| Course | PSYCH 645 Personality Theories (PSYCH/645) |
|---|---|
| Week | 1 |
| Paper type | Personality theory case analysis |
| Length | about 1,219 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSYCH 645 Week 1
A Band Director Who Waits for Everyone to Leave: Reading One Case Through Psychodynamic and Attachment Theories
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
PSYCH/645: Personality Theories
Week 1 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Elena Ruiz and her history are a composite case written for a model paper; theories and research findings come from the sources listed.
Personality theories try to explain why people behave in consistent ways across situations and time. Psychodynamic and attachment theories locate the roots of these patterns in early relationships and in processes outside awareness. This paper applies both to a composite case and evaluates what they can and cannot explain.
The Case
Elena Ruiz is twenty-nine and directs the band program at a public high school in Glendale, Arizona. She is admired by students and colleagues, organized and tireless; her marching band won a state title last fall. In her personal life, a pattern repeats. Over eight years, she has had four serious relationships. Each ended the same way: as the relationship deepened, typically around the time a partner suggested moving in together or meeting extended family, Elena grew irritable, found faults and ended it. Afterward she felt relief, then loneliness, then regret.
Elena's parents divorced when she was seven. Her father moved to Tucson, visited unpredictably and sometimes missed planned weekends without calling. Her mother, who worked two jobs, was loving but stretched thin and expected Elena to care for her younger brother. Elena describes herself as "the responsible one" and says she learned early "not to count on anyone."
Psychodynamic Ideas and Their Legacy
Freud's psychodynamic theory proposed that much of mental life is unconscious, that personality develops through childhood experiences, that people use defense mechanisms to reduce anxiety and that conflicts among desires, morality and reality shape behavior. Later psychodynamic theorists placed more weight on relationships and social needs.
Westen (1998) sorted Freud's ideas into those modern laboratories have confirmed and those they have not; the oral-anal-phallic timetable fell in the second pile, but a surprising number of broader claims landed in the first. Supported propositions include that much of mental life, including thoughts, feelings and motives, is unconscious; that mental processes operate in parallel and can conflict, producing compromise solutions; that stable personality patterns begin forming in childhood; that mental representations of self and others guide interactions; and that development involves learning to regulate sexual and aggressive feelings and moving from immature dependence to mature interdependence.
A Psychodynamic Reading
A psychodynamic reading of Elena focuses on conflict and defense. She wants closeness, yet closeness threatens repetition of her father's unreliability, arousing anxiety she may not consciously connect to him. Ending relationships before partners can leave may function as a defense that converts feared passive abandonment into active control. Finding faults could reflect devaluation, a defense that makes leaving easier. Her identity as "the responsible one" may also reflect reaction formation against dependence: she becomes the person others rely on so that she never has to rely on anyone.
These interpretations fit the pattern but are hard to test. The same behavior, ending relationships, could result from incompatibility, from career demands or from simple preferences. A responsible psychodynamic interpretation treats these as hypotheses, not conclusions.
Attachment Theory
Bowlby proposed that infants are biologically predisposed to seek closeness to caregivers for protection and that, from repeated experiences, children form internal working models of whether others are available and whether they themselves are worthy of care. Ainsworth's laboratory observations identified patterns of secure, anxious-ambivalent and avoidant attachment in infants.
Hazan and Shaver (1987) extended attachment theory to adult romantic relationships. In newspaper and student surveys, adults chose descriptions of how they felt in relationships that corresponded to secure, anxious-ambivalent and avoidant patterns, in proportions similar to those found in infants. Adults' attachment styles were related to their descriptions of their most important love experiences and to their recollections of childhood relationships with parents. Later researchers described adult attachment along two dimensions, anxiety about abandonment and avoidance of closeness, rather than as categories.
Elena ends relationships at exactly the moment they ask her to rely on someone.
An Attachment Reading
Elena's pattern suggests high scores on both attachment anxiety and avoidance, sometimes called fearful avoidance. She longs for closeness and fears losing it, yet she withdraws when closeness grows. Her father's unpredictable visits fit research linking inconsistent caregiving to anxious attachment, and her mother's stretched availability, combined with early caregiving responsibility, may have taught her self-reliance as protection.
How Stable Are Attachment Patterns?
Attachment theory is sometimes described as claiming that early patterns are fixed. Fraley (2002) meta-analyzed longitudinal studies of attachment security from infancy through early adulthood and tested competing models of stability. The data fit a model in which early representations exert a lasting, moderate influence, a prototype, while later experiences also shape attachment. Stability was moderate rather than high, meaning that early experience matters but does not determine adult patterns.
This finding suggests that Elena's pattern can change through new relationship experiences, especially with a partner who remains reliable when she withdraws, or through therapy.
Other Psychodynamic Voices
Later psychodynamic theorists offer additional angles. Karen Horney described basic anxiety, a child's feeling of being isolated and helpless in a potentially hostile world, and three strategies for coping with it: moving toward people, moving against them and moving away from them. Elena's pattern blends moving toward, in her intense early investment in partners, with moving away, when closeness grows. Erik Erikson placed intimacy versus isolation as the central task of young adulthood, built on earlier resolutions of trust and identity. Elena's difficulty with trust in childhood, and her strong occupational identity, fit his sequence: she has built a secure sense of who she is at work, while intimacy remains unresolved.
