CCMH 504 Week 2 Early Childhood and Attachment Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This CCMH 504 Week 2 example reads a three-year-old's new distress at separations through attachment theory and research on early stress, asking whether her crying at the door signals a problem or a healthy bond under pressure and how a counselor can help her parents respond while the household absorbs a grandmother's stroke and a father's job loss. In Week 2, University of Phoenix CCMH 504 turns to early childhood and attachment, and the CCMH/504 paper has MS in Clinical Mental Health Counseling students apply attachment theory and early development research to a young child within her family and culture. The analysis is written by a composite counseling intern in Mesa. She draws on Ainsworth and Bell's strange situation study, a report on early adversity and toxic stress and a meta-analysis of interventions to improve parental sensitivity.

CourseCCMH 504 Individual and Family Development Across the Life Span (CCMH/504)
Week2
Paper typeDevelopmental case analysis
Lengthabout 1,176 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramMS in Clinical Mental Health Counseling
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for CCMH 504 Week 2

1

Sofia Cries at the Door: Attachment, Stress and a Three-Year-Old's Distress in a Family Under Strain

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

CCMH/504: Individual and Family Development Across the Life Span

Week 2 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The counseling center, the family and all details are composites written for a model paper; theories and research findings come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title holds the behavior that brought Sofia to the counselor's attention.
2

Last week I introduced the Ortega family. This week I focus on the youngest, Sofia, three, who has begun crying and clinging every morning when her mother leaves for work. Her mother worries that something is wrong with her. Attachment theory suggests a different reading.

What Sofia Does

According to her parents, Sofia cries loudly at the door, holds her mother's legs and sometimes refuses breakfast afterward. Within twenty minutes she settles, usually with her grandmother or father, and plays normally. When Lucia comes home, Sofia runs to her, wants to be held for a few minutes and then returns to play. Before the family's changes, Sofia separated from her mother with a wave. She talks in full sentences, plays pretend games and is toilet trained.

Attachment and the Strange Situation

Ainsworth and Bell (1970) observed fifty-six one-year-olds and their mothers in a laboratory sequence that became known as the strange situation, a series of brief episodes in which the mother and a stranger came and went. Infants explored the toys freely when their mothers were present, using them as a secure base. When their mothers left, exploration dropped and many cried; when mothers returned, most sought closeness and were soothed, then went back to play. Some infants, however, avoided their mothers on reunion or mixed seeking contact with angry resistance, patterns the authors linked to differences in mothers' responsiveness at home.

What this part is doingDescribing what babies did on reunion, not only at separation, is what distinguishes the patterns.
3

Reading Sofia's Behavior

Seen this way, Sofia's pattern looks secure. She protests separation, can be comforted by other familiar adults and greets her mother warmly, seeking closeness before returning to play. What changed is the intensity of her protest, which rose when her household changed. A three-year-old typically handles separations more easily than a one-year-old, because she can hold a picture of her mother in mind and understand simple explanations, but stress can temporarily undo that progress.

Stress in Early Childhood

Shonkoff and Garner (2012) described how early adversity affects development. Their report sorts children's stress reactions into three grades. The mildest, called positive stress, is short-lived, like a first morning at preschool. Tolerable stress runs deeper, as when a relative dies, yet loving adults soften its impact. Toxic stress is the heavy, repeated or drawn-out version, when a child's alarm systems keep firing and no steady adult helps calm them, and it can disrupt developing brain architecture and raise risks for later physical and mental health problems. The presence of responsive caregivers is what turns potentially toxic stress into tolerable stress.

The question is not whether Sofia is stressed, but whether the adults around her can keep that stress tolerable.

The Family's Stress

The Ortegas' changes are significant but not catastrophic. Sofia has a grandmother at home, a father now available during the day and a mother who returns every evening. These are buffering relationships. The risk is that the adults' own stress reduces their responsiveness: Lucia described feeling "short-tempered and exhausted," and Ray admitted he sometimes watches television while Sofia plays alone because he feels low. Supporting the parents' well-being is therefore a way of supporting Sofia.

Culture and Caregiving

In many Mexican American families, young children spend much of the day with grandparents and other relatives, and close physical comfort is expected rather than seen as indulgence. Lucia had been told by a coworker that she should "let Sofia cry it out" to make her more independent. I explained that responsive comfort tends to build confidence rather than dependence, which fit Lucia's instincts and her family's practices.

What this part is doingLinking research on responsiveness to the family's own caregiving values makes the advice easier to accept.
4

Helping the Parents Respond

Research on interventions suggests a focused approach. A meta-analysis of seventy studies found that programs aimed at increasing parents' sensitive responsiveness made parents more attuned and, less strongly, made children's attachments more secure, and that brief, behaviorally focused programs worked at least as well as longer, broader ones (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2003).

Following that evidence, I planned four short coaching sessions with Lucia and Ray. We will build a predictable goodbye routine: the same words, a hug and a small object of Lucia's for Sofia to hold, without sneaking out. We will plan reunions as unhurried moments of attention before chores. We will practice noticing and naming Sofia's feelings. And we will ask Esperanza to take a deliberate role as Sofia's morning companion, making her a second secure base.

