| Course | HRM 420 Human Resource Risk Management (HRM/420) |
|---|---|
| Week | 4 |
| Paper type | Legal compliance and discrimination risk paper |
| Length | about 1,046 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Business |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HRM 420 Week 4
A Harassment Charge, Child Labor Findings and Split-Shift Pay: Auditing Lone Star Play Centers' Compliance Risks and Building Controls That Prevent Discrimination Claims
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
HRM/420: Human Resource Risk Management
Week 4 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Lone Star Play Centers and the claims are composites written for a model paper; laws are summarized generally from the sources listed and should be confirmed with counsel.
Lone Star Play Centers, the Dallas-Fort Worth entertainment chain, faces a charge from a former assistant manager alleging that her general manager made repeated sexual comments and cut her hours after she objected, and a state finding that 15-year-olds worked past permitted hours. The chief executive asked whether these were isolated problems or symptoms of wider compliance gaps. Legal problems rarely arrive alone; an audit finds the next ones before an agency or a lawyer does. This paper audits Lone Star's compliance and designs controls.
The Harassment Charge
Title VII covers sexual harassment, including unwelcome sexual conduct that is serious or frequent enough to make the workplace hostile, and it forbids punishing employees who complain (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2024). The former manager alleges both. Retaliation claims are often easier to prove than the underlying harassment, because the timing of an adverse action after a complaint can speak for itself. Lone Star's counsel is responding to the charge; the audit asks why the company did not know sooner.
The Child Labor Findings
Federal and Texas law limit the hours 14- and 15-year-olds may work, especially on school days, and bar minors under 18 from hazardous occupations. Scheduling software at two centers allowed managers to schedule 15-year-olds until 10 p.m. on school nights. Lone Star stopped employing 15-year-olds in Week 1; the audit also checks that 16- and 17-year-olds are kept away from prohibited equipment.
The Audit Approach
HR, with outside counsel, reviewed a sample of payroll records, schedules, personnel files, job postings, hiring and promotion data and complaint records at all 14 centers, and interviewed managers and employees. Each area was rated compliant, at risk or noncompliant.
Wage and Hour Findings
Party hosts often work split shifts, a morning party and an evening party, and some centers did not pay for required staff meetings held between them. Several centers rounded time punches in ways that consistently favored the company. Both practices create wage claims. Controls: pay for all meetings, adopt neutral rounding or exact punches and audit payroll quarterly.
Hiring and Promotion Data
Promotion to shift lead and assistant manager at most centers favored men, though women made up half the frontline workforce. Analysis found that promotions depended on managers' informal recommendations rather than posted openings. Control: post all lead and management openings with criteria and use a structured interview panel.
Harassment Prevention: What Works
Kalev et al. (2006) studied diversity programs in hundreds of firms over three decades and found that structures assigning responsibility, such as diversity task forces and managers accountable for outcomes, were associated with greater increases in managerial diversity than training or evaluations alone. Applied to harassment, the evidence suggests that annual training must be backed by accountable managers, multiple ways to report and consistent consequences.
The Prevention Design
Lone Star will train all employees annually with scenarios relevant to entertainment centers, including harassment by customers, which employers must also address. General managers' performance reviews will include their centers' complaint handling and engagement survey results on respect. A hotline run by an outside provider, a dedicated HR email and the option to report to any manager provide multiple channels, especially important for minors who may fear reporting to their own supervisor.
Complaint and Investigation Procedures
Every complaint is logged by HR within one business day, investigated by someone outside the center, documented and resolved with written conclusions. Investigations interview the complainant, the accused and witnesses separately, and HR follows up 30 and 90 days later to check for retaliation. Fair procedures matter to everyone watching, not only the parties, because employees judge an organization by how consistently and respectfully it handles complaints (Colquitt et al., 2001).
Preventing Retaliation
Managers receive training on what counts as retaliation, such as reducing hours, changing duties or excluding someone from parties after a complaint. Any adverse action within six months of a complaint involving the complainant must be reviewed by HR before it takes effect.
Recordkeeping
Employers must retain payroll and personnel records for periods set by federal rules. Lone Star will store minors' work permits and proof of age centrally, retain hiring and promotion records for at least the required periods and preserve complaint files.
Insurance as Transfer
Employment practices liability insurance covers defense costs and settlements for claims such as discrimination, harassment and retaliation. Lone Star had a policy with a $50,000 retention; the audit recommends keeping it but notes that insurers will price future coverage on the company's controls, so the audit's fixes also reduce premiums. Insurance transfers cost; it does not prevent harm to employees.
Owners and Deadlines
The HR director owns harassment prevention and investigations, the payroll manager owns wage practices, the operations director owns minors' scheduling controls and general managers own center-level compliance, with deadlines from 30 to 120 days.
Customer Harassment of Employees
Many harassment incidents at Lone Star involve customers, not coworkers: adults making comments to teenage party hosts or arcade attendants. Employers can be responsible for harassment by nonemployees when they know or should know of it and fail to act. The prevention design therefore gives staff a radio code to summon a manager, authorizes managers to remove customers who harass staff and records such incidents so patterns at particular centers or events can be addressed. Telling young employees clearly that the company will back them is itself a protection.
