| Course | LDR 321 Modern Leadership (LDR/321) |
|---|---|
| Week | 4 |
| Paper type | Teamwork and inclusion analysis |
| Length | about 1,017 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Business |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for LDR 321 Week 4
One Crew, Not Three Cliques: Building Teamwork and Inclusion to Raise Performance Among Ride Operators at a Pocono Amusement Park
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
LDR/321: Modern Leadership
Week 4 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Pinecrest Park, its crews and its survey results are composites written for a model paper.
By Week 4, the course had studied the invented Pinecrest ride crews' individual strengths, their communication and how their supervisors handle disruption. One pattern kept appearing. Operators tend to group with others like themselves: local high school and college students, retirees and international students. On breaks, each group sits apart. Supervisors often assign rides by group because it seems easier, so some rides are staffed entirely by teens and others entirely by international students. Rides manager Alicia Gomez wants to know whether this pattern affects performance and how to build one crew. This paper reviews research on teamwork and inclusion and analyzes Pinecrest's ride crews.
Teamwork Processes
LePine et al. (2008) conducted a meta-analysis of teamwork processes based on a framework of three types: transition processes, such as mission analysis and planning; action processes, such as monitoring progress, coordinating and backing up teammates; and interpersonal processes, such as managing conflict, motivation and confidence. All three were positively related to team performance and member satisfaction. Teams that monitored one another, backed each other up and managed conflict well performed better.
Inclusion as Belonging and Uniqueness
Shore et al. (2011) reviewed research on inclusion and proposed a model in which inclusion results from satisfying two needs at once: belongingness, feeling part of the group, and uniqueness, being valued for one's distinctive characteristics. Assimilation offers belonging but demands that people hide differences; differentiation values uniqueness but leaves people outside the group; exclusion offers neither. True inclusion offers both.
Leader Inclusiveness
Nembhard and Edmondson (2006) examined neonatal intensive care teams and found that when physicians in charge openly asked for and welcomed input, nurses and therapists felt safer speaking up, and the effect was largest for those with the least formal status. Inclusive leaders helped team members speak up across status differences.
Survey Findings
A short survey of 180 operators asked about belonging, being valued and teamwork. Local students scored highest on belonging. Retirees felt valued for their reliability but somewhat outside the social life of the crew. International students scored lowest on both, and several wrote that supervisors spoke mainly to the local operators and that their ideas were rarely asked for.
Performance Patterns
Ride data showed that during peak periods, rides staffed by a single group had more coordination problems, such as slower guest loading and missed backup when an operator needed relief. Mixed crews, where they existed, had slightly faster loading and fewer delays, and their operators reported more backup from teammates.
The crews that looked most comfortable were not the crews that ran the rides best.
What Operators Wrote
Open comments gave the numbers a human face. An international student from Peru wrote that she had worked at Pinecrest for six weeks and no supervisor had asked her opinion about anything. A retiree wrote that he liked the work but felt invisible at crew parties planned around college students' schedules. A local student wrote that he would like to work with the international students but did not know how to start a conversation. These comments suggest that most operators would welcome closer ties if the park made them easier.
How Supervisors Contribute
Supervisors' habits reinforce the divisions. Assigning rides by group feels efficient, since supervisors assume similar people work well together, but it limits relationships across groups. Supervisors also tend to joke and talk most with operators who share their background, and some admitted they speak less with international students because conversations take more effort.
Interpreting the Findings
In Shore et al.'s terms, international students experience something close to exclusion and retirees something close to differentiation. Single-group crews limit the action processes, monitoring and backup, that LePine et al. (2008) link to performance, because operators lack relationships with people in other groups who could help. Supervisors' attention to local operators matches the opposite of leader inclusiveness.
Practice 1: Mixed Crews by Design
Supervisors will staff each ride with a mix of groups and rotate assignments weekly, so operators work with different people. Mixed crews build relationships that support backup across groups.
Practice 2: Structured Team Routines
Each crew will start shifts with a short briefing that assigns backup partners and a rotation plan, supporting transition and action processes.
Practice 3: Valuing Distinct Contributions
The park will recognize distinct strengths: retirees as mentors on guest service, international students as language helpers for international guests, with a badge showing languages spoken, and local students as experts on area information for guests.
Practice 4: Inclusive Supervisor Behaviors
Supervisors will make a point of asking each operator for input during huddles, rotating whom they ask first, and will learn every operator's name and something about them in the first week.
Practice 5: Shared Social Moments
The park will hold two crew events per month, such as a pizza night where international students share a dish from home, open to all operators.
Addressing Exclusion When It Appears
Supervisors will step in when they see exclusion, such as jokes about accents or operators refusing to work with someone. A quiet private conversation, followed by reassignment if behavior continues, signals that respect is part of the job. Operators will also have an anonymous way to report problems through the department's suggestion box.
