| Course | FIN 571 Corporate Finance (FIN/571) |
|---|---|
| Week | 1 |
| Paper type | Financial analysis and planning paper |
| Length | about 1,166 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for FIN 571 Week 1
Can Cascade Ridge Grow 15 Percent Without New Owners? Ratio Analysis, a Percent-of-Sales Forecast and the Additional Funds a Craft Beverage Company Would Need
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
FIN/571: Corporate Finance
Week 1 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Cascade Ridge Beverage and all figures are composites written for a model paper; methods and research findings come from the sources listed.
Cascade Ridge Beverage, a composite company in Bend, Oregon, began as a craft brewery and now sells beer, hard tea and a growing line of non-alcoholic craft beers through distributors in nine western states. Revenue last year was $180 million and net income about $11 million. Beer volume has been flat for three years as drinking habits shift, while non-alcoholic and hard tea sales grew more than 30 percent. Management wants to grow revenue 15 percent next year, to about $207 million, mostly from those lines. The founding family owns 80 percent of the shares and does not want to sell more. The family's question was simple: could the company grow that fast with the money it generates and borrows, or would growth require new owners? This paper answers with ratio analysis and a financial plan.
Profitability
Gross margin was 40 percent and operating margin 10 percent, on operating income of $18 million. After $3.2 million of interest and a 26 percent tax rate, net income was about $10.95 million, a net margin of 6.1 percent. Return on assets was about 7.3 percent and return on equity about 13.5 percent. Craft beverage peers of similar size reported operating margins of 8 to 12 percent, so Cascade Ridge sits in the middle. By line, non-alcoholic products earn the highest gross margin, about 46 percent, because they sell at prices close to craft beer without the federal excise tax, while beer margins have slipped to 37 percent with discounting.
Efficiency
Total asset turnover was 1.2 times, about average for brewers, who need heavy equipment. Inventory, $22 million of ingredients, packaging and finished goods, turned about five times a year on cost of goods sold. Receivables of $14 million represent about 28 days of sales; many states' alcohol laws limit how much credit brewers may extend to distributors, which keeps collection periods short.
Liquidity
Current assets of about $42 million against current liabilities of about $27 million give a current ratio near 1.6. Cash of $6 million covers about two weeks of operating expenses, thin for a seasonal business whose summer production requires building inventory in spring.
Solvency
Debt of $48 million against equity of $81 million gives a debt-to-equity ratio near 0.6. Operating income covers interest about 5.6 times. The company's bank requires coverage above 3 times and total debt below 3 times EBITDA, its operating earnings before interest, taxes and noncash charges, which at about $27 million of EBITDA gives room to borrow roughly $30 million more before reaching the limit.
What the Ratios Say
Cascade Ridge is financially sound but changing. Its liquidity and debt are moderate, giving room to borrow, but returns in the original beer business are falling while newer lines earn more. Growth therefore makes strategic sense, but it will consume capital. Higgins et al. (2019) describe this as the central planning question for growing firms: whether operations can fund growth or whether outside financing must fill the gap.
The Percent-of-Sales Forecast
Following the standard percent-of-sales approach (Ross et al., 2022), the forecast assumes that operating assets grow in proportion to sales: receivables, inventory and the production equipment that runs near capacity, about $126 million together, or 70 cents per dollar of sales. Spontaneous liabilities, payables and accrued expenses of $21 million, grow too, about 11.7 cents per dollar of sales. Debt and equity do not grow automatically; they are the result the plan solves for. Net margin is held at 6.1 percent and the dividend payout at 30 percent of earnings.
Additional Funds Needed
Additional funds needed equals the required increase in assets, minus the spontaneous increase in liabilities, minus the addition to retained earnings (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2022). With sales rising by $27 million, assets must rise by 0.70 times $27 million, or about $18.9 million. Payables and accruals supply about $3.2 million. Next year's net income of about $12.6 million, less 30 percent paid out, retains about $8.8 million. The gap is $18.9 million minus $3.2 million minus $8.8 million, about $6.9 million.
Adding the Canning Line
The forecast so far assumes assets grow smoothly. In fact, Cascade Ridge's canning line runs two shifts at full capacity, and the non-alcoholic growth requires a new high-speed line costing about $9 million. That lumpy investment raises the funding need to about $15.9 million.
The DuPont View of Returns
Return on equity of 13.5 percent can be split into three parts: a net margin of 6.1 percent, asset turnover of 1.2 times and an equity multiplier of about 1.85, total assets of $150 million over equity of $81 million. Compared with three years ago, when return on equity was about 16 percent, the decline came almost entirely from margin, as beer discounting deepened, while turnover and financing barely changed. That points the planning effort at margin and product mix rather than at the balance sheet, and it explains why management wants growth concentrated in the higher-margin lines.
Seasonality Inside the Year
An annual forecast hides seasonal swings. Cascade Ridge builds inventory from March to May for summer, when about 40 percent of annual volume ships. Peak working capital in May runs about $8 million above the year-end figure used in the percent-of-sales forecast. The annual funding gap therefore understates the peak borrowing need, which the company's revolving line must cover. A monthly cash budget, prepared alongside the annual plan, will size that line. Without it, the company could meet its annual target and still run short of cash in May, when cans, malt and hops for the summer must be paid for weeks before distributors pay for the beer.
