PSY/335 Research Methods sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Queenie Halstead, MA · Research Methods · University of Phoenix · Free custom samples in 24–48h

PSY/335 covers how psychological research is designed and judged. Five weekly samples cover the scientific method and literature, research ethics, experimental and quasi-experimental designs, survey and correlational methods and qualitative research with a proposal.

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. PSY/335 is Phoenix’s Research Methods course. It covers the fundamentals of research and evaluation in psychology, including critical analysis of research literature, quantitative methodologies and an introduction to qualitative methods, with emphasis on links between design, theory and application and on legal and ethical issues in research with human subjects. Searches like "psy/335 week 3 assignment example", "PSY335 sample paper", and "PSY 335 week samples" land on this page.

What PSY/335 is really about

Every claim in psychology rests on a study someone designed. PSY/335 teaches students to read journal articles critically, distinguish experimental, correlational and qualitative designs, understand measurement reliability and validity and apply ethical standards such as informed consent and review board approval.

Students typically critique a published study, write a literature review on a narrow question, design a simple experiment or survey with hypotheses and variables and write a short research proposal. A typical proposal tests whether a study technique improves quiz scores or surveys sleep and stress.

What PSY/335’s assessments ask for

Faculty expect accurate design vocabulary, hypotheses that match the design, attention to validity threats and ethics and APA formatting of the proposal. Critiques should name specific strengths and weaknesses. Name the variables, the design and the main threat to validity, and state how participants will be protected.

Where students lose points in PSY/335

Points are lost when causal claims are made from correlational designs, when variables are not operationally defined or when ethical safeguards are missing. Summaries in place of critique also lose marks.

The PSY/335 drawers

Wk 1

PSY/335 Wk 1 assignment example

Wk 1 usually introduces the scientific method and reading research. Full sample paper, annotated: The Scientific Method and Reading Research.

Read the sample →
Wk 2

PSY/335 Wk 2 assignment example

Wk 2 typically examines ethics in research with people. Full sample paper, annotated: Ethics in Research With People.

Read the sample →
Wk 3

PSY/335 Wk 3 assignment example

Wk 3 often covers experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Full sample paper, annotated: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs.

Read the sample →
Wk 4

PSY/335 Wk 4 assignment example

Wk 4 commonly addresses surveys, correlation and measurement. Full sample paper, annotated: Surveys, Correlation and Measurement.

Read the sample →
Wk 5

PSY/335 Wk 5 assignment example

Wk 5 closes with qualitative methods and a research proposal. Full sample paper, annotated: Qualitative Methods and a Research Proposal.

Read the sample →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

University of Phoenix revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a PSY/335 sample the right way

Whether you are critiquing an article or proposing a study, the week's sample models the design reasoning.

How these samples are written

The discipline behind every paper here: instructions are the outline, worksheets get filled exactly, decks get outlined slide by slide, and the one-course-at-a-time rhythm means your one course gets the whole desk. Send your week's instructions with a request and the sample matches them, revisions included.

PSY/335 questions, answered

What is an operational definition?

A precise description of how a variable will be measured or manipulated in a particular study.

Why can't correlational studies show cause?

Because a third variable or reverse direction could explain the relationship.

What does an institutional review board do?

It reviews research with human participants to protect their rights and welfare.