HCP 513 Week 3 Regulatory Agencies and Enforcement Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This HCP 513 Week 3 example maps the regulatory agencies and enforcement tools that apply to health care organizations, as the compliance officer of a composite 85-physician multispecialty group prepares a guide for her board. The third week of University of Phoenix HCP 513 turns to the agencies that write, check and enforce the rules, and HCP/513 MHA compliance students usually explain which agencies oversee which activities, how enforcement works and what an organization should do when an agency calls. The APA 7 paper starts with three events in one month: a Medicare contractor's review of physical therapy claims, a state medical board complaint and a federal subpoena served on a neighboring practice. It then maps agencies at the federal and state levels by what they oversee and the tools they use, from claim reviews and exclusion to civil and criminal cases. Whistleblower research shows why internal reporting matters.

CourseHCP 513 Health Care Compliance Foundations (HCP/513)
Week3
Paper typeRegulatory agencies paper
Lengthabout 1,168 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramMHA
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HCP 513 Week 3

1

A Contractor's Letter, a Licensing Board Complaint and a Subpoena Down the Street: Mapping the Agencies That Regulate a Physician Group and the Tools They Use to Enforce

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

HCP/513: Health Care Compliance Foundations

Week 3 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The medical group, its letters and complaints are composites written for a model paper; enforcement figures and research come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title names three kinds of contact, which previews the paper's point that agencies reach organizations in very different ways.
2

In a single month, three events reached the compliance officer of a composite 85-physician multispecialty group. The group's Medicare administrative contractor sent a letter selecting 20 physical therapy claims for medical review. A patient filed a complaint with the state medical board about one of the group's orthopedic surgeons. And federal agents served a subpoena on an unaffiliated pain management practice two blocks away, which the group's physicians heard about within hours. The board asked the officer which agencies could reach the group and how. This paper presents the map she prepared.

Why a Map Helps

Health care is overseen by many agencies with overlapping reach. Staff who receive a letter or visit need to know what it means and whom to call. Leaders need to know which risks carry administrative, civil or criminal consequences. A map organizes the agencies by what they oversee and the tools they use.

Federal Agency One: The Medicare and Medicaid Agency

The federal agency that runs Medicare and oversees Medicaid sets conditions of participation and payment rules and works through contractors. Medicare administrative contractors process claims and conduct medical reviews, such as the review of the group's therapy claims. Other contractors audit claims for improper payments and investigate suspected fraud, and can recommend payment suspension. The agency also certifies facilities, such as the group's surgery center, through state survey agencies or approved accrediting organizations.

Federal Agency Two: The Office of Inspector General

The inspector general's office for the federal health department audits and investigates federal health programs, excludes individuals and entities from participation, imposes civil monetary penalties, negotiates corporate integrity agreements in settlements and issues compliance guidance and advisory opinions (Office of Inspector General, 2023). Its self-disclosure protocol lets providers report potential fraud and resolve it, generally with lower penalties than if the government discovered it first.

What this part is doingMentioning the self-disclosure protocol shows the board that the inspector general is also a route for resolving problems, not only a threat.
3

Federal Agency Three: The Department of Justice

The Justice Department, through U.S. Attorneys' offices and its civil and criminal divisions, pursues civil False Claims Act actions and prosecutes health care fraud, kickback schemes and related crimes. The department reported more than $6.8 billion in False Claims Act recoveries for fiscal year 2025, over $5.7 billion of it tied to health care; private relators filed 1,297 qui tam suits and the government opened 401 investigations of its own (U.S. Department of Justice, 2026).

Other Federal Agencies

The Office for Civil Rights enforces privacy, security and breach notification rules and civil rights laws in health care. The Drug Enforcement Administration registers prescribers of controlled substances and enforces controlled substance laws, relevant to the group's pain and surgical practices. The Federal Bureau of Investigation investigates health care fraud with the inspector general.