Sensitivity
If net margin improved to 7 percent, retained earnings would rise by about $1.3 million and the gap would fall to about $14.6 million. Cutting the payout to 15 percent would reduce the gap by about $1.9 million. If growth reached only 10 percent, the smooth asset increase would shrink by about $6 million, though the canning line would still be needed. Management controls the payout directly; margin and growth depend partly on the market.
Can the Company Avoid New Owners?
A gap of about $16 million is within the roughly $30 million of borrowing capacity the bank's covenants allow. Borrowing the full amount would raise debt to about $64 million and the debt-to-earnings ratio to about 2.2 times, within limits but leaving less room for a bad year. A lower payout, an equipment lease for the canning line or a combination could reduce the borrowing. Week 6 compares those options.
Conclusion
Cascade Ridge's ratios show a sound company whose newer lines outperform its core beer business. Growing 15 percent requires about $16 million of outside funds, mostly because of a new canning line. That gap fits within its borrowing capacity, so growth does not require new owners, but how it is financed will decide how much flexibility remains.
References
Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2022). Financial management: Theory and practice (17th ed.). Cengage.
Higgins, R. C., Koski, J. L., & Mitton, T. (2019). Analysis for financial management (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J., & Jordan, B. D. (2022). Corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw Hill.
What the FIN 571 Week 1 instructions ask
The first FIN 571 assignment usually pairs a review of a company's statements with a first financial plan. Expect computing and interpreting liquidity, asset management, debt management, profitability and market ratios, comparing them with industry benchmarks and prior years, and building pro forma statements for a growth scenario, often with the percent-of-sales method and an additional funds needed calculation. Many versions ask students to identify the company's strengths and weaknesses and the financing implications of its growth plan. Show formulas and figures in tables, explain what each result means for decisions, test key assumptions and cite corporate finance texts in APA style.
How this FIN 571 Week 1 example is built
A company deciding how fast to grow needs to know two things first: how healthy it is now, and how much money the growth will consume. The paper starts with ratios in four groups, compared with craft beverage peers, and finds solid liquidity and moderate debt but declining returns in the beer business. It then forecasts next year's balance sheet with assets and spontaneous liabilities rising in proportion to sales. The additional funds needed formula shows the gap between what growth requires and what retained earnings and payables supply. Adding the planned canning line widens the gap. Sensitivity to margin and payout shows what management controls. The paper ends with financing options for Week 6.
FIN 571 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go
Grading this first week usually rewards correct ratios with meaningful comparisons and a financial plan whose numbers tie together. Instructors look for ratios grouped and interpreted, with peer or trend comparisons, and for a pro forma forecast that applies the percent-of-sales method sensibly, distinguishing items that grow with sales from those that do not. A correct additional funds needed calculation, with each term explained, earns credit, as does sensitivity analysis showing how margin, payout and capacity change the result. Linking the analysis to the company's strategy and financing choices shows graduate-level judgment. Tables, clear assumptions and APA references complete the paper. Graders at the MBA level also look for a short statement of what management can control, such as payout and pricing, and what it cannot, such as category growth.
FIN 571 Week 1 help: mistakes to avoid
A common FIN 571 Week 1 error is assuming every balance sheet item grows with sales, including debt and equity, which hides the financing gap the plan is meant to reveal. Grow only operating assets and spontaneous liabilities. Another is ignoring capacity: if plants are full, fixed assets jump rather than rise smoothly. Account for it. Students also present ratios without comparison or interpretation. Say what each one means. Avoid treating additional funds needed as a precise number; test it. Explain each term of the formula. Separate business lines when their performance differs. Finally, connect the funding gap to the financing choices the company faces, and note which choice preserves the most flexibility.
Related FIN 571 sample papers
Other FIN 571 week samples
More MBA sample papers
- MGT 521 Week 1: Manager Profile and Career Fit
- MGT 526 Week 1: The Organization and Its Changing Environment
FIN 571 Week 1 questions, answered
What does FIN 571 Week 1 usually cover?
It usually covers financial statement and ratio analysis and basic financial planning, including pro forma statements, the percent-of-sales method and calculating the additional funds a company needs to grow.
Where can I find a free FIN 571 Week 1 sample paper?
The complete ratio analysis and growth plan for a craft beverage company, with the additional funds calculation shown and annotated, is posted on this page for anyone. A first draft on your own company is free on request.
What is the additional funds needed formula?
It equals the increase in assets required by growth, minus the increase in spontaneous liabilities such as payables, minus the addition to retained earnings from next year's profit after dividends.
What is the percent-of-sales method?
A forecasting approach that assumes certain income statement and balance sheet items stay at their current percentage of sales, so they can be projected from a sales forecast.
Why does capacity matter in financial planning?
When plants are already full, growth requires a large new investment rather than a gradual increase in assets, which raises the funding need beyond what percent-of-sales suggests.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All FIN 571 week samples · All courses