| Course | PSYCH 650 Psychopathology (PSYCH/650) |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Anxiety and trauma disorders case analysis |
| Length | about 1,197 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSYCH 650 Week 2
A Bus Driver After a Fatal Crash: Telling Panic, Posttraumatic Stress and Normal Distress Apart, and What Treatment Research Offers
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
PSYCH/650: Psychopathology
Week 2 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The crisis unit, its staff and the client are composites written for a model paper; diagnostic criteria and research findings come from the sources listed.
Fear and anxiety are normal responses to danger, and most people exposed to trauma recover. For some, fear persists, spreads and disrupts life. Mr. T.'s three weeks of nightmares are the starting point for sorting out which, if any, of these disorders fits, and what the treatment literature can offer him.
The Case
Mr. T., a thirty-four-year-old bus driver for the regional transit system in Phoenix, was driving his evening route when a car struck a pedestrian in the crosswalk directly in front of his bus. He stopped, called for help and stayed with the man, who died before paramedics arrived. Mr. T. took two days off and returned to work. Three weeks later, he came to our crisis stabilization unit, saying he had barely slept. He described nightmares of the crash, flashes of the scene when he closed his eyes, avoiding the intersection by asking to change routes, jumping at the sound of brakes, irritability with his children and guilt that he could not save the man. He also described two episodes, one in a grocery store, of sudden pounding heart, shortness of breath and a feeling that he was dying, peaking within minutes. He has no history of mental health treatment. His wife works nights, and he has few close friends.
How Common Are These Disorders?
Kessler et al. (2005) interviewed more than nine thousand American adults chosen to mirror the country and asked about symptoms across their whole lives. Anxiety disorders were the most prevalent class of disorders, with about twenty-nine percent of adults meeting criteria for at least one in their lifetime; specific phobia and social phobia were most common, and posttraumatic stress disorder affected about seven percent. Most disorders began early in life, with anxiety disorders often starting in childhood or adolescence. Mr. T.'s symptoms began in adulthood after a specific event, which points toward trauma-related rather than lifelong anxiety disorders.
Normal Distress or Disorder?
Many people experience intrusive memories, poor sleep and jumpiness after witnessing a death, and symptoms often fade over weeks. The question is whether Mr. T.'s distress exceeds what is expected and impairs his functioning. His inability to sleep, avoidance of his route, irritability at home and panic episodes suggest significant impairment.
Acute Stress Disorder
The DSM-5-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2022) defines acute stress disorder as a set of intrusion, negative mood, dissociative, avoidance and arousal symptoms beginning or worsening after a traumatic event and lasting from three days to one month. At three weeks, Mr. T. falls within that window and shows intrusion symptoms such as nightmares and flashbacks, avoidance of the route, arousal symptoms such as startle and sleep problems and negative mood. Acute stress disorder fits his current presentation.
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
For posttraumatic stress disorder, the person must have faced or seen death or grave injury and then show four families of symptoms, unwanted reliving, steering clear of reminders, darker thoughts and moods and a body stuck on alert, for longer than a month, with real suffering or loss of function. Mr. T. meets the exposure criterion and has symptoms in all clusters, but the duration requirement is not yet met. If his symptoms persist beyond one month, a PTSD diagnosis would be appropriate.
Three weeks after the crash, the calendar, not the symptoms, kept the diagnosis from being PTSD.
Panic Attacks Versus Panic Disorder
Mr. T.'s grocery store episodes fit the description of panic attacks: abrupt surges of intense fear peaking within minutes with physical symptoms. Panic attacks can occur within many disorders, including PTSD, and are listed as a specifier. Panic disorder requires recurrent unexpected attacks followed by at least a month of persistent worry about further attacks or maladaptive changes in behavior. With two attacks in three weeks, both arising in a period of trauma-related arousal, panic disorder is not supported now, though clinicians should monitor whether he begins avoiding places out of fear of attacks.
Adjustment Disorder as an Alternative
If Mr. T.'s symptoms had been milder, or had not included the specific intrusion and avoidance patterns of trauma disorders, adjustment disorder would be a reasonable alternative. Adjustment disorder describes emotional or behavioral symptoms that develop within three months of a stressor, are out of proportion to it or cause significant impairment and do not meet criteria for another disorder. Because Mr. T.'s symptoms do meet acute stress disorder criteria, that diagnosis takes precedence, but adjustment disorder remains relevant if his trauma-specific symptoms fade while low mood or irritability persists.
Guilt and Moral Injury
Mr. T.'s guilt deserves separate attention. He repeatedly said he should have seen the car sooner, although he had no control over it. Trauma-related guilt is common among people who witness deaths in their work, and it can maintain distress even when fear subsides. Cognitive processing therapy addresses such beliefs directly by helping people examine what they could and could not have known and done at the time.
Who Develops PTSD?
Brewin et al. (2000) meta-analyzed studies of risk factors for PTSD in trauma-exposed adults. Pre-trauma factors such as prior psychiatric history, childhood abuse and family psychiatric history had small but consistent effects. What happened during and after the event mattered more: how severe it was, how much new stress piled on and, near the top of the list, whether anyone was there to lean on. Effects of many factors varied across populations and study methods.
For Mr. T., protective factors include no prior psychiatric history; risk factors include the severity of witnessing a death up close, his guilt and his limited social support, with his wife working nights and few friends.
