MKT 431 Week 4 Pricing Strategy Example

Reviewed by Davina Cresswell, MBA · University of Phoenix · Updated

This MKT 431 Week 4 example develops a pricing strategy for a small business that cannot win on price alone but still has many pricing choices. Week 4 of University of Phoenix MKT 431 covers pricing strategy, and in MKT/431 BS in Business students set prices with costs, competitors and customer value in mind and explain how customers will perceive them. The business studied, a composite Chattanooga bike retailer and repair shop, has a value proposition that rests on fitting, test rides and fast repairs. The paper reviews pricing objectives, applies value-based pricing, prices service packages, an e-bike care plan, rentals and guided tours, uses bundling and mental accounting research, sets a narrow price match and checks each price for fairness.

CourseMKT 431 Small Business Marketing (MKT/431)
Week4
Paper typeSmall business pricing strategy
Lengthabout 1,017 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramBS in Business
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MKT 431 Week 4

1

Tune-Up Plans, Tour Prices and a Price Match: Pricing Strategy for a Small Bike Shop

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

MKT/431: Small Business Marketing

Week 4 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Iron Horse Cycles, its prices, costs and results are composites written for a model paper.

What this part is doingThe title lists three pricing decisions the paper makes.
2

The value proposition Iron Horse Cycles adopted last week promises Chattanooga riders a proper fit, a real test ride and quick repairs. Online sellers undercut its bike prices, while manufacturers set minimum advertised prices that limit how far the shop can discount new bikes. Yet much of the shop's revenue comes from services, rentals and soon guided tours, where it sets its own prices. The prices a small shop controls are often the ones that matter most for its profit, because services carry margins that new bikes never will. This paper develops a pricing strategy for those offerings.

Pricing Objectives

Iron Horse has three objectives: earn a gross margin of at least 55% on service, build repeat visits from serious riders and e-bike owners and keep prices close enough to competitors that the value gap feels worth paying.

Constraints on Bike Prices

Most bike brands set minimum advertised prices, so Iron Horse sells new bikes at about the same advertised price as online sellers that carry the same brand. Bike margins average about 35%. The shop's room to compete lies in fitting, test rides and service, not discounts.

Value-Based Pricing

Hinterhuber (2008) found that although value-based pricing is widely considered superior, many firms resist it because of difficulty assessing and communicating value, difficulty segmenting markets and lack of management support. For a small shop, value-based pricing means starting with what customers would pay for an outcome, such as a bike that shifts smoothly before a race, and then checking costs and competitors.

What this part is doingNaming the barriers explains why most small shops still price by markup.
3

Current Service Pricing

The shop now charges a la carte: $25 to adjust brakes, $25 for gears, $15 for a tire change and so on. Customers often feel surprised by the total, and staff spend time explaining charges.

Tune-Up Packages

Three packages will replace most a la carte charges: a Basic at $69, covering adjustments and safety checks; a Standard at $119, adding cleaning and minor parts; and a Complete at $219, including full overhaul. Labor costs average about $40 per hour, and each package is priced to meet the 55% margin objective.

Mental Accounting and Bundles

Thaler (1985) showed that people evaluate gains and losses in separate mental accounts and that combining several losses into one feels less painful than paying them separately. A single package price feels better to customers than a list of small charges, even if the total is similar.

E-Bike Care Plan

E-bike owners will be offered a care plan at $15 a month, including two Standard tune-ups a year, priority repair slots, battery health checks and 10% off parts. The plan costs the shop about $95 a year in labor and parts discounts, against $180 in revenue, and it encourages owners to return regularly.

Will Customers Buy the Plan?

A short survey of 85 e-bike owners found that 46% would definitely or probably enroll at $15 a month, falling to 28% at $20. At $15, enrollment of 40% of the shop's roughly 370 e-bike customers would bring in about $26,600 a year in plan fees, while the added visits create chances to sell parts and accessories. The plan also smooths service demand, since scheduled tune-ups can be booked in slower months.

Rental Pricing

Rentals are priced at $35 for a half day and $55 for a full day for standard bikes and $55 and $85 for e-bikes, in line with other Riverwalk rental outlets.

Guided Tour Pricing

Two-hour guided e-bike tours will be priced at $59 per person. Competitor walking and segway tours in the city range from $35 to $79. The tour includes bike, helmet, guide and water. Costs per tour of eight riders are about $160 for the guide, $40 for bike wear and $30 for insurance and supplies, or $230. At eight riders, revenue is $472, and break-even is four riders.

What this part is doingA break-even figure shows the tour price is grounded in costs, not guesswork.
4

Price Fairness

Xia et al. (2004) proposed that customers judge price fairness by comparing a price with reference prices, such as past prices, competitor prices and perceived costs, and that perceived unfairness leads to negative emotions and behaviors. Customers who see a price increase as justified by higher costs tend to accept it more readily than one that seems driven by demand alone.

