risk
Cement makes up a large share of Harbor Point's cost and has risen sharply in recent years. Fixing a price for 22 months exposes the company to that risk. The plan proposes an escalation clause tied to a published cement price index, which protects Harbor Point while giving the contractor a transparent, predictable formula rather than a padded fixed price.
Ethics in the Process
Harbor Point will not misrepresent its costs or invent competing offers. Bluffing about facts can damage trust and, in some cases, create legal risk. It can decline to reveal its reservation point without lying about it.
Closing the Deal
Agreement will be confirmed in a written contract covering price, escalation for cement costs, delivery commitments, quality testing, payment terms and dispute resolution. Both sides will review the terms together to avoid misunderstandings.
Implementation
After signing, Harbor Point will assign a project coordinator, hold weekly meetings during major pours and track on-time delivery and test results. Implementation is where the value of the agreement is realized or lost.
Conclusion
Harbor Point's preparation defines its target of $203, a walk-away point of $188 and a best alternative of selling to other projects. Estimating the contractor's alternatives suggests a zone of agreement from $188 to $206. A well-justified first offer, information exchange, planned concessions and careful implementation give Harbor Point the best chance of a strong, durable agreement.
References
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.
Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.657
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2020). Negotiation (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Thompson, L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90020-7
What the MGT 445 Week 1 instructions ask
The first MGT 445 assignment usually asks students to explain the negotiation process and apply it to a situation. Common requirements include the stages of negotiation, such as preparation, relationship building, information exchange, bargaining, closing and implementation; key concepts such as interests, positions, best alternative to a negotiated agreement, reservation point, target and zone of possible agreement; and a plan for a specific negotiation. Some prompts ask students to describe a negotiation they observed. Define each concept clearly, apply it with numbers, plan concessions in advance and cite negotiation sources in APA format. If you describe a real negotiation, change names and sensitive details.
How this MGT 445 Week 1 example is built
A concrete supplier preparing to bid on a hospital tower must know its limits before it hears the contractor's first number, and the paper builds that preparation. It explains the stages of negotiation. It sets the supplier's target price, its walk-away price based on costs and its best alternative, other projects it could supply. It estimates the contractor's alternatives, including a rival supplier, and the likely zone of agreement. It considers whether to make the first offer, plans a concession pattern and identifies interests beyond price, such as delivery reliability and payment timing. It ends with how the deal will be closed and monitored, including the escalation clause, delivery commitments and a project coordinator who will manage 22 months of pours.
MGT 445 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go
Strong process papers show that preparation drives outcomes and apply negotiation concepts with specific numbers. Instructors credit correct definitions of interests, positions, BATNA, reservation point and target, a reasoned estimate of the other side's position, a plan for opening offers and concessions and attention to implementation after agreement. Using research, such as studies of first offers and information exchange, strengthens the plan. A realistic, ethical approach shows professionalism. Clear headings and correct APA citations finish the paper. Identifying interests beyond price sets up the integrative bargaining covered next, and a short table listing each side's target, reservation point and alternative lets a reader check the zone of agreement at a glance.
MGT 445 Week 1 help: mistakes to avoid
Students often describe negotiation as what happens at the table. Spend most of your effort on preparation. Another frequent gap is confusing BATNA with a bottom line; the best alternative is what you will do if no deal is reached, and it sets the walk-away point. Explain both. Students also forget to estimate the other side's alternatives and limits. Do it. Avoid plans with no numbers. Plan concessions before the meeting. Consider interests beyond price. Finally, include implementation, since a deal that falls apart in delivery was not really a good deal. Name who will manage the relationship after signing and how problems will be raised.
Related MGT 445 sample papers
Other MGT 445 week samples
- MGT 445 Week 2: Distributive vs. Integrative Strategy
- MGT 445 Week 3: Analyzing Stakeholder Interests
- MGT 445 Week 4: Conflict Management
- MGT 445 Week 5: Culture and Technology in Negotiation
More BS in Business sample papers
- MGT 418 Week 1: Screening New Business Opportunities
- MGT 434 Week 1: EEO Law and Affirmative Action
- MGT 465 Week 1: Strategy and the Business Concept
- MGT 498 Week 1: Strategic Planning and Management Fundamentals
MGT 445 Week 1 questions, answered
What does MGT 445 Week 1 usually cover?
It usually covers the negotiation process, including preparation, information exchange, bargaining, closing and implementation, along with interests, positions, BATNA, reservation points and the zone of possible agreement.
Where can I find a free MGT 445 Week 1 sample paper?
A complete negotiation plan for a concrete supply contract, with targets, limits and notes, is on this page. MGT 445 students can request a free first draft.
What is a BATNA?
The best alternative to a negotiated agreement, the course of action a party will take if the negotiation fails. A strong BATNA increases bargaining power and helps set the walk-away point.
What is the zone of possible agreement?
The range between the parties' reservation points, where any agreement would be acceptable to both. If the reservation points do not overlap, no agreement is possible on those terms.
Should you make the first offer in a negotiation?
Research suggests that first offers often anchor the outcome, so making a well-prepared, ambitious first offer can help, especially when you have good information about the other side's limits.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All MGT 445 week samples · All courses