| Course | MGT 571 Staffing, Leading and Controlling for Agile Environments (MGT/571) |
|---|---|
| Week | 6 |
| Paper type | Strategic execution plan |
| Length | about 1,176 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGT 571 Week 6
From Three Pilot Teams to an Agile Product Organization: The Execution Plan for Tippecanoe Orthopedic Systems
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
MGT/571: Staffing, Leading and Controlling for Agile Environments
Week 6 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Tippecanoe Orthopedic Systems and all results and plans are composites written for a model paper.
Nine months ago, the composite device company Tippecanoe launched three agile teams for surgical planning software and two instrument projects. Over the course of this work, it redesigned staffing, leadership, legal safeguards and controls. Now leaders must decide whether and how to extend agile work across product development and how to execute strategy through it. Pilots prove that something can work in a corner of an organization; execution proves it can work everywhere it is needed without breaking what already works. This paper presents the execution plan.
Pilot Results
The planning software team has released updates every quarter, and surgeon use of the planning tool has risen 40 percent. The first instrument team's project is on track to finish in about 22 months, compared with 36 for similar past projects. The second instrument team, slower at first because of leadership issues, now meets most sprint goals. Quality findings in design reviews fell, and no regulatory findings have been tied to the pilots. Team engagement scores rose.
Interpreting the Results
The pilots support expansion but come with caveats: the teams were staffed with volunteers, received extra coaching and worked on projects chosen to suit agile methods. Results across the whole organization may be smaller. Dikert et al. (2016) found that large-scale agile transformations face coordination and integration challenges that small pilots do not reveal.
Strategic Objectives for Agile Teams
Over the coming three years, Tippecanoe aims to protect implant share by offering surgeons the best planning tools and instruments, reduce development time and keep its quality record. Each agile team will have a mission tied to these objectives, such as improving planning accuracy for revision knee surgery or reducing instrument tray weight.
From Strategy to Team Missions
Kaplan and Norton (2008) argued that execution depends on linking strategy to operations through objectives, initiatives and regular reviews. Tippecanoe will translate strategic objectives into a small number of product goals each year, and each team's backlog will be prioritized against those goals by its product owner with input from surgeons.
Scaling Plan
Expansion will add five teams in two waves: three in the next six months for additional instrument families and a data analytics team, and two more six months later. Implant design and manufacturing will remain in stage-gate processes, with liaisons to agile teams.
Governance for the Expansion
An agile steering group, chaired by the chief operating officer and including the heads of engineering, quality, regulatory, manufacturing and HR, will oversee the expansion. It will approve each new team's launch only when a trained product owner, a quality engineer and a regulatory specialist are in place and the team's mission is tied to a strategic goal. The group will also decide when to pause expansion if quality or engagement measures slip.
Communicating the Expansion
Engineers outside the pilots have heard mixed stories. Leaders will share pilot results openly at a product development meeting, invite pilot team members to describe their experience and explain how people can join new teams through the internal marketplace. Being candid about early problems, including the second instrument team's slow start, will make the expansion more credible.
Coordination Among Teams
With eight teams, coordination matters. Teams working on related products will meet every two weeks to align, share a common architecture for software and coordinate releases. A small product leadership group will resolve conflicts among team priorities.
Quarterly Portfolio Planning
Every quarter, leaders will review team results, surgeon feedback, market changes and risks and decide where to shift people and money. Teams whose work has less value will be redirected; promising opportunities will receive more resources. This creates the resource fluidity identified as weak in Week 1.
Integrating Staffing
The staffing model from Week 2, with dedicated cross-functional teams, internal mobility and limited contractors, will extend to new teams. Product owner development will expand, since this role is the main constraint on scaling.
Integrating Leadership
The leadership changes from Week 3, with department heads as capability builders and clear decision rights, will become standard. New team leaders will receive coaching before their teams launch.
Integrating Legal and Ethical Safeguards
The safeguards from Week 4, verified testing, privacy controls, contractor agreements and the speak-up system, will apply to all teams, with the compliance and ethics group reviewing new teams' practices.
Integrating Controls
The control system from Week 5, belief and boundary systems, balanced metrics and interactive reviews, will scale through the portfolio dashboard, with each new team adopting the same measures.
The Cost of Scaling
Scaling has a price. Two more agile coaches cost about $360,000 a year, three additional quality engineers about $420,000 and product owner training about $120,000. Development tool licenses and automation add about $150,000. Against these costs, cutting instrument development by a year on four projects is expected to bring roughly $18 million in revenue forward and help protect a knee implant business worth far more. Leaders approved the budget with a review after the first expansion wave.
Connecting With Stable Functions
Implant design and manufacturing will not adopt sprints, but agile teams depend on them for materials testing, prototypes and production transfer. Each stable function will name a liaison who attends quarterly portfolio planning and team reviews when their work is involved. Manufacturing engineers will join instrument teams during design transfer, so products are designed for production from the start. This keeps the organization from splitting into a fast part and a slow part that do not understand each other.
Learning From the Bottom Up
Execution is not only top-down. Wolf and Floyd (2017) emphasized that planning's value often lies in participation and learning. Teams' discoveries about surgeon needs will feed quarterly strategy reviews, and successful practices will spread through communities of practice for product owners, quality engineers and developers.
