HRM 548 Week 5 Employment Policies Example

Reviewed by Davina Cresswell, MBA · University of Phoenix · Updated

This HRM 548 Week 5 example designs employment policies on scheduling, hybrid work, internal mobility and tuition assistance for a credit union trying to keep the people it hires. University of Phoenix HRM 548 covers employment policies in Week 5, and in HRM/548 MBA students learn to write policies that are lawful, consistent and aligned with recruiting and retention goals rather than simply copied from a template. The case stays with Saguaro Valley, where unpredictable schedules and unclear paths to promotion drive member service turnover. The paper reviews current policies, uses research on schedule stability and hybrid work, drafts four policies with eligibility and limits, addresses legal and fairness concerns and plans how managers will apply them consistently.

CourseHRM 548 Recruitment and Retention Practices (HRM/548)
Week5
Paper typeEmployment policy design
Lengthabout 1,179 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HRM 548 Week 5

1

Schedules Posted Three Weeks Ahead, Hybrid Work and Internal Mobility: Employment Policies That Support Retention at Saguaro Valley

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

HRM/548: Recruitment and Retention Practices

Week 5 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Saguaro Valley Credit Union and its policies are composites written for a model paper; legal points are general and should be confirmed with counsel.

What this part is doingThe title names the policies the paper designs and ties them to retention.
2

Every year, the composite Saguaro Valley Credit Union loses 44 percent of its member service representatives each year. Exit interviews and stay surveys point to the same problems: schedules posted two days ahead and changed often, no remote option for contact center staff while competitors offer one, promotions that seem to depend on a manager's favor and a tuition program few employees know about. Its policies were written over 15 years by different leaders and are applied differently in each branch. Employment policies are the organization's promises in writing, and when they are vague or ignored, employees judge the organization by its least consistent manager. This paper redesigns four policies to support retention.

Reviewing Current Policies

The review found policies that were vague, outdated or contradictory. The scheduling policy said only that managers would "post schedules in a timely manner." The handbook had no remote work policy. Transfers required the current manager's approval, which some managers withheld from strong performers. Tuition assistance existed but required approval by a vice president and was not mentioned in recruiting.

How Policies Affect Retention

Drawing on more than a hundred studies, Jiang et al. (2012) showed that HR practices affect organizational outcomes through employees' skills, motivation and opportunities to contribute, with motivation and opportunity practices strongly linked to lower turnover. Policies on scheduling, flexibility and advancement fall into those categories.

Research on Schedule Instability

Schneider and Harknett (2019) surveyed thousands of hourly service workers and found that short notice, on-call shifts and last-minute cancellations were associated with psychological distress, poor sleep and unhappiness, with effects comparable to large income differences. Kesavan et al. (2022) evaluated a stable scheduling experiment at Gap stores and found that more predictable schedules increased sales and labor productivity, showing that stability can benefit the business as well as workers.

What this part is doingCiting both worker and business outcomes makes the scheduling policy a business decision, not only a benefit.
3

Policy One: Predictable Scheduling

Schedules for all hourly employees will be posted at least 21 days in advance. Changes initiated by the credit union after posting will require employee consent, except for emergencies such as branch closures. Employees may swap shifts with qualified coworkers through the scheduling app with supervisor notification rather than approval. Each employee may list availability, which managers must honor for at least 80 percent of scheduled hours. Branches will build schedules from forecasting tools that predict transaction volume.

Applying the Scheduling Policy

The policy requires better forecasting. The credit union's transaction data show predictable peaks around paydays and Saturdays, so the workforce management team will provide staffing forecasts to branches. A small float pool of representatives, paid a premium, will cover absences across branches so that last-minute changes do not fall on regular staff.

Policy Two: Hybrid Work

Contact center agents, operations staff and fraud analysts who have completed 90 days and meet performance standards may work from home up to three days a week. Bloom et al. (2024) ran a randomized experiment at a large travel company and reported that a two-day-a-week home schedule reduced resignations by roughly a third, while performance reviews and promotion rates were unchanged. Employees must have a quiet workspace and secure internet, and the credit union provides equipment.

Wage and Hour Issues for Remote Staff

Nonexempt remote employees must record all hours worked, including time spent logging in and preparing systems, and may not work unrecorded time. Managers will be trained to monitor and approve overtime. Remote workers outside Arizona require registration and tax withholding in their states, so remote work will be limited to Arizona residents for nonexempt roles.

Fairness for Branch Staff

Branch staff cannot work remotely. To balance the policy, branch employees will receive first choice of predictable schedules, a branch premium of $0.75 an hour and priority for internal moves into hybrid-eligible roles after a year. Explaining these balancing steps prevents resentment.

What this part is doingAddressing who cannot use a policy shows awareness that fairness affects retention as much as flexibility.
4

Policy Three: Internal Mobility

All openings below the director level will be posted internally for five business days before external posting. Employees in good standing with nine months in their current role may apply without their manager's approval, though the manager will be notified when the employee becomes a finalist. Internal candidates will be interviewed using the same structured process as external ones. Managers may delay a transfer by no more than four weeks for coverage.

Why Manager Approval Was Removed

Managers withheld approval from their best performers to keep them, which led those employees to leave the credit union entirely. Removing the veto keeps talent inside the organization. Managers who develop employees who move up will be recognized in performance reviews.

Policy Four: Tuition and Certification Assistance

Employees with six months of service may receive up to $5,250 a year for degree programs and up to $2,000 for job-related certifications, such as Certified Fraud Examiner or mortgage licensing. The $5,250 cap is chosen because federal tax rules let employees receive educational assistance up to that figure each year without owing income tax on it. Employees who leave within 12 months of receiving assistance repay a prorated amount. Approval moves from a vice president to HR, with decisions in five business days.

