| Course | HCS 446 Facility Planning (HCS/446) |
|---|---|
| Week | 1 |
| Paper type | Facility design process paper |
| Length | about 1,029 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Health Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HCS 446 Week 1
Somewhere to Go at Two in the Morning: The Design Process and Planning Team for a County's First Behavioral Health Crisis Receiving Center
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
HCS/446: Facility Planning
Week 1 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The county, the provider and the project figures are composites written for a model paper; guidance and research findings come from the sources listed.
In a composite county of 410,000 people, adults whose mental illness or drug use reaches a crisis point have two places to go at two in the morning: a hospital emergency department or, if police are involved, jail. Last year, adults waiting for a psychiatric bed spent a median of 19 hours in the county's emergency departments. The county, its largest nonprofit behavioral health provider and two hospitals agreed to build a crisis receiving center, a place where anyone in crisis can walk in or be brought by police or a mobile team at any hour. This paper describes the design process that will take the project from that agreement to its first patient.
Why the Facility Exists
Federal crisis care guidance (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2020) describes three essential elements of a crisis system: someone to call, someone to respond and somewhere to go. The county has a crisis line and two mobile teams but no place built for crisis stabilization. The center will accept everyone who arrives, including people brought by police, and offer up to 23 hours of observation in a recliner area and short-term stays of several days.
Stage One: Needs Assessment
The process begins by measuring need. Planners counted emergency visits for psychiatric crises, police transports and crisis line calls that ended without a place to send the caller. They estimated demand at about 8,500 visits a year in the first full year. This number drives every later decision about size and staffing.
Stage Two: Functional Program
The functional program translates need into spaces. It lists every room, its size, its occupants and its relationships: two separate entrances, one for walk-ins and one for police and ambulances; an intake and triage area; 16 recliners for observation; 16 short-term beds; calming rooms; a medical exam room; staff work areas and support spaces. It also states staffing and hours. A building designed before its program is written ends up telling the program what to be.
Stages Three to Five: Design
Schematic design produces rough plans showing how the spaces fit together and how people move. Design development adds detail: materials, doors, lighting, heating and ventilation, furniture and security systems. Construction documents are the final drawings and specifications that contractors will price and build from. Each stage narrows choices, and each change becomes more expensive as design moves forward.
Stage Six: Bidding and Contracting
The owner selects a contractor through competitive bids or a negotiated process in which the contractor joins the team during design to advise on cost and schedule. For this project, the county chose the second approach because crisis center features, such as tamper-resistant fixtures, carry long lead times.
Stage Seven: Construction
Construction takes the drawings into steel, walls and systems. The owner's representative attends weekly meetings, reviews changes and checks that work matches the drawings, especially for safety features.
Stage Eight: Activation
Activation, sometimes called transition planning, is the three to six months of preparation before opening: hiring and training staff, testing equipment and alarms, running mock patient scenarios, obtaining licenses and inspections and moving in. Many projects underestimate this stage.
The Planning Team
The owner, the nonprofit provider, leads through a project director and a steering committee that includes county and hospital representatives. The architect, chosen for experience with behavioral health buildings, leads design, supported by engineers. The contractor advises on cost and builds. Clinical users, nurses, peer specialists, psychiatrists and security staff, define workflow and safety needs. People with lived experience of crisis, recruited through a peer advocacy group, review plans for dignity and comfort. Police and mobile team leaders advise on the entrance for transports. Infection prevention, information technology and facilities staff join early. State licensing staff are consulted before design is final.
Evidence-Based Design
Ulrich et al. (2008) reviewed research linking hospital design to outcomes and found evidence that single rooms, noise reduction, daylight, views of nature and better layouts improve safety, reduce stress and support staff effectiveness. The team adopted evidence-based design as a principle: every major choice, from window placement to room size, must be supported by research or by the experience of comparable centers.
Design Guidelines
National design guidelines published by the Facility Guidelines Institute (2022) for outpatient facilities, which many states adopt into their licensing rules, set minimum sizes, clearances and features for spaces such as exam rooms and behavioral health areas. Meeting them is a floor, not a goal.
What Goes Wrong When Stages Are Skipped
The steering committee studied two crisis centers in neighboring states before starting. One had skipped a detailed functional program to save time and opened with a single entrance, so people brought in handcuffs by police passed through the same lobby as families arriving voluntarily; a second entrance was added two years later at nearly three times the cost it would have added during design. The other center compressed activation to five weeks, opened with staff who had never practiced a medical emergency in the building and closed its short-term unit for a month to retrain. Both lessons shaped this project's schedule: the program and activation stages were protected even when the county asked to open sooner.
