| Course | MKT 449 Marketing Analytics (MKT/449) |
|---|---|
| Week | 4 |
| Paper type | Customer loyalty analysis |
| Length | about 1,027 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Business |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MKT 449 Week 4
Who Comes Back for More Socks: Recency, Frequency, Spending and Lifetime Value for the Direct Customers of a Vermont Wool Brand
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
MKT/449: Marketing Analytics
Week 4 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Hollow Brook Sock Company and its customer file are composites written for a model paper.
The previous weeks showed that Hollow Brook Sock Company, an invented Burlington maker of merino wool socks, has low penetration outside New England and modest brand recognition. Growth will require new buyers, but the company also wants to know how well it keeps the buyers it has. Founder Grace Thibault believes customers love the brand, citing enthusiastic reviews. Her direct customer file, holding three years of website orders from 61,000 customers, allows a test of that belief. This paper defines customer loyalty, analyzes the file with repeat purchase, RFM and lifetime value measures and recommends a loyalty program for each segment.
Two Kinds of Loyalty
Behavioral loyalty is repeat buying. Attitudinal loyalty is a favorable attitude, such as preference or willingness to recommend. The two often differ: a customer may praise the brand and still buy a cheaper sock next time, or may keep buying from habit without strong feelings. Because sales depend on behavior, this analysis treats purchase data as the main evidence and survey data as context.
Repeat Purchase and Retention
Of the 24,800 customers who made a first purchase two years ago, 8,430 bought again within 12 months, a repeat purchase rate of 34 percent. Among all customers active in a given year, 38 percent bought again the following year, which is the annual retention rate. Customers who first bought hiking socks returned more often than those who first bought a holiday gift pack, of whom only 19 percent returned.
RFM Scoring
Each customer received three scores from 1 to 5. Recency measured the months since the last order, with 5 for the most recent fifth of customers. Frequency measured the number of orders in three years. Monetary value measured total spending. Fader et al. (2005) demonstrated that how lately and how often someone bought can jointly forecast later buying, and that customers with the same expected value can have quite different combinations of the two, which they mapped as iso-value curves. Their work supports using all three dimensions rather than spending alone.
Five Segments
The scores grouped customers into five segments. Champions, 4,900 customers or 8 percent, ordered recently and often and spent heavily; they produced 31 percent of direct revenue. Loyal regulars, 9,800 customers or 16 percent, bought two or three times a year. Promising new buyers, 11,600 or 19 percent, bought once in the past six months. At-risk customers, 8,500 or 14 percent, bought several times but not in the past year. Lapsed one-time buyers, 26,200 or 43 percent, bought once more than a year ago.
Lifetime Value
Gupta et al. (2004) showed that the value of a firm's customers can be estimated from the margin each customer generates, the retention rate and the cost of acquiring new customers, and that customer value tracked the market value of several firms reasonably well. A short-cut version takes one year's margin and scales it by the retention rate, then divides by a denominator built from the discount rate plus the share of customers lost each year.
For an average direct customer, annual spending is $74 and gross margin is 55 percent, giving $40.70 in annual margin. With retention of 0.38 and a discount rate of 0.10, lifetime value from future years is $40.70 multiplied by 0.38 divided by 0.72, or about $21.48, plus the first year's margin, for a total near $62. For champions, with annual margin of about $160 and retention of 0.80, the same formula gives future value of about $427, or about $587 including the current year.
One champion is worth roughly as much as nine average customers, which is why they deserve their own program.
The Net Promoter Question
The company's annual survey asks how likely customers are to recommend the brand, producing a net promoter score of 58, which the founder cites as proof of loyalty. Keiningham et al. (2007) tested the claim that the net promoter score is the single best predictor of growth using data from many firms and found that it did not outperform other satisfaction and loyalty measures. Hollow Brook's high score comes mostly from champions and regulars, who are most likely to answer the survey, while the lapsed segment is silent.
Where Customers Leave
The steepest drop happens after the first purchase. Two-thirds of first-time buyers never order again, while customers who make a second purchase have a retention rate above 60 percent in later years. The second order is therefore the turning point in the relationship. Reviews of first-time buyers who did not return mention sizing problems more than any other issue, especially for the women's medium, which runs small. Fixing the size chart and offering a free exchange may do as much for retention as any email program.
Programs by Segment
Champions will receive early access to new colors, a free pair on their purchase anniversary and invitations to review new designs; the goal is to keep their retention above 80 percent. Loyal regulars will receive a replenishment reminder after six months, since wool socks wear out on a fairly predictable cycle. Promising new buyers, the most important group for retention, will receive a three-email welcome series explaining care and fit and offering a second-pair discount within 90 days. At-risk customers will receive one personal note and a modest offer; those who do not respond will move to low-frequency emails. Lapsed gift buyers will receive one holiday reminder each year and nothing else, to save cost.