State Agencies

States license facilities, such as the surgery center and laboratory, and professionals, through medical, nursing and therapy boards, which investigate complaints about practice and conduct. State Medicaid fraud control units investigate and prosecute Medicaid fraud and patient abuse. State health departments survey facilities, and state attorneys general may enforce privacy and consumer protection laws.

Enforcement Tools From Least to Most Severe

Enforcement ranges widely. Administrative tools include education letters, claim denials, targeted reviews, extrapolated overpayment demands, payment suspension, revocation of billing privileges, civil monetary penalties and exclusion. Civil enforcement under the False Claims Act can bring treble damages and per-claim penalties. Criminal prosecution can lead to fines, imprisonment and mandatory exclusion. Licensing boards can reprimand, restrict or revoke licenses.

Where the Three Events Fall

The contractor review is administrative and routine but can lead to denials and, if patterns emerge, wider review. The board complaint concerns one surgeon's license and requires his response, supported by the group. The subpoena next door is a criminal or civil investigation of another practice, but agents often seek records from referral partners, so the group checked whether it had any financial relationships with that practice. It had one: a shared lease for an MRI suite, reviewed immediately.

Why Insiders Matter

Many enforcement cases begin with an insider. A study of whistleblowers in fraud cases against pharmaceutical companies found that most were insiders, that many had first tried to fix problems within their companies and that many described serious personal and professional costs from coming forward (Kesselheim et al., 2010). When employees believe internal reports will be heard, problems reach the compliance officer before they reach a prosecutor.

What this part is doingLinking the whistleblower research to internal reporting turns enforcement data into a reason to strengthen the hotline.
4

How Enforcement Has Shifted

Enforcement priorities change, and the map needs updating. In recent years, federal enforcement has focused increasingly on Medicare Advantage risk adjustment coding, telehealth, laboratory testing, opioid prescribing and financial relationships with referral sources. Data analytics now drive much of it: contractors and investigators compare each provider's billing patterns with peers and target outliers. For the group, that means its own billing data are visible to regulators in ways that make patterns, such as unusually high rates of complex visits or therapy units, likely to draw attention. The officer began running the same peer comparisons internally so the group would see its outliers first.

Cooperation and Its Value

How an organization responds affects outcomes. Federal policy gives credit to organizations that voluntarily disclose problems, cooperate with investigations and fix root causes, which can reduce penalties in civil settlements. That credit depends on having found and documented problems through the compliance program before the government arrives, another reason the officer invests in auditing and internal reporting.

A Protocol for Agency Contact

The officer set a protocol. Any letter, call, visit or subpoena from a government agency goes to the compliance officer within one business day. Legal counsel is notified for any subpoena, search warrant or investigation. Staff are told they may be courteous but should not answer substantive questions or provide documents without coordination. A legal hold preserves relevant records. Routine contractor reviews are handled by the revenue cycle team with compliance oversight, with deadlines tracked.

Keeping the Map Current

The officer assigned herself a quarterly review of the map, adding new enforcement priorities, rule changes and any agency contacts the group received. Each review is summarized for the board's compliance committee in one page, so directors can see whether the group's exposure is changing and whether contacts are being handled on time.

Training Staff on the Protocol

Front-desk staff, who are often first to meet an agent or process server, received a one-page guide: be polite, ask for identification and the document, call the compliance officer and do not guess. Managers learned the difference between a routine audit letter and a legal demand.

Conclusion

The group can be reached by federal agencies that pay for, audit, investigate and prosecute, by state agencies that license and inspect and by courts through whistleblowers. Mapping each agency's reach and tools, and setting a protocol for contact, turned a month of unsettling events into a plan. Research on whistleblowers and record qui tam filings show why internal reporting is the group's best early warning.