Legal and Consistency Review

Counsel reviewed the policies for wage and hour compliance, consistency with antidiscrimination law and accommodation duties, since an employee with a disability may need remote work as an accommodation even outside the hybrid policy's eligibility. Each policy includes a statement that it does not create a contract.

What the Policies Cost

The policies are not free. The float pool adds about 14 positions at a premium, roughly $650,000 a year. The branch premium costs about $370,000. Hybrid equipment and security add $120,000 in the first year. Wider tuition use could reach $400,000 a year if 80 employees participate. Against these costs, each avoided departure saves about $11,500, so the policies pay for themselves if they prevent about 135 departures a year, about a third of the reduction the credit union is targeting. On those numbers, the board signed off, asking for a progress report in a year.

What this part is doingCosting the policies shows they are investments with a break-even point, not perks.
5

Communicating the Policies

The policies will be introduced at all-staff meetings, posted in the employee app and included in recruiting materials, since they are part of the employer brand from Week 2. Plain-language summaries will accompany the formal text.

Training and Accountability

Managers will complete training on applying each policy. Scheduling compliance, internal transfer approvals and tuition use will be reported monthly by branch, and regional managers will review outliers.

Measuring Results

The credit union will track member service turnover, schedule change frequency, internal fill rate, hybrid participation, tuition use and engagement survey items on fairness and flexibility. Targets include an internal fill rate of 50 percent for lending roles and a reduction in member service turnover to 35 percent within 18 months.

Conclusion

Saguaro Valley's vague and inconsistent policies were contributing to turnover. Predictable scheduling, hybrid work with balancing benefits for branch staff, open internal mobility and accessible tuition assistance address the problems employees named. Clear language, legal review, communication and manager accountability will determine whether the policies change employees' experience.

6

References

Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630(8018), 920-925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2

Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088

Kesavan, S., Lambert, S. J., Williams, J. C., & Pendem, P. K. (2022). Doing well by doing good: Improving retail store performance with responsible scheduling practices at the Gap, Inc. Management Science, 68(11), 7818-7836. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4291

Schneider, D., & Harknett, K. (2019). Consequences of routine work-schedule instability for worker health and well-being. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 82-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418823184

What the HRM 548 Week 5 instructions ask

Week 5 in HRM 548 typically has students evaluate and develop employment policies that support recruiting and retention. Common elements include reviewing existing policies for clarity, consistency and legal risk; designing policies on topics such as scheduling, remote work, internal transfers and promotion, education assistance, leave and conduct; explaining how policies support the employer brand; and planning communication and manager training. Many prompts ask students to draft policy language. Write policies that are specific about eligibility and limits, explain the reasoning behind each, use research to show likely effects and list every source in APA style.

How this HRM 548 Week 5 example is built

At a credit union whose branch schedules are posted two days ahead and whose promotions depend on manager favor the policies themselves work against retention, and the paper redesigns four of them. A scheduling policy posts schedules three weeks ahead and limits last-minute changes. A hybrid work policy covers contact center and back office staff who can work remotely part of the week. An internal mobility policy posts openings internally first and lets employees apply after nine months without manager permission. A tuition assistance policy pays for degrees and certifications with a repayment provision. Each policy is checked for legal and fairness issues, and the paper closes with manager training, communication plans and measures that show whether turnover and internal fill rates improve.

HRM 548 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go

The strongest policy papers produce usable policies with clear eligibility, procedures and limits, and explain how each one supports the organization's goals. Faculty credit the use of research to predict effects, attention to legal issues such as wage and hour rules and nondiscrimination, and awareness of fairness among groups who cannot benefit from a policy, such as branch staff who cannot work remotely. Plans for communication, manager training and consistent application show implementation skill. Measures that track whether policies work, plus APA citations, complete the paper. Drafting at least one policy in full, with the actual wording employees would read, shows faculty that the writer can move from analysis to a usable document, and explaining what each policy costs helps leadership approve it.

HRM 548 Week 5 help: mistakes to avoid

Many students write policy goals rather than policies. Include eligibility, procedures and limits. Another frequent gap is writing a remote work policy without addressing employees who cannot use it; explain how fairness will be handled. Students also overlook wage and hour issues, such as tracking hours for nonexempt remote workers. Address them. Avoid policies that give managers unlimited discretion, since inconsistency undermines trust. Check that tuition repayment terms are reasonable. Explain how policies connect to the employer brand. Finally, plan how managers will be trained and held accountable, because a policy managers ignore does not exist for employees. Report compliance by branch so problems surface early.

Related HRM 548 sample papers

Other HRM 548 week samples

More MBA sample papers

HRM 548 Week 5 questions, answered

What does HRM 548 Week 5 usually cover?

It usually covers employment policies that support recruiting and retention, such as scheduling, remote work, internal mobility, education assistance and leave, along with legal review, communication and manager training.

Where can I find a free HRM 548 Week 5 sample paper?

Four complete policies for a credit union, with research and legal notes, appear in the paper on this page. A free draft tailored to your own policy assignment is available on request.

Why does schedule predictability matter for retention?

Research on hourly service workers links unstable, short-notice schedules to stress, poor sleep and higher turnover, while experiments with more stable scheduling have improved both retention and store performance.

Does hybrid work affect retention?

A large randomized experiment published in 2024 found that allowing employees to work from home two days a week reduced quit rates by about one third without harming performance or promotion.

What should an internal mobility policy include?

Rules for posting openings internally, eligibility to apply, whether manager approval is needed, how internal candidates are evaluated and how transfers are timed, so employees see a fair path to advancement.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.