DHA 733 Week 8 Integrative Seminar Paper Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This DHA 733 Week 8 example is an integrative seminar paper in which a regional vice president for four rural North Carolina hospitals draws together a year of work on workforce, technology, equity, change and new models of care. University of Phoenix DHA 733 closes with a synthesis of contemporary leadership issues, and in the final week DHA/733 students typically integrate theory, evidence and experience into a coherent leadership philosophy and agenda. The APA 7 paper returns to complexity leadership as its organizing lens. A meta-analysis found that organizational and individual interventions cut physician burnout from 54% to 44%. The Quintuple Aim keeps equity in view. A leadership philosophy, results and a five-year agenda close the paper.

CourseDHA 733 Contemporary Leadership Issues (DHA/733)
Week8
Paper typeIntegrative leadership paper
Lengthabout 1,152 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramDHA
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for DHA 733 Week 8

1

What a Rural Health Leader Learned: An Integrative Account of Leading Through Workforce, Technology, Trust and Change

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

DHA/733: Contemporary Leadership Issues

Week 8 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The health network, the executive, events, results and plans are composites written for a model paper; research findings come from the sources cited.

What this part is doingThe title frames the paper as learning, which invites honesty about failure as well as success.
2

At the start of the course, the regional vice president wrote six questions: what kind of leadership suits a sprawling rural region, how to steady the workforce, how to adopt artificial intelligence safely, how to earn community trust, how to lead change and what new model could make the region more resilient. A year later, she returned to those questions with results, some encouraging and some sobering. This paper integrates what she learned.

A Unifying Lens: Complexity Leadership

The course's topics connect through one idea. Uhl-Bien and colleagues argued that modern organizations behave like living, adapting systems, and that leadership in them takes three intertwined forms: administrative leadership through formal structures, adaptive leadership that emerges from people's interactions and enabling leadership that creates the conditions for adaptation and manages tension between the two (Uhl-Bien et al., 2007). Looking back, the region's successes came when leaders enabled adaptive work and its failures came when they relied on administrative orders alone.

What this part is doingChoosing one lens turns a list of topics into an argument.
3

Workforce: What Happened

The regional staffing model began as an administrative order and nearly failed. Rebuilt through co-design with nurses, it ended mandatory overtime in the pilot hospitals and, after a year, first-year nurse turnover fell from 31% to 22%, short of the 18% target. Agency spending fell by about a quarter. Two units with persistent manager turnover showed no improvement, a sign that the model depends on stable local leadership.

Is the Workforce Effort on the Right Track?

Evidence suggests it is. West and colleagues' meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials and 37 cohort studies found that interventions reduced overall physician burnout from 54% to 44% and high emotional exhaustion from 38% to 24%, and judged that changes aimed at the person and changes aimed at the workplace each lowered burnout by amounts that matter clinically (West et al., 2016). The region's early reliance on wellness classes alone had little effect; the structural changes to staffing and scheduling mattered more.

Technology: What Happened

The ambient scribe pilot showed modest time savings for most clinicians and large savings for a few, with note errors found in about one audited note in twenty, mostly minor. Spanish-language visits performed worse. The region expanded the tool cautiously with continued audits and a separate review of Spanish-language notes. The sepsis alert's silent pilot confirmed the concern: the model would have missed most local cases, and the region declined it.

Equity and Trust: What Happened

Stratified data revealed gaps that had been invisible, including longer emergency waits for Black patients at two hospitals, which narrowed after triage audits. The community council met ten times. But the annual trust survey showed only small change, a reminder that trust returns slowly. A year of better behavior is a start, not a verdict, for a community that remembers decades.

Change and New Models: What Happened

The home hospital proposal won board approval for a pilot but stalled while payment rules were uncertain. The delay taught a hard lesson: a sound model can wait on factors no local leader controls, so leaders need parallel paths, such as commercial contracts, rather than a single dependency.

Judging the Year With Five Aims

Nundy and colleagues' Quintuple Aim adds health equity to experience, population health, cost and workforce well-being (Nundy et al., 2022). Measured against those aims, the year improved workforce well-being and cost modestly, began to address equity, left population health largely unchanged in the short term and improved patient experience in some units. Progress was uneven, as complex systems predict.

What Did Not Work

Some efforts failed outright. Wellness classes offered in the first months drew few nurses and changed nothing measurable. A communication campaign about the staffing model, launched before nurses were involved, deepened suspicion. Two unit managers left during the year, and their units' turnover rose. And the first community council meeting, held in a hospital conference room, drew only board-selected participants; it worked only after moving to a church hall and opening attendance.

What this part is doingListing failures with the same specificity as successes is what makes the account credible.
4

The Relationship With the Academic Center

The year also changed the region's relationship with the network's academic center. Joint clinical groups on transfers and the home hospital planning brought rural and academic clinicians into regular contact. Academic leaders began to see the rural hospitals as partners with knowledge of their own rather than as feeders of referrals. That shift, hard to measure, may prove the most durable result.

Lessons About Leadership

Five lessons emerged. Announcing change is not leading it. Evidence must be applied to one's own programs as rigorously as to vendors'. Trust is earned by behavior over time. Structural changes outperform exhortations. And a leader's job in a complex system is less to design solutions than to create conditions in which the people closest to problems can solve them.

