| Course | RES 724 Qualitative Methods and Design (RES/724) |
|---|---|
| Week | 6 |
| Paper type | Doctoral qualitative coding and analysis paper |
| Length | about 1,151 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | DBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for RES 724 Week 6
From Transcript to Themes: Coding and Analyzing Successors' Accounts With IPA
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
RES/724: Qualitative Methods and Design
Week 6 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The learner, the firms, the successors, the transcript excerpts and the planned study are composites written for a model paper.
Weeks 1 to 5 planned the composite Des Moines banker's interpretative phenomenological analysis. Before recruiting, she conducted three pilot interviews with successors in Nebraska and Missouri who meet every criterion except location, none of them clients of her bank, and who agreed that their data could be used for practice only. This paper uses those transcripts to work through IPA analysis.
IPA's Analytic Steps
Smith et al. (2009) set out a flexible sequence for IPA analysis: reading and rereading a transcript to become immersed; initial noting, with exploratory comments on descriptive content, language use and conceptual meaning; developing emergent themes, more recently called experiential statements, that capture the meaning of short sections; searching for connections among those statements to form a case's themes; moving to the next case while bracketing the first; and looking for patterns across cases. Each case is analyzed in full before the next, reflecting IPA's idiographic commitment.
A Transcript Excerpt
From the first pilot successor, called Dana, who leads a trailer manufacturer founded by her father:
"The first month, I'd walk out on the floor and they'd stop talking. Not because they didn't like me. They've known me since I was six. It's that they didn't know what I was yet. Was I Dana, or was I the boss? And honestly, I didn't know either. Dad would come in at seven like always, and I'd see guys go to his office with questions. I'd be sitting in my office, which is really his old office, and I'd hear them laughing in there."
Exploratory Comments
Descriptive comments: employees stop talking when she walks on the floor; known her since childhood; father arrives at seven; employees take questions to him; she sits in his former office.
Linguistic comments: "what I was yet," not who, suggesting a role not yet formed; the question "Dana, or the boss?" sets personal identity against role; "really his old office" signals she does not feel the office is hers; laughter heard through a wall, from outside.
Conceptual comments: an identity in transition, for her and for employees; authority located in the father's person and routines; a sense of occupying a space that still belongs to someone else; exclusion from the informal life of the plant.
First-Cycle Codes
Saldaña (2016) describes many first-cycle coding methods and advises choosing those that suit the research questions and tradition. Two fit IPA's focus on experience. In vivo codes use the participant's words: "what I was yet," "his old office." Emotion codes capture feelings named or implied: uncertainty, exclusion. The banker applies both alongside exploratory comments, not as a substitute for them.
Experiential Statements
From the comments, the banker wrote experiential statements that condense meaning while staying close to Dana's words:
Becoming the boss is a question of what she is, not only what she does.
Authority still lives in her father's routine and presence.
She occupies a space that is not yet hers.
Being known since childhood complicates being followed.
Dana's Personal Experiential Themes
Across her full transcript, 46 experiential statements clustered into four personal themes:
Leading from a borrowed office: her sense that the role, space and authority were her father's.
Earning the floor: her efforts to gain employees' trust through presence and competence on the shop floor.
Two Danas: the tension between the daughter employees knew and the leader she was becoming.
Guarding the name: her sense of responsibility not to be the generation that lost the business.
Dana did not describe a conflict with her father; she described sitting in his office and hearing laughter through the wall.
Comparing Cases
After analyzing each of the three pilot cases separately, the banker compared them using a matrix display, following Miles et al. (2014), who recommend matrices with cases as rows and themes as columns to make patterns and differences across cases visible. Tentative group themes:
Leading from a borrowed office: present in all three cases, in different forms. One successor had moved the founder to a new office; another described the founder's truck in the parking lot as a signal to employees.
Earning the floor: present in two cases. The third successor, who had worked on the floor for ten years before taking over, described the opposite: needing to step back from the floor to lead.
Guarding the name: present in all three.
The divergent case is kept visible, since it suggests that a successor's prior role in the firm shapes the experience of taking over.
Writing Theme Labels
Theme labels went through several versions. "Authority issues" became "Authority still lives with Dad" and then "Leading from a borrowed office," a phrase that captures Dana's spatial image and her sense of the role. The banker tested each label against two questions: would a successor recognize the experience in it, and does it say something rather than name a topic? "Employee relationships" failed both and was replaced by "Earning the floor," which describes what successors do and feel.
The Double Hermeneutic in Practice
IPA describes the researcher as making sense of participants making sense of their experience. In Dana's case, Dana interprets the silence on the floor as employees not knowing "what I was yet." The banker's interpretation goes further, reading the silence alongside the borrowed office as a sign that the role itself was still being negotiated. Both readings are reported, with the banker's marked as interpretation and grounded in Dana's words.