Treatment: Exposure and Inhibitory Learning
Craske et al. (2014) described an inhibitory learning approach to exposure therapy. The older story said fear simply wears down during a session; the newer one says the person learns something new, that the dreaded thing does not happen, and that this fresh memory has to outcompete the old one. Strategies to strengthen this new learning include designing exposures that violate the person's expectations, removing safety behaviors, varying exposure contexts and combining multiple fear cues. The authors argued that these strategies can make treatment gains last longer.
Trauma-focused therapies with strong evidence for PTSD, such as prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy, include exposure to trauma memories and reminders and work on beliefs such as guilt.
Plan for Mr. T.
The crisis team recommended a short stay for stabilization and sleep, education about common trauma reactions, a referral to the transit agency's employee assistance program for trauma-focused therapy, encouragement to connect with a peer support group for transit workers and gradual, planned return to his route with a supervisor's support. They also screened for suicide risk and alcohol use, both negative.
Limits
Diagnosis at three weeks is provisional. Mr. T.'s guilt may need specific attention beyond exposure.
Conclusion
Mr. T.'s symptoms fit acute stress disorder with panic attacks, not yet PTSD or panic disorder. Research on prevalence, risk factors and exposure therapy shows that his reaction is common, that support after trauma matters greatly and that effective treatments exist.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J. D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 748-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.748
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593
What the PSYCH 650 Week 2 instructions ask
In Week 2, students usually study anxiety disorders and trauma- and stressor-related disorders, two groups that the DSM now separates. Expect the panic, worry and phobia conditions alongside the reactions that follow trauma or major stress, each with its rules, how often it occurs, who is at risk, why it develops and what treatment works. A case calling for differential diagnosis is a common format. Walk through the criteria for each plausible diagnosis, explain which fit and which do not and why, discuss risk and protective factors in the person's history and summarize treatments with research support. Cite current research and the DSM in APA style.
How this PSYCH 650 Week 2 example is built
Malik Johnson, writing this sample, describes Mr. T., thirty-four, a Valley Metro bus driver who saw a pedestrian killed by a car in front of his bus. Three weeks later he has nightmares, avoids the route, startles at brakes and has had two sudden attacks of racing heart and fear of dying. A national survey shows anxiety disorders are the most common class of mental disorders. A risk factor meta-analysis shows that what happens after trauma, such as lack of support and life stress, predicts PTSD more than many pre-trauma factors. An inhibitory learning account explains how exposure therapy builds new safety learning. Malik works through acute stress disorder, PTSD and panic disorder and outlines treatment.
PSYCH 650 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
Anxiety and trauma papers earn credit for accurate application of criteria, careful differential diagnosis that rules alternatives in or out and a treatment discussion grounded in evidence. Faculty look for timing requirements, such as the one-month threshold separating acute stress disorder from PTSD, to be applied correctly, for panic attacks to be distinguished from panic disorder, for risk and protective factors to be tied to the case and for treatments to be described with their evidence. Credit goes to recognizing normal reactions to trauma and avoiding premature diagnosis. Respectful, nonsensational description of traumatic events matters. Exact terms and APA-style sources finish the work.
PSYCH 650 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid
Students often diagnose PTSD within days or weeks of a trauma, overlooking the duration requirement and the fact that many people recover without treatment. Another frequent error is treating any panic attack as panic disorder, which requires recurrent unexpected attacks and persistent worry or behavior change. Some papers describe exposure therapy as simply facing fears without explaining how it works or how it is delivered safely. Others describe the traumatic event in unnecessary graphic detail. Apply the criteria carefully, including timing, separate symptoms from disorders, connect risk factors to the case and explain treatments with research. A tutor can help you build a differential diagnosis table for a case, with a column for each criterion and a row for each candidate disorder.
Related PSYCH 650 sample papers
Other PSYCH 650 week samples
- PSYCH 650 Week 1: Classification and the DSM
- PSYCH 650 Week 3: Depressive and Bipolar Disorders
- PSYCH 650 Week 4: Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
- PSYCH 650 Week 5: Substance Use and Personality
- PSYCH 650 Week 6: Culture, Bias and Diagnosis
More MS in Psychology sample papers
- PSYCH 642 Week 2: Tests and Their Validity
- PSYCH 644 Week 2: Attention and Perception
- PSYCH 645 Week 2: Trait and Affective Models
- PSYCH 647 Week 2: Criteria and Measurement
PSYCH 650 Week 2 questions, answered
What does PSYCH 650 Week 2 usually cover?
Anxiety disorders and trauma- and stressor-related disorders, including criteria, risk factors, causes and treatments.
Where can I find a free PSYCH 650 Week 2 sample paper?
The PSYCH 650 Week 2 case analysis of a bus driver after a fatal crash can be read in full above, free.
What is the difference between acute stress disorder and PTSD?
Acute stress disorder applies from three days to one month after trauma; PTSD requires symptoms lasting more than a month.
Is a panic attack the same as panic disorder?
No; panic disorder requires recurrent unexpected attacks plus at least a month of worry about attacks or changes in behavior.
Does exposure therapy work for PTSD?
Yes; exposure-based therapies are among the best-supported treatments for PTSD and anxiety disorders.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All PSYCH 650 week samples · All courses