NSG/482 Week 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management, sample paper

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix

This page holds a complete NSG/482 Week 5 sample paper on emergency preparedness and disaster management, in true APA form. A composite northern county plans for a multiday winter power outage, and the paper follows the disaster cycle to show what community health nurses do for residents who depend on electricity for oxygen, dialysis, ventilators and refrigerated medicine, from finding them before the storm to checking on them after the lights return.

1

When the Power Goes Out for a Week: A Community Health Nursing Plan for Electricity-Dependent Residents Before, During, and After a Winter Storm

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

NSG/482: Promoting Healthy Communities

Week 5 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The county, residents and figures are a composite written for a model paper.

What this part is doingThe title names the hazard, the vulnerable group and the time frame of the plan. Choosing one hazard and one group is what lets the paper be specific.
2

A disaster lands unevenly across a community. When a severe winter storm cuts power for several days, most households face cold and inconvenience. For a resident who uses home oxygen, a ventilator, a powered wheelchair or insulin that must stay refrigerated, a long outage becomes a medical emergency. A composite northern county of 95,000 people experienced a four-day outage after an ice storm two winters ago, and the health department's after-action review found that it had no list of residents who depend on electricity for health and no plan for reaching them. The county's disaster plan had shelters, generators and snowplows, but it did not know the names of the people who would be in danger first. This paper proposes a community health nursing plan for electricity-dependent residents across the phases of the disaster cycle.

The Hazard and the Population at Risk

Severe winter storms bring cold exposure, falls on ice and carbon monoxide poisoning from generators and heaters used indoors. Houck and Hampson (1997) described an epidemic of carbon monoxide poisoning after a winter storm in Washington State, with most cases linked to improperly vented generators, charcoal and other fuel-burning devices used to heat or power homes. Power outages add risks specific to people who rely on medical equipment. Busby et al. (2021), analyzing the February 2021 Texas blackout, showed how failures across the energy system cascaded into prolonged outages with serious health effects, including deaths from hypothermia and carbon monoxide poisoning.

Residents who depend on dialysis are also at risk even if their home equipment does not use power, because dialysis centers close during outages. Lurie et al. (2015), studying Medicare beneficiaries on dialysis after Hurricane Sandy, found that those who received early dialysis before the storm had lower rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations afterward, showing that planning before an event changes outcomes.

In the composite county, federal emPOWER data, which count Medicare enrollees whose home equipment needs electricity and report them by county and zip code, showed about 1,150 such beneficiaries (Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response [ASPR], n.d.). Adults with private insurance or Medicaid and children who use equipment are not included, so the true number is higher.

What this part is doingThe section uses two past events to show the specific health risks and one study to show that preparation changes outcomes. The emPOWER figure grounds the population size, and its limitation is stated.
3

Mitigation and Preparedness

Veenema (2019) describes preparedness as the phase in which communities identify hazards and vulnerable groups, plan and practice their response, and build the relationships they will need when a disaster strikes. For this plan, preparedness has four parts led by community health nurses.

First, the county creates a voluntary registry of electricity-dependent residents. Nurses enroll residents through home health agencies, durable medical equipment suppliers, dialysis centers and primary care clinics, and the registry records each person's equipment, battery backup time, caregiver and preferred contact method. The emPOWER data help nurses judge how complete the registry is by zip code.

Second, nurses help each registered resident write a personal emergency plan: how long the equipment's batteries last, where the resident will go if power is out longer than that, who will drive and what supplies to keep ready, including a paper list of medications and oxygen tanks that do not need power.

Third, the county's dialysis centers agree to shift patients to early treatment when a severe storm is forecast, based on the evidence from past storms.

Fourth, the health department works with the utility to flag registered households for priority restoration and with emergency management to designate a warming center with backup power, charging stations and space for oxygen concentrators.

What this part is doingEach preparedness step names who acts, what they do and why. The dialysis step is tied directly to the study above, which keeps the plan evidence-based.
4

Response

When a storm is forecast, nurses call every registered resident to confirm his or her plan. When the power goes out, the registry becomes a call list sorted by risk, starting with ventilator users and residents whose batteries will run out first. Residents who cannot be reached are checked in person by teams of a nurse and a firefighter or volunteer. Nurses at the warming center assess arrivals, keep medications organized, watch for signs of cold injury and carbon monoxide exposure and help residents with equipment. Public messages from the health department, in English and the county's other common languages, warn against running generators, grills or gas stoves indoors and remind residents to keep refrigerated insulin in a cooler with ice.