Applying Fairness

Iron Horse will not raise rental prices on busy summer weekends, because tourists and locals may see demand-based increases as unfair and post negative reviews. Instead, it will offer weekday discounts.

Communicating Prices

Prices will be posted clearly in the shop and online, with packages shown side by side so customers can see what each includes. Staff will explain the care plan at the time of every e-bike sale, and repair tickets will list what was done under the package so customers see the value they received.

Price Match

The shop will match an authorized dealer's advertised price on identical bikes in stock. This addresses commuters' price concerns without cutting prices for everyone.

Pricing for Groups and Clubs

Cycling clubs and corporate wellness programs offer steady volume. Clubs with at least 20 members will receive 10% off packages, and companies that sponsor employee bike commuting can buy discounted tune-up vouchers in blocks of ten. These discounts are tied to volume, so they reward commitment rather than training individual customers to wait for sales.

What this part is doingLinking discounts to volume protects the shop's price image.
5

Psychological Pricing

Packages end in nine, such as $69 and $119, a common retail convention. The Complete package at $219 makes the Standard look like a good middle choice.

Expected Results

The owners expect service revenue to rise about 18% in the first year from packages and the care plan, with service margin rising from 51% to 56%. Guided tours should add about $35,000 in gross profit, in line with the Week 2 estimate.

Reviewing Prices

Prices will be reviewed every six months, comparing margins, competitor prices and package sales.

Conclusion

Iron Horse cannot win on bike prices, but it controls service, rental and tour prices. Value-based pricing, tune-up packages, an e-bike care plan, competitive rentals, cost-based checks for tours, fairness rules and a price match support its value proposition and profit.

6

References

Hinterhuber, A. (2008). Customer value-based pricing strategies: Why companies resist. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(4), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660810887079

Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733

What the MKT 431 Week 4 instructions ask

The fourth MKT 431 assignment usually asks students to develop a pricing strategy for a small business. Common requirements include setting pricing objectives, analyzing costs, comparing competitor prices, considering customer perceptions of value and fairness, choosing pricing methods and tactics such as bundling, discounts or psychological pricing and showing how prices support the value proposition. Some prompts ask students to calculate break-even or margins, and a few ask for a pricing table. Use the business's own numbers where possible, including costs per hour of labor, support choices with pricing research and cite sources in APA style. Price each major offering separately when they serve different customers, since a single approach rarely fits products, services and experiences alike.

How this MKT 431 Week 4 example is built

A bike shop faces manufacturer pricing rules on bikes but sets its own prices for service, rentals and tours, and the paper builds a strategy around those choices. It explains why value-based pricing fits the shop, using research on why firms resist it. It replaces single repairs with three tune-up packages, creates a $15 monthly e-bike care plan, prices guided tours at $59 based on competitor and value checks and calculates break-even for tours. Research on mental accounting supports bundling, while research on price fairness shapes a narrow price match and a decision not to raise rental prices on peak weekends, offering weekday discounts instead.

MKT 431 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go

Strong pricing papers combine cost, competition and customer value and explain the reasoning behind each price. Instructors credit clear objectives, accurate cost and margin figures, competitor comparisons, value-based thinking, appropriate tactics and attention to how customers perceive fairness. Papers that price different offerings differently, and that show calculations such as break-even, demonstrate practical skill. Reviewers look for pricing research, consistency with the value proposition and realistic numbers for a small business. Planning a regular price review also earns credit. A table of prices and margins helps, as do organized headings and accurate APA citations that connect each decision to evidence and the earlier weeks of analysis.

MKT 431 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid

Students often set prices by adding a markup to cost without checking value or competitors. Use all three. Another frequent gap is treating every product the same way; services, products and experiences often need different approaches. Students also ignore fairness. Customers react strongly to prices they see as unfair. Show calculations for margins and break-even. Consider bundles and subscriptions, which can smooth demand across seasons. Explain how prices support the value proposition. Note limits such as manufacturer pricing rules that restrict discounts. Avoid discounting that trains customers to wait for sales, since that habit is hard to reverse. Use research on pricing psychology. Finally, plan how you will review prices, since costs and competitors change.

Related MKT 431 sample papers

Other MKT 431 week samples

More BS in Business sample papers

MKT 431 Week 4 questions, answered

What does MKT 431 Week 4 usually cover?

It usually covers pricing strategy: pricing objectives, costs, competitor prices, customer value and fairness, pricing methods and tactics and how prices support the value proposition.

Where can I find a free MKT 431 Week 4 sample paper?

The complete pricing strategy for an independent bike shop, with calculations, appears above; a custom pricing plan for your own company can be requested.

What is value-based pricing?

Setting prices according to the value customers perceive in an offering, informed by costs and competitor prices but not determined by them alone.

What is bundling?

Selling two or more products or services together at a single price, often lower than the sum of separate prices, to increase value and sales.

Why does price fairness matter?

Customers who see a price as unfair may stop buying, complain or spread negative word of mouth, even if the price is justified by costs.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.