| Course | PSY 355 Motivational Processes in Human Psychology (PSY/355) |
|---|---|
| Week | 3 |
| Paper type | Person perception analysis paper |
| Length | about 1,016 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSY 355 Week 3
Cold Emails and Warm Coworkers: Person Perception, Schemas and First Impressions
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
PSY/355: Motivational Processes in Human Psychology
Week 3 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The people described are composites written for a model paper; research findings come from the sources listed.
People form impressions of others quickly, often from a few cues, and act on them. Those impressions shape whom we approach, trust and help. This paper explains how person perception works, the schemas that guide it and how it can mislead, applying the concepts to two impressions formed by a returning adult student.
Two Impressions
Malik, the composite twenty-nine-year-old student and logistics coordinator in Phoenix from earlier weeks, has formed two firm impressions. The first is of Dr. Alvarez, his online statistics instructor. Her emails are short and direct: "See Module 3. Due Sunday." He has decided she is cold and impatient, and he has stopped emailing her with questions, even as he falls behind. The second is of Jasmine, a new coordinator at his workplace. On her first morning, he saw her on her phone for several minutes while trucks waited to be scheduled. He has told a colleague she seems lazy and has avoided assigning her urgent loads.
How Impressions Form
Asch (1946) gave participants lists of traits describing a person and asked them to write impressions. Lists that differed only in the words "warm" or "cold" produced strikingly different overall pictures; the warm person was seen as generous, happy and good-natured, the cold person as the opposite, even though the other traits were identical. Other traits, such as polite or blunt, had little effect. Traits listed first also colored the meaning of later ones, a primacy effect. Asch concluded that impressions form as organized wholes in which some central traits shape the meaning of everything else.
Malik's impression of Dr. Alvarez fits this pattern. Once he judged her cold, he read her deadlines as harsh and her brevity as dismissive, while overlooking the detailed feedback she posted on his first assignment.
Schemas That Fill the Gaps
People use schemas, organized knowledge structures, to fill in what they do not know. Person schemas describe types of people, such as the dedicated worker or the slacker. Role schemas describe how people in a role should behave, such as a supportive instructor or a focused new hire. Event schemas, or scripts, describe expected sequences, such as a first day at work.
Malik's role schema for an instructor, built in a community college where teachers chatted before class, expects warmth in conversation. His event schema for a first day says new hires stay off their phones. When Dr. Alvarez and Jasmine did not match these scripts, he filled the gaps with negative traits.
The Problem With Email
Kruger et al. (2005) asked people to send short email messages meant to be sarcastic, serious, angry or sad and to predict whether readers would recognize the intended tone. Senders were highly confident, but readers identified the tone only modestly better than chance. When the same messages were spoken aloud, recognition improved. Senders, who heard their own tone in their heads, assumed it was obvious in the text.
For Malik, this research suggests that Dr. Alvarez's brevity may reflect efficiency with a large online class, not coldness. Without her voice and face, he has little evidence about her warmth and is relying on his schema.
Dr. Alvarez wrote "See Module 3" to save Malik time; he read it as a door closing.
Warmth and Competence
Fiske et al. (2002) proposed that people judge others, and the groups they belong to, along two main dimensions: warmth, whether someone intends to help or harm, and competence, whether they can act on those intentions. Across several studies, many groups were rated high on one and low on the other, producing mixed impressions that elicit different emotions, such as admiration, pity, envy or contempt.
Malik rated Dr. Alvarez as competent but cold and Jasmine as warm but incompetent. These mixed impressions guide his behavior: he avoids the instructor he respects but fears, and he sidelines the coworker he likes but distrusts. Both responses have costs.
How Impressions Motivate Behavior
Impressions are not just private beliefs; they shape action. Because Malik sees Dr. Alvarez as unapproachable, he does not ask for help, deepening his struggle in statistics. Because he sees Jasmine as lazy, he gives her fewer chances to show her skills, which may limit her performance and confirm his view, a pattern known as a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Testing the Impressions
Malik decided to gather more evidence. He attended one of Dr. Alvarez's optional live review sessions, where she joked about her own struggles with statistics in graduate school, answered questions patiently and stayed late to help a student. He then asked his supervisor about Jasmine's first morning and learned she had been texting the trucking company to confirm a delayed shipment, the exact task she had been assigned. Both impressions, formed from a few cues and filled in by schemas, were wrong. He emailed Dr. Alvarez a question that night and had a friendly, detailed answer by morning.
