PSY 301 Week 2 Emotional Intelligence Development Plan Example

Reviewed by Queenie Halstead, MA · University of Phoenix · Updated

This PSY 301 Week 2 example turns an emotional intelligence self-assessment into a specific, research-based plan for improving one skill, managing emotions under pressure, with steps, practice and ways to track progress. University of Phoenix PSY 301 concludes with strategies for building emotional intelligence, and PSY/301, a two-week course open to psychology students and others, asks learners to select evidence-based techniques, set measurable goals and explain how they will practice and evaluate change. The sample continues with the composite charge nurse in Phoenix whose stress shows in curt exchanges with staff. It applies research on how emotion regulation strategies work, compares reappraisal with suppression, reviews evidence that emotional intelligence can be trained and lays out a six-week plan with daily practices and feedback checkpoints.

CoursePSY 301 Emotional Intelligence (PSY/301)
Week2
Paper typeEmotional intelligence development plan
Lengthabout 1,007 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramBS in Psychology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSY 301 Week 2

1

Pause, Reframe, Reach Out: An Emotional Intelligence Development Plan for a Charge Nurse

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

PSY/301: Emotional Intelligence

Week 2 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The charge nurse and the plan are composites written for a model paper; research findings come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title names the three steps at the center of the plan.
2

Week 1 identified a clear growth area for Keisha, a composite charge nurse in Phoenix, Arizona: managing frustration on short-staffed shifts and meeting anxious staff with reassurance instead of impatience. This paper builds a six-week plan to strengthen that one skill using research on emotion regulation and on training.

The Target Skill

The skill is narrow and observable: when Keisha feels pressure rising during a busy shift, she will notice it early, respond to staff questions in a calm, helpful tone and offer brief reassurance when a nurse seems anxious. Success means fewer curt exchanges, staff who feel comfortable asking questions and a charge nurse who goes home less drained.

How Emotion Regulation Works

Gross (1998) reviewed research on emotion regulation and proposed a process model: people can influence emotions at different points, by choosing or changing situations, shifting attention, changing how they interpret events or adjusting their responses once an emotion is underway. Strategies used early, before an emotion is fully formed, tend to be more effective than strategies used late.

For Keisha, this suggests acting early: noticing the first signs of stress and reframing situations before frustration builds, rather than trying to hide irritation after it has surfaced.

What this part is doingPlacing each strategy on the timeline of an emotion explains why the plan starts with early steps.
3

Reappraisal Versus Suppression

Gross and John (2003) compared two common strategies. Reappraisal, changing the meaning of a situation, was associated with more positive emotion, better relationships and greater well-being. Suppression, hiding emotional expression, was associated with less positive emotion, worse relationships and lower well-being, and it did not reduce the inner experience of the emotion.

Keisha's current approach is largely suppression: she tries to hide stress but it leaks out in tone and sighs. Reappraisal offers a better route. When a new nurse asks a question for the third time, Keisha can reinterpret it as a sign that the nurse is careful and wants to get things right, not as incompetence.

Can These Skills Be Trained?

Mattingly and Kraiger (2019) combined studies of emotional intelligence training in a meta-analysis and found moderate positive effects, suggesting that emotional skills can be improved through structured programs, though effects varied by study design and measurement. The finding supports the idea that Keisha's growth area is not fixed and that regular, deliberate practice can help, especially when it is paired with feedback.

Keisha cannot add nurses to the schedule, but she can change what a third question at the nurses' station means to her.

The Plan

Weeks 1 and 2: noticing. Keisha will set her watch to buzz every two hours during shifts as a cue to check her stress on a scale from one to ten. When it reaches six or higher, she will take three slow breaths before her next interaction with anyone. She will log each check in a pocket notebook.

Weeks 3 and 4: reframing. Before each shift, she will write one reframing sentence for common triggers, such as "Questions mean my nurses care about safety." During shifts, when she notices irritation, she will repeat the sentence before responding.

Weeks 5 and 6: reaching out. Keisha will practice a brief check-in when a nurse seems stressed, such as "This is a tough shift. What do you need from me?" She will aim for at least two check-ins per shift.

Throughout, she will keep the guilt-free mindset that slips are expected and provide useful information about which situations are hardest.

Measuring Progress

Keisha will track three indicators: her logged stress ratings and pauses, the number of curt exchanges she notices each shift and feedback from the two nurses who rated her in Week 1, who will answer three short questions every two weeks about her tone and approachability. At the end of six weeks, she will retake the Week 1 self-assessment and compare results with her starting point.