What the Pattern Costs and Protects
Defenses persist because they work in the short term. Each breakup spares Elena the anxiety of waiting to be left and gives her a sense of control, followed by relief. The costs arrive later: loneliness, regret and a growing belief that she is "not built for relationships." Understanding both the protection and the cost is central to psychodynamic thinking, which treats symptoms as compromises rather than simple errors.
What the Theories Suggest About Change
Shedler (2010) reviewed outcome research on psychodynamic psychotherapy and concluded that its effects were as large as those of other empirically supported therapies and that benefits tended to persist or grow after treatment ended. Shedler described distinctive features, such as focus on emotion, exploration of avoidance, identification of recurring patterns and attention to the therapy relationship.
For Elena, a psychodynamic or attachment-informed therapy would explore her recurring pattern, connect it to early experiences and use the therapy relationship itself, in which she might feel the urge to quit as therapy deepens, as a chance to experience reliability.
Limits of These Theories
Both theories emphasize childhood, which risks underweighting Elena's adult circumstances, such as a demanding job with long evenings and weekends. Psychodynamic interpretations are difficult to falsify. Attachment research relies heavily on self-report in adults. Later weeks will examine traits, cognition, humanistic needs and culture, which may explain parts of Elena's pattern these theories miss.
Conclusion
Psychodynamic and attachment theories offer a coherent account of Elena's pattern: early experiences of unreliable care may have shaped expectations that closeness leads to loss and defenses that end relationships before that can happen. Modern research supports core ideas such as unconscious processes and moderately stable attachment patterns while rejecting determinism. The theories are most useful as hypotheses to explore, not verdicts on a person.
References
Fraley, R. C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 123-151. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_03
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018378
Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 333-371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.333
What the PSYCH 645 Week 1 instructions ask
The first week of PSYCH 645 usually asks students to describe psychodynamic and attachment theories of personality and apply them to a real or composite person, behavior by behavior. Prompts commonly cover Freud's structural model and defense mechanisms, later psychodynamic theorists such as Adler, Horney and Erikson, object relations and attachment theory from Bowlby and Ainsworth to adult attachment research. Some versions ask you to evaluate the theories' scientific status. Apply concepts to specific behaviors rather than general traits, separate claims with research support from those without, consider alternative explanations and note what the theories suggest about change. Cite primary and current sources in APA style.
How this PSYCH 645 Week 1 example is built
Priya Nair, an MS in Psychology student who works in a school district's HR office, writes this sample about Elena Ruiz, a composite case: a talented band director who has ended four serious relationships, each when it began to feel close. A review of Freud's legacy identifies which psychodynamic ideas survive in modern research, such as unconscious processes and defenses. A study of adult romance found that people describe love styles resembling infant attachment patterns. A meta-analysis shows moderate stability in attachment from infancy to adulthood. A review of psychodynamic therapy supports its effectiveness. Priya interprets Elena's pattern as anxious-avoidant attachment and preemptive defense, and she notes what the theories cannot explain.
PSYCH 645 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go
Personality theory case papers earn credit for accurate theory, application to specific behaviors in the case and critical evaluation of what the theory can and cannot support. Instructors look for psychodynamic and attachment concepts to be defined correctly and tied to particular behaviors in the case, for students to distinguish ideas with empirical support from those without and for alternative explanations to be considered. Credit goes to discussing modern research, such as adult attachment studies, rather than only classic texts, and to noting implications for change. Overinterpretation, such as diagnosing hidden wishes from thin evidence, loses points. Respectful language about the person and APA references complete a strong analysis.
PSYCH 645 Week 1 help: mistakes to avoid
In this opening week, students often apply psychodynamic concepts loosely, labeling every behavior a defense without evidence that it serves that function. Another common weakness is presenting Freud's theories as either fully proven or fully discredited, ignoring the modern research that supports some ideas and rejects others. Some papers lock a person into the attachment box assigned in infancy, though follow-up studies find only middling stability over the decades. Others summarize theories without applying them to the case. Tie each concept to a specific behavior, cite modern evidence, consider other explanations and say what the theory suggests about change. A tutor can help you map case details onto theory concepts, with a piece of evidence beside each link you claim.
Related PSYCH 645 sample papers
Other PSYCH 645 week samples
- PSYCH 645 Week 2: Trait and Affective Models
- PSYCH 645 Week 3: Cognitive-Behavioral Approaches
- PSYCH 645 Week 4: Humanistic and Existential Views
- PSYCH 645 Week 5: Systems and Cultural Perspectives
- PSYCH 645 Week 6: Integrated Case Analysis
More MS in Psychology sample papers
- PSYCH 634 Week 1: Neurons and Neurotransmission
- PSYCH 639 Week 1: Ethical Principles and Codes
- PSYCH 642 Week 1: Recruitment Strategy and Sources
- PSYCH 644 Week 1: Learning Theories
PSYCH 645 Week 1 questions, answered
What does PSYCH 645 Week 1 usually cover?
Psychodynamic and attachment theories of personality, applied to a case and evaluated against research.
Where can I find a free PSYCH 645 Week 1 sample paper?
The full PSYCH 645 Week 1 case analysis of a band director's relationship pattern is posted above, free.
Is psychodynamic theory scientific?
Partly; experiments back the idea that much mental activity runs outside awareness and that people protect themselves from anxiety, but not Freud's stage timetable.
Are attachment styles fixed from childhood?
No; research shows moderate stability from infancy to adulthood, with change shaped by later relationships and experiences.
What is an internal working model?
A mental representation of oneself and others in relationships, built from early experiences, that guides expectations.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All PSYCH 645 week samples · All courses