PSYCH/614 Social Psychology sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Queenie Halstead, MA · Social Psychology · University of Phoenix · Free custom samples in 24–48h

PSYCH/614 examines how situations shape people. The six weekly samples take up the field's methods, social cognition, attitudes and persuasion, conformity and obedience, group processes and intergroup relations and applying social psychology.

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. PSYCH/614 is Phoenix’s Social Psychology course. It examines how situations and environments influence thoughts, feelings and behaviors, covering concepts such as attitudes, conformity, social conditioning, cognition and influence as a foundation of knowledge in psychology. Searches like "psych/614 week 3 assignment example", "PSYCH614 sample paper", and "PSYCH 614 week samples" land on this page.

What PSYCH/614 is really about

PSYCH/614 asks students to read social psychology critically, including the replication debates that have tested classic findings. Topics include attribution, the self, attitudes and persuasion, conformity, obedience, prejudice, prosocial behavior and group dynamics.

Students typically evaluate a classic study and its replications, apply social influence research to a real setting, analyze prejudice reduction strategies and design an intervention based on social psychological principles. Cases include vaccine hesitancy, political polarization and workplace conformity.

What PSYCH/614’s assessments ask for

Faculty expect current evidence, awareness of replication issues and applications tied to specific mechanisms. Interventions should be grounded in tested findings. Graduate papers should evaluate evidence quality and replication status, not just describe findings.

Where students lose points in PSYCH/614

Points are lost when famous studies are retold uncritically, when applications rely on intuition or when individual explanations ignore context. Another common loss comes from treating a single study as settled fact. Graduate papers should say how large the effect was, whether it replicated and how the setting of the original study differs from the situation being analyzed.

The PSYCH/614 drawers

Wk 1

PSYCH/614 Wk 1 assignment example

Wk 1 usually introduces social psychology's methods and replication. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 2

PSYCH/614 Wk 2 assignment example

Wk 2 typically examines social cognition and attribution. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 3

PSYCH/614 Wk 3 assignment example

Wk 3 often covers attitudes, persuasion and behavior. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 4

PSYCH/614 Wk 4 assignment example

Wk 4 commonly addresses conformity, compliance and obedience. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 5

PSYCH/614 Wk 5 assignment example

Wk 5 usually explores groups, prejudice and intergroup relations. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Wk 6

PSYCH/614 Wk 6 assignment example

Wk 6 closes with applied social psychology. On request, free, 24-48h.

Request it free →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

University of Phoenix revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a PSYCH/614 sample the right way

Use the samples to see how a graduate paper handles a classic finding together with its replications and real-world uses.

How these samples are written

Method, in one line: instructions first, structure from the rubric, artifacts exact. Week counts vary by course model; the catch-all row absorbs the difference. Your free request matches what your classroom actually shows.

PSYCH/614 questions, answered

What is the replication crisis in social psychology?

A period of concern after many well-known findings failed to reproduce, prompting reforms such as preregistration.

What is the elaboration likelihood model?

A model of persuasion with a central route based on argument quality and a peripheral route based on cues.

How can prejudice be reduced?

Research supports approaches such as structured intergroup contact under equal status and shared goals.