5

References

Kesselheim, A. S., Studdert, D. M., & Mello, M. M. (2010). Whistle-blowers' experiences in fraud litigation against pharmaceutical companies. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(19), 1832-1839. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr0912039

Office of Inspector General. (2023). General compliance program guidance. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/general-compliance-program-guidance/

U.S. Department of Justice. (2026, January 16). False Claims Act settlements and judgments exceed $6.8B in fiscal year 2025 [Press release]. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/false-claims-act-settlements-and-judgments-exceed-68b-fiscal-year-2025

What the HCP 513 Week 3 instructions ask

In HCP 513 Week 3, the assignment typically asks which government bodies oversee health care organizations and how each enforces its rules. Prompts often name federal agencies such as the Medicare and Medicaid agency, the Office of Inspector General, the Department of Justice and the Office for Civil Rights, state agencies such as licensing boards and Medicaid fraud units, enforcement tools and penalties and how organizations should respond to inquiries. Some versions ask for a table of agencies. Strong papers organize agencies by what they oversee, explain enforcement tools accurately with current data, distinguish civil, criminal and administrative actions, apply the map to one organization and describe a response protocol.

How this HCP 513 Week 3 example is built

The paper opens with three events in one month: a Medicare contractor's letter selecting 20 physical therapy claims for review, a patient's complaint to the state medical board about an orthopedic surgeon and a federal subpoena served on a pain practice down the street. Agencies are then mapped at the federal and state levels. Enforcement tools are explained, from contractor reviews and payment suspension to exclusion, civil monetary penalties, False Claims Act cases and criminal prosecution. Record whistleblower filings in fiscal year 2025 and research on whistleblowers' experiences follow. A protocol for responding to agency contacts, and one-page training for front-desk staff, close the paper.

HCP 513 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

The agencies week is typically graded on accuracy about who regulates what and how enforcement works, and on whether the student can apply that knowledge to an organization. Instructors look for correct identification of federal and state agencies and their roles, explanation of enforcement tools and penalties, distinctions among administrative, civil and criminal enforcement, current enforcement data and practical guidance for responding to agencies. Applying the map to a specific organization, and to real contacts it has received, shows understanding. Official sources and research earn credit, and dates matter. Organization, clear writing and APA citations account for the remainder. Papers that confuse agencies' roles, or list agencies without explaining their tools, commonly lose points.

HCP 513 Week 3 help: mistakes to avoid

A common weakness in HCP 513 Week 3 is listing agencies without explaining what they do to an organization. For each, state what it oversees, what tools it has and how an organization would encounter it: a letter, a survey, a subpoena, a complaint. Distinguish administrative actions, such as payment suspension and exclusion, from civil cases under the False Claims Act and criminal prosecution. Include state agencies, which license people and facilities. Use current enforcement data with dates. Explain why internal reporting matters, since many cases begin with insiders. Finally, describe how your organization should respond when an agency calls, including who is notified, how records are preserved and how staff are trained.

Related HCP 513 sample papers

Other HCP 513 week samples

More MHA sample papers

HCP 513 Week 3 questions, answered

What does HCP/513 Week 3 usually ask for?

Assignments in this week generally call for identifying the agencies that regulate health care, explaining their enforcement tools and penalties and describing how organizations respond to inquiries.

Where can I find a free HCP 513 Week 3 sample paper?

The agency map for a physician group is available above to read for free, and margin notes explain each enforcement tool. A version mapped to your own facility is free as a first paper.

What does the HHS Office of Inspector General do?

It audits and investigates federal health programs, excludes individuals and entities from participation, imposes civil monetary penalties, issues compliance guidance and advisory opinions and runs a self-disclosure protocol.

What is a qui tam lawsuit?

A lawsuit filed by a private person, often an employee, on the government's behalf under the False Claims Act, in which the whistleblower can receive a share of any recovery.

What happens if a provider is excluded from Medicare?

Medicare, Medicaid and other federal programs stop paying for anything the excluded person or company furnishes, orders or prescribes, and an employer that bills for their work can be fined.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.