Memos
The banker writes a memo after each analytic session. One reads: "Borrowed office appears in all three, but only Dana uses the word 'borrowed.' Am I importing her phrase into the others? Check whether 'borrowed' fits or whether the others describe something closer to 'shared.'" Memos like this record doubts, alternative readings and decisions.
Software and Audit Trail
Transcripts, comments and codes are organized in qualitative analysis software, which stores links between excerpts and themes. The software does not identify themes; the banker does, by reading and rereading. An analytic log records each step: dates, transcripts analyzed, changes to theme labels and reasons. Together with memos, it forms the audit trail described in Week 7.
Checks on the Analysis
A fellow doctoral student coded Dana's full transcript independently during one long session. The two compared experiential statements, not to reach agreement scores, which IPA does not seek, but to see whether the banker had missed or overstated anything. The colleague noticed humor in Dana's account that the banker had not commented on, which led to a memo on how successors use humor to manage awkward moments with employees.
Conclusion
IPA's steps, applied to a pilot excerpt, turned Dana's words into exploratory comments, experiential statements and four personal themes, and comparison across three cases produced tentative group themes with a divergent case kept in view. Memos, software, an analytic log and a colleague's reading make the analysis traceable. Week 7 turns to trustworthiness.
References
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
What the RES 724 Week 6 instructions ask
The sixth RES 724 assignment asks doctoral learners to code and analyze qualitative data. Learners usually describe an analysis approach suited to their tradition, such as thematic analysis, IPA, grounded theory coding or content analysis, demonstrate first-cycle and later coding on a sample of data, show how codes become categories or themes, present a theme table with supporting quotations and explain memos, software and the audit trail. Some versions ask learners to compare two coding methods on the same excerpt or to code with a partner. Use the learner's own pilot or practice data, show actual coded text, cite methodological sources in APA and explain each analytic decision so a reader could follow it.
How this RES 724 Week 6 example is built
Our model paper follows the IPA steps set out in the approach's main text: reading and rereading, exploratory comments on descriptive, linguistic and conceptual levels, experiential statements, clustering into personal themes and comparing cases for group themes. A short transcript excerpt from a successor called Dana shows each step. Guidance from a widely used coding manual helps the banker choose in vivo and emotion codes for first-cycle work, and a methods sourcebook supports matrix displays across cases. Three pilot cases yield tentative group themes, such as earning the floor and leading from a borrowed office, each with quotations and a count of cases. Memos record decisions and doubts, and an analytic log of every step forms the audit trail.
RES 724 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go
Doctoral graders reward analysis papers that show the work. Strong papers name an analysis approach suited to the tradition, demonstrate coding on actual data excerpts, explain how codes become themes and support each theme with quotations from more than one participant where claims are shared. Credit goes to transparent decision trails, regular analytic memos and attention to divergence as well as convergence across cases. Graders also value a theme table that readers can check against the data, with labels that describe experience rather than repeat interview topics. Clear analytic writing and methods references in APA complete the paper.
RES 724 Week 6 help: mistakes to avoid
Analysis papers often list themes without showing the coding that produced them. Include coded excerpts. Another frequent gap is themes that are just topics from the interview guide, such as "relationships with employees." A theme should say something about the experience. Learners also report only what participants share and ignore cases that differ; IPA values divergence. Some papers describe software as if it did the analysis itself; software organizes, the researcher interprets. Finally, keep memos from the very first transcript; they become the audit trail. Label each theme with a phrase a participant might recognize. A tutor can help you check whether your themes describe experience rather than topics.
Related RES 724 sample papers
Other RES 724 week samples
- RES 724 Week 1: Qualitative Traditions
- RES 724 Week 2: Qualitative Research Questions
- RES 724 Week 3: Sampling and Access
- RES 724 Week 4: Interviewing
- RES 724 Week 5: Observation and Documents
- RES 724 Week 7: Trustworthiness
- RES 724 Week 8: Qualitative Design
More DBA sample papers
- ORG 727 Week 6: Design and Technology
- RES 709 Week 6: Qualitative Designs
- RES 710 Week 6: Correlation
- RES 720 Week 6: Chi-Square and Nonparametric Tests
RES 724 Week 6 questions, answered
What does RES 724 Week 6 usually cover?
It usually covers qualitative coding and analysis: choosing an analysis method, first-cycle and later coding, developing themes, memos and audit trails.
Where can I find a free RES 724 Week 6 sample paper?
The RES 724 Week 6 IPA coding and analysis of successors' accounts is above, posted free.
What are the steps of interpretative phenomenological analysis?
Reading and rereading, making exploratory notes, developing experiential statements, clustering them into personal themes for each case and then comparing cases for group themes.
What is an in vivo code?
A code that uses the participant's own words as its label, keeping analysis close to how they describe their experience.
What is an analytic memo?
A note the researcher writes during analysis to record ideas, decisions and questions, forming part of the audit trail.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All RES 724 week samples · All courses