HCS 131 Week 1 Communication in a Diverse Workplace Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This HCS 131 Week 1 example analyzes communication in a diverse health care workplace and gives the full paper in APA 7 form. University of Phoenix HCS 131, cataloged as HCS/131 Business Communications Skills for Health Care Professionals, begins the BS in Health Administration communication sequence with the people who must talk to one another every day, and week one looks at how differences in culture, language, age and role shape those conversations. The sample follows the front office of a composite outpatient rehabilitation clinic where staff span four generations and patients speak six languages. It describes three communication breakdowns, explains each with a framework for cultural competence at the organizational, structural and clinical levels, and proposes practical changes, from interpreter access to a shared style guide for messages. The health administration paper ends with what the office manager will measure.

CourseHCS 131 Business Communications Skills for Health Care Professionals (HCS/131)
Week1
Paper typeWorkplace communication analysis
Lengthabout 1,033 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramBS in Health Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HCS 131 Week 1

1

Four Generations, Six Languages and One Front Office: Communicating Well in a Diverse Outpatient Rehabilitation Clinic

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

HCS/131: Business Communications Skills for Health Care Professionals

Week 1 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The clinic, its staff and the situations described are composites written for a model paper.

What this part is doingThe title names the kinds of diversity and the setting, so the reader knows the paper is about a specific office rather than diversity in general.
2

The front office of the outpatient rehabilitation clinic described here is small: a practice manager, three patient service representatives, a referral coordinator and a billing specialist, supporting nine physical, occupational and speech therapists. The staff range in age from 22 to 67, and among them they speak English, Spanish and Vietnamese. The patients are more diverse still. About a third prefer a language other than English, including Spanish, Vietnamese, Arabic, Somali and Russian, and they range from high school athletes after knee surgery to adults in their nineties recovering from strokes. Every day, dozens of messages pass between these people by phone, text, patient portal, email and conversation at the desk. This paper examines three times those messages failed and what the office can change.

A Framework for the Analysis

Betancourt et al. (2003) described cultural competence in health care at three levels. Organizational barriers arise when leadership and staff do not reflect the community served. Structural barriers arise from the way care is organized, such as the lack of interpreter services or confusing processes. Clinical barriers arise in the interaction between a provider and a patient, when cultural or language differences go unrecognized. Although the framework was written about care, it fits the administrative side of a clinic well, because front-office staff meet patients first and shape their experience of every visit.

Case One: The Confusing Reminder

A Somali-speaking patient missed two appointments in a row. Her reminders had been sent by automated text in English, reading "Your appt w/ PT is confirmed for 10/14 @ 0930. Reply C to confirm or R to resched." To a reader of English as a second language, the abbreviations and military time made the message nearly unreadable. This was a structural barrier: the process assumed that every patient reads casual English shorthand, and no one had checked whether the message worked for the people receiving it. The fix is structural too: reminders in the patient's preferred language, written in full words and standard times, and a phone call from an interpreter-supported staff member after a first missed visit.

What this part is doingEach case names the framework level that explains it, which shows the grader that analysis, not only description, is happening.
3

Case Two: Text or Call?

A patient service representative who has worked at the clinic for twenty years prefers to call patients about schedule changes, while a newer representative texts them. Each thought the other was being unprofessional: calls seemed intrusive to one, texts seemed careless to the other. Tension grew until they stopped covering for each other's lunch breaks. This was an organizational problem, not a generational one. The clinic had no shared expectations for how to contact patients, so each person followed habit. Both methods have a place: a text suits a simple confirmation, and a call suits a change that needs a conversation.

Case Three: Therapist Shorthand

A physical therapist documented a plan of care as "PT 2x/wk x 6 wks, HEP, reassess ROM." The billing specialist, who came from a dental office, did not know that HEP meant home exercise program or that ROM meant range of motion, and sent an authorization request that left out the reassessment visit. The insurer denied it. This was a clinical-level barrier in an administrative setting: professional shorthand that made sense to clinicians was a foreign language to a colleague in another role.

Strategies for the Office

Four changes follow from the cases. First, the clinic will use a professional interpreter service by phone and video for every patient who prefers another language and will translate its reminder and welcome templates into the six most common languages, in line with the national CLAS standards, which call for free language assistance and easy-to-understand materials (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, n.d.). Second, the manager will write a one-page style guide for patient messages: full words, standard times, no abbreviations, and the clinic's phone number in every message. Third, the team will hold a 30-minute meeting on communication preferences, where each person says how they like to receive messages and the team agrees which situations call for a text, a call or a face-to-face talk. Agreeing on channel norms out loud is a habit recommended for teams whose members work on different schedules or in different places (Dhawan & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2018). Fourth, therapists will lead a short session on common rehabilitation abbreviations for the front office, and the front office will explain which details insurers need, so each side learns the other's language.