The Grandmother's Role

Including Esperanza serves two purposes. It gives Sofia a steady, available adult during the hardest part of the day. It also gives Esperanza, whose stroke took away her independence, a meaningful role in the family. Her slowed speech is not an obstacle with a three-year-old, who responds to warmth and routine more than to words.

Nico and Gabriela Through the Same Lens

Attachment does not end in early childhood, and the same household stress shows up in the older children in age-typical ways. Nico, eight, has returned to bedwetting, a common regression when a school-age child feels insecure, and Gabriela, fifteen, has withdrawn into her room and her phone. Both still turn to their parents in their own ways: Nico asks to sleep in his parents' room, and Gabriela waits up for her mother on late shifts. Later weeks will examine each child in depth, but the attachment lens suggests that all three children need the same thing in different forms, reliable adults who notice them during a hard season.

What the Parents Learned

After two coaching sessions, Lucia reported that mornings had become shorter and calmer. Sofia still cried, but for a few minutes rather than twenty, and she began handing her mother's scarf back at reunion as a ritual of her own invention. Ray said that sitting on the floor with Sofia for ten minutes after Lucia left helped him as much as it helped her, a reminder that responsiveness can buffer the caregiver's stress too.

When to Assess Further

Sofia's distress seems a normal response to change. I would recommend further assessment if her distress lasted all day, if she could not be comforted by any familiar adult, if she lost skills such as language or toileting or if she showed fearfulness or withdrawal across settings. I will check with her parents at each session.

What Lucia Needed to Hear

At the end of our first session, Lucia asked directly whether Sofia's crying meant she had done something wrong by returning to work. I told her that Sofia's protest and her joy at reunion showed that the two of them share a strong bond, and that a child who cries for her mother is showing how much her mother matters. Lucia cried, then laughed, and said nobody had told her in a long while that she was doing something right.

Conclusion

Attachment research suggests that Sofia's crying at the door reflects a secure bond under strain rather than a disorder. Research on early stress shows that responsive caregivers keep stress tolerable, and intervention research supports brief coaching for predictable separations, warm reunions and an expanded circle of secure bases.

5

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127388

Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Juffer, F. (2003). Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.195

Shonkoff, J. P., Garner, A. S., Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care, & Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232-e246. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2663

What the CCMH 504 Week 2 instructions ask

Week 2 of CCMH 504 typically examines development from infancy through early childhood, with attention to attachment. Prompts commonly ask students to explain attachment theory and patterns of attachment, describe early cognitive, emotional and social milestones, discuss how stress and adversity affect young children and apply the material to a child in a vignette. Some versions ask how culture shapes caregiving and expectations for independence. Describe the child's behavior in developmental terms, distinguish normal reactions from concerns that need further assessment, consider family and cultural context and recommend counseling approaches that support the caregiver relationship. State the signs that would prompt further assessment, and cite scholarly sources in APA style.

How this CCMH 504 Week 2 example is built

Three-year-old Sofia Ortega has begun crying and clinging whenever her mother leaves for work, four months after her grandmother moved in following a stroke and her father lost his job. Jenna Castellanos, the counseling intern, uses Ainsworth and Bell's strange situation study to show that protest at separation and comfort-seeking at reunion reflect a secure bond. A report on toxic stress explains that ongoing stress without a buffering adult can harm development, which makes the parents' responsiveness central. A meta-analysis of sensitivity interventions supports brief, focused coaching. Jenna normalizes Sofia's distress, coaches predictable goodbyes and reunions and involves the grandmother as a second secure base, while naming signs that would call for a fuller assessment.

CCMH 504 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

In this unit, early childhood papers earn marks for accurate use of attachment theory, careful developmental description and responsible counseling recommendations. Faculty look for attachment concepts such as secure base and patterns of attachment to be explained correctly, for the child's behavior to be compared with typical development, for stress and family context to be considered and for recommendations to support caregivers rather than treat the child in isolation. Credit goes to avoiding labels, attending to culture and naming signs that would call for further assessment. Diagnosing a young child from a short vignette loses points, as does advice that ignores the caregivers' own stress; APA style applies throughout.

CCMH 504 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid

Students often label a young child's distress as an attachment disorder after a single behavior, when the behavior may reflect a secure bond under strain. Another frequent error is describing attachment patterns without explaining how they were observed or what they predict. Some papers ignore caregivers' own stress, which shapes their responsiveness. Others recommend individual therapy for the child alone, though young children change mostly through their relationships. Describe behavior developmentally, separate normal reactions from concerns, consider family stress and culture and recommend concrete support for caregivers. A tutor can help you apply attachment concepts to a specific child without overreaching or skipping the family context.

Related CCMH 504 sample papers

Other CCMH 504 week samples

CCMH 504 Week 2 questions, answered

What does CCMH 504 Week 2 usually cover?

Development from infancy through early childhood, including attachment, milestones, early stress and caregiving.

Where can I find a free CCMH 504 Week 2 sample paper?

Above is the complete CCMH 504 Week 2 paper on a three-year-old's separation distress, free to read.

Is separation distress normal at age three?

Some distress is common, especially during family stress, and protest followed by comfort at reunion often reflects a secure bond.

What is a secure base?

A trusted caregiver whose availability lets a child explore and to whom the child returns for comfort.

What is toxic stress?

Strong, frequent or prolonged stress without the buffering support of caring adults, which can affect development.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.