Accommodation Requests
The audit also found that requests for schedule changes for religious observance or medical needs were handled differently at each center. Lone Star will route all accommodation requests through HR, respond within five business days and document the interactive discussion, reducing the risk of inconsistent decisions.
Ongoing Monitoring
HR will repeat the audit annually, review payroll and scheduling exceptions monthly and report compliance status to the chief executive quarterly.
Conclusion
Lone Star's harassment charge and child labor findings were symptoms of wider gaps: unpaid meeting time, biased rounding, informal promotions and a reporting system minors could not trust. An audit matched each risk to a control, research on accountability shaped harassment prevention and complaint procedures, retaliation reviews, records and insurance complete a system that prevents claims rather than only defending them.
References
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100404
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2024). Enforcement guidance on harassment in the workplace. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/enforcement-guidance-harassment-workplace
What the HRM 420 Week 4 instructions ask
Students in HRM 420 Week 4 usually analyze legal compliance risks and strategies for preventing discrimination and harassment. Common requirements include major employment laws such as Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, compliance audits, policies and training, complaint and investigation procedures, retaliation risk, recordkeeping, insurance and the effectiveness of diversity and anti-harassment programs. Many prompts ask students to audit an organization and recommend controls. Describe laws accurately and generally, connect each risk to a control, use research on what works and support recommendations with sources in APA style.
How this HRM 420 Week 4 example is built
An employer with two legal problems on its desk needs to find the others before they arrive, and the paper conducts that search. It begins with the harassment charge and the child labor findings. A structured audit then reviews pay practices, minors' employment, hiring and promotion data, harassment prevention and records. Each finding is matched to a control. Research on diversity programs shows that accountability structures work better than mandatory training alone, shaping the harassment prevention design. Complaint and investigation procedures protect employees and the company. Insurance is considered as a transfer of residual risk. The paper ends with owners, deadlines and audit cycles.
HRM 420 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
Grading in this week usually rewards a systematic audit tied to specific controls and evidence-based prevention. Credit goes to papers that describe major laws accurately and generally, identify risks with evidence from records, match each risk to a preventive or detective control, address retaliation and use research on the effectiveness of diversity and harassment programs. Recognizing that policies without accountability rarely change behavior shows understanding. Including procedures for complaints and investigations, and a schedule for repeating the audit, completes the system. Tables of findings and controls and APA references finish the paper; checking data across all locations, rather than relying on the incidents already known, shows the audit mindset. Explaining how employees, including minors, can report safely adds a practical dimension that graders value.
HRM 420 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid
HRM 420 Week 4 papers often stop at describing laws. Apply them to the organization's records and practices. Another frequent gap is relying on annual harassment training as the main prevention; research shows training alone has limited effects. Add accountability, reporting channels and manager responsibility. Students also overlook retaliation, now a leading basis for charges. Plan to prevent it. Avoid audits without follow-up; assign owners and deadlines. Describe insurance as transferring cost, not removing risk, and note what the policy excludes. Check special rules for minors. Finally, explain how compliance will be monitored between audits, and who reports results to leadership. Include a timeline for fixing each finding, since findings without deadlines tend to linger.
Related HRM 420 sample papers
Other HRM 420 week samples
- HRM 420 Week 1: HR Risk Management Concepts
- HRM 420 Week 2: Workplace Health and Safety
- HRM 420 Week 3: Security and Crisis Management
- HRM 420 Week 5: An HR Risk Management Plan
More BS in Business sample papers
- HRM 324 Week 4: Benefits and Retirement Plans
- HRM 326 Week 4: Legal Issues and Motivation
- MGT 312 Week 4: Organizational Culture, Diversity and Communication
- MGT 498 Week 4: Innovation, Sustainability, and the Global Market
HRM 420 Week 4 questions, answered
What does HRM 420 Week 4 usually cover?
It usually covers legal compliance and discrimination risk, including major employment laws, compliance audits, harassment prevention, complaint and investigation procedures, retaliation, recordkeeping and employment practices liability insurance.
Where can I find a free HRM 420 Week 4 sample paper?
A full compliance audit for a family entertainment chain, with findings matched to controls and research on prevention annotated, is open on this page. Ask for your own case and the opening draft costs nothing.
What is employment practices liability insurance?
Insurance that covers employers against claims such as discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination and retaliation, paying defense costs and settlements up to policy limits, subject to deductibles and exclusions.
Does harassment training prevent harassment?
Research suggests training alone has limited and sometimes short-lived effects; prevention works better when combined with accountable leadership, multiple reporting channels and prompt, fair investigations.
What is retaliation in employment law?
Adverse action against an employee for complaining about discrimination, participating in an investigation or exercising other legal rights. It is unlawful even if the underlying complaint is not proven.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All HRM 420 week samples · All courses