| Course | HRM 300 Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (HRM/300) |
|---|---|
| Week | 5 |
| Paper type | Employee relations and employment law paper |
| Length | about 1,060 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Business |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HRM 300 Week 5
When a Technician Complains About Summer Overtime and a Supervisor's Comments: Employee Relations, Wage and Hour Law, Harassment and Fair Discipline at Desert Air Mechanical
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
HRM/300: Fundamentals of Human Resource Management
Week 5 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Desert Air Mechanical, the employees and the incidents are composites written for a model paper; laws are summarized generally from the sources listed and should be confirmed with counsel.
In late July, Marco, a composite senior technician at Desert Air Mechanical in Tucson, met with the HR manager. He said that technicians on the evening on-call rotation were not paid for the hours they waited for calls, that driving between calls was sometimes left off timesheets and that a crew supervisor had repeatedly made comments about a younger female technician's ability to do attic work. He added that several technicians had been talking about the pay issues among themselves and wanted answers. One conversation raised wage law, harassment, labor rights and, because it was July in Tucson, safety, and HR had to handle each one fairly and correctly. This paper works through them.
At-Will Employment and Its Limits
Arizona follows employment at will: either party may end employment for any lawful reason. The limits are what matter here. Employers may not act for discriminatory reasons, in retaliation for protected complaints or in violation of wage and labor laws (Dessler, 2020). Every step HR takes must respect those limits.
Wage and Hour: On-Call Time
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, whether on-call time counts as hours worked depends on how restricted the employee is (U.S. Department of Labor, 2008). Technicians who must stay home, respond within 15 minutes and cannot drink or travel far are significantly restricted, and their waiting time may well be compensable. Technicians who can go about their lives and respond within an hour by phone are less likely to be working. Desert Air's rotation required a 20-minute response with the truck at home, so HR, with counsel, decided to pay a flat on-call stipend and pay all time from the moment a call is accepted.
Wage and Hour: Travel Between Calls
Time spent traveling between customer sites during the workday is work time and must be paid, and overtime applies above 40 hours in a week. HR reviewed three months of GPS records against timesheets, found about 160 unrecorded hours across 22 technicians and paid back wages with overtime where due. Correcting errors promptly reduces legal exposure and shows good faith.
The Harassment Concern
Title VII prohibits sex discrimination, including harassment that is severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile environment, and employers must take prompt corrective action when they know of it. HR opened an investigation within two days: interviewing the female technician, the supervisor and four crew members separately, asking open questions, documenting answers and reviewing text messages. The investigation found that the supervisor had repeatedly said in front of the crew that women did not belong in attics and had assigned her only easy calls.
The Investigation's Fairness
Colquitt et al. (2001) synthesized decades of studies and showed that employees' judgments of fairness depend not only on outcomes but also on procedural fairness, consistent and unbiased processes, and on interpersonal fairness, being treated with respect and given explanations. A fair investigation therefore matters to everyone watching, not just the parties.
Protected Concerted Activity
The technicians who discussed pay among themselves and raised concerns as a group engaged in protected concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act, which covers most private-sector employees whether or not they have a union. Managers may not discourage those discussions or punish participants. HR briefed supervisors that comments like "stop stirring things up" could be unlawful.
Discipline for the Supervisor
Desert Air's progressive discipline policy moves from coaching to written warning to final warning and termination, but serious misconduct can skip steps. Given the repeated comments and the work assignments that limited the technician's development, HR issued a final written warning, removed the supervisor's authority over assignments for six months and required training. The decision was documented and consistent with how a similar case was handled two years earlier.
Protecting Against Retaliation
Retaliation claims are among the most common charges filed with federal enforcement agencies. HR checked that the female technician's assignments, schedule and pay were not reduced after the complaint and that Marco faced no adverse action. Both were told to report any problems directly to HR.
Heat Illness Prevention
Marco also mentioned that a technician had become dizzy in an attic the previous week. Federal law requires employers to protect workers from recognized hazards, and federal regulators have proposed a national heat standard. Desert Air adopted a written heat illness prevention plan: mandatory water and shade breaks, starting attic work by 6 a.m. in summer, buddy checks on long jobs and gradual acclimatization for new hires.
Leave and Accommodation
In the same week, an employee asked about leave for surgery. Because it employs more than 50 people, Desert Air must give eligible employees as much as twelve weeks a year of unpaid leave with their jobs held, under federal family and medical leave law. A technician with a back injury may need accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. HR handles each through a documented interactive process.
Communicating the Outcome
Fairness requires telling people what happened, within the limits of privacy. HR met with Marco to explain the pay corrections and the new on-call stipend, and with the female technician to explain that her concerns were substantiated and action was taken, without disclosing every detail of the supervisor's discipline. All technicians received a written summary of the new on-call and travel time rules. Explaining decisions is part of the interpersonal fairness research associates with trust.
