| Course | FIN 370 Finance for Business (FIN/370) |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Time value of money application paper |
| Length | about 1,069 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | BS in Finance |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for FIN 370 Week 2
Four Money Decisions for a Food Truck Owner: A Loan Payment, Leasing Versus Buying a Second Truck, Saving for a Commissary Kitchen and the Real Cost of a Merchant Cash Advance
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
FIN/370: Finance for Business
Week 2 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The food truck business and all figures are composites written for a model paper; methods and research findings come from the sources listed.
A composite owner runs a food truck selling tacos and rice bowls at office parks and breweries and earns about $140,000 a year before her own pay. Demand exceeds what one truck can serve, and she plans to add a second truck this year and a small commissary kitchen within four years. Every step involves money paid or received at different times. A dollar next year and a dollar today are different amounts of money, and every one of her decisions depends on knowing by how much. This paper works through four decisions.
Decision One: The Equipment Loan
A lender offers $85,000 to buy and outfit a second truck at 9% annual interest for five years, with monthly payments at the end of each month. The monthly rate is 0.75% and there are 60 payments. The payment on an ordinary annuity is the loan amount times the rate divided by one minus the discount factor for 60 periods, which gives about $1,764 a month (Brigham & Houston, 2022). Over five years she would pay about $105,800, of which about $20,800 is interest. In the first month, $637.50 of the payment is interest and about $1,127 reduces principal; by the last year most of each payment is principal.
Decision Two: Lease or Buy
A leasing company offers the same outfitted truck for $1,650 a month for five years, paid at the beginning of each month, with no down payment, after which she could buy it for $15,000. If she buys with the loan, she owns the truck after five years and expects it to be worth about $22,000.
To compare, she discounts both at her borrowing rate of 9%. The loan option costs the present value of the loan payments, which equals the $85,000 borrowed, less the present value of the $22,000 resale value in five years, about $14,000, for a net cost of about $71,000. The lease payments are an annuity due; their present value is about $80,100. If she exercised the $15,000 purchase option to keep the truck, its present value of about $9,600 would add to the lease cost, while she would still own a truck worth $22,000, so the comparison favors buying by a wide margin. Buying is cheaper in present value terms by roughly $9,000 or more, depending on the resale value.
Decision Three: Saving for the Kitchen
She wants $60,000 in four years for commissary equipment and a lease deposit. A high-yield business savings account pays 4.2% compounded monthly. The monthly deposit that grows to $60,000 in 48 months is the future value annuity payment: $60,000 times the monthly rate divided by the growth factor minus one, about $1,150 a month. If she can deposit only $900 a month, she would have about $47,000 after four years and would need to wait about a year longer or finance the rest.
Decision Four: The Merchant Cash Advance
A company offers $30,000 now in exchange for $39,000 collected by taking 15% of her daily card sales until paid, which it expects to take about eight months. The offer is quoted as a factor of 1.30, which sounds like 30%. But the $9,000 cost is paid over about eight months, with the balance falling daily. Treated as a series of equal payments over 240 days, the implied monthly rate is roughly 6 to 7%, an effective annual rate above 100%. Compared with the 9% equipment loan, the advance is extraordinarily expensive and would only make sense for a short emergency she could not finance any other way.
What Compounding Means
Compounding explains why the advance is so costly and why the savings plan works. Interest earned or charged on prior interest grows over time; at 4.2% compounded monthly, the effective annual rate is about 4.28%, slightly more than the stated rate, while the advance's short repayment period multiplies its cost many times over. The Truth in Lending rules that require annual percentage rates on consumer loans exist because stated factors and fees hide these differences, but business financing like merchant cash advances is often not covered by those disclosure rules, so business owners must compute the effective rate themselves.
Taxes and Cash Flow
The comparison above ignores taxes to keep the focus on timing. In practice, interest on the loan and depreciation on the owned truck are deductible, while lease payments on an operating lease are deductible as rent. Because her business is profitable, both options produce tax savings of similar size, and the after-tax comparison still favors buying. Cash flow matters too: the loan payment is about $114 higher each month than the lease payment, which she must be able to cover in slow winter months.
Sensitivity
The lease versus buy answer depends on the resale value. If the truck were worth only $12,000 after five years, the loan's net cost would rise to about $77,200, still below the lease. The savings plan depends on the account rate; at 3% the deposit needed rises to about $1,180.
Putting the Answers Together
The owner should finance the second truck with the equipment loan rather than the lease, since buying is cheaper in present value terms and she keeps a valuable asset. She should decline the merchant cash advance. Petersen and Rajan (1994) found that small firms with close banking relationships obtained more credit and relied less on expensive alternatives, which argues for building her relationship with the equipment lender's bank now, before she needs short-term credit. She should begin a monthly transfer of about $1,150 to the savings account for the kitchen, or accept a later opening date if cash flow is tight while the loan is being paid. Graham and Harvey (2001) found that small firms more often rely on simple rules such as payback, but each of her choices turns on discounting, which a simple rule would miss.
Conclusion
Four decisions, a loan payment of about $1,764 a month, a lease that costs about $9,000 more than buying in present value, a savings plan of about $1,150 a month and an advance with an effective annual rate above 100%, all came from the same principle: money received or paid at different times must be brought to the same point before it can be compared.
References
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2022). Fundamentals of financial management (16th ed.). Cengage.
Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00044-7
Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04418.x
What the FIN 370 Week 2 instructions ask
FIN 370 Week 2 commonly asks students to solve and explain time value of money problems. Typical requirements include future and present values of single amounts, ordinary