| Course | COM 295 Business Communications (COM/295) |
|---|---|
| Week | 4 |
| Paper type | Communication technology analysis |
| Length | about 1,001 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Business |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for COM 295 Week 4
Reviews, Texts and Team Chat: Technology and Social Media in an HVAC Company's Communication
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
COM/295: Business Communications
Week 4 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Gulf Breeze Air Services, its people, customers and figures are composites written for a model paper.
Gulf Breeze, the Tampa service company examined in earlier weeks, communicates through more digital channels each year. Customers review it on search and review sites, book through its website, receive appointment texts and see its posts on two social media platforms. Inside, staff moved from email and radio to a team chat app last year. These tools save time but create new problems. This paper analyzes them.
A Framework for Social Media
Kaplan and Haenlein (2010) described social media as online platforms through which users create and share content with one another. They sorted social media into types according to how much personal presence and self-disclosure each allows, and advised firms to choose channels carefully, align them and be active, interesting and honest. For Gulf Breeze, the most important social media are not its own posts but review sites, where customers create the content that prospective customers read.
Online Reviews
Gulf Breeze receives about 80 reviews a month, with a 4.3-star average. Most are positive and mention technicians by name. About one in ten is negative, usually about scheduling delays in summer or prices. Until recently, nobody answered reviews; the marketing coordinator had no time and was unsure what to say.
Proserpio and Zervas (2017) studied hotels that began responding to online reviews and found that, after managers started responding, ratings rose slightly and review volume increased, and that negative reviews became less frequent or shorter, possibly because unhappy customers knew their complaints would be read. Although the setting differs, the findings suggest that responding is worth the effort if responses are genuine.
An unanswered one-star review keeps talking to prospective customers long after the customer has stopped.
A good response thanks the reviewer, addresses the specific concern without arguing, offers to resolve it offline and avoids sharing private details. Responses to positive reviews can thank technicians by name, reinforcing service culture.
What the Negative Reviews Say
A review of the last 100 negative reviews found three themes. About half complained about waiting for service during summer peaks, often after being told a technician would arrive the same day. About a quarter objected to prices, especially repair quotes they felt were pushed on them. The rest concerned billing errors and missed callbacks. Several of these complaints could have been resolved quickly if someone had responded, and the themes match problems identified in other weeks: scheduling communication, honest quotes and follow-up. Reviews are not only a reputation issue; they are free, public feedback on operations.
Responding in Practice
Two sample responses show the approach. To a three-star review complaining of a long wait: "Thank you for letting us know, and I'm sorry you waited most of the day in July. Summer demand stretched our schedule, and we should have called you when the time changed. I'd like to make it right; please call me directly at the number below." To a five-star review naming a technician: "Thank you for the kind words about Andre. We'll make sure he sees them." Each takes a minute to write and tells future customers that someone is listening.
Appointment Texts
Customers receive a text the day before an appointment and another when the technician is on the way, with a photo of the technician. Surveys show customers like them; missed appointments fell 18 percent after texts began. But texting carries legal requirements. Federal law restricts automated calls and texts to mobile phones without prior consent, and marketing texts require express written consent. Gulf Breeze's booking form collects phone numbers but does not clearly ask for consent to texts, and last spring the marketing team sent a promotional text to all customers. That exposes the company to risk.
Team Chat
Moving dispatch and office communication to a chat app cut the time to reassign a technician from about 20 minutes to 5. But the app created two problems. Messages arrive after hours, and some technicians feel expected to respond at 9 p.m. And chat messages are business records: in a dispute, they may have to be produced, and casual comments about customers or coworkers could embarrass the company or support a claim.
Social Media Posts
The company's own posts, mostly photos of new installations and seasonal tips, reach about 3,000 followers and draw little engagement. Posts that feature technicians and practical advice, such as how to change a filter, perform best. A modest plan of two useful posts a week, with technicians' consent to appear, would build familiarity without much cost. Paid promotion is not needed for now, though the company may test it before the busy summer season.
Privacy and Records
Each channel handles customer data: addresses, phone numbers, photos of homes and sometimes access codes. Bovée and Thill (2021) advise organizations to treat digital messages with the same care as formal documents, since they can be stored, forwarded and retrieved. Gulf Breeze should limit sensitive details in chat, set retention periods and train staff.
Recommendations
Review responses: reply to every review within two business days using a short guide; route serious complaints to a manager.