Recovery

Recovery begins when the power returns, but for many residents the effects continue. Oxygen supplies may be depleted, insulin may have spoiled and some residents may have missed dialysis or medications. In the week after restoration, nurses call registered residents again to replace supplies, reschedule care and identify anyone who was hospitalized. The health department also reviews emergency department data for carbon monoxide cases and cold injuries, and holds an after-action review with residents, providers and partners to learn what failed.

Privacy, Consent and Fair Priority

A registry of medically vulnerable residents raises ethical questions that the plan must answer before it starts. Enrollment is voluntary and uses written consent, and the registry records only what responders need: equipment, backup time, contact information and a caregiver. It is stored by the health department, shared with emergency management only during an activation and never used for any other purpose. Some residents, especially undocumented immigrants and people who distrust government, may decline to enroll; for them nurses offer the personal emergency plan without registration, so declining the list does not mean losing preparation.

Priority raises a second question. During an outage, calling ventilator users before oxygen users and oxygen users before people with refrigerated medicine is a judgment about who faces the most immediate danger, and it should be written into the plan in advance and explained to enrollees, rather than decided under pressure on the night of the storm. Writing the order down makes it consistent, open to review and fair to the people it ranks.

Testing the Plan

A plan that has never been practiced will fail in ways no one predicted. Before the next winter, the county will run a tabletop exercise with emergency management, the utility, dialysis centers, home health agencies and the fire department, using a four-day outage scenario. In the fall, nurses will test the call list by attempting to reach every registered resident within 24 hours, which will show how many contacts are out of date. The results of both tests will be used to update the plan.

Evaluation

The plan's success will be measured by the number of registered residents compared with emPOWER estimates, the percentage with a written personal plan, the percentage reached within 24 hours during an outage or exercise and, after a real event, emergency visits and hospitalizations among registered residents compared with the previous storm.

Conclusion

Winter storms that cut power for days threaten everyone, but they endanger residents who rely on electricity for their health first and most. The composite county's last outage showed that its disaster plan did not know who those residents were. A community health nursing plan that builds a registry and personal plans before the storm, checks on residents by risk during it and restores care afterward, and that is tested before it is needed, turns the disaster cycle into specific actions for the people with the most to lose.

What this part is doingThe conclusion restates the argument about unequal risk and ties it to each phase of the cycle. Every source cited in the body appears in the reference list.
5

References

Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response. (n.d.). HHS emPOWER program platform. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://empowerprogram.hhs.gov

Busby, J. W., Baker, K., Bazilian, M. D., Gilbert, A. Q., Grubert, E., Rai, V., Rhodes, J. D., Shidore, S., Smith, C. A., & Webber, M. E. (2021). Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas. Energy Research & Social Science, 77, Article 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102106

Houck, P. M., & Hampson, N. B. (1997). Epidemic carbon monoxide poisoning following a winter storm. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(4), 469-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(97)00079-6

Lurie, N., Finne, K., Worrall, C., Jauregui, M., Thaweethai, T., Margolis, G., & Kelman, J. (2015). Early dialysis and adverse outcomes after Hurricane Sandy. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 66(3), 507-512. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.04.050

Veenema, T. G. (Ed.). (2019). Disaster nursing and emergency preparedness for chemical, biological, and radiological terrorism and other hazards (4th ed.). Springer Publishing.

How this NSG 482 Week 5 example is structured

The University of Phoenix library guide for NSG/482 lists Week 5 as Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management, the course's final week. The paper chooses one hazard and one vulnerable group so the disaster cycle can be applied concretely instead of described in general. Each phase, mitigation and preparedness, response and recovery, carries specific nursing actions, and the evidence from past outages supports why the group is at risk. The final section shows how the plan would be tested before a real storm. Students search this week as NSG 482 Week 5, NSG482 Wk 5 or NSG/482 Wk 5; all three are the same assignment.

NSG/482 Week 5 questions, answered

What does NSG/482 Week 5 usually ask for?

The library guide for NSG/482 lists Week 5 as emergency preparedness and disaster management. Many sections ask for a paper on a community's disaster plan and the community health nurse's role in one or more phases of the disaster cycle. Check whether your instructions name a specific hazard or ask you to choose one.

Should I cover every phase of the disaster cycle?

If your prompt asks about the nurse's role in disaster management, covering each phase briefly shows you understand the whole cycle. A strong paper still chooses one hazard and one population, so each phase has concrete actions rather than general statements.

What sources work for a disaster paper?

A disaster nursing text, studies of health effects from real events and official program sources, such as the federal emPOWER program for electricity-dependent Medicare beneficiaries, work well together. Local emergency management plans are useful if they are public.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.