DHA 722 Week 2 History of Health Financing Legislation Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This DHA 722 Week 2 example traces the history of federal health financing legislation through the life of one rural North Carolina hospital, built in 1952 with federal construction money and shaped by every major financing law since. University of Phoenix DHA 722 asks students to understand how today's financing system was built, and in week two DHA/722 students typically describe landmark laws, the problems they addressed and their lasting effects. The APA 7 paper uses research finding that the Hill-Burton program added over 70,000 hospital beds and narrowed rural and urban gaps. It draws on Starr's history of American medicine and an account of the Affordable Care Act's first years, when the share of Americans without coverage dropped to 9.1% in 2015 from 16.0% five years earlier. Lessons for leaders close the paper.

CourseDHA 722 Policy and Regulation in Health Care (DHA/722)
Week2
Paper typeHealth policy history paper
Lengthabout 1,165 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramDHA
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for DHA 722 Week 2

1

A Hospital Built in 1952: Tracing Eighty Years of Federal Health Financing Law Through One Rural North Carolina Hospital

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

DHA/722: Policy and Regulation in Health Care

Week 2 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The rural hospital, its history, dates of local events and financial details are composites written for a model paper; federal laws are described in general terms, and research findings come from the sources cited.

What this part is doingThe title's date anchors the paper's story in one building.
2

In the lobby of the region's oldest hospital hangs a bronze plaque dated 1952. It records that the building was constructed with federal funds under the Hospital Survey and Construction Act. The regional vice president passed it daily for years before asking what it meant. This paper answers by tracing eighty years of federal health financing law through that hospital, showing how each law shaped what it built, whom it served and how it was paid.

Before Federal Financing

Before the Second World War, many rural counties had no hospital at all. Care was provided by local physicians, small private clinics and charity. Hospitals clustered in cities, where paying patients and philanthropy could support them. Starr describes how the American hospital grew as a mostly private, locally financed institution, with government playing a limited role until the middle of the century (Starr, 2017).

The Hill-Burton Act of 1946

A 1946 construction law, named for its Senate sponsors Lister Hill and Harold Burton, changed that. It provided federal grants for hospital construction, allocated in favor of states with lower incomes and fewer beds. Chung and colleagues found that the program generated substantial and lasting increases in capacity, a net gain of over 70,000 beds, roughly 17% of hospital bed growth from 1948 to 1975, and sharply reduced differences in beds per capita between rich and poor, rural and urban and Southern and other counties (Chung et al., 2017). The plaque in the lobby is a small piece of a national effort that put hospitals in places like this county.

Hill-Burton's Obligations

Hill-Burton funds came with obligations. Hospitals that accepted them agreed to provide a reasonable volume of free or reduced-cost care to people unable to pay and to serve all people in their area. These obligations foreshadowed later debates about hospitals' community responsibilities.

What this part is doingNoting the obligations links a construction program to today's charity care debates.
3

Medicare and Medicaid, 1965

The Social Security Amendments of 1965 created Medicare, financing care for people 65 and older, and Medicaid, financing care for certain low-income people through federal and state funds. For the hospital, the change was immediate: older patients who had paid little or nothing now brought payment. Medicare also required participating hospitals to desegregate, and the hospital, like many in the South, integrated its wards to qualify for the new payments, a reminder that financing law can carry civil rights obligations.

What this part is doingThe civil rights condition shows that financing laws can change more than payment. Medicare paid hospitals their reasonable costs, which encouraged expansion but did little to restrain spending.
4

Controlling Costs: Prospective Payment, 1983

As spending rose, Congress shifted Medicare from cost-based payment to a prospective payment system in 1983, setting a price in advance for each admission according to its diagnosis-related group. Hospitals now profited by shortening stays and controlling costs. Small rural hospitals with few admissions struggled under fixed rates. A single long, costly stay could wipe out a month's margin, and the hospital, which had grown under cost-based payment, closed a wing and reduced staff in the late 1980s. Average lengths of stay fell sharply nationwide as hospitals discharged patients sooner, which in turn increased demand for home health and nursing home care.

Emergency Care Obligations, 1986

In 1986, Congress required hospitals that participate in Medicare and operate emergency departments to screen and stabilize anyone who arrives, regardless of ability to pay. The law protected patients but added unfunded care to hospitals' costs, particularly in areas with many uninsured residents. It also made the emergency department the one place in American health care where treatment is guaranteed, a role rural emergency departments still carry.

Critical Access Hospitals, 1997

By the 1990s, rural hospitals were closing. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 created the critical access hospital designation, returning small rural hospitals to cost-based Medicare payment if they met limits on beds and length of stay. The region's smallest hospital converted soon after and survived, in part, because of that change. The same law created the Children's Health Insurance Program, covering children in families above Medicaid income limits. In the region, the program meant that children of farmworkers, factory workers and store clerks, whose parents earned too much for Medicaid but could not afford private coverage, could see the pediatrician at the hospital's clinic. Critical access status also limited the smallest hospital to 25 beds and an average stay of 96 hours, rules that shaped its services for the next two decades.

Prescription Drugs, 2003

The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 added outpatient prescription drug coverage to Medicare through private plans beginning in 2006. For the hospital's older patients, many of whom had rationed medications, the change reduced a common barrier to managing chronic disease.

The Affordable Care Act, 2010

The Affordable Care Act was the largest change since 1965. It expanded Medicaid, created subsidized insurance marketplaces, banned coverage denials for preexisting conditions and began shifting Medicare payment toward value. In a 2016 review, President Obama reported a 43% drop in the share of people without insurance, to 9.1% by 2015, with improvements in access, financial security and self-reported health, and that about 30% of traditional Medicare payments flowed through alternative payment models (Obama, 2016).