Supporting International Students
Because international students scored lowest on belonging, the department will add a welcome session in their first week covering park routines, local transportation and who to ask for help, led by a returning international operator.
Measures
Alicia will repeat the survey midseason and at season's end, tracking belonging and being valued by group, and will track loading times, delays and backup incidents by crew.
Conclusion
Research shows that teamwork processes drive team performance, that inclusion requires both belonging and valued uniqueness and that inclusive leader behaviors build psychological safety across status differences. Pinecrest's ride crews split into groups, leaving some operators excluded and weakening coordination. Mixed crews, team routines, recognition of distinct strengths, inclusive supervisor behaviors and shared social moments can build one crew that runs the rides better.
References
LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262-1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943
What the LDR 321 Week 4 instructions ask
The fourth LDR 321 assignment typically asks students to examine how leaders build teamwork and an inclusive environment that improves performance. Expect to discuss team processes such as coordination, communication and conflict management, the meaning of inclusion as belongingness combined with valued uniqueness, the effects of diversity on teams and leader behaviors that encourage participation. Many prompts ask students to recommend practices for a specific team. A strong paper uses research on teamwork and inclusion, gathers evidence about how the team actually functions, avoids treating inclusion as a slogan and proposes concrete practices with measures of both inclusion and performance. Cite scholarly sources in APA format.
How this LDR 321 Week 4 example is built
At Pinecrest, break areas show three distinct groups: local students, retirees and international students. Survey data show that international students feel least included, and rides staffed by a single group have more coordination problems during busy periods. The paper reviews a meta-analysis showing that teamwork processes, transition, action and interpersonal, relate to team effectiveness, a model defining inclusion as the combination of belonging and being valued for one's unique qualities and research showing that leaders' inclusive words and deeds create psychological safety. The analysis finds coordination gaps and low inclusion in some areas, and the paper recommends mixed crews, structured rotations, recognition that values distinct contributions, supervisor behaviors and measures for both inclusion and ride performance.
LDR 321 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
Teamwork and inclusion papers are graded on conceptual accuracy, evidence and practicality. Strong work defines inclusion precisely, including both belonging and valued uniqueness, explains team processes with research, uses data about the team, such as surveys or performance records, and connects inclusion to performance outcomes. Graders reward practices that change how teams are structured and led, not only awareness messages, and measures that track both inclusion and results. Graders also check that inclusion measures are broken out by group so that gaps are visible. The best papers treat team members' differences as resources the team can draw on and show leaders actively inviting contributions from everyone.
LDR 321 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid
A common problem is treating inclusion as being nice or holding a single diversity event. Research defines inclusion as belonging plus being valued for unique qualities, built through daily practices. Describe the practices. Another frequent weakness is discussing inclusion without any link to performance, or performance without considering who is left out. Connect them with data. Some papers assume diversity automatically helps or hurts teams. Research shows effects depend on processes and leadership. Others focus only on the supervisor's attitude and ignore team structures, such as who works with whom. Change structures too. Ask members of each group what would help before deciding. Finally, measure both inclusion and results, so progress on one is not mistaken for progress on both.
Related LDR 321 sample papers
Other LDR 321 week samples
- LDR 321 Week 1: Understanding Individual Attributes
- LDR 321 Week 2: Communication Strategies for Leaders
- LDR 321 Week 3: Adaptive Leadership
- LDR 321 Week 5: Change Management and Empowerment
More BS in Business sample papers
- LDR 309 Week 4: Mentorship and Succession Planning
- LDR 310 Week 4: Implementation Plan
- MGT 312 Week 4: Organizational Culture, Diversity and Communication
- MGT 316 Week 4: Decision-Making Principles
LDR 321 Week 4 questions, answered
What does LDR 321 Week 4 usually cover?
It usually covers how leaders build teamwork and an inclusive environment that improves performance, including team processes, inclusion, diversity and leader behaviors that invite participation.
Where can I find a free LDR 321 Week 4 sample paper?
The Week 4 teamwork and inclusion analysis of ride crews at a composite Pocono amusement park is shown above in full.
What is inclusion in the workplace?
Research defines inclusion as the experience of belonging to a group while being valued for one's unique characteristics, rather than having to hide differences to fit in.
What are teamwork processes?
They are the activities teams use to accomplish work, including planning and goal setting before tasks, coordinating and monitoring during tasks and managing conflict and motivation throughout.
How do leaders create an inclusive team?
By inviting and appreciating everyone's input, structuring work so people from different groups collaborate, recognizing distinct contributions and addressing exclusion when it appears.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All LDR 321 week samples · All courses