HCS 498 Week 2 Environmental Scan of Current Health Care Events Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This HCS 498 Week 2 example scans current health care events that influence a hospital's performance, continuing the five-year strategic plan for a composite nonprofit inpatient rehabilitation hospital begun with its new mission. The APA 7 scan follows. For week two, University of Phoenix HCS 498 has health administration students research recent developments in policy, payment, competition and the workforce and explain what each means for the organization in the scenario, and HCS/498 treats this scan as the evidence base for next week's SWOT analysis. The sample covers six developments: a federal advisory commission's call to cut rehabilitation payments, the 2026 payment rule, growth in Medicare Advantage, prior authorization denials and the new federal limits on them, for-profit expansion and therapist staffing. Each is sourced, dated and tied to a number from the hospital's own records, so its effect on admissions, revenue or quality can be judged.

CourseHCS 498 Strategic Decision Making for Health Care Managers (HCS/498)
Week2
Paper typeEnvironmental scan paper
Lengthabout 1,056 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramBS in Health Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HCS 498 Week 2

1

Denied at the Door: An Environmental Scan of the Payment Rules, Payer Shifts and Competitors That Will Shape a Rehabilitation Hospital's Next Five Years

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

HCS/498: Strategic Decision Making for Health Care Managers

Week 2 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The rehabilitation hospital and its referral and denial figures are composites written for a model paper; national data, rules and reports come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title puts the hospital's sharpest current problem first, which tells the reader the scan will be judged by its effect on this organization.
2

When the planning committee at the rehabilitation hospital, the same 70-bed nonprofit whose mission was rewritten last week, reviewed its referral data, one number stood out. Referrals from its largest partner hospital had fallen 21% in a year, and most of the lost patients were Medicare Advantage members whose rehabilitation stays had been denied or delayed by their plans. The committee asked for a scan of current health care events that could change the hospital's performance over the next five years. This paper presents the scan, grouped into payment policy, payers, competition and workforce, and ends with a ranking of each development for next week's SWOT analysis.

Payment Policy: The Advisory Commission's Recommendation

In March 2025, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (2025) reported that fee-for-service Medicare spent $9.6 billion on 404,000 rehabilitation hospital stays in 2023 and that facilities' Medicare margin reached 14.8%. Finding payments more than adequate, it recommended that the 2025 base rate be reduced by 7% for fiscal year 2026. The recommendation was not adopted in the final payment rule, but it signals that Congress's advisers see rehabilitation hospitals as overpaid by Medicare. For this hospital, whose Medicare margin was 9.2%, a future cut of that size would erase most of its Medicare profit.

What this part is doingThe scan separates a recommendation from a rule, a distinction that affects how much weight the SWOT should give each event.
3

Payment Policy: The 2026 Final Rule

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025) published its final payment rule for fiscal year 2026 in August 2025, updating rates and case-mix weights, continuing the second year of a three-year phaseout of the rural payment adjustment and updating quality reporting requirements. The hospital is urban and receives no rural adjustment, so the phaseout does not affect it directly, but two rural competitors that do receive it will lose revenue and may reduce services, possibly sending more patients its way.

Payers: Medicare Advantage Growth

Medicare Advantage plans now cover about half of Medicare beneficiaries nationally, and at this hospital their share of admissions rose from 18% to 24% in three years. Medicare Advantage plans usually pay under negotiated contracts and require approval before admission, so a shifting payer mix changes both revenue per stay and how many referred patients are admitted.

Payers: Denials and New Federal Limits

A review by the Office of Inspector General (2022) of plan decisions concluded that about one in eight prior authorization requests denied by Medicare Advantage organizations met Medicare coverage rules and would likely have been approved under traditional Medicare, and it named stays in post-acute facilities such as inpatient rehabilitation hospitals among the examples. At this hospital, 14% of Medicare Advantage referrals were denied last year, compared with almost none under traditional Medicare. Two federal rules respond. The first, published in 2023, requires Medicare Advantage plans to follow traditional Medicare's coverage criteria when approving services such as inpatient rehabilitation (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2023). The second, published in 2024, requires plans to decide standard prior authorization requests within seven calendar days and urgent requests within 72 hours beginning in 2026 (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2024). For this hospital, the most important current event is not a payment cut but a change in who decides whether a patient is admitted, and how fast.

Competition: For-Profit Expansion

The commission's chapter also observed new openings by for-profit chains and reported that freestanding facilities' all-payer margin rose to about 10% in 2023 (Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, 2025). Locally, the chain whose 50 beds opened last year a short drive away is already drawing case managers' attention, and a second company has announced a joint venture with an acute care system in the region. Joint ventures give competitors a built-in referral stream from their partner hospital.

What this part is doingCompetitive events are tied to named local consequences, which keeps a national trend from reading like background.
4

Quality Reporting and Public Comparison

Rehabilitation hospitals report quality measures such as discharge to the community and potentially preventable readmissions, and the advisory commission reported a national median risk-adjusted community discharge rate of 67.2% for 2022 through 2023. This hospital's rate is 69.5%, slightly above the median but below the new competitor's advertised figure. Public quality data give referring case managers a way to compare hospitals.

Workforce

Therapy staffing is the hospital's binding constraint. Every patient must receive intensive therapy, and the hospital has 14% of its physical and occupational therapist positions vacant, filled partly with contract staff at higher cost. Competitors recruit from the same small pool of therapists with rehabilitation experience, and the new competitor offered sign-on bonuses in its first year.