A Leadership Philosophy

The vice president summarized her philosophy in four sentences: I will set clear principles and let those closest to the work design how to meet them. I will measure what matters to patients, staff and communities, including gaps between groups. I will tell the truth about what is not working. And I will judge my leadership by whether the people I serve are healthier and trust us more.

Developing the Next Leaders

The region's future depends on leaders who are not yet in leadership roles. Charge nurses, unit managers and physician leads carried much of the year's work, often without training. The vice president committed to a leadership program for them, built on the course's lessons, with coaching, protected time and a project each participant leads.

Sustaining the Leader

Leadership in a strained system also wears on leaders. The vice president worked most weekends during the staffing crisis and recognized the same warning signs she had seen in her staff. She now protects one day each weekend, meets monthly with a mentor outside the network and delegates decisions that others are ready to make.

A Five-Year Agenda

Commitments include first-year nurse turnover below 15% by the third year, stratified quality data public on the region's website, a community trust survey showing improvement each year, the home hospital service operating under at least two payer contracts and a regional complexity-informed leadership program for managers.

Connection to Doctoral Research

The vice president's dissertation will study how enabling leadership practices affect nurse retention in rural hospitals, testing the year's central lesson with a rigorous design. Using the region's units as sites, it will compare retention on units whose managers adopt co-design and regular rounding with units that adopt them later, measuring turnover, psychological safety and engagement over two years.

Conclusion

A year of leading through workforce strain, new technology, mistrust and change showed that complexity leadership explains both the region's failures and its successes. Evidence confirms that structural changes reduce burnout, and the five aims reveal uneven progress. A clear philosophy and specific commitments give the next five years direction.

5

References

Nundy, S., Cooper, L. A., & Mate, K. S. (2022). The Quintuple Aim for health care improvement: A new imperative to advance health equity. JAMA, 327(6), 521-522. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.25181

Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002

West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Erwin, P. J., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2016). Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 388(10057), 2272-2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X

What the DHA 733 Week 8 instructions ask

The final DHA 733 assignment usually calls for an integrative seminar paper. Students are generally asked to synthesize the course's topics, such as contemporary issues, leadership theory, workforce, technology, equity and change, into a coherent account; apply theory and evidence to their own leadership experience; evaluate what worked and what did not; articulate a personal leadership philosophy; and propose an agenda for the future. Some versions ask for connections to the student's doctoral research. Name the research question and design if so. Strong papers integrate rather than summarize, use evidence to judge their own actions honestly, connect theory to practice and end with specific commitments rather than general aspirations.

How this DHA 733 Week 8 example is built

The vice president's return to the questions set at the start of the course opens the paper. A single lens, complexity leadership, organizes the synthesis. Results are reviewed candidly: the staffing model, the scribe pilot, the trust work and the home hospital proposal, with a separate account of what failed and why. Evidence on burnout interventions tests whether workforce efforts are on the right track. The Quintuple Aim is used to judge the year's work as a whole. Lessons about leadership are drawn, a personal philosophy is stated and a five-year agenda with specific commitments and measures closes the paper, along with connections to the vice president's doctoral research.

DHA 733 Week 8 grading rubric: where the points go

The integrative week typically rewards genuine synthesis, honest evaluation and a clear leadership philosophy. Graders look first for course topics connected through one unifying lens, theory and evidence applied to real experience, successes and failures evaluated with data, lessons stated, a personal philosophy articulated and a future agenda with specific commitments. Foundational leadership theory and outcome research strengthen the paper. Owning failures openly earns credit, and so does an agenda tied to measurable aims with dates attached. Reflective yet precise writing and correct APA references complete the grade, and the paper should read as one argument. Papers that summarize each week in turn without integration, or that report only successes, usually score lower.

DHA 733 Week 8 help: mistakes to avoid

Many DHA 733 Week 8 papers summarize the course week by week. Integrate instead. Choose one lens, such as a leadership theory or a set of aims, and use it to connect everything you studied and did. Evaluate your own actions with the same rigor you would apply to a vendor's claims: what changed, by how much and what failed? Use research to judge whether you are on the right track. Then state your leadership philosophy in a few sentences you would be willing to be held to. End with a short agenda of specific commitments, each with a measure and a date, and link them to your doctoral research.

Related DHA 733 sample papers

Other DHA 733 week samples

More DHA sample papers

DHA 733 Week 8 questions, answered

What does DHA/733 Week 8 usually ask for?

The final leadership paper usually calls for an integrative seminar paper that synthesizes the course, evaluates the student's own leadership and states a philosophy and future agenda.

Where can I find a free DHA 733 Week 8 sample paper?

Scroll up for the complete integrative seminar sample, free to all readers, with notes on how each week is woven in. Share your course themes and experience, and the opening draft is ours to write at no cost.

Do burnout interventions work?

A meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials and 37 cohort studies found that interventions reduced overall physician burnout from 54% to 44%, with both individual and organizational strategies producing meaningful reductions.

What is a leadership philosophy?

A short statement of the beliefs and commitments that guide a leader's decisions, specific enough that others can hold the leader to it.

How should an integrative leadership paper be organized?

Around a unifying lens, such as a leadership theory or a set of aims, rather than week by week, with honest evaluation of results and specific future commitments.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.