The Supreme Court and State Choices

A 2012 Supreme Court ruling made Medicaid expansion optional for states. North Carolina did not expand until December 2023, so for more than a decade the region's hospitals carried uncompensated care that hospitals in expansion states did not.

Recent Changes

Legislation passed in 2025 adds work requirements for many expansion adults and limits state financing mechanisms, while funding rural health transformation grants. The hospital's financing continues to shift with each Congress. The rural grants could fund new services, while coverage losses could return uncompensated care to levels last seen before expansion, so the hospital faces gains and losses from the same law.

Patterns Across Eighty Years

Several patterns emerge. Coverage expansions are followed by cost controls: Medicare's cost-based payment gave way to prospective payment. Most laws build on existing programs rather than replacing them. Rural hospitals repeatedly need special provisions, from Hill-Burton's formula to critical access status and the newer emergency designation. And federal decisions often leave key choices to states.

Lessons for Health Leaders

History suggests that financing is never settled. Leaders should expect coverage and payment rules to change every few years, often in large year-end bills that give little warning, build reserves and flexibility, understand the history behind current programs and engage in the policy process, since rural provisions have usually come from advocates who explained local needs. The oldest hospital's own board minutes show trustees traveling to Raleigh and Washington in almost every decade to argue for their community, and the next decade will require the same.

Conclusion

The plaque in the lobby marks the start of eighty years in which federal law built, paid for and reshaped one rural hospital. Hill-Burton gave it walls, Medicare and Medicaid gave it paying patients, prospective payment and critical access rules changed how it was paid and the Affordable Care Act expanded coverage. Each law answered one problem and created the conditions for the next.

5

References

Chung, A. P., Gaynor, M., & Richards-Shubik, S. (2017). Subsidies and structure: The lasting impact of the Hill-Burton program on the hospital industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(5), 926-943. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00654

Obama, B. (2016). United States health care reform: Progress to date and next steps. JAMA, 316(5), 525-532. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.9797

Starr, P. (2017). The social transformation of American medicine: The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry (Updated ed.). Basic Books.

What the DHA 722 Week 2 instructions ask

The second DHA 722 assignment typically traces the history of health financing legislation. Students are often asked to describe landmark federal laws such as the Hill-Burton Act, the Social Security Amendments of 1965 creating Medicare and Medicaid, the shift to prospective payment, the laws creating critical access hospitals and the Children's Health Insurance Program, the Medicare prescription drug benefit and the Affordable Care Act, explain the problems each addressed and assess their lasting effects on organizations and access. Some versions ask for a timeline. Add a sentence of analysis to each entry if so. Strong papers connect laws to the conditions that produced them, show how each built on or reacted to earlier laws and draw lessons for current policy.

How this DHA 722 Week 2 example is built

A plaque in the lobby of the region's oldest hospital, recording federal construction funds from 1952, opens the paper. The Hill-Burton program is described, with evidence on its effects on hospital capacity. The 1965 amendments that founded Medicare and Medicaid, the 1983 move to prospective payment, emergency care obligations and the creation of critical access hospitals are traced. Later laws expanding children's coverage and adding prescription drugs to Medicare follow. The Affordable Care Act and its effects on coverage are reviewed, as are more recent changes. Patterns across eighty years and lessons for health leaders close the paper, along with what they suggest for the next round of debates.

DHA 722 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

The financing history week usually rewards accurate description of landmark laws, analysis of why they passed and assessment of their lasting effects. Graders look for major laws identified correctly, the problems each addressed explained, connections among laws drawn, effects on hospitals, patients and spending assessed with evidence and lessons for current policy stated. Historical scholarship and evaluations of specific laws strengthen the paper. Linking national laws to one organization's history earns credit. Identifying recurring patterns, such as incremental expansion and cost control following coverage, also earns marks. Papers that merely list laws with dates usually score lower, while tidy organization and a correct APA reference list secure the final marks.

DHA 722 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid

Many DHA 722 Week 2 papers read like a list of dates. Tell a story instead. Pick an organization or community and show how each law changed it: who could be treated, how the organization was paid and what it could build. For each law, explain the problem it addressed and the politics that allowed it to pass. Use evidence on effects, such as capacity, coverage and spending. Look for patterns: coverage expansions tend to be followed by efforts to control costs, and many laws build on programs already in place. End with what that history suggests about the next round of financing debates and how leaders should prepare.

Related DHA 722 sample papers

Other DHA 722 week samples

More DHA sample papers

DHA 722 Week 2 questions, answered

What does DHA/722 Week 2 usually ask for?

The second health policy paper typically traces the history of health financing legislation, describing landmark laws, the problems they addressed and their lasting effects.

Where can I find a free DHA 722 Week 2 sample paper?

Right on this page. The financing history paper is posted in full, with notes explaining each law's significance. Send the laws your course emphasizes, and the first draft is written at our expense.

What was the Hill-Burton program?

A postwar federal program that subsidized hospital construction; research estimates it added over 70,000 beds and narrowed rural, urban and regional gaps in hospital capacity.

What changed in 1983?

Medicare shifted from paying hospitals their costs to paying fixed prospective amounts per admission based on diagnosis-related groups, giving hospitals a strong incentive to shorten stays and control costs.

How much did the Affordable Care Act reduce the uninsured rate?

A 2016 review reported that the share of uninsured Americans dropped by 43% over five years, reaching 9.1% in 2015, with gains in access to care, financial security and self-reported health.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.