| Course | MPH 530 Epidemiology Concepts and Public Health Diseases (MPH/530) |
|---|---|
| Week | 1 |
| Paper type | Epidemiologic measures paper |
| Length | about 1,165 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MPH |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for MPH 530 Week 1
Counting Correctly: Prevalence, Incidence and Mortality Rates Worked Through for Diabetes and Overdose in a Southern Colorado County
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
MPH/530: Epidemiology Concepts and Public Health Diseases
Week 1 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The county health department, its cohort and local counts are composites written for a model paper; state and county estimates come from the CDC data sets cited, retrieved in September 2026.
At a budget hearing, a county commissioner in a composite southern Colorado county asked the health department's epidemiologist a reasonable question: why does the department report diabetes as a percentage but overdoses as deaths per 100,000, and which number tells me the bigger problem? The epidemiologist prepared this paper to explain the measures of disease frequency and work through them with local and state data.
Three Families of Measures
Measures of disease frequency fall into three families. Prevalence answers what share of a population currently has a condition. Incidence answers how fast people are newly developing it. Mortality measures answer how many are dying. Each answers a different question.
Prevalence
Prevalence is the number of existing cases divided by the population at the same time. It tells planners how much burden exists now, for example how many people need diabetes care, medicines and supplies.
Incidence
Incidence counts new cases. The incidence proportion, also called cumulative incidence or risk, puts the people who became cases over a stated period over everyone who could have become a case when the period began. The incidence rate instead puts new cases over the summed time each person was actually watched, which copes with people joining or dropping out at different points.
How Prevalence and Incidence Relate
A methods review explains that prevalence reflects both incidence and duration: in a steady state, prevalence is approximately incidence multiplied by average disease duration, so conditions with long survival can have high prevalence even when new cases are not especially common (Noordzij et al., 2010). Diabetes, which people live with for decades, has high prevalence for this reason.
Diabetes Prevalence in the County
CDC's 2025 county estimates for Pueblo County, on which the composite county is modeled, put age-adjusted diagnosed diabetes prevalence among adults at 10.4% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025). With roughly 131,000 adults in a population of about 169,000, that implies roughly 13,600 adults with diagnosed diabetes if applied to the crude count, an approximation that is useful for planning services.
Why Age Adjustment
Age-adjusted prevalence recalculates what prevalence would be if the county had a standard age distribution. Because diabetes rises with age, a county with more older adults would show higher crude prevalence. Age adjustment allows fair comparisons with other counties and with the state; crude counts are better for planning local services.
Incidence From the Prevention Cohort
The department followed 402 adults with prediabetes enrolled in its prevention program for one year. During the year, 14 were newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. The incidence proportion was 14 divided by 402, or 3.5% over one year.
Incidence Rate With Person-Time
Not everyone was followed for the full year: some moved or left the program. Together the 402 participants contributed 351 person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate was 14 new cases divided by 351 person-years, or 4.0 per 100 person-years. The rate is slightly higher than the proportion because it accounts for time actually observed.
Overdose Mortality
CDC's provisional counts show 1,819 drug overdose deaths in Colorado in the 12 months ending December 2025 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2026). With a state population of roughly 6.0 million, the crude overdose mortality rate was about 30 deaths per 100,000 residents per year. Rates per 100,000 are used for deaths because deaths are rare relative to the population; a percentage would be a small, hard-to-read number.
Proportionate Mortality
The same data show 45,870 deaths from all causes in Colorado over that period, so overdoses accounted for 1,819 divided by 45,870, or 4.0% of all deaths. Proportionate mortality tells the share of deaths from a cause, not the risk of dying from it. A cause can make up a larger share of deaths either because it rose or because other causes fell.
Drug-Specific Counts
The provisional data also specify drugs involved. Synthetic opioids other than methadone were involved in 1,044 deaths and psychostimulants such as methamphetamine in 879, about 57% and 48% of overdose deaths. The percentages add to more than 100% because many deaths involve more than one drug.
Years of Life Lost
Another way to compare the two problems is premature mortality. Overdose deaths in Colorado occur mostly among adults aged 25 to 54, while diabetes deaths occur mostly after 65. Measures such as years of potential life lost weight deaths by how early they occur, which is why overdoses rank higher on premature mortality than their share of total deaths suggests.
Rates Over Time
A single year's rate is a snapshot. The epidemiologist showed the commissioner how Colorado's overdose deaths moved over five years, from 1,917 in 2021 to 1,640 in 2024 and 1,819 in 2025, and explained that comparing years requires the same measure and the same data source each time.
Which Number Shows the Bigger Problem
The commissioner's question has no single answer, because the measures answer different questions and serve different decisions. Diabetes affects far more people at any time, about one adult in ten, and drives ongoing care costs. Overdoses kill far more younger people suddenly, each death representing many years of life lost. Both measures are needed.
A Summary Table
The epidemiologist's table listed each measure, its formula, the value and its meaning: diabetes prevalence, 10.4% age-adjusted, how common diagnosed diabetes is among adults; incidence proportion, 3.5% over one year, the risk of diabetes among program participants; incidence rate, 4.0 per 100 person-years, new cases per time at risk; overdose mortality, about 30 per 100,000 per year; proportionate mortality, 4.0% of deaths.