Timeline
Needs assessment and functional programming take four months, design 10 months, bidding two months, construction 14 months and activation four months, about three years in all.
Guiding Principles
The steering committee adopted four principles: accept everyone who arrives; keep patients and staff safe without making the building feel like a jail; design for dignity and calm; and allow the center to adapt as the county's crisis system grows.
Conclusion
The crisis receiving center begins with a need, adults in crisis with nowhere to go, and a national model for meeting it. The design process moves from needs assessment and functional program through design, contracting and construction to activation, with clinicians, people with lived experience and first responders on the planning team from the start. Evidence-based design and national guidelines set the tests every decision must pass as the project moves into site selection next week.
References
Facility Guidelines Institute. (2022). Guidelines for design and construction of outpatient facilities. Facility Guidelines Institute.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). National guidelines for behavioral health crisis care: Best practice toolkit. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/national-guidelines-for-behavioral-health-crisis-care-02242020.pdf
Ulrich, R. S., Zimring, C., Zhu, X., DuBose, J., Seo, H., Choi, Y., Quan, X., & Joseph, A. (2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 61-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758670800100306
What the HCS 446 Week 1 instructions ask
HCS 446 Week 1 usually introduces the facility design process. Students may be asked to describe the stages of planning and building a health care facility, identify the members of the planning and design team and their roles and explain principles such as evidence-based design, patient flow and regulatory compliance. Some versions ask students to begin the course project by choosing a facility type they will plan throughout the course. Most versions run a few pages and draw on design literature or professional guidance. Strong papers explain the stages in order with the decisions made at each, show why involving clinicians, patients and operations staff early prevents expensive changes later and connect the process to a specific facility.
How this HCS 446 Week 1 example is built
The paper begins with the problem the building answers: adults in mental health crisis in the county wait in hospital emergency departments or jail cells because there is nowhere else to go. It then describes the design process in eight stages, from needs assessment and a functional program that lists every space and its size, through schematic design, design development and construction documents, to bidding, construction and activation. The planning team is introduced by role, with the decisions each owns. A section on evidence-based design explains how research on healing environments shapes choices. The paper closes with the project's timeline, its guiding principles and the risks of skipping early stages.
HCS 446 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go
The first week of the facility planning course is usually graded on an accurate, well-ordered explanation of the design process and the planning team. Instructors look for the main stages described with the decisions made at each, the roles of owners, architects, engineers, clinicians, operations staff and regulators, and principles such as evidence-based design and compliance with design guidelines. Applying the process to a specific facility earns credit, especially when it sets up the rest of the course project. Scholarly and professional sources should support the discussion. The remaining credit covers writing mechanics and citation format. Papers that describe construction without the planning that precedes it, or that leave clinicians and patients out of the team, usually lose points.
HCS 446 Week 1 help: mistakes to avoid
The most common gap in HCS 446 Week 1 is starting with the building rather than the need. Begin with the service problem and the functional program, then design. Another is describing the team as only architects and contractors; clinicians, patients or their families, operations staff, information technology and infection prevention belong in planning from the start. Students also skip activation, the months of training and testing before opening. Name the stages in order and say what is decided in each. Mention the national design guidelines and evidence-based design, since both will return in later weeks. Choose a facility you can carry through the course. Finally, note that early changes are cheap and late changes expensive.
Related HCS 446 sample papers
Other HCS 446 week samples
- HCS 446 Week 2: Facility Selection and Research
- HCS 446 Week 3: Crisis Center Floor Plan
- HCS 446 Week 4: Codes, Compliance and Utilization
- HCS 446 Week 5: Facility Project Management
More BS in Health Administration sample papers
- HCS 430 Week 1: Sources of Health Law and Who Enforces Them
- HCS 433 Week 1: Aging Process and Theories of Aging
- HCS 451 Week 1: Quality-Improvement Concepts
- HCS 455 Week 1: Origins of U.S. Health Care Policy
HCS 446 Week 1 questions, answered
What does HCS/446 Week 1 usually ask for?
Many sections ask students to describe the facility design process, the planning team and design principles, and to choose the facility type they will plan throughout the course.
Where can I find a free HCS 446 Week 1 sample paper?
The crisis center design process paper is published on this page at no charge, with brief notes in the margin on each stage. We will write your first facility planning paper free as well.
What are the stages of health care facility design?
Needs assessment, functional programming, schematic design, design development, construction documents, bidding, construction and activation or transition into the building.
What is a functional program in health care design?
A document that defines the services, workload, staffing, spaces, sizes and relationships a facility needs, prepared before design begins.
What is evidence-based design?
An approach that bases decisions about a health care building on research linking design features, such as single rooms, daylight and noise control, to outcomes for patients and staff.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All HCS 446 week samples · All courses