PSY/390 Learning and Cognition sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Queenie Halstead, MA · Learning and Cognition · University of Phoenix · Free custom samples in 24–48h

PSY/390 links how people learn with how they think. Five weekly samples cover classical and operant conditioning, cognitive views of learning, memory systems, language and concepts and problem solving and decision making.

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. PSY/390 is Phoenix’s Learning and Cognition course. It studies learning from basic associationist ideas to complex cognitive behaviors such as problem solving and thinking, presenting ideas about the mind, the fundamental concepts of learning and conditioning and the strengths and weaknesses of memory as they relate to language and problem solving. Searches like "psy/390 week 3 assignment example", "PSY390 sample paper", and "PSY 390 week samples" land on this page.

What PSY/390 is really about

Learning ranges from a dog salivating to a bell to a student solving a proof. PSY/390 traces behaviorist principles of conditioning, cognitive models of attention and memory, the role of language and concepts and the heuristics and biases that shape reasoning.

Students typically apply conditioning principles to a habit, explain a memory phenomenon such as forgetting or false memory, compare behavioral and cognitive explanations of learning and analyze a decision using research on heuristics. Examples include using spaced practice for an exam, unlearning a habit and judging risk after news coverage.

What PSY/390’s assessments ask for

Faculty expect correct terminology, examples that fit the concept precisely and research support. Comparisons should show what each theory explains and what it misses. Tie each example to a specific principle, such as the spacing effect or availability heuristic, and cite the research.

Where students lose points in PSY/390

Work loses credit when conditioning types are confused, when memory is described as a perfect recording or when examples are generic. Missing citations for research findings also cost marks.

The PSY/390 drawers

Wk 1

PSY/390 Wk 1 assignment example

Wk 1 usually introduces classical and operant conditioning. Full sample paper, annotated: Classical and Operant Conditioning.

Read the sample →
Wk 2

PSY/390 Wk 2 assignment example

Wk 2 typically examines cognitive and social learning. Full sample paper, annotated: Cognitive and Social Learning.

Read the sample →
Wk 3

PSY/390 Wk 3 assignment example

Wk 3 often covers memory systems and forgetting. Full sample paper, annotated: Memory Systems and Forgetting.

Read the sample →
Wk 4

PSY/390 Wk 4 assignment example

Wk 4 commonly addresses language and concepts. Full sample paper, annotated: Language and Concepts.

Read the sample →
Wk 5

PSY/390 Wk 5 assignment example

Wk 5 closes with problem solving and decision making. Full sample paper, annotated: Problem Solving and Decision Making.

Read the sample →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

University of Phoenix revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a PSY/390 sample the right way

Check the week on your topic for an example of learning or memory research applied to one concrete behavior.

How these samples are written

Method, in one line: instructions first, structure from the rubric, artifacts exact. Week counts vary by course model; the catch-all row absorbs the difference. Your free request matches what your classroom actually shows.

PSY/390 questions, answered

What is the difference between classical and operant conditioning?

Classical conditioning pairs stimuli to produce a response; operant conditioning changes behavior through its consequences.

Are memories accurate recordings?

No; memory is reconstructive and can be distorted by later information and expectations.

What is a heuristic?

A mental shortcut that speeds decisions but can lead to systematic errors.