What this part is doingStrategies map back to the cases one for one, so no recommendation appears without a problem it solves.
4

Strengths the Diversity Brings

The same differences that caused these breakdowns are also the office's greatest assets. The Spanish- and Vietnamese-speaking representatives can greet many patients in their own language and notice when a patient nods without understanding. The veteran receptionist knows which long-time patients need a call rather than a text and why. The newer representative set up the text reminders that most younger patients prefer. The billing specialist's dental background brought a habit of checking every authorization twice. A manager who treats these differences as resources, and asks staff to teach one another, gets a front office that can serve every patient who walks in.

Why This Matters

Communication in a clinic is not only courtesy. Missed appointments lose revenue and delay recovery. Tension between staff slows the front desk and spills over to patients. Denied authorizations delay care and create extra work. Each of the three breakdowns cost time and money, and at least one cost a patient two weeks of therapy.

Measuring Improvement

The practice manager will track the no-show rate for patients who prefer languages other than English, the number of authorization denials related to missing information and a short quarterly staff survey on how well team members feel they communicate. If the no-show gap between English-speaking and other patients narrows over two quarters, the translated reminders are working.

Conclusion

Diversity in a health care workplace brings skills and perspectives the clinic needs, but it also brings more ways for messages to go wrong. Looking at breakdowns through organizational, structural and clinical lenses shows where to act. Small, specific changes, translated messages, shared norms and cross-training in each other's vocabulary, can make a diverse front office communicate as one team.

5

References

Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Ananeh-Firempong, O. (2003). Defining cultural competence: A practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Reports, 118(4), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50253-4

Dhawan, E., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2018). How to collaborate effectively if your team is remote. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2-5.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. (n.d.). National standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) in health and health care. https://thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov/clas

What the HCS 131 Week 1 instructions ask

The first HCS 131 assignment usually asks students to examine communication in a diverse health care workplace. Versions include a short paper describing a communication scenario and how diversity affected it, a reflection on the student's own workplace, or an analysis of strategies for communicating effectively across cultures, generations and roles. The prompt typically wants examples, a clear explanation of the barriers involved and specific strategies for improvement rather than general statements about respect. Many sections ask students to use at least one scholarly or professional source in APA format. Expected length is often one to three pages. Instructors look for awareness of how differences affect communication without relying on stereotypes, and for strategies a health care office could actually adopt.

How this HCS 131 Week 1 example is built

The paper introduces the clinic and its people in two paragraphs so the reader knows who is communicating. Three short cases follow: a scheduling message misunderstood by a patient who reads English as a second language, a disagreement between a veteran receptionist and a newer coworker about texting patients, and a physical therapist's shorthand that confused the billing team. Each case is explained with one level of the cultural competence framework from Betancourt and colleagues: organizational, structural or clinical. The paper then proposes four changes: professional interpreters and translated templates, a shared style guide for patient messages, a short team meeting on communication preferences and plain-language training. A final section lists measures the manager will track to see whether the changes work.

HCS 131 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go

Week 1 rubrics in this course tend to reward specific, realistic analysis. Faculty look for communication problems described in enough detail to see the barrier, explanations that draw on a credible source, and strategies that fit a health care workplace. Points are often given for recognizing several kinds of diversity, including language, culture, age and professional role, while avoiding stereotypes. Organization, clarity and professional tone count, since this is a communication course and the paper itself is judged as communication. APA format, citations and references complete the grade. Papers that list diversity terms without examples or recommend only "be respectful" tend to lose points, while papers that link each strategy to a specific breakdown do better.

HCS 131 Week 1 help: mistakes to avoid

A frequent mistake in HCS 131 Week 1 is writing about diversity in general terms, with praise for inclusion but no example of communication actually failing or succeeding. Describe a real or composite situation. Another mistake is falling into stereotypes, such as saying that older workers cannot use technology; describe preferences and habits instead, and note individual differences. Students sometimes recommend using family members as interpreters, which health care organizations avoid for accuracy and privacy reasons. Recommend professional interpreters. Keep strategies concrete: who does what, and how it will be checked. Proofread carefully, since grammar errors undercut a paper about communication. Finally, cite at least one professional or scholarly source rather than relying on personal opinion.

Related HCS 131 sample papers

Other HCS 131 week samples

More BS in Health Administration sample papers

HCS 131 Week 1 questions, answered

What does HCS/131 Week 1 usually ask for?

Many sections ask students to examine communication in a diverse health care workplace, describing how differences in culture, language, age or role affect communication and proposing strategies.

Where can I find a free HCS 131 Week 1 sample paper?

The rehabilitation clinic paper above is the free, complete HCS 131 Week 1 sample, with notes explaining how each case is built. For your own workplace scenario, your first custom paper is written free of charge.

Why not use family members as interpreters?

Family members may translate inaccurately, leave out sensitive details or change the message, and their involvement can compromise the patient's privacy, so trained professional interpreters are preferred.

What is cultural competence in health care?

It is an organization's and its staff's ability to provide care and service that meet the social, cultural and language needs of patients, addressed at organizational, structural and clinical levels.

How can managers improve communication across generations?

By asking staff about their preferred channels, agreeing on team norms for email, text and meetings, and pairing staff so each learns from the others' strengths.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.