PSYCH 645 Week 4 Humanistic and Existential Views of Personality Example

Reviewed by Queenie Halstead, MA · University of Phoenix · Updated

This PSYCH 645 Week 4 example looks at the same composite case through humanistic and existential theories, which see personality in terms of growth, self-concept, conditions of worth, freedom and the search for meaning rather than traits or conditioning. Humanistic and existential views anchor Week 4 of University of Phoenix PSYCH 645; the PSYCH/645 paper has MS in Psychology students apply ideas from Rogers, Maslow and existential writers to a person, connect them to research on self-concordance and psychological needs and weigh their strengths and limits. Priya Nair, the composite student author, asks why the band director feels valued only after a win. It draws on Rogers's statement of the conditions for personality change, a study of how goals that fit the self support well-being, a self-determination account of basic psychological needs and a meta-analysis of empathy in therapy.

CoursePSYCH 645 Personality Theories (PSYCH/645)
Week4
Paper typeHumanistic and existential case analysis
Lengthabout 1,170 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramMS in Psychology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSYCH 645 Week 4

1

Worth Earned by Trophies: Humanistic and Existential Views of the Band Director's Search for Acceptance and Meaning

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

PSYCH/645: Personality Theories

Week 4 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Elena Ruiz and her history are a composite case written for a model paper; theories and research findings come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title names the condition of worth that the humanistic analysis centers on.
2

Humanistic and existential theories view people as active agents striving for growth and meaning, shaped by how others accepted or judged them and by the choices they face. This paper applies these perspectives to the composite case from earlier weeks, asking how her sense of worth and her search for meaning shape her relationships.

Elena in Her Own Words

In a conversation about her journal, Elena Ruiz said: "I feel worth something only after a good performance. When the band wins, I feel like I've earned the right to exist for another month. With Daniel, there's nothing to win. He says he loves me, and I keep thinking, for what?" She recalled her mother praising her for watching her brother and for straight A's, and her father showing up mainly for concerts. "My parents came to the concerts," she said. "That was when I was visible."

Rogers's Self Theory

In Rogers's view, every person carries a built-in push toward growth, and personality takes shape around the picture each person forms of who they are. When children receive positive regard only for certain behaviors, they develop conditions of worth: beliefs that they are valuable only when meeting certain standards. They then distort or deny experiences that conflict with these conditions, producing incongruence between self-concept and experience, which leads to anxiety and defensiveness.

Rogers (1957) stated the necessary and sufficient conditions for therapeutic personality change: two persons in psychological contact, a client in a state of incongruence, a therapist who is congruent or genuine in the relationship, who experiences unconditional positive regard for the client and empathic understanding of the client's frame of reference and who communicates these to the client to a minimal degree. Rogers proposed that when these conditions are present, constructive personality change follows.

Elena's account fits Rogers's ideas closely. Praise tied to achievement and caretaking taught her that her worth depends on performance. Love without performance, Daniel's love, does not fit her self-concept and feels unearned, perhaps even suspicious. Ending relationships may restore congruence with the belief that she must earn affection.

What this part is doingUsing Elena's own words keeps the humanistic analysis grounded in her experience rather than in labels.
3

Goals That Fit the Self

Humanistic ideas inspired research on how goals relate to the self. Sheldon and Kasser (1995) studied coherence and congruence in personal goals and found that people whose goals were self-concordant, pursued because they were enjoyable or personally important rather than because of guilt or external pressure, showed greater well-being, vitality and healthy functioning. Congruent goals were more consistent with psychological needs and better integrated with each other.

Elena's professional goals mix both kinds: she loves music and teaching, but she also pursues trophies to feel worthy. The second kind, driven by internal pressure, may explain why victories bring relief rather than joy.

Basic Psychological Needs

Self-determination theory, developed by Ryan and Deci (2000), proposes three basic psychological needs: autonomy, the experience of choosing one's actions; competence, the experience of being effective; and relatedness, the experience of close, caring connection. When these needs are satisfied, people show more intrinsic motivation, integration and well-being; when they are thwarted, motivation and well-being decline. The theory distinguishes intrinsic motivation from forms of extrinsic motivation that range from controlled to more autonomous.

For Elena, competence is richly satisfied at work and autonomy partly so, though often under internal pressure. Relatedness, especially in intimate relationships, is chronically unmet, and she undermines it when it is offered.

At school every need is met but one; at home, the one that is missing is the one she keeps refusing.

Maslow and Self-Actualization

Maslow stacked human needs in tiers, bodily needs and safety at the base, then love and belonging, then esteem, with becoming all one can be at the top. Modern research supports the idea of universal needs but not a rigid order. Elena's esteem needs, met through achievement, may be crowding out belonging, an inversion of Maslow's sequence that suggests needs can be met in unusual combinations.

Existential Themes

Existential psychologists emphasize that humans face certain givens: freedom and the responsibility it brings, isolation, the search for meaning and mortality. Elena's choices to end relationships are free choices, and existential thinking would ask her to own them as choices rather than as inevitable reactions. Her isolation, a basic human condition, may be intensified by her pattern of leaving. Her meaning comes largely from music and students, a genuine source, but one that may not fill the space intimate connection could.

The Value of Being Understood

Elliott et al. (2018) meta-analyzed studies of therapist empathy and found that empathy was a moderately strong predictor of therapy outcome across different therapy approaches. Clients who felt understood improved more. The finding supports Rogers's emphasis on empathic understanding, though it does not prove that empathy alone is sufficient for change.