Measuring the Programs
Each program will hold out a random 10 percent of its segment as a control group that receives no special treatment, so the effect can be measured. The main target is to raise first-year retention of new buyers from 34 percent to 40 percent within a year.
Conclusion
Purchase data show that Hollow Brook's loyalty is real but concentrated: a small group of champions produces nearly a third of direct revenue, while many first-time buyers never return. RFM scoring, lifetime value estimates and research on customer valuation turn that picture into segment programs, and control groups will show which ones work.
References
Fader, P. S., Hardie, B. G. S., & Lee, K. L. (2005). RFM and CLV: Using iso-value curves for customer base analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.415
Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.1.7.25084
Keiningham, T. L., Cooil, B., Andreassen, T. W., & Aksoy, L. (2007). A longitudinal examination of net promoter and firm revenue growth. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.039
What the MKT 449 Week 4 instructions ask
In Week 4, MKT 449 students commonly analyze customer loyalty for an organization using data and analytics. Prompts may ask for definitions of loyalty and retention, calculation of metrics such as repeat purchase rate, retention or churn rate, recency, frequency and monetary value scores, customer lifetime value and net promoter score, and recommendations to improve loyalty among valuable customers. Some versions supply sample data; others ask students to work with realistic figures. Show your calculations and assumptions, segment customers rather than treating them as one group and connect the metrics to decisions about spending. Cite scholarly research in APA style, especially on customer valuation, and note where a metric could mislead.
How this MKT 449 Week 4 example is built
Hollow Brook's direct customer file holds three years of orders from 61,000 customers, and the founder wants to know who is loyal and what that loyalty is worth. The paper separates repeat buying from attitude, then calculates a 12-month repeat rate of 34 percent and a yearly retention rate of 38 percent among first-year buyers. Each customer receives recency, frequency and monetary scores, which group the file into five segments, from champions to lapsed one-time buyers. Lifetime value is estimated with a simple margin, retention and discount formula, and research on recency-frequency models, on valuing a customer base and on the net promoter score explains both the method and its limits. Segment programs and a retention target complete the analysis.
MKT 449 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
Loyalty analytics papers are judged on correct calculation, sound segmentation and useful interpretation. Faculty reward clear definitions of loyalty and retention, metrics computed accurately with stated assumptions and segments that reveal real differences among customers. Lifetime value estimates should be explained step by step and treated as estimates. Research on customer valuation and on the limits of single measures, such as the net promoter score, strengthens the analysis. The higher bands connect each segment to a specific, affordable action and a target that can be tracked. Tables that summarize segments, organized headings, scholarly sources cited correctly in APA style and concise writing complete the assessment.
MKT 449 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid
Many loyalty papers measure satisfaction and call it loyalty, but satisfied customers often buy from competitors. Use purchase behavior as the core measure and treat surveys as supporting evidence. Another frequent error is calculating lifetime value with revenue instead of margin, which inflates the result. Use gross margin per year. Students also ignore discounting or use retention rates that are far too high, producing values no business would believe. Show your formula and check it against common sense. Some papers create segments but recommend the same discount for all of them. Tailor the action to the segment. Finally, avoid treating the net promoter score as a complete loyalty measure; it is one signal among several, and research has questioned its link to growth.
Related MKT 449 sample papers
Other MKT 449 week samples
- MKT 449 Week 1: Web Analytics and Marketing Data
- MKT 449 Week 2: Analyzing Market Penetration
- MKT 449 Week 3: Measuring Brand Recognition
- MKT 449 Week 5: Marketing Performance Dashboard
More BS in Business sample papers
- MKT 438 Week 4: Crisis Communication
- MKT 440 Week 4: Ethics in Digital Marketing
- MKT 443 Week 4: Social Ads and Influencers
- MKT 446 Week 4: Page-Level SEO Strategy
MKT 449 Week 4 questions, answered
What does MKT 449 Week 4 usually cover?
It usually covers customer loyalty analytics: repeat purchase and retention rates, recency, frequency and monetary value segmentation, customer lifetime value and net promoter score, with recommendations for valuable segments.
Where can I find a free MKT 449 Week 4 sample paper?
The loyalty analysis for a composite Vermont wool sock brand above shows the RFM segments, retention figures and lifetime value calculation in full.
What is RFM analysis?
RFM analysis scores each customer on recency of the last purchase, frequency of purchases and monetary value of spending, then groups customers with similar scores to guide marketing.
How do you calculate customer lifetime value?
A simple method multiplies annual gross margin per customer by a factor based on the retention rate and discount rate, margin times retention divided by one plus discount rate minus retention, which approximates the present value of future profits.
Is net promoter score a good measure of loyalty?
It is a quick indicator of customers' willingness to recommend, but research has found its link to revenue growth weaker than claimed, so it should be used with behavioral measures.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All MKT 449 week samples · All courses