HCS 490 Week 3 Effective Consumer Access and Communication Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This HCS 490 Week 3 example analyzes how health care consumers seek access and information and builds a communication plan around those habits, with every section of the APA 7 paper shown. In week three of University of Phoenix HCS 490, whose catalog code is HCS/490, BS in Health Administration students examine how organizations can make care easier to reach and messages easier to use. The sample starts from where consumers actually begin, an online search, and follows them to a health system's website, patient portal and phone lines. It draws on an integrative review of how consumer-led online health sources affect people, a review of patient portals and engagement, and federal health literacy guidance. It then proposes a plan for a composite regional health system covering search and website content, online scheduling, portal messaging standards, the phone as a safety net and plain-language materials, with measures for each channel.

CourseHCS 490 Health Care Consumer - Trends and Marketing (HCS/490)
Week3
Paper typeConsumer access and communication plan
Lengthabout 1,025 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramBS in Health Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HCS 490 Week 3

1

Where Consumers Actually Start: Online Search, Portals and the Phone, and a Communication Plan That Meets Health Care Consumers on Each Channel

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

HCS/490: Health Care Consumer - Trends and Marketing

Week 3 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The health system, its channels and its figures are composites written for a model paper; research findings come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title starts from consumer behavior, which signals that the plan is designed around where people begin rather than where the organization wants them.
2

A woman with a new cough that will not go away does not begin by calling a clinic. She types her symptoms into a search engine, reads a few articles, checks her insurer's website to see which clinics are in network, looks at reviews and only then tries to book an appointment online. If that fails, she calls. Every step is a point where a health care organization can make access easier or harder. This paper analyzes how consumers seek access and information and proposes a communication plan for a composite regional health system with five hospitals and 70 clinics.

Where Consumers Begin: Online Sources

Laukka et al. (2019) reviewed research on consumer-led health-related online sources, such as websites, forums and apps, and their impact on consumers. They found that online sources can increase consumers' knowledge, help them take part in decisions and change how they interact with health professionals, while also raising concerns about the quality of information and how consumers interpret it. For a health system, this means its first contact with many consumers happens on a search results page, and the information it publishes competes with everything else online.

The Website and Online Scheduling

The health system's website should answer the questions consumers bring from search: which locations treat this problem, whether the system accepts their insurance, how soon they can be seen and what it will cost. Online scheduling that shows real open times for primary care and common specialties turns a search into an appointment. Pages about common conditions should be written in plain language, reviewed by clinicians and dated, so consumers can judge their currency.

What this part is doingThe plan follows the consumer's own sequence of steps, so each recommendation appears at the moment it would matter.
3

Reviews and Reputation

Before booking, many consumers read online reviews of physicians and clinics. The health system cannot control what people write, but it can respond. The plan assigns a patient experience coordinator to read reviews weekly, reply to negative reviews with an invitation to call, without discussing any patient's care in public, and pass recurring complaints, such as parking or wait times, to the relevant managers. Posting the system's own patient survey results for each physician gives consumers a larger, more balanced sample than a handful of reviews.

Telehealth as an Access Channel

Video and phone visits have become a routine way in for follow-up care, medication checks and behavioral health. For consumers who work hourly jobs or live far from a clinic, a telehealth visit can be the difference between care and no care. The plan offers a video visit option whenever the clinician agrees it is appropriate, a phone-only option for consumers without reliable internet and a short test call before a first video visit.

The Patient Portal

After the first visit, much communication moves to the patient portal: test results, messages, refills and scheduling. Irizarry et al. (2015) reviewed research on patient portals and engagement and found that portals can support engagement, but that use varies, with lower adoption among older adults, people with lower health literacy and some minority groups, and that design, training and clinician encouragement influence whether patients use them. A portal that serves only the patients who were already most engaged can widen the very gaps in access that the health system wants to close.

The plan sets three portal standards: no message waits more than one business day for a first response, which may simply name who will answer and by when; test results appear with a plain-language explanation or a note that the clinician will call; and front desk staff offer help signing up at every visit, with a paper guide and a video in English and Spanish.

The Phone as a Safety Net

Many consumers, especially older adults and people with limited internet access, still rely on the phone. The health system's central line averages a four-minute hold time and a 12% abandonment rate at peak hours. The plan adds staff during the morning peak, offers a call-back option instead of holding and trains call center staff to complete scheduling, billing questions and prescription requests on one call. The phone is treated as a channel with its own standards, not as the place consumers end up when digital tools fail.

Speaking So Consumers Understand

All channels depend on plain language. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2024) recommends what it calls health literacy universal precautions, which start from the assumption that any patient may struggle with health information and so build every conversation and document to be understood by all, with tools such as teach-back and simple written instructions. The plan requires that patient-facing letters, bills and web pages be written so that most adults can read them easily, with short sentences and everyday words, tested with patients and offered in the system's most common languages.