What this part is doingLinking Rogers's claim to outcome research separates what is supported from what remains a hypothesis.
4

The Ideal Self and the Real Self

Rogers also distinguished the self a person is from the self they believe they should be. When the gap between the two is wide, people feel chronic dissatisfaction. Elena's ideal self is flawless: the director whose band never misses an entrance, the daughter who never needed help, the partner who would never disappoint. Measured against that ideal, her real self always falls short, and closeness threatens to reveal the shortfall. Narrowing the gap does not mean lowering every standard; it means allowing the ideal to include being imperfect and still loved, which her history never taught.

Responsibility Without Blame

Existential thinking holds people responsible for their choices, which can sound harsh. In practice, existential therapists pair responsibility with compassion: Elena did not choose her father's absences, but she can choose how she responds to Daniel now. Owning the breakups as choices, rather than as things that happened to her, gives her the possibility of choosing differently.

What This Perspective Adds

Earlier weeks explained Elena's pattern through attachment, traits and cognitions. The humanistic view adds the meaning she gives to worth: she believes she must earn love. It emphasizes her agency and capacity for growth and points toward an accepting relationship, therapeutic or personal, as the setting for change.

Criticisms

Words like actualization resist measurement, and the founders of the humanistic movement wrote more from the therapy room than from experiments. Self-determination theory and studies of empathy have given some ideas stronger evidence, but others remain hard to examine.

A Growth-Oriented Path

A humanistic approach would offer Elena a relationship of acceptance not tied to performance, in which she can notice experiences that conflict with her conditions of worth, such as Daniel's care, without discarding them. Practices such as pursuing music for its own sake, not only for competitions, could shift her goals toward self-concordance.

Conclusion

Humanistic and existential theories describe Elena's pattern as the result of conditions of worth that tie her value to achievement, unmet needs for relatedness and choices she can learn to own. Research on self-concordant goals, basic needs and empathy supports parts of this view and points toward acceptance as a route to change.

5

References

Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Murphy, D. (2018). Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000175

Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531

What the PSYCH 645 Week 4 instructions ask

Week 4 of PSYCH 645 generally covers humanistic and existential perspectives on what people strive for and how they make meaning. Expect prompts on Rogers's self theory, congruence and conditions of worth, Maslow's ladder of needs, the existential concerns of freedom, responsibility, isolation and meaning and research traditions that grew from these ideas, including self-determination theory and positive psychology. A case or a self-reflection may be assigned. Apply the concepts to the person's own experience and goals, explain what the perspective adds to earlier theories, connect claims to research where it exists and acknowledge criticisms about testability. Support the paper with sources cited in APA style.

How this PSYCH 645 Week 4 example is built

Priya Nair, the MS in Psychology student who writes this sample, considers why Elena Ruiz, the composite band director, says she feels "worth something only after a good performance." Rogers's conditions for change and his concepts of conditions of worth and incongruence explain a self built on achievement. A study of self-concordant goals shows that goals pursued for one's own reasons support well-being more than goals pursued from pressure. A self-determination account explains how her needs for autonomy and competence are met at work while relatedness goes hungry. A meta-analysis of empathy supports the value of feeling understood. Existential themes of freedom and isolation frame her choices. Priya proposes a growth-oriented path.

PSYCH 645 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go

Humanistic and existential papers earn credit for accurate concepts, empathic application to the person's own experience and an honest critical evaluation of the perspective. Faculty check that Rogers, Maslow and the existential writers are represented fairly and tied to the person's words, that newer research such as self-determination theory is used where it helps and that the testability problem is faced. Credit goes to showing what this perspective adds to earlier analyses. Sentimental writing without theory or evidence loses points, as does treating every humanistic claim as proven. Graders also reward papers that say plainly what this perspective adds beyond earlier weeks, such as the meaning a person gives to worth. Sources belong in APA style.

PSYCH 645 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid

In this unit, humanistic papers often describe a person warmly but loosely, using words like growth and authenticity without defining them or tying them to evidence. Another common weakness is presenting Maslow's hierarchy as rigid and well supported, when research supports basic needs but not a strict sequence. Some students skip existential themes or treat them as purely philosophical. Others ignore criticisms that these theories are hard to test. Define each concept, apply it to the person's own words and goals, connect to self-determination and related research and state limits plainly. A tutor can help you link a humanistic concept to a measurable finding so the paper rests on more than warmth.

Related PSYCH 645 sample papers

Other PSYCH 645 week samples

More MS in Psychology sample papers

PSYCH 645 Week 4 questions, answered

What does PSYCH 645 Week 4 usually cover?

Humanistic and existential theories of personality, including Rogers, Maslow, self-determination and existential themes of freedom and meaning.

Where can I find a free PSYCH 645 Week 4 sample paper?

The PSYCH 645 Week 4 analysis of a band director's achievement-based worth is printed in full above, free to read.

What are conditions of worth?

The lesson, learned early, that love arrives only when you meet certain standards, which Rogers believed bends the way people see themselves.

What is congruence in Rogers's theory?

How closely the picture you hold of yourself lines up with what you actually live through; a wide gap, Rogers argued, breeds anxiety and defensiveness.

Is Maslow's hierarchy supported by research?

Research supports universal basic needs but not a strict order in which lower needs must be met before higher ones.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.