Are First Impressions Ever Right?
Brief impressions are not always wrong. People can pick up real information from short observations, such as how energetic or anxious someone seems. The trouble comes when a few cues are stretched into broad conclusions about character, when the setting distorts the cues, as email does, or when a schema supplies traits the evidence never showed. Malik's error was not noticing cues but treating them as the whole person.
Why First Impressions Persist
Malik's earlier impressions might have persisted without this test. People tend to notice evidence that fits their impressions and to explain away what does not. They also behave in ways that elicit confirming responses. Deliberately seeking disconfirming evidence, considering situational explanations and using richer channels, such as a call instead of an email, help correct mistaken impressions.
Conclusion
Malik's impressions of his instructor and coworker formed quickly around central traits, were filled in by role and event schemas and shaped his behavior in ways that hurt both him and others. Research on central traits, email communication and warmth and competence judgments explains each step. Testing impressions against richer evidence corrected both and offers a habit worth keeping.
References
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z.-W. (2005). Egocentrism over e-mail: Can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 925-936. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.925
What the PSY 355 Week 3 instructions ask
Week 3 work in PSY 355 centers on how people perceive others and form impressions of them. Typical requirements include describing impression formation, the role of schemas such as person, role and event schemas, central traits and primacy effects, stereotypes as cognitive structures and common errors such as the halo effect. Many versions ask students to analyze an impression they formed of someone and how it influenced their behavior toward that person. Describe the processes accurately, connect them to a specific situation, consider how the impression could be wrong and draw on research. Use APA format with citations to the textbook and peer-reviewed studies, and describe what you did to check the impression.
How this PSY 355 Week 3 example is built
Our worked paper examines two of Malik's impressions. He reads his statistics instructor's brief emails as cold and stops asking her questions. He judges a new coworker as lazy after seeing her on her phone during her first morning. Classic experiments show that a single central trait such as "cold" can color an entire impression. Research on email shows that senders and readers routinely overestimate how clearly tone comes across in text. A model of stereotype content explains how warmth and competence judgments organize impressions. Testing both impressions against more evidence shows that the instructor is warm on live calls and the coworker was texting a supervisor about a delayed truck.
PSY 355 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go
Person perception papers are usually graded on accurate explanation of processes, correct use of terms and thoughtful application. Instructors look for schemas, central traits, primacy effects and stereotypes to be defined and illustrated, for the link between impressions and behavior to be shown and for the student to consider how impressions could be biased. Credit goes to research beyond the textbook, to recognizing the role of context and medium and to proposing ways to test impressions. Clear structure and APA formatting are expected. Papers stand out when they show how the perceiver's own goals and mood shaped the impression, not only the target's behavior.
PSY 355 Week 3 help: mistakes to avoid
A frequent weakness is describing impression formation in general terms without analyzing a specific impression and how it formed. Another is treating stereotypes only as conscious prejudice, overlooking their role as mental shortcuts that everyone uses and that can mislead. Students also confuse the halo effect with primacy, or fail to show how an impression changed their own behavior, which is the motivational point of this week. Some papers assume first impressions are always wrong, ignoring research showing they can be partly accurate. Choose a real impression, trace the cues and schemas involved, show its effects and test it against more evidence. A tutor can help you link perception terms to a real example.
Related PSY 355 sample papers
Other PSY 355 week samples
- PSY 355 Week 1: Theories of Motivation
- PSY 355 Week 2: Self-Schemas and Self-Concept
- PSY 355 Week 4: Attributions and Expectations
- PSY 355 Week 5: Applying Motivation Research
More BS in Psychology sample papers
- PSY 315 Week 3: Hypothesis Testing and t Tests
- PSY 335 Week 3: Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
- PSY 340 Week 3: Sensation, Perception and Movement
- PSY 390 Week 3: Memory Systems and Forgetting
PSY 355 Week 3 questions, answered
What does PSY 355 Week 3 usually cover?
It usually covers impression formation, social schemas, central traits, stereotypes and errors in perceiving others.
Where can I find a free PSY 355 Week 3 sample paper?
Above you will find the full PSY 355 Week 3 paper on first impressions and schemas, free.
What is a central trait?
A trait, such as warm or cold, that strongly shapes the overall impression formed of a person.
What is a role schema?
A set of expectations about how people in a particular role, such as instructor or manager, will behave.
Why is tone hard to read in email?
Text lacks voice and facial cues, and writers assume their intended tone is clearer than it is.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All PSY 355 week samples · All courses