| Course | MKT 554 Consumer Behavior (MKT/554) |
|---|---|
| Week | 5 |
| Paper type | Persuasion strategy analysis |
| Length | about 1,173 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MKT 554 Week 5
Telling Parents the Truth Persuasively: Persuasion Research Applied to a Back-to-School Rental Campaign at a Texas Music Chain
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
MKT/554: Consumer Behavior
Week 5 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Harmon and Vale Music, its campaign and its test results are composites written for a model paper.
Each July, Harmon and Vale Music, the composite Texas instrument chain followed in this course, sends back-to-school rental messages to families of incoming band students. Last summer, a national online rental company began advertising to Texas families with a $9.99 first month and free shipping, and the chain's rentals among new families fell 7 percent. The online company's later monthly payments, however, are higher than the chain's, and its instruments must be shipped back for repair. Marketing director Camila Reyes needs a campaign that persuades families to rent locally without misleading them. This paper applies persuasion research to the problem, designs and tests three messages and sets ethical limits.
How Parents Process Rental Messages
Chaiken (1980) distinguished systematic processing, in which people carefully evaluate arguments, from heuristic processing, in which people rely on simple cues such as the source's expertise or the length of a message. In her experiments, people who were highly motivated, for example because a decision affected them personally, processed systematically, while less motivated people relied more on heuristics. Band parents are moderately motivated but short on time and knowledge. Many will skim an email and rely on cues: who is speaking, what other families do and what the price seems to be. A smaller group, often parents comparing costs, will read details carefully.
Persuasion Knowledge
Friestad and Wright (1994) proposed that consumers develop knowledge about persuasion over their lives, learning to recognize marketers' tactics and to judge whether they are appropriate. When consumers identify a tactic, they may reinterpret the message, for example seeing a low introductory price as a lure. Parents have seen countless back-to-school promotions. A message that looks like a sales trick will trigger skepticism, while one that seems informative and fair is more likely to be trusted.
Framing
Tversky and Kahneman (1981) showed that people's choices change when identical outcomes are described differently, as gains or as losses. In their famous example, people preferred a certain option when outcomes were framed as lives saved but preferred a risky option when the same outcomes were framed as lives lost. For the campaign, the total cost of renting can be framed as money saved by renting locally or as money lost by choosing a low first month that leads to higher payments.
Social Norms
Goldstein et al. (2008) tested messages in hotel rooms that encouraged guests to reuse towels. Messages stating that most guests reused towels outperformed standard environmental messages, and the effect grew when the message described previous occupants of that very room. Norms are most persuasive when the reference group is close to the audience. For band parents, "families at your school" is closer than "families across Texas."
Three Message Versions
Version A, the cost frame, compares the first-year cost of renting a trumpet: $384 at Harmon and Vale versus $459 at the online company after its first month, using the published prices of both, and adds that local repairs take two days instead of two weeks. Version B, the local norm, states that 4 in 5 band families at the recipient's school rented from Harmon and Vale last year, based on rental records for each school, and includes a short quote from the school's band director, used with permission. Version C, the expertise cue, features a photograph and short note from the chain's head repair technician explaining how instruments are checked before each rental.
Each version is persuasive only because it is true, and each can be checked by a parent who wants to check it.
The Test
Emails were sent in mid-July to 18,000 families, including past customers with younger children and families who requested information at school demonstrations, randomly divided into four groups: the three versions and the chain's standard message as a control. The outcome was the share of each group that reserved a rental within three weeks. The control produced a 6.1 percent reservation rate. Version A produced 6.8 percent, Version B 8.4 percent and Version C 6.5 percent. The differences between B and the control were large enough, given about 4,500 families per group, to be unlikely to be due to chance; the differences for A and C were small and uncertain.
Interpreting the Results
The local norm worked best, consistent with research showing that norms of nearby, similar people are persuasive and that busy recipients rely on simple cues. The band director's quote also added expert credibility. The cost comparison helped less, perhaps because parents skimming the email did not read the numbers, though interviews suggest it mattered to the smaller group that compared prices carefully. The technician note appealed to a concern most parents did not yet have.
Who Responded
Looking within the test groups adds detail. Among families who had rented from the chain before for an older child, all versions performed similarly well, since these parents already knew the store. Among families new to the chain, the local norm version more than doubled the reservation rate of the control, while the cost comparison produced a small gain. Spanish-language recipients responded most strongly to the norm message that included their band director's words, consistent with the Week 2 finding that directors are the most trusted voice for many families. These patterns suggest that norms matter most when people lack their own experience to rely on.
Limits of the Test
The test measured reservations, not completed rentals or long-term satisfaction, and it ran for one season with one competitor's prices. Families who reserved after the norm message might have been more likely to cancel, though early data show cancellation rates were similar across groups. The test should be repeated next summer with completed rentals as the outcome before the chain treats the result as settled.