Risks of Scaling
Risks include coordination overhead, dilution of coaching, pressure on quality and regulatory staff and resistance from functions outside agile teams. Responses include limiting expansion to two waves, hiring two more agile coaches, adding quality engineers and including manufacturing and implant leaders in portfolio planning.
Measuring Success
Success will be measured by time to market for new instruments and software features, surgeon adoption and satisfaction, quality and regulatory findings, implant market share in accounts using the planning tool, development cost per product and employee engagement. Success is not the number of teams using agile.
Reflecting on the Course
The course moved from understanding agile environments to staffing teams, leading them, protecting legal and ethical standards, designing controls and now executing strategy. Each piece depends on the others: well-staffed teams fail under old leadership, empowered teams need boundaries and controls only work when they encourage the right behavior.
Conclusion
Tippecanoe's pilots show that agile methods can speed development in a regulated company without harming quality. Expanding in stages, linking team missions to strategy, planning the portfolio quarterly and integrating staffing, leadership, safeguards and controls give the company a way to execute its strategy through agile teams while protecting patients and its quality record.
References
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The execution premium: Linking strategy to operations for competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.
Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2017). Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1754-1788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478185
What the MGT 571 Week 6 instructions ask
The closing MGT 571 prompt usually calls for a strategic execution plan for an organization working in agile ways. Common requirements include linking strategy to agile work, scaling from teams to the organization, portfolio management and resource allocation, integrating staffing, leadership, legal and control elements, managing risks of scaling and measuring success. Many instructors also want a brief reflection on the whole course. Use results or evidence to justify scaling decisions, show how strategy reaches teams and how team learning reaches strategy, pull in the work of earlier weeks and document sources in APA style. Show how departments outside the agile teams, such as manufacturing, will connect to them.
How this MGT 571 Week 6 example is built
Three pilot teams have shown that agile can work in a regulated device company, and the paper plans how to execute strategy through agile across the product organization. Pilot results show software releases every quarter, instrument development cut from 36 to 22 months and no increase in quality findings. Strategic objectives are translated into team missions. Expansion to eight teams proceeds in two waves. Quarterly portfolio planning shifts people and money among teams. The staffing, leadership, legal and control designs from earlier weeks are integrated. Risks of scaling are addressed, and success measures cover speed, quality, surgeon value and employee engagement.
MGT 571 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go
Strong final papers integrate the course into a coherent execution plan supported by evidence. Faculty credit a fair review of pilot results, a clear line from strategy to team missions, a realistic scaling plan, dynamic resource allocation through portfolio planning, integration of staffing, leadership, legal and control elements and attention to the risks of scaling. Using research on strategy execution and large-scale agile shows depth. Measures of success that balance speed, quality and people demonstrate judgment. APA references and clear structure complete the paper. Faculty also look for honesty about what the pilots cannot prove, such as results driven by volunteers and extra coaching, and for a plan that keeps stable functions, such as validated manufacturing, connected to agile teams rather than ignored. Budgeting for the coaching and quality staff that scaling requires adds credibility.
MGT 571 Week 6 help: mistakes to avoid
Students often propose scaling agile everywhere at once after a small pilot. Scale in stages and justify each with evidence. Another frequent gap is losing the link between strategy and team work as the number of teams grows. Show how priorities flow down and learning flows up. Students also treat earlier weeks as separate topics. Integrate them. Avoid ignoring parts of the organization that will not become agile; explain how they interact with agile teams. Address risks such as coordination costs. Finally, define success broadly, since speed gained at the cost of quality or people is not success.
Related MGT 571 sample papers
Other MGT 571 week samples
- MGT 571 Week 1: Agile Environments
- MGT 571 Week 2: Staffing for Agility
- MGT 571 Week 3: Leading Teams Through Change
- MGT 571 Week 4: Legal and Ethical Considerations
- MGT 571 Week 5: Controls and Agile Metrics
More MBA sample papers
- MGT 521 Week 6: Performance Measurement and the Balanced Scorecard
- MGT 526 Week 6: Final Change Plan and Evaluation
- MGT 566 Week 6: Executing and Measuring the Plan
- MGT 576 Week 6: Restructuring and Value Creation
MGT 571 Week 6 questions, answered
What does MGT 571 Week 6 usually cover?
It usually covers strategic execution in agile organizations: linking strategy to agile teams, scaling, portfolio planning and resource allocation, integrating staffing, leadership and controls and measuring success.
Where can I find a free MGT 571 Week 6 sample paper?
The complete strategic execution plan for a medical device company's agile product organization, with pilot results and notes, is presented here. A free first draft of your final MGT 571 paper can be requested.
How should organizations scale agile?
In stages, using evidence from pilots, adapting practices to the organization, building coordination mechanisms among teams and changing supporting functions such as budgeting, HR and governance.
What is portfolio planning in agile organizations?
A regular process, often quarterly, in which leaders review team results and strategic priorities and shift people, funding and goals among teams to focus on the most valuable work.
How is success measured in an agile transformation?
By outcomes such as speed to market, quality, customer value, financial results and employee engagement, rather than by how many teams use agile practices.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All MGT 571 week samples · All courses