| Course | PSYCH 645 Personality Theories (PSYCH/645) |
|---|---|
| Week | 4 |
| Paper type | Humanistic and existential case analysis |
| Length | about 1,170 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSYCH 645 Week 4
Worth Earned by Trophies: Humanistic and Existential Views of the Band Director's Search for Acceptance and Meaning
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
PSYCH/645: Personality Theories
Week 4 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Elena Ruiz and her history are a composite case written for a model paper; theories and research findings come from the sources listed.
Humanistic and existential theories view people as active agents striving for growth and meaning, shaped by how others accepted or judged them and by the choices they face. This paper applies these perspectives to the composite case from earlier weeks, asking how her sense of worth and her search for meaning shape her relationships.
Elena in Her Own Words
In a conversation about her journal, Elena Ruiz said: "I feel worth something only after a good performance. When the band wins, I feel like I've earned the right to exist for another month. With Daniel, there's nothing to win. He says he loves me, and I keep thinking, for what?" She recalled her mother praising her for watching her brother and for straight A's, and her father showing up mainly for concerts. "My parents came to the concerts," she said. "That was when I was visible."
Rogers's Self Theory
In Rogers's view, every person carries a built-in push toward growth, and personality takes shape around the picture each person forms of who they are. When children receive positive regard only for certain behaviors, they develop conditions of worth: beliefs that they are valuable only when meeting certain standards. They then distort or deny experiences that conflict with these conditions, producing incongruence between self-concept and experience, which leads to anxiety and defensiveness.
Rogers (1957) stated the necessary and sufficient conditions for therapeutic personality change: two persons in psychological contact, a client in a state of incongruence, a therapist who is congruent or genuine in the relationship, who experiences unconditional positive regard for the client and empathic understanding of the client's frame of reference and who communicates these to the client to a minimal degree. Rogers proposed that when these conditions are present, constructive personality change follows.
Elena's account fits Rogers's ideas closely. Praise tied to achievement and caretaking taught her that her worth depends on performance. Love without performance, Daniel's love, does not fit her self-concept and feels unearned, perhaps even suspicious. Ending relationships may restore congruence with the belief that she must earn affection.
Goals That Fit the Self
Humanistic ideas inspired research on how goals relate to the self. Sheldon and Kasser (1995) studied coherence and congruence in personal goals and found that people whose goals were self-concordant, pursued because they were enjoyable or personally important rather than because of guilt or external pressure, showed greater well-being, vitality and healthy functioning. Congruent goals were more consistent with psychological needs and better integrated with each other.
Elena's professional goals mix both kinds: she loves music and teaching, but she also pursues trophies to feel worthy. The second kind, driven by internal pressure, may explain why victories bring relief rather than joy.
Basic Psychological Needs
Self-determination theory, developed by Ryan and Deci (2000), proposes three basic psychological needs: autonomy, the experience of choosing one's actions; competence, the experience of being effective; and relatedness, the experience of close, caring connection. When these needs are satisfied, people show more intrinsic motivation, integration and well-being; when they are thwarted, motivation and well-being decline. The theory distinguishes intrinsic motivation from forms of extrinsic motivation that range from controlled to more autonomous.
For Elena, competence is richly satisfied at work and autonomy partly so, though often under internal pressure. Relatedness, especially in intimate relationships, is chronically unmet, and she undermines it when it is offered.
At school every need is met but one; at home, the one that is missing is the one she keeps refusing.
Maslow and Self-Actualization
Maslow stacked human needs in tiers, bodily needs and safety at the base, then love and belonging, then esteem, with becoming all one can be at the top. Modern research supports the idea of universal needs but not a rigid order. Elena's esteem needs, met through achievement, may be crowding out belonging, an inversion of Maslow's sequence that suggests needs can be met in unusual combinations.
Existential Themes
Existential psychologists emphasize that humans face certain givens: freedom and the responsibility it brings, isolation, the search for meaning and mortality. Elena's choices to end relationships are free choices, and existential thinking would ask her to own them as choices rather than as inevitable reactions. Her isolation, a basic human condition, may be intensified by her pattern of leaving. Her meaning comes largely from music and students, a genuine source, but one that may not fill the space intimate connection could.
The Value of Being Understood
Elliott et al. (2018) meta-analyzed studies of therapist empathy and found that empathy was a moderately strong predictor of therapy outcome across different therapy approaches. Clients who felt understood improved more. The finding supports Rogers's emphasis on empathic understanding, though it does not prove that empathy alone is sufficient for change.
The Ideal Self and the Real Self
Rogers also distinguished the self a person is from the self they believe they should be. When the gap between the two is wide, people feel chronic dissatisfaction. Elena's ideal self is flawless: the director whose band never misses an entrance, the daughter who never needed help, the partner who would never disappoint. Measured against that ideal, her real self always falls short, and closeness threatens to reveal the shortfall. Narrowing the gap does not mean lowering every standard; it means allowing the ideal to include being imperfect and still loved, which her history never taught.
Responsibility Without Blame
Existential thinking holds people responsible for their choices, which can sound harsh. In practice, existential therapists pair responsibility with compassion: Elena did not choose her father's absences, but she can choose how she responds to Daniel now. Owning the breakups as choices, rather than as things that happened to her, gives her the possibility of choosing differently.