Technology and Care Models

Two developments in how rehabilitation is delivered also matter. Remote monitoring and video visits now let therapists follow patients at home after discharge, which could support the transition program the committee is considering and help show that patients stay home. Robotic gait trainers and other devices are spreading among competitors, and families increasingly ask about them on tours, although the hospital's physicians note that equipment matters less than therapy intensity and skilled staff. Neither development is urgent, but both shape how referral sources and families judge rehabilitation hospitals, and the new competitor features its equipment prominently in its marketing to case managers.

What the Events Mean Together

The developments point in one direction. Revenue per Medicare patient faces pressure from advisers, a growing share of patients depend on plans that deny more often, competitors with hospital partners are growing and staffing is costly. At the same time, new federal rules may reduce improper denials, rural competitors face revenue losses and the hospital's quality results are above the national median.

Ranking for the SWOT

The committee ranked the six developments by likely impact over five years and timing. Highest impact and nearest: Medicare Advantage denials and the 2026 decision timelines, affecting admissions now. High impact, near term: therapist staffing. High impact, medium term: for-profit joint ventures. Medium impact, uncertain timing: the recommended payment cut. Lower impact: the rural adjustment phaseout. Opportunity: public quality comparison, if the hospital improves community discharge further.

Conclusion

The scan found that the hospital's performance over the next five years will be shaped less by any single payment update than by how Medicare Advantage plans decide admissions, how quickly competitors with referral partners expand and whether the hospital can staff therapy. These developments, dated and sourced, form the external half of next week's SWOT analysis.

5

References

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). Medicare program; Contract year 2024 policy and technical changes to the Medicare Advantage program, Medicare prescription drug benefit program, Medicare cost plan program, and programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly. Federal Register, 88, 22120. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2023-07115

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2024). Medicare and Medicaid programs; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Advancing interoperability and improving prior authorization processes. Federal Register, 89, 8758. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2024-00895

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2025). Medicare program; Inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2026 and updates to the IRF quality reporting program. Federal Register, 90, 37678. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2025-14780

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. (2025). Inpatient rehabilitation facility services. In Report to the Congress: Medicare payment policy (pp. 247-263). https://www.medpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Mar25_Ch8_MedPAC_Report_To_Congress_SEC.pdf

Office of Inspector General. (2022). Some Medicare Advantage organization denials of prior authorization requests raise concerns about beneficiary access to medically necessary care (OEI-09-18-00260). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/OEI-09-18-00260.pdf

What the HCS 498 Week 2 instructions ask

The second week of HCS 498 usually asks students to research current health care events and trends that affect the performance of the hospital or facility in their strategic planning scenario. Students review recent news, policy changes and industry data, summarize the most relevant developments and explain how each could affect the organization's operations, finances or quality. The work is typically added to a strategic plan template and later feeds the SWOT analysis. A page or two per section with current sources is common. Strong scans select developments that genuinely affect the organization, cite recent and credible sources with dates, separate facts from predictions and explain the likely impact on specific measures rather than on health care in general.

How this HCS 498 Week 2 example is built

The scan opens with the planning committee's finding that referrals from one partner hospital fell by a fifth in a year, mostly among Medicare Advantage patients whose rehabilitation stays were denied. Six sections follow in the same pattern: what happened, when, according to whom and what it means for the hospital. Payment policy comes first, with the federal commission's recommendation and the final 2026 rule. Payer shifts come next, with Medicare Advantage growth, the inspector general's findings on denials and the 2024 federal rules on coverage criteria and decision timelines. Competition and workforce follow. A closing table-like summary ranks each development by likely impact and timing for the SWOT.

HCS 498 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

For the environmental scan, grading typically centers on relevance, currency and analysis. Instructors check that the events chosen actually affect the organization in the scenario, that sources are recent and credible and that each development is described accurately with dates. The largest share of credit usually goes to explaining the specific impact on the organization's performance, such as volume, revenue, costs or quality. Distinguishing confirmed changes from proposals or predictions shows care. The scan should lead naturally into the SWOT analysis. Organization, concise writing and APA citations fill out the rubric. Scans built on old news, generic national trends with no link to the organization or unsourced claims tend to receive fewer points.

HCS 498 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid

A common problem in HCS 498 Week 2 is describing national trends with no link to the scenario's organization. For every event, add one sentence on what it changes for your hospital or facility. Another is using outdated sources; check that rules and figures are the latest available and include dates. Students also confuse a recommendation with a rule; an advisory commission can recommend a cut that Congress and the payment agency do not adopt, so say which is which. Keep the scan balanced, since opportunities belong in it as much as threats. Group events by type, such as policy, payers, competition and workforce. Finally, finish with a ranking by impact, because the SWOT analysis next week needs one.

Related HCS 498 sample papers

Other HCS 498 week samples

More BS in Health Administration sample papers

HCS 498 Week 2 questions, answered

What does HCS/498 Week 2 usually ask for?

Many sections ask students to research current health care events and trends that affect the performance of the hospital or facility in their strategic plan scenario and explain the impact of each.

Where can I find a free HCS 498 Week 2 sample paper?

The rehabilitation hospital environmental scan above is free to read in full, and side notes explain how each event was chosen and dated. Your own scan can be written free the first time.

What is an environmental scan in strategic planning?

A structured review of external developments, such as policy, payment, technology, demographics, competition and workforce, that could affect an organization's strategy and performance.

What is the difference between an environmental scan and a SWOT analysis?

The scan gathers and explains external developments; the SWOT then sorts those findings, along with internal strengths and weaknesses, into a framework for choosing strategy.

How recent should sources be in an environmental scan?

As recent as possible, usually within the past one to three years for policy, payment and market data, because the purpose is to describe current conditions.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.