Text consent: add a clear consent checkbox to booking forms, separate from marketing consent; include opt-out instructions in every text; send marketing texts only to customers who opted in.
Chat norms: no expectation of replies outside shifts except for on-call staff; no customer access codes in chat; professional tone.
Employee social media policy: guidance on representing the company and protecting customer privacy, written to respect employees' legal right to discuss working conditions.
Measures: review response rate and time, average rating, text opt-out rate, missed appointments and an employee survey question on after-hours messages.
Conclusion
Technology has made Gulf Breeze faster and more visible, but each channel brings risks. Research suggests that responding to reviews improves reputation, while texting and chat require attention to consent, records and employees' time. Clear guidelines with measurable goals let the company keep the benefits of digital communication while managing its risks.
References
Bovée, C. L., & Thill, J. V. (2021). Business communication today (15th ed.). Pearson.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Proserpio, D., & Zervas, G. (2017). Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Science, 36(5), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1043
What the COM 295 Week 4 instructions ask
For the fourth COM 295 paper, students look at how technology and social media shape business communication. Prompts may ask students to describe tools such as email, messaging apps, video meetings, social media and review sites, analyze their benefits and risks for internal and external communication, discuss legal and ethical issues such as privacy and records and recommend guidelines for an organization. A few versions focus on judging how well a company uses its social media accounts. Analyze one organization's actual tools and practices, back each claim with the textbook and published studies, cited in APA. Recommend specific guidelines, and say how the organization would measure whether they work.
How this COM 295 Week 4 example is built
The model paper starts with numbers: about 80 new online reviews a month, a 4.3-star average and a pattern of unanswered negative reviews. Research shows that managers who respond to reviews can see ratings and review volume change, though responses must be genuine. The paper also examines appointment texts, which customers like but which require consent under federal law, and the team chat app, which sped up dispatch but blurred work hours and created records that may be discoverable in disputes. A framework for social media classifies the company's channels by purpose. Recommendations include a review response guide, consent and opt-out practices for texts, chat norms and a short social media policy for employees.
COM 295 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
Instructors reward analysis of specific tools in a specific organization. Strong papers describe how the organization uses each technology, weigh benefits and risks with evidence and address legal and ethical issues such as consent, privacy and records. Credit goes to recommendations that are practical and measurable, such as response times for reviews or norms for after-hours messages, and to awareness of how technology affects both customers and employees. Graders also look for research on social media or online reviews rather than general claims. Graders also check how the organization will know if its new guidelines succeed. Clear organization, a professional voice and APA references round out the paper.
COM 295 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid
Technology papers often praise social media in general without analyzing how one organization uses it. Describe the actual channels, volumes and problems. Another frequent gap is ignoring legal and ethical limits, such as consent for marketing texts, privacy of customer data and records retention. Address them. Students also overlook effects on employees, such as messages after hours. Consider them. Some papers recommend being active on every platform; focus on the channels that matter to the organization's customers. Finally, make recommendations measurable, such as replying to every review within two business days. A tutor can help you find research on the channels your organization uses and turn findings into specific guidelines.
Related COM 295 sample papers
Other COM 295 week samples
- COM 295 Week 1: Business Documents and Purposes
- COM 295 Week 2: Audience, Context and Channel
- COM 295 Week 3: Persuasive and Bad-News Messages
- COM 295 Week 5: Ethics and Culture in Communication
More BS in Business sample papers
- BUS 441 Week 4: Planning Human Resource Needs
- BUS 475 Week 4: Risk, Ethics, Legal Exposure and Measures of Success
- ECO 365 Week 4: Market Structures
- ECO 370 Week 4: Environmental Policy Tools
COM 295 Week 4 questions, answered
What does COM 295 Week 4 usually cover?
It usually covers technology and social media in business communication, including benefits, risks, legal and ethical issues and guidelines for organizations.
Where can I find a free COM 295 Week 4 sample paper?
The Week 4 paper above analyzes reviews, texting and team chat at an HVAC company, and the full paper is posted on this page.
Should businesses respond to online reviews?
Research suggests that responding to reviews can improve subsequent ratings and engagement, especially when responses are genuine and address specific concerns.
Do businesses need consent to text customers?
For many automated or marketing texts, federal law requires prior consent, and customers must be able to opt out; transactional messages have different rules.
What should a social media policy for employees include?
Guidance on representing the company, protecting customer privacy, handling complaints, separating personal and business accounts and respecting employees' legal rights.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All COM 295 week samples · All courses