| Course | FIN 460 Fundamental Analysis (FIN/460) |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Ratio and working capital analysis paper |
| Length | about 1,002 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Finance |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for FIN 460 Week 2
Twelve Ratios and One Problem: Liquidity, Turnover, Margins, a DuPont Breakdown and Lease-Adjusted Debt Show Where Trailhead Outfitters Trails Its Peers
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
FIN/460: Fundamental Analysis
Week 2 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Trailhead Outfitters, its peers and all figures are composites written for a model paper; ratio methods and research findings come from the sources listed.
Week 1 left the analyst covering Trailhead Outfitters, the composite outdoor gear retailer, with five questions, the first being whether its inventory turns more slowly than peers'. Ratios answer that and more. Peer figures come from the median of four comparable specialty retailers' latest annual reports, and prior-year figures from Trailhead's previous filing. A ratio by itself is a number; a ratio set beside last year's figure and a competitor's becomes evidence. This paper builds that evidence.
Liquidity
The current ratio, current assets of $730 million divided by current liabilities of $470 million, is 1.55, close to the peer median of 1.6. The quick ratio, which excludes inventory, is only 0.40 against a peer median of 0.5. Retailers typically show low quick ratios because inventory is their main current asset, so the quick ratio mostly confirms that Trailhead depends on selling its goods to meet short-term obligations. Liquidity is adequate but not generous.
Activity
Dividing the year's cost of goods sold by the $540 million of inventory gives turnover of 2.6 times, or about 139 days of inventory. The peer median is 3.4 times, about 107 days, and Trailhead's own figure a year earlier was about 124 days. Receivables are negligible at about five days, since most sales are paid by card. Payables run about 67 days, close to peers. Total asset turnover is 1.26, below the peer median of 1.4.
Profitability
The gross margin is 41.0 percent against a peer median of 41.5 percent, and down from 41.8 percent the prior year. The operating margin is 7.0 percent against a peer median of 8.5 percent and a prior-year 8.1 percent. The net margin is 4.7 percent. Return on assets is 5.9 percent and return on equity 19.4 percent, the latter above the peer median of 17 percent.
The DuPont Breakdown
The DuPont identity splits return on equity into three multiplied parts: how much profit each sales dollar keeps, the revenue generated per dollar of assets and the assets carried per dollar of shareholders' money. For Trailhead, 4.69 percent times 1.26 times 3.28 equals 19.4 percent. The peer median breaks down roughly as 5.6 percent times 1.40 times 2.17, about 17 percent. Trailhead's higher return on equity therefore comes entirely from a higher equity multiplier: it earns less on each dollar of sales and uses its assets less efficiently, but finances more of its assets with liabilities. Nissim and Penman (2001) recommend separating operating returns from financing effects precisely because financial structure can make a weaker operating business look stronger.
Solvency and Leases
Conventional debt of $250 million against equity of $580 million gives a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.43. Adding $650 million of lease liabilities raises it to 1.55, against a peer median near 1.2 on the same basis. Operating income covers interest about 9.3 times, comfortable, but a fuller measure adding about $110 million of annual lease payments to both sides gives fixed charge coverage of about 2.2 times, much tighter. Leases are where Trailhead's obligations really sit.
The Cash Conversion Cycle
Days of inventory of 139 plus days of receivables of about 5 minus days of payables of 67 gives a cash conversion cycle of about 77 days, compared with about 45 days for peers. Every day of the cycle ties up roughly $3.9 million of cost of goods. The 32-day gap with peers represents about $125 million of extra cash tied up in operations.
Market Ratios
At $34 a share and earnings per share of $2.25, the price-to-earnings ratio is about 15, close to the peer median of 15.5. The market is valuing Trailhead roughly in line with peers despite weaker operating ratios, which suggests investors expect improvement.
What the Ratios Say Together
One problem explains most of the gap: slow inventory. Excess inventory lowers asset turnover, raises the cash conversion cycle, ties up cash and, when goods must be cleared, cuts gross margin through markdowns, which helps explain the margin decline. Fairfield and Yohn (2001) found that changes in asset turnover help predict future changes in profitability, while profit margin alone does not, which suggests that Trailhead's turnover trend deserves close watching.
What Fixing It Would Be Worth
If Trailhead reduced days of inventory to 115 over two years, it would release about $93 million of cash and, by reducing markdowns, could recover perhaps half a point of gross margin, worth about $12 million of operating income a year. Management's discussion cites a new allocation system intended to do exactly that, which Week 4 will test.
Checking the Peer Set
Ratios compared with the wrong peers mislead. The four peers chosen are specialty retailers selling branded outdoor and athletic goods through stores and online, with revenue between $1.5 billion and $5 billion. Big-box sporting goods chains were excluded because they sell broader categories with faster-turning goods, and online-only sellers were excluded because they carry no store leases. Removing the largest peer from the median changes days of inventory by only three days, so the conclusion does not depend on one company. A careful analyst also checks that peers use the same inventory method; all four use average cost, as Trailhead does (Penman, 2013).