Records and Documentation
Each step, from the first meeting to the final discipline, was documented with dates, witnesses and the evidence considered. Good records protect both employees and the company if a decision is later challenged and help HR spot patterns across complaints.
Building Trust
The best employee relations practice is preventing problems. Desert Air will run an annual anonymous engagement survey, train supervisors in respectful supervision and complaint handling, publish its pay and scheduling policies and hold quarterly technician meetings where concerns can be raised openly.
Conclusion
A single complaint at Desert Air involved wage law, harassment, labor rights, safety and leave. Paying for restricted on-call and travel time, investigating promptly and fairly, protecting employees who raised concerns together, disciplining consistently, preventing retaliation and adopting a heat plan resolved the issues lawfully. Fair processes and prevention build the trust that keeps technicians from leaving.
References
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2008). Fact sheet #22: Hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Wage and Hour Division. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/22-flsa-hours-worked
What the HRM 300 Week 5 instructions ask
In the final HRM 300 assignment, students typically explain employee relations and the major employment laws and then apply them to workplace situations. Common requirements include at-will employment and the exceptions that limit it, Title VII and harassment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act's wage and hour rules, family and medical leave, protections for concerted activity under labor law, workplace safety, complaint and investigation procedures and progressive discipline. Many prompts present scenarios and ask how HR should respond. State laws accurately and generally, apply them to the facts, propose fair procedures and cite sources in APA style, noting that legal advice should be confirmed with counsel.
How this HRM 300 Week 5 example is built
A single complaint can raise several legal questions at once, and the paper treats the technician's concerns that way. It starts with the facts: on-call hours, travel between calls and a supervisor's remarks. Wage and hour law determines which hours must be paid. A prompt, fair investigation of the remarks follows a standard process. The technician's discussion with coworkers about pay is protected activity, which shapes how managers must respond. Progressive discipline gives the supervisor a fair consequence. Heat illness prevention addresses a safety risk raised in the same conversation. Research on fairness explains why process matters to employees. The paper ends with practices that prevent the next complaint.
HRM 300 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go
What earns marks in this last week is accurate application of employment law to facts and fair, practical HR procedures. Credit goes to papers that identify each legal issue, apply the relevant rule correctly and generally, describe a sound investigation process, distinguish protected activity from misconduct and propose discipline that is consistent and documented. Recognizing that employees judge HR by the fairness of its procedures, and citing research to that effect, shows understanding beyond compliance. Instructors also reward a section on prevention, since good employee relations reduce complaints. Clear organization and APA references complete the paper, and credit goes to papers that monitor for retaliation after the complaint, since that is where many employers stumble. Stating which steps need legal counsel shows good judgment about HR's limits.
HRM 300 Week 5 help: mistakes to avoid
A common HRM 300 Week 5 problem is treating every complaint as only a legal risk to contain. Investigate fairly and fix real problems. Another frequent gap is misstating wage and hour rules for on-call and travel time; check what counts as hours worked. Students also forget that employees discussing pay or working conditions together are generally protected by federal labor law, even without a union. Avoid retaliating, or appearing to, against anyone who complains. Document each step. Keep discipline consistent. Note when legal advice is needed. Finally, propose practices that prevent problems, such as supervisor training and regular channels for raising concerns. Close with who owns each practice and how its effect will be checked.
Related HRM 300 sample papers
Other HRM 300 week samples
- HRM 300 Week 1: HR's Strategic Role
- HRM 300 Week 2: Workforce Planning and Recruiting
- HRM 300 Week 3: Selection and Onboarding
- HRM 300 Week 4: Training, Performance and Pay
More BS in Business sample papers
- ECO 372 Week 5: Monetary Policy and the Fed
- FIN 419 Week 5: Regulation and Evolving Issues
- MGT 312 Week 5: Conflict, Change and a Recommendation to Management
- MGT 498 Week 5: Strategic Plan Implementation and Recommendation
HRM 300 Week 5 questions, answered
What does HRM 300 Week 5 usually cover?
It usually covers employee relations and employment law, including at-will employment, discrimination and harassment, wage and hour rules, leave and disability law, protected concerted activity, safety, investigations and progressive discipline.
Where can I find a free HRM 300 Week 5 sample paper?
A complete paper working through an HVAC technician's overtime and harassment complaint under employment law, with each step explained in notes, can be read here. Your own scenario can begin with a free draft.
Is on-call time paid under federal wage law?
It depends on how restricted the employee is. If an employee must stay on the premises or is so restricted that the time cannot be used for personal purposes, it is generally work time; otherwise it may not be.
What is protected concerted activity?
Under the National Labor Relations Act, most private-sector employees have the right to act together for mutual aid, such as discussing pay or complaining about conditions, and employers may not punish them for it.
What is progressive discipline?
A process of increasingly serious responses to repeated problems, such as a verbal warning, written warning, final warning and termination, applied consistently and documented at each step.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All HRM 300 week samples · All courses