What this part is doingBuilding feedback from others into the plan addresses the self-report gap found in Week 1.
4

A Sample Shift Using the Plan

Consider a Tuesday in week four. The unit is down two nurses. At ten in the morning, Keisha's watch buzzes; she rates her stress at seven and takes three slow breaths. Ten minutes later, a new nurse asks for the third time how to program an infusion pump. Keisha feels irritation rise, repeats her reframing sentence, "Questions mean my nurses care about safety," and walks the nurse through the steps, adding, "Good call checking before you start." Later, she notices a nurse looking overwhelmed and asks, "This is a tough shift. What do you need from me?" The nurse asks for help with a discharge, and Keisha reassigns a lower-acuity patient. In her notebook that night she records two pauses, one reframe and two check-ins, and one curt moment she caught too late.

Why This Order

The plan builds skills in sequence. Noticing comes first because reappraisal is hard to use without catching the emotion early. Reframing comes next because it changes the interpretation that fuels irritation. Reaching out comes last because it requires enough calm to attend to others' needs. Each stage makes the next easier, and skipping ahead would leave the later habits without a base.

Anticipating Obstacles

On the most chaotic shifts, the watch cue may be ignored. Keisha will ask a trusted nurse to give a quiet signal if she sounds sharp. Fatigue also undermines regulation, so she will protect sleep before her runs of back-to-back twelve-hour shifts. If stress remains high despite the plan, she can use her hospital's free and confidential employee assistance program.

Expected Benefits

For her team, a calmer charge nurse should make it easier to ask questions, which supports patient safety because errors are more often caught when nurses speak up. For Keisha, using reappraisal rather than suppression may reduce the exhaustion she carries home, consistent with research linking reappraisal to well-being.

Conclusion

Keisha's plan targets one skill, managing emotions under pressure, with strategies supported by research on emotion regulation: early noticing, reappraisal rather than suppression and supportive check-ins. Evidence that emotional intelligence can be trained supports the effort, and feedback from coworkers gives a check on progress beyond her own impressions.

5

References

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348

Mattingly, V., & Kraiger, K. (2019). Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.03.002

What the PSY 301 Week 2 instructions ask

The closing PSY 301 assignment usually asks students to create a plan to strengthen one or more emotional intelligence skills identified in their self-assessment. Prompts commonly require specific goals, strategies grounded in research, a timeline, ways to practice in daily life and a method to measure progress. Some versions ask students to explain how improved emotional intelligence would affect their work, relationships or health, or to share the plan with a mentor. Choose a narrow skill rather than "becoming more emotionally intelligent," select techniques with research support, describe exactly when and how you will practice and plan to gather feedback from others. Use the course text and a scholarly article in APA format.

How this PSY 301 Week 2 example is built

Our worked plan targets Keisha's growth area from Week 1: managing frustration on short-staffed shifts and responding to staff anxiety with support. A review of emotion regulation shows that strategies used early, such as reframing a situation, work differently from strategies used after emotions take hold, such as hiding them. Research comparing reappraisal and suppression shows that reappraisal is linked to better well-being and relationships, while suppression is not. A meta-analysis indicates that emotional intelligence training produces moderate improvements. The six-week plan combines a pause routine, reframing staff questions as signs of conscientiousness, a brief check-in practice and feedback from two nurses every two weeks.

PSY 301 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Development plans are usually graded on specificity, research grounding and feasibility. Instructors look for one or two clearly defined skills, strategies that match those skills and are supported by evidence, realistic practice schedules and measurable indicators of progress. Credit goes to plans that include feedback from others, anticipate obstacles and explain expected benefits. A clear structure, APA citations and a concluding reflection on the course are expected. Instructors also value plans that start small enough to succeed early, since early success builds confidence, and that explain what the writer will do on days when the plan slips rather than assuming perfect follow-through. Plans tied to the Week 1 assessment, rather than starting fresh, show continuity.

PSY 301 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid

A common weakness is a plan that lists general intentions, such as "be more patient," without saying what the person will do differently in which situations. Another is choosing strategies that research questions, such as simply suppressing emotions. Students also set goals with no way to tell whether they were met by the end of the plan. Some plans ignore obstacles, like busy weeks when practice slips or stressful events that make old habits return. Define the situations where the skill matters, pick a few strategies with evidence, schedule practice and plan how you and others will judge progress. A tutor can help you write measurable goals for an emotional skill.

Related PSY 301 sample papers

Other PSY 301 week samples

More BS in Psychology sample papers

PSY 301 Week 2 questions, answered

What does PSY 301 Week 2 usually cover?

It usually covers strategies for improving emotional intelligence and a personal development plan with goals and measures.

Where can I find a free PSY 301 Week 2 sample paper?

The PSY 301 Week 2 development plan for a charge nurse is posted above, free to use.

What is cognitive reappraisal?

Changing how you interpret a situation to change its emotional impact, such as seeing a challenge as an opportunity to help.

Is suppressing emotions a good strategy?

Research links habitual suppression to worse well-being and relationships compared with reappraisal.

Can emotional intelligence be trained?

Research suggests training produces moderate improvements, especially when it includes practice and feedback.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.