Limits of Ratio Analysis
Ratios depend on accounting choices and on the date of the balance sheet; a retailer reporting at its seasonal low in inventory looks better than one reporting at a high. Trailhead and two of its peers end their fiscal years in early February, after holiday clearance, making comparisons fair among them. The other two peers end in late January, close enough that seasonal timing does not distort the comparison.
Conclusion
Trailhead's liquidity is adequate and its return on equity looks strong, but the DuPont breakdown shows that strength comes from liabilities, mostly leases, while margins and asset turnover trail peers. Slow inventory is the single problem behind most of the weakness, and fixing it would release cash and support margins.
References
Fairfield, P. M., & Yohn, T. L. (2001). Using asset turnover and profit margin to forecast changes in profitability. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012430513430
Nissim, D., & Penman, S. H. (2001). Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(1), 109-154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011338221623
Penman, S. H. (2013). Financial statement analysis and security valuation (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
What the FIN 460 Week 2 instructions ask
FIN 460 Week 2 assignments commonly require a full ratio analysis of a company. Students are usually asked to compute and interpret liquidity ratios, activity or efficiency ratios including inventory, receivables and payables turnover, profitability ratios and margins, solvency ratios, and often market ratios such as price to earnings. Many prompts also ask for a DuPont analysis and a working capital or cash conversion cycle assessment, with comparisons over time and against industry peers. Present ratios in a table with formulas, explain what each shows, identify the most important strengths and weaknesses rather than describing every number, and cite analysis texts and research in APA style.
How this FIN 460 Week 2 example is built
Twelve ratios can bury a reader, so the paper organizes them around a single question: why does Trailhead earn less on its sales and assets than its peers? Liquidity is checked first and found adequate. Activity ratios show inventory turning far more slowly than peers', while receivables and payables look normal. Margins are slightly below peers. The DuPont breakdown shows that return on equity looks healthy only because of financial structure, much of it from leases. Lease-adjusted debt confirms that reading. The cash conversion cycle ties inventory to cash. The paper ends by naming inventory as the one problem worth solving and explaining what fixing it would be worth.
FIN 460 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
Grading this week generally rewards correct calculations, comparisons that give ratios meaning and interpretation that focuses on what matters most. Instructors look for formulas applied consistently, results compared with prior years and peers, a DuPont analysis that explains the drivers of return on equity and an understanding of working capital through turnover and the cash conversion cycle. Credit goes to papers that adjust for items like leases where they change the picture and that draw a clear conclusion rather than listing every ratio. A ratio table with formulas, peer figures and sources, and APA references, completes a strong analysis. Instructors also give credit when the paper names the single weakness that explains most of the gap, since that is what a reader can act on.
FIN 460 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid
Students often lose marks on FIN 460 Week 2 by reporting ratios without comparison. Put each beside last year and the peer median. Another frequent error is putting revenue rather than cost in the numerator of inventory turnover, which overstates it. Use cost. Students also read a high return on equity as a sign of strength without checking whether debt or leases produce it. Break it down. Avoid describing every ratio equally; lead with the two or three that explain the company. State the formula for each ratio. Finally, connect the ratios to cash, since working capital problems show up there first, and say what fixing the main weakness would be worth.
Related FIN 460 sample papers
Other FIN 460 week samples
- FIN 460 Week 1: Fundamental Analysis and Statements
- FIN 460 Week 3: Industry, Competition and the Economy
- FIN 460 Week 4: Forecasting Financial Performance
- FIN 460 Week 5: Intrinsic Value and Stock Valuation
More BS in Finance sample papers
- FIN 405 Week 2: Heuristics and Cognitive Biases
- FIN 420 Week 2: Credit and Debt Management
- FIN 422 Week 2: Federal Law and Participation Rules
- FIN 440 Week 2: Corporate Risk and Credit Risk
FIN 460 Week 2 questions, answered
What does FIN 460 Week 2 usually cover?
It usually covers ratio analysis of a company, including liquidity, efficiency, profitability, solvency and market ratios, a DuPont breakdown and working capital measures such as the cash conversion cycle, compared with peers.
Where can I find a free FIN 460 Week 2 sample paper?
A full ratio analysis of an outdoor retailer, with a DuPont breakdown and lease-adjusted debt, each explained in the margin, can be studied here without charge, and a draft built on your own company costs nothing to start.
What is DuPont analysis?
A three-part split of return on equity into profit per sales dollar, sales per asset dollar and assets per equity dollar, which shows whether returns come from profitability, efficiency or the use of debt.
How is inventory turnover calculated?
Cost of goods sold divided by average or ending inventory. Dividing 365 by the result gives days of inventory, the average number of days goods are held before sale.
Why adjust debt for leases?
Because lease payments are fixed obligations much like interest and principal. Including lease liabilities gives a truer picture of a retailer's financial commitments and risk.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All FIN 460 week samples · All courses