Common Errors
Common errors include confusing prevalence with incidence, omitting the time period from rates, comparing crude rates between populations with different ages, ignoring person-time when follow-up varies and adding drug-specific percentages as if they were exclusive.
Checking the Arithmetic
Before presenting, a second epidemiologist recalculated every figure from the source files. Independent checking caught one error in an early draft, where the person-time had been entered as 315 instead of 351 years, which would have overstated the incidence rate. Simple checks prevent embarrassing corrections later.
Limits of the Data
County prevalence estimates are modeled from survey data and carry uncertainty. Provisional death counts may change as investigations are completed. The cohort is small, so its incidence estimate is imprecise.
A Plain-Language Guide for Commissioners
Prevalence tells you the size of the group that already has a condition and needs services today. Incidence tells you how fast new cases are appearing and whether prevention is working. Mortality rates tell you how many people are dying, adjusted for population size.
Conclusion
The commissioner's question had a precise answer: different measures answer different questions. Worked with local and state data, prevalence showed the burden of diabetes, incidence showed the pace of new cases in the prevention cohort and mortality measures showed the toll of overdoses. Showing each calculation, choosing the right measure and interpreting it plainly are the first skills of epidemiology.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local data for better health, county data, 2025 release [Data set]. data.cdc.gov. https://data.cdc.gov/d/swc5-untb
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). VSRR provisional drug overdose death counts [Data set]. data.cdc.gov. https://data.cdc.gov/d/xkb8-kh2a
Noordzij, M., Dekker, F. W., Zoccali, C., & Jager, K. J. (2010). Measures of disease frequency: Prevalence and incidence. Nephron Clinical Practice, 115(1), c17-c20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000286345
What the MPH 530 Week 1 instructions ask
MPH 530 Week 1 usually asks students to explain and calculate measures of disease frequency. Prompts may ask students to define prevalence, incidence proportion, incidence rate and mortality rates, calculate them from data provided or found, explain crude, specific and adjusted rates and interpret what the numbers mean for public health. Some versions supply a dataset; others ask students to find public data from sources such as CDC. Check which applies to you before starting. Strong papers show every single calculation with numerator, denominator and time period, choose the right measure for the question, distinguish prevalence from incidence, explain age adjustment and interpret results in plain language.
How this MPH 530 Week 1 example is built
The paper opens with a county commissioner asking why the health department reports diabetes as a percentage but overdoses as a rate per 100,000. Prevalence, incidence and mortality are defined, and the relationship between prevalence, incidence and duration is explained with a methods review. County diabetes prevalence from CDC estimates is interpreted, including age adjustment. Incidence proportion and incidence rate are calculated from the department's prevention cohort. Overdose mortality and proportionate mortality are calculated from state provisional counts, with drug-specific figures explained. A summary table and a plain-language guide for commissioners close the paper, with common errors to avoid and the limits of the data.
MPH 530 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go
The disease frequency week is typically graded on correct calculations, correct choice of measures and clear interpretation. Graders look for accurate definitions, calculations shown with numerators, denominators and time periods, correct use of crude, specific and adjusted rates, a clear distinction between prevalence and incidence and interpretation that explains what the numbers mean for decisions. Official data sources with dates strengthen the paper. Pointing out common errors earns credit. Tables that summarize each measure, its formula and its meaning help readers follow the argument. Readable organization and properly formatted references earn what remains. Papers that confuse prevalence with incidence, or report rates without denominators or time periods, commonly lose points.
MPH 530 Week 1 help: mistakes to avoid
MPH 530 Week 1 papers often lose points on arithmetic that is not shown. Write each measure as a fraction: who is counted on top, who is at risk on the bottom and over what time. Use prevalence for how common a condition is now and incidence for how quickly new cases arise. Remember that prevalence rises when people live longer with a disease, not only when more people get it. Use age-adjusted rates to compare places with different age structures. Round sensibly, state the units and give the source and year for every number. Finally, explain each result in a sentence a non-specialist could understand, and note the data's limits, such as modeled estimates or provisional counts.
Related MPH 530 sample papers
Other MPH 530 week samples
- MPH 530 Week 2: Descriptive Epidemiology
- MPH 530 Week 3: Epidemiologic Study Designs
- MPH 530 Week 4: Bias, Confounding and Causation
- MPH 530 Week 5: Outbreak Investigation
- MPH 530 Week 6: Applied Epidemiologic Case Study
More MPH sample papers
MPH 530 Week 1 questions, answered
What does MPH/530 Week 1 usually ask for?
The opening epidemiology paper generally has students define and calculate measures of disease frequency, including prevalence, incidence and mortality rates, and interpret them.
Where can I find a free MPH 530 Week 1 sample paper?
The disease frequency paper above is free to read, and every calculation is shown with a note. Send the data or prompt from your course, and we work the first paper for you free.
What is the difference between an incidence proportion and an incidence rate?
The proportion compares new cases with everyone at risk when a period began; the rate compares new cases with the total observed time contributed by people at risk.
What is proportionate mortality?
The share of all deaths in a population during a period that are due to a specific cause, such as overdoses making up 4.0% of Colorado deaths in 2025.
How are prevalence and incidence related?
Prevalence depends on both how often new cases occur and how long people live with the condition, so a condition with long survival can have high prevalence even with modest incidence.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All MPH 530 week samples · All courses