PSY/355 Motivational Processes in Human Psychology sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Queenie Halstead, MA · Motivational Processes in Human Psychology · University of Phoenix · Free custom samples in 24–48h

PSY/355 examines how people perceive themselves and others and how those perceptions motivate action. Five weekly samples cover motivation theories, self-schemas and self-concept, person perception, attribution and expectations and applying motivation research.

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. PSY/355 is Phoenix’s Motivational Processes in Human Psychology course. It examines theories and research on the structures, such as self, person, role and event schemas, and the processes, such as expectations, attributions and inferences, that underlie self-perception and the perception of others. Searches like "psy/355 week 3 assignment example", "PSY355 sample paper", and "PSY 355 week samples" land on this page.

What PSY/355 is really about

What people believe about themselves and others guides effort, persistence and choice. PSY/355 connects classic motivation theories with social cognition: schemas that organize knowledge, attributions that explain success and failure and expectations that can become self-fulfilling.

Students typically apply attribution theory to a workplace or school situation, analyze how a self-schema shapes motivation, compare motivation theories for a real goal and design a strategy to change expectations or attributions. Cases include a student who blames failure on lack of ability or a manager who misjudges an employee.

What PSY/355’s assessments ask for

Faculty expect accurate use of terms such as schema, attribution and self-efficacy, applications tied to specific behavior and research support. Strategies should follow from the theory used. Name the schema or attribution at work and explain how changing it could change behavior.

Where students lose points in PSY/355

Points slip when theories are listed without application, when attribution errors are misidentified or when motivation is reduced to rewards alone. Unsupported self-help claims also cost marks.

The PSY/355 drawers

Wk 1

PSY/355 Wk 1 assignment example

Wk 1 usually introduces theories of motivation. Full sample paper, annotated: Theories of Motivation.

Read the sample →
Wk 2

PSY/355 Wk 2 assignment example

Wk 2 typically examines the self, self-schemas and self-concept. Full sample paper, annotated: The Self, Self-Schemas and Self-Concept.

Read the sample →
Wk 3

PSY/355 Wk 3 assignment example

Wk 3 often covers person perception and social schemas. Full sample paper, annotated: Person Perception and Social Schemas.

Read the sample →
Wk 4

PSY/355 Wk 4 assignment example

Wk 4 commonly addresses attributions, expectations and inference. Full sample paper, annotated: Attributions, Expectations and Inference.

Read the sample →
Wk 5

PSY/355 Wk 5 assignment example

Wk 5 closes with applying motivation research to change. Full sample paper, annotated: Applying Motivation Research to Change.

Read the sample →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

University of Phoenix revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a PSY/355 sample the right way

Bring the goal or situation you are analyzing; the samples show schemas and attributions at work on real cases.

How these samples are written

Every sample in this stack is written the way the custom ones are: the instructions decoded first, a subject-matched writer drafting to the rubric, format checked line by line. Phoenix runs several course models, weekly letter-graded, competency-based, and directed-study, so a custom request is always written to what YOUR classroom shows, never from a stale template.

PSY/355 questions, answered

What is a schema?

An organized mental structure of knowledge that guides how people interpret new information.

What is the fundamental attribution error?

The tendency to explain others' behavior by their traits while underestimating situational influences.

What is self-efficacy?

A person's belief in their ability to succeed at a task, which affects effort and persistence.