What this part is doingThe literacy section applies to every channel, which keeps the plan from treating plain language as a separate project.
4

Connecting the Channels

Consumers should not have to repeat themselves. When a consumer starts scheduling online and calls for help, the call center should see the attempt. When a portal message raises a billing question, it should reach billing without the consumer resending it. The plan links the scheduling system, portal and call center records so staff can see recent contacts.

Measures

Measures include the share of appointments booked online and completed without a phone call, portal reply time, portal enrollment by age group and language, call abandonment and hold times, patient ratings of how easy it was to get an appointment and readability scores of revised materials. Results will be reported by age, language and payer so that gaps are visible. A quarterly review will compare the measures across the five hospitals and 70 clinics, so that locations with slow replies or long holds can learn from the best performers.

Conclusion

Consumers begin with a search, move through websites and portals and fall back on the phone. Each channel can open or close access. A plan that publishes useful information, lets consumers book online, answers portal messages promptly, keeps the phone strong, speaks plainly and connects every channel meets consumers where they are rather than where the organization would prefer them to be.

5

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2024). Health literacy universal precautions toolkit (3rd ed.). https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/improve/precautions/index.html

Irizarry, T., DeVito Dabbs, A., & Curran, C. R. (2015). Patient portals and patient engagement: A state of the science review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(6), Article e148. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255

Laukka, E., Rantakokko, P., & Suhonen, M. (2019). Consumer-led health-related online sources and their impact on consumers: An integrative review of the literature. Health Informatics Journal, 25(2), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217704254

What the HCS 490 Week 3 instructions ask

The Week 3 assignment in HCS 490 generally asks students to examine how health care organizations can improve consumer access and communication. Prompts may ask how consumers find and evaluate information, which channels organizations use to reach them, how technology such as websites, portals, telehealth and social media changes access, and how communication can be made clear for people with different literacy levels and languages. Some versions ask students to evaluate one organization's communication; others ask for recommendations. Papers of two to three pages with scholarly sources are common. The strongest responses start from consumer behavior, use evidence about what works, cover several channels and include people who are less comfortable with digital tools.

How this HCS 490 Week 3 example is built

The paper follows a consumer's path. It begins with online search and uses the Laukka integrative review to explain how consumers use online health sources and how those sources affect their knowledge, decisions and relationships with clinicians. The next section covers the website and online scheduling, then the patient portal, drawing on Irizarry and colleagues' review of portals and engagement, including who uses them less. The phone is treated as a safety net rather than an afterthought. A plain-language section uses federal health literacy guidance. The plan for the health system sets standards for each channel, such as a one-business-day portal reply, and lists measures. The paper ends with how the channels should connect so a consumer does not have to start over.

HCS 490 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

Rubrics for access and communication usually reward a consumer-centered analysis backed by evidence. Faculty look for accurate description of the channels consumers use, research on how those channels affect access and engagement, and attention to groups that are underserved by digital tools. Specific, measurable standards for each channel earn credit, as do plans that connect channels rather than treating each separately. Organization, clear writing and correct citations complete the grade. Papers that recommend social media or apps without evidence, or that assume all consumers are digitally fluent, tend to lose points to papers that design for the full range of consumers an organization serves.

HCS 490 Week 3 help: mistakes to avoid

A common mistake in HCS 490 Week 3 is focusing only on new technology, recommending an app for everything. Many consumers still rely on the phone, and some cannot use portals easily. Design for all of them. Another mistake is describing channels without standards; say how quickly messages will be answered and how you will know. Students also forget health literacy and language, which determine whether a message is understood at all. Use research on consumer online behavior rather than assumptions. Connect channels, so a question started online can be finished by phone without repeating everything. Finally, include measures that reflect the consumer's experience, such as time to an answer, not only the organization's activity, such as messages sent.

Related HCS 490 sample papers

Other HCS 490 week samples

More BS in Health Administration sample papers

HCS 490 Week 3 questions, answered

What does HCS/490 Week 3 usually ask for?

Many sections ask students to examine how health care organizations can improve consumer access and communication, including websites, portals, telehealth and plain-language materials.

Where can I find a free HCS 490 Week 3 sample paper?

The consumer access and communication plan above is the free Week 3 sample, complete and annotated. For your own organization or audience, ask for a first custom paper without charge.

How do online health sources affect consumers?

An integrative review found that consumer-led online sources can increase knowledge, support decision making and change how consumers interact with clinicians, but also raise concerns about information quality and misunderstanding.

Who uses patient portals less?

Research on portals has found lower use among older adults, people with lower incomes or less education and some racial and ethnic minority groups, which can widen gaps in access.

What is plain language in health care?

Communication that the intended audience can understand the first time they read or hear it, using common words, short sentences and a clear order, with key actions stated first.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.