Ethical Review
The campaign follows four rules. Every number must be accurate and current for each school, and the norm message will not be used where the share is low. Competitor prices must come from the competitor's published terms on the date sent. No false urgency, such as invented deadlines, will be used. Band directors' quotes require written permission and directors must not receive payment. These rules protect parents' trust, which persuasion knowledge research suggests is easily lost.
Applying the Results Beyond Email
The same principle will guide school-night conversations. Staff will mention, where true, how many families from the student's school rent from the chain, and will hand parents the cost comparison sheet rather than reciting numbers.
Final Campaign
The final campaign leads with the local norm and the director's quote, links to a clear cost comparison for parents who want details and sends the technician note later, in September, when repair needs arise.
Conclusion
Persuasion research explains how busy parents process messages, how they recognize marketing tactics and how framing and norms change responses. A controlled test showed that a truthful local norm message outperformed cost and expertise messages. Built on accurate claims and tested before launch, the campaign persuades without manipulating.
References
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
What the MKT 554 Week 5 instructions ask
In Week 5, MKT 554 students are often asked to analyze persuasion in marketing, typically by evaluating or designing a persuasive campaign for a company. Requirements may include explaining persuasion theories, such as dual-process models, source credibility, message framing, social proof and scarcity, analyzing how target consumers process messages and how they recognize persuasion attempts, and recommending message strategies. Some prompts ask students to evaluate the ethics of persuasion techniques. A strong paper matches theories to the audience's motivation and knowledge, explains predicted effects, proposes a way to test messages and draws a clear line between persuasion and manipulation. Cite peer-reviewed research in APA format.
How this MKT 554 Week 5 example is built
A national online rental company has begun advertising to Texas families with low first-month prices, and Harmon and Vale's back-to-school campaign must respond. The paper first considers how parents process rental messages: most have little time and knowledge, so simple cues carry weight, but they also know marketers try to persuade them. A dual-process model of persuasion and the persuasion knowledge model explain both sides. Research on framing shows how the same facts can be presented as gains or losses, and research on social norms shows the power of telling people what others like them do. Three email versions are designed and tested with 18,000 past and prospective customers, and the results, along with an ethics review, shape the final campaign.
MKT 554 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go
Persuasion papers at this level are evaluated on theoretical accuracy, fit between theory and audience and attention to ethics and evidence. Instructors notice whether the student understands that different audiences, and even different members of one audience, process the same message in different ways. The strongest papers explain how the target audience is likely to process messages, choose persuasion principles that fit that processing and show concrete message designs. Instructors reward plans to test messages rather than assuming they will work, and they expect a clear account of where persuasion becomes manipulation. Recommendations should follow from the evidence and respect customers' interests. Graduate-level writing, organized analysis, peer-reviewed sources and accurate APA references complete a strong submission.
MKT 554 Week 5 help: mistakes to avoid
Students often list persuasion techniques, such as scarcity, authority and social proof, and recommend all of them at once. Choose the few that fit the audience and explain why. Another frequent problem is ignoring how consumers recognize and resist persuasion; parents who sense a sales trick may distrust the whole message. Address persuasion knowledge. Some papers write sample messages that make claims the company cannot support. Every claim in a persuasive message must be true and verifiable. Others propose tactics, such as false countdown timers, that are manipulative and may break advertising law. Explain the ethical limits. Finally, include a test design with a measurable outcome, such as rental sign-ups, since persuasion predictions are often wrong.
Related MKT 554 sample papers
Other MKT 554 week samples
- MKT 554 Week 1: Buyer Behavior and Preference
- MKT 554 Week 2: Demographic and Cultural Influences
- MKT 554 Week 3: Motivation and Brand Perception
- MKT 554 Week 4: Attitude Formation
- MKT 554 Week 6: Consumer Protection and Strategy
More MBA sample papers
- MGT 526 Week 5: Decision Memo to a Decision Maker
- MGT 566 Week 5: Developing Contingency Plans
- MGT 571 Week 5: Controls and Agile Metrics
- MGT 576 Week 5: Alliances and Acquisitions
MKT 554 Week 5 questions, answered
What does MKT 554 Week 5 usually cover?
It usually covers persuasion in marketing, including dual-process theories, source credibility, framing, social norms and other influence principles, applied to a campaign along with ethical limits.
Where can I find a free MKT 554 Week 5 sample paper?
The persuasion analysis and email test for a composite Texas instrument chain's back-to-school campaign is posted above as a free Week 5 example.
What is the persuasion knowledge model?
It describes how consumers learn over time to recognize and interpret persuasion attempts, and how that knowledge shapes their reactions, including skepticism toward tactics they see as unfair.
What is message framing?
Framing is presenting the same information in different ways, such as emphasizing what a buyer gains by acting or what they lose by not acting, which can change how people respond.
When does persuasion become manipulation?
When it relies on false or misleading claims, hides important information or exploits weaknesses in ways that lead people to choices against their own interests.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All MKT 554 week samples · All courses