What This Perspective Adds
Earlier weeks explained Elena's pattern through attachment, traits and cognitions. The humanistic view adds the meaning she gives to worth: she believes she must earn love. It emphasizes her agency and capacity for growth and points toward an accepting relationship, therapeutic or personal, as the setting for change.
Criticisms
Words like actualization resist measurement, and the founders of the humanistic movement wrote more from the therapy room than from experiments. Self-determination theory and studies of empathy have given some ideas stronger evidence, but others remain hard to examine.
A Growth-Oriented Path
A humanistic approach would offer Elena a relationship of acceptance not tied to performance, in which she can notice experiences that conflict with her conditions of worth, such as Daniel's care, without discarding them. Practices such as pursuing music for its own sake, not only for competitions, could shift her goals toward self-concordance.
Conclusion
Humanistic and existential theories describe Elena's pattern as the result of conditions of worth that tie her value to achievement, unmet needs for relatedness and choices she can learn to own. Research on self-concordant goals, basic needs and empathy supports parts of this view and points toward acceptance as a route to change.
References
Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Murphy, D. (2018). Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000175
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531
What the PSYCH 645 Week 4 instructions ask
Week 4 of PSYCH 645 generally covers humanistic and existential perspectives on what people strive for and how they make meaning. Expect prompts on Rogers's self theory, congruence and conditions of worth, Maslow's ladder of needs, the existential concerns of freedom, responsibility, isolation and meaning and research traditions that grew from these ideas, including self-determination theory and positive psychology. A case or a self-reflection may be assigned. Apply the concepts to the person's own experience and goals, explain what the perspective adds to earlier theories, connect claims to research where it exists and acknowledge criticisms about testability. Support the paper with sources cited in APA style.
How this PSYCH 645 Week 4 example is built
Priya Nair, the MS in Psychology student who writes this sample, considers why Elena Ruiz, the composite band director, says she feels "worth something only after a good performance." Rogers's conditions for change and his concepts of conditions of worth and incongruence explain a self built on achievement. A study of self-concordant goals shows that goals pursued for one's own reasons support well-being more than goals pursued from pressure. A self-determination account explains how her needs for autonomy and competence are met at work while relatedness goes hungry. A meta-analysis of empathy supports the value of feeling understood. Existential themes of freedom and isolation frame her choices. Priya proposes a growth-oriented path.
PSYCH 645 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
Humanistic and existential papers earn credit for accurate concepts, empathic application to the person's own experience and an honest critical evaluation of the perspective. Faculty check that Rogers, Maslow and the existential writers are represented fairly and tied to the person's words, that newer research such as self-determination theory is used where it helps and that the testability problem is faced. Credit goes to showing what this perspective adds to earlier analyses. Sentimental writing without theory or evidence loses points, as does treating every humanistic claim as proven. Graders also reward papers that say plainly what this perspective adds beyond earlier weeks, such as the meaning a person gives to worth. Sources belong in APA style.
PSYCH 645 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid
In this unit, humanistic papers often describe a person warmly but loosely, using words like growth and authenticity without defining them or tying them to evidence. Another common weakness is presenting Maslow's hierarchy as rigid and well supported, when research supports basic needs but not a strict sequence. Some students skip existential themes or treat them as purely philosophical. Others ignore criticisms that these theories are hard to test. Define each concept, apply it to the person's own words and goals, connect to self-determination and related research and state limits plainly. A tutor can help you link a humanistic concept to a measurable finding so the paper rests on more than warmth.
Related PSYCH 645 sample papers
Other PSYCH 645 week samples
- PSYCH 645 Week 1: Psychodynamic and Attachment
- PSYCH 645 Week 2: Trait and Affective Models
- PSYCH 645 Week 3: Cognitive-Behavioral Approaches
- PSYCH 645 Week 5: Systems and Cultural Perspectives
- PSYCH 645 Week 6: Integrated Case Analysis
More MS in Psychology sample papers
- PSYCH 634 Week 4: Sleep, Hunger and Motivation
- PSYCH 639 Week 4: Confidentiality and Multiple Roles
- PSYCH 642 Week 4: Placement and Onboarding
- PSYCH 644 Week 4: Knowledge and Language
PSYCH 645 Week 4 questions, answered
What does PSYCH 645 Week 4 usually cover?
Humanistic and existential theories of personality, including Rogers, Maslow, self-determination and existential themes of freedom and meaning.
Where can I find a free PSYCH 645 Week 4 sample paper?
The PSYCH 645 Week 4 analysis of a band director's achievement-based worth is printed in full above, free to read.
What are conditions of worth?
The lesson, learned early, that love arrives only when you meet certain standards, which Rogers believed bends the way people see themselves.
What is congruence in Rogers's theory?
How closely the picture you hold of yourself lines up with what you actually live through; a wide gap, Rogers argued, breeds anxiety and defensiveness.
Is Maslow's hierarchy supported by research?
Research supports universal basic needs but not a strict order in which lower needs must be met before higher ones.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All PSYCH 645 week samples · All courses