MKT 711 Week 6 Global Marketing and Customer Relationships Example

Reviewed by Davina Cresswell, MBA · University of Phoenix · Updated

This MKT 711 Week 6 example develops solutions for global marketing, asking how a firm should enter a foreign market and build customer relationships across a cultural and institutional distance. University of Phoenix MKT 711 includes global business marketing among its outcomes, and MKT/711 has DBA candidates base entry and adaptation choices on internationalization research. The firm, an invented sensor maker from Madison, is weighing Brazil and the Netherlands as its first market abroad. The paper reviews the revised Uppsala model of internationalization through networks, research on export marketing strategy and performance and on perceived brand globalness, compares the two markets and recommends a relationship-led entry into Brazil's southeastern dairy region.

CourseMKT 711 Marketing and Managing the Customer Relationship (MKT/711)
Week6
Paper typeDoctoral global marketing analysis
Lengthabout 1,159 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramDBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MKT 711 Week 6

1

From Wisconsin to Minas Gerais: Global Marketing and Customer Relationships in a Dairy Sensor Firm's First Foreign Market

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

MKT/711: Marketing and Managing the Customer Relationship

Week 6 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

HerdSense Technologies, its partners and its market research are composites written for a model paper.

What this part is doingThe title names both ends of the expansion, which frames the paper as a comparison and a choice.
2

HerdSense Technologies, the composite Madison maker of dairy cow sensors studied in this course, has about 1,400 US customer farms and 410,000 monitored cows. Its investors have asked for a plan to enter a first foreign market within two years. Two candidates have emerged from early discussions: the Netherlands, home to large, highly efficient dairy farms and to several established herd monitoring firms, and Brazil, one of the world's largest milk producers, where many farms in the southeastern state of Minas Gerais are modernizing. This paper reviews research on internationalization and global marketing, compares the two markets and recommends an entry strategy that builds on HerdSense's relationship model.

Internationalization Through Networks

Johanson and Vahlne (2009) revised their Uppsala model of internationalization to argue that markets are networks of relationships, and that the main obstacle for a firm entering a foreign market is being an outsider to the relevant networks, which they called the liability of outsidership. Internationalization proceeds as firms build trust and commitment with partners, learn and create knowledge within relationships and increase their commitment step by step. The model fits HerdSense, whose domestic success depends on dealers and veterinarians.

Export Strategy and Performance

Cavusgil and Zou (1994) studied US export ventures and found that performance was linked to marketing strategy choices, including adapting products to foreign markets, supporting foreign distributors or subsidiaries and the firm's international competence and commitment. Firms that adapted products where needed and supported their partners strongly tended to perform better. The finding supports adapting HerdSense's offer and investing in its foreign partners rather than shipping collars to a distributor and waiting.

What this part is doingTwo strands of research, networks and adaptation, frame the market comparison.
3

Brand Origin and Globalness

Steenkamp et al. (2003) found that consumers in several countries associated perceived brand globalness with higher quality and prestige, which increased purchase likelihood. In business markets, a foreign origin may also signal technical capability. American agricultural technology carries a reputation in Brazil, though price sensitivity is higher than in the Netherlands.

Comparison Criteria

The two markets were compared on six criteria: market size and growth, competitive intensity, fit between HerdSense's product and local farms, availability of relationship partners such as dealers and veterinarians, economic and currency risk and regulatory requirements, including data rules.

The Netherlands

The Dutch dairy sector is large for its land area and highly technical, with high adoption of milking robots and monitoring. Fit with HerdSense's product is good. But competition is intense, with established firms whose products are integrated into robots and farm software, and Dutch farmers have strong relationships with these suppliers. HerdSense would enter as an outsider in a dense network with little room. European data rules would also require careful compliance.

Brazil

Brazil has a very large number of dairy farms, many small and pasture-based, but a growing group of mid-size and large confinement farms in Minas Gerais and neighboring states is investing in technology. Competition in sensors is less established. Fit is good for confinement and semi-confinement farms with 200 to 1,500 cows, similar to HerdSense's most valuable US segments. Risks include currency swings, which make dollar prices volatile, higher price sensitivity and different heat and disease conditions.

In the Netherlands HerdSense would be one more outsider in a crowded network; in Brazil it can help build the network.

Customers and Buying Behavior in Brazil

Interviews arranged by a prospective partner with 18 farm managers in Minas Gerais suggest how buying differs. Decisions are often made by the owner, sometimes with the farm's veterinarian, and relationships with equipment dealers are personal and long-standing. Managers asked about financing more than about features, and several wanted proof from farms nearby before committing. Many used messaging apps rather than email to communicate with suppliers. These patterns favor a dealer-led, relationship-based approach and suggest that local reference farms will matter even more than in Wisconsin.

Competitors in Each Market

In the Netherlands, the leading monitoring systems are sold with milking robots and are deeply integrated into farm software, so a farm switching to HerdSense would lose that integration. In Brazil, competitors include a few international brands sold through distributors and some local startups, none with a dominant position among mid-size confinement farms. This difference in competitive structure, more than market size, drives the recommendation.

The Decision

The comparison favors Brazil. The Netherlands scores higher on technical fit but much lower on competitive room and partner availability. Brazil's mid-size confinement farms resemble HerdSense's US dealer-served farms, where Week 2 found the highest value per cow, and the liability of outsidership is easier to overcome where networks are still forming.

Entry Mode

HerdSense should enter through a partnership with an established Brazilian distributor of dairy equipment with technicians in Minas Gerais, rather than through a subsidiary. The partner brings relationships with farms and veterinarians. HerdSense will station two of its own staff, a dairy scientist and a technical manager, with the partner for the first two years.

Adaptation

The software will be translated into Portuguese, with alerts adjusted for heat stress, which is more common in Brazil, and for breeds such as Girolando, a crossbreed common in the region. Pricing will be set in Brazilian reais, with hardware financing through the partner and subscription prices about 20 percent lower than in the United States, reflecting lower farm margins. Support will follow the US dealer model, with the partner handling installation and first-line help.

What this part is doingEach adaptation responds to a specific difference between the markets.
4

Building Relationships Abroad

Following the revised Uppsala model, HerdSense will commit gradually. Year one focuses on 40 pilot farms selected with the partner and two veterinary practices, with results shared at regional field days. Year two expands to 300 farms if pilot retention exceeds 85 percent. The dairy scientist will work with Brazilian universities that run dairy extension programs, building credibility within the local knowledge network.

Measuring Success Abroad

The Brazil venture will be judged on pilot retention, alert accuracy for local breeds, average revenue per cow in local currency and the number of farms referred by pilot participants. These measures mirror the US dashboard while reflecting local conditions.

Ethics and Data

The Week 5 data stewardship policy will apply in Brazil, adapted to Brazil's general data protection law, with farmer ownership and consent as in the United States.

Risks and Learning

Currency risk will be partly managed by local pricing and periodic adjustments. Partner risk will be managed through clear performance terms and HerdSense's own staff on site. The pilot is designed to learn: alert accuracy for local breeds, retention and willingness to pay will be measured before larger commitments.

Conclusion

Research on internationalization through networks, export strategy and brand globalness suggests that HerdSense's first foreign market should be one where it can join and build relationships rather than fight entrenched incumbents. Brazil's modernizing dairy region offers that opportunity. A partner-led entry with adapted product and pricing, HerdSense staff on the ground and staged commitment extends the firm's relationship model abroad while limiting risk.

5

References

Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy-performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800101

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24

Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Batra, R., & Alden, D. L. (2003). How perceived brand globalness creates brand value. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400002

What the MKT 711 Week 6 instructions ask

For the sixth week of MKT 711, doctoral students are typically told to recommend a global marketing approach, often for an organization considering international expansion. Requirements may include evaluating foreign markets, choosing an entry mode, deciding how far to standardize or adapt the marketing mix, building relationships with partners and customers abroad and considering cultural, economic and regulatory differences. Students should ground recommendations in internationalization and international marketing research, compare options systematically using evidence about each market and address risks. A strong doctoral paper explains the mechanisms behind its recommendations, links global strategy to the organization's capabilities and relationship model and cites peer-reviewed research in APA format.

How this MKT 711 Week 6 example is built

Investors want HerdSense to grow abroad, and two markets stand out: the Netherlands, with large, technology-savvy dairy farms and strong competitors, and Brazil, with a large, modernizing dairy sector and fewer established sensor providers. The paper begins with the revised Uppsala model, which sees internationalization as a process of building positions in business networks and overcoming the liability of being an outsider. Research on export ventures shows how adapting products and supporting distributors affects performance, and research on brand globalness shows when foreign origin helps. A structured comparison favors Brazil's southeastern dairy region. The entry plan relies on a local dealer partner, veterinarians and a Portuguese-language product, with adaptation of pricing and service and a staged commitment.

MKT 711 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go

Doctoral global marketing papers are judged on use of theory, quality of market analysis and coherence of the entry strategy. High marks require a clear account of internationalization and international marketing research, a systematic comparison of markets with evidence, an entry mode and adaptation strategy justified by theory and the firm's capabilities and attention to relationships with partners and customers abroad. Graders expect students to identify risks and propose a staged approach. The paper should connect global choices to earlier analyses of customer value and relationships. Reviewers also check that the market comparison uses the same criteria for every country. Scholarly writing, a solid base of peer-reviewed sources, logical organization and correct APA formatting are expected.

MKT 711 Week 6 help: mistakes to avoid

Global strategy papers often choose a market because it is large or familiar and then justify the choice afterward. Compare candidate markets on explicit criteria and let the comparison decide. Another frequent weakness is treating entry as a single decision about mode, ignoring the relationships a firm needs abroad; research on internationalization stresses networks and partners. Students also recommend full standardization or full adaptation without analysis. Explain what must change and what should stay. Some papers overlook the firm's capacity, proposing several countries at once. Stage the commitment. Finally, include risks such as currency swings, regulation and partner failure, and say how the firm will learn and adjust after entering.

Related MKT 711 sample papers

Other MKT 711 week samples

More DBA sample papers

MKT 711 Week 6 questions, answered

What does MKT 711 Week 6 usually cover?

It usually covers global marketing: evaluating foreign markets, choosing entry modes, adapting or standardizing marketing and building relationships with partners and customers abroad, grounded in internationalization research.

Where can I find a free MKT 711 Week 6 sample paper?

The global marketing analysis of a composite dairy sensor firm choosing between Brazil and the Netherlands appears in full above.

What is the revised Uppsala model?

It explains internationalization as a process of building relationships and positions within business networks abroad, arguing that the main barrier is being an outsider to relevant networks.

Should global firms standardize or adapt their marketing?

Research suggests adapting where customer needs, conditions or regulations differ and standardizing where it does not hurt fit, with product adaptation and distributor support often linked to export performance.

Does a global brand image help sell products abroad?

Studies have found that consumers often associate perceived brand globalness with quality and prestige, though the effect varies by market and product.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.