| Course | CHL 630 Planning and Implementing Community Health Initiatives (CHL/630) |
|---|---|
| Week | 5 |
| Paper type | Structure and staffing plan |
| Length | about 1,154 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MPH |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for CHL 630 Week 5
Who Reports to Whom and Who Decides: Organizational Structure and Staffing for Walk and Eat Well
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
CHL/630: Planning and Implementing Community Health Initiatives
Week 5 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The initiative's governance, fiscal agent, positions, supervision ratios, hiring and policies are composites written for a model paper modeled on Yakima, Washington; research findings come from the sources cited.
In her first week, a newly hired Walk and Eat Well promotora asked the coordinator a question that revealed a gap in the plan: her paycheck came from the community health center, her training came from the health district and her assignments came from the coalition. Who was her boss, and who could change her schedule? This paper sets the initiative's organizational structure and staffing so that question has a clear answer.
Why Structure Matters
Structure determines how decisions are made, who is accountable and how work flows. In a partnership, unclear structure leads to duplicated effort, conflict and staff burnout. The implementation literature treats the organization's own characteristics as a major influence on whether programs succeed.
An Implementation Framework
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research combines constructs from many implementation theories into five broad domains. One concerns the program itself; two concern the context, one inside the organization and one outside it; one concerns the people doing the work; and one concerns how implementation is carried out. The framework gives teams shared terms for explaining why a program thrives in one place and stalls in another (Damschroder et al., 2009). Two domains, the inner setting and the individuals involved, are the focus of structure and staffing.
Governance
The coalition's steering committee, a majority residents, holds final authority over the initiative's direction, budget and major changes. It delegates oversight to an initiative committee of seven: three residents, including a lifestyle group graduate, and representatives of the health center, health district, a partner store and the parks department. The committee meets monthly, approves work plans and reviews data.
Formal Rules and Leadership
Evidence on coalitions supports clear governance. Zakocs and Edwards, reviewing 26 studies, found that coalitions with written procedures and skilled leaders, among other traits such as broad and active membership, tended to work better (Zakocs & Edwards, 2006). The initiative committee has a written charter, and its co-chairs, one resident and one staff member, are trained in facilitation.
The Fiscal Agent
The community health center serves as fiscal agent and employer. A written agreement specifies its duties: receiving and managing grant funds, employing the coordinator and promotoras under its personnel policies, providing payroll, insurance and human resources, reporting finances monthly to the initiative committee and following the committee's decisions on program direction within legal and policy limits.
The Organizational Chart
The chart answers the promotora's question. Solid lines show supervision: promotoras report to the lead promotora, who reports to the coordinator, who reports to the health center's community programs director for employment matters and to the initiative committee for program direction. Dotted lines show coordination with the health district's evaluator, the parks department, partner stores and walk leaders.
Position: Coordinator
The coordinator, full time, manages daily operations, supervises the lead promotora, manages the budget, works with stores and parks, prepares reports and staffs the initiative committee. Qualifications include a bachelor's degree in public health or related field or equivalent experience, bilingual Spanish and English and experience in community programs.
Position: Lead Promotora
The lead promotora, half time, supervises and coaches six promotoras, observes sessions for fidelity, covers absences and handles scheduling. Qualifications include state community health worker certification, at least two years of community work and fluency in Spanish.
Position: Promotoras
Six promotoras, each about 20 hours a week, recruit participants, lead lifestyle groups, support walks and tastings and track data. The job description emphasizes traits and relationships over credentials: residents of the east side or similar communities, bilingual, respected by neighbors and able to listen well. The state certificate is completed during the first year with paid training time.
Hiring for Lived Experience
Evidence supports this approach. The IMPaCT model hires community health workers for traits such as empathy and lived experience; in a randomized trial of 592 patients across three primary care practices, workers' support improved patients' ratings of care quality and cut total hospital days by more than half at six months (Kangovi et al., 2018). Hiring neighbors is not a compromise on quality; it is how the evidence says the work gets done.
The Hiring Process
Hiring involves residents. Interview panels include a resident from the initiative committee, the coordinator and the lead promotora. Candidates take part in a short role play, explaining a program to a skeptical neighbor, which reveals listening skills better than a résumé. Positions are posted at churches, the flea market and the community center, as well as online, in both languages.
Store Liaison Duties
Rather than a separate position, store liaison duties are split: the coordinator manages grants and distributor links, while two promotoras each serve as the regular contact for two stores, visiting weekly and running tastings.
Volunteers
Twelve walk leaders volunteer with monthly stipends. The lead promotora recruits, trains and schedules them, holds a quarterly appreciation event and checks in monthly. Volunteer roles have written descriptions and a code of conduct.
Supervision Ratio
One lead promotora for six promotoras keeps supervision close enough for weekly one-on-one coaching and monthly session observation, consistent with community health worker program practice.
Training
New staff complete orientation, the curriculum training, the state certificate course and training in privacy, mandatory reporting and safety. Refreshers occur every six months.
Communication Between Partners
Because staff work across organizations, communication rules matter. The coordinator sends a brief weekly update to the health center, health district and parks department; problems that affect more than one partner go to a monthly partners' call; and residents on the initiative committee receive the same information as staff, in Spanish and English, before each meeting.
Policies
Written policies cover communication, with a weekly staff meeting and monthly updates to partners; data, with privacy protections and secure storage; safety, including rules for home visits and evening walks; and conflicts of interest for committee members.
Staff Well-Being
Promotoras carry their neighbors' stories home. The plan includes monthly group debriefs led by a counselor from the health center, flexible scheduling around family needs and a rule that no promotora works more than two evenings in a row. Caring for staff is part of keeping them, and keeping them is part of keeping participants.
Retention and Succession
Living wages, paid training, a career ladder from promotora to lead promotora and recognition reduce turnover. Each role has a written manual so that a successor can step in, and the lead promotora is trained to act as coordinator if needed.
Conclusion
The promotora's question now has an answer: she is employed and paid by the health center, supervised by the lead promotora and coordinator and directed in her program work by an initiative committee with a resident majority. An implementation framework focused attention on the organization and its people, coalition research supported formal rules and shared leadership and trial evidence supported hiring neighbors. A clear chart, defined positions, supervision, training and policies complete the structure.
References
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
Kangovi, S., Mitra, N., Norton, L., Harte, R., Zhao, X., Carter, T., Grande, D., & Long, J. A. (2018). Effect of community health worker support on clinical outcomes of low-income patients across primary care facilities: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(12), 1635-1643. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630
Zakocs, R. C., & Edwards, E. M. (2006). What explains community coalition effectiveness? A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(4), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.004
What the CHL 630 Week 5 instructions ask
The fifth CHL 630 assignment usually asks students to set an initiative's organizational structure and staffing. Prompts may ask students to describe governance and decision-making, choose a lead or fiscal agent, draw an organizational chart, define positions with responsibilities, qualifications, effort and supervision, plan recruitment, training and retention, address volunteer management and describe policies for communication, data and accountability. Some versions ask for job descriptions; if yours does, include at least one in full with duties, qualifications and supervisor. Strong plans match structure to the partnership, keep lines of authority clear, hire for the skills and lived experience the work requires, budget realistic supervision and plan for turnover.
How this CHL 630 Week 5 example is built
A new promotora's confusion about whether she reports to the health center or the coalition opens the paper. Governance is set: the coalition's steering committee oversees the initiative through an initiative committee with resident majority. The health center serves as fiscal agent and employer. An organizational chart shows reporting lines, with solid lines for supervision and dotted lines for coordination. Positions are defined: coordinator, lead promotora, six promotoras, walk leaders and store liaison duties. An implementation framework guides attention to the organization's setting and the people involved. Hiring for lived experience is supported by trial evidence. Training, supervision ratios, volunteer management, written policies and succession planning close the paper.
CHL 630 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go
The structure and staffing week is typically graded on clear governance, a sensible organizational chart and a realistic staffing plan. Graders look for governance and decision rules, a lead or fiscal agent with defined responsibilities, reporting lines, positions with duties, qualifications, effort and supervision, recruitment, training and retention plans, volunteer management and policies for communication, data and accountability. Implementation and workforce research strengthens the plan, especially when tied to specific hiring and supervision choices. Hiring community members with lived experience earns credit. Planning supervision ratios and turnover also earns marks. A readable chart and exact citations complete the grade. Plans with unclear authority usually score lower, and so do staffing plans that leave out supervision.
CHL 630 Week 5 help: mistakes to avoid
Many CHL 630 Week 5 papers draw boxes without explaining who decides what. Start with governance: who sets direction, approves budgets and resolves disputes? Choose a fiscal agent that can employ staff and manage money, and write down its duties to the partnership. Draw a chart with solid lines for supervision and dotted lines for coordination. Define each position: duties, qualifications, hours and supervisor. Hire for the skills the work needs, including language and lived experience. Budget for supervision and training. Plan how volunteers are recruited, supported and recognized, with written role descriptions. Finally, write down what happens when a key person leaves, and keep manuals current so a successor can step in.
Related CHL 630 sample papers
Other CHL 630 week samples
- CHL 630 Week 1: Theory and Evidence
- CHL 630 Week 2: Logic Model
- CHL 630 Week 3: Intervention Activities
- CHL 630 Week 4: Program Budget
- CHL 630 Week 6: Implementation Plan
More MPH sample papers
- CHL 610 Week 5: Community Health Profile
- CHL 620 Week 5: Community Organizing
- MPH 510 Week 5: Community Stewardship
- MPH 520 Week 5: Multilevel Intervention Design
CHL 630 Week 5 questions, answered
What does CHL/630 Week 5 usually ask for?
The fifth planning paper usually asks students to set organizational structure and staffing, including governance, a fiscal agent, an organizational chart, positions, supervision, training and policies.
Where can I find a free CHL 630 Week 5 sample paper?
Read the structure and staffing plan above free of charge; each role carries a margin note. Describe your initiative; your first paper is on us.
What is a fiscal agent?
An organization that receives and manages funds on behalf of a partnership or coalition, often also employing staff, under an agreement that defines its duties to the partnership.
What is the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research?
A widely used framework that groups the influences on implementation into five domains: the program, the settings inside and outside the organization, the people involved and the process of putting it in place.
Why hire community health workers from the community?
Workers who share residents' language, culture and experiences build trust quickly; a randomized trial of a model that hired for such traits reduced hospital days and improved perceived quality of care.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All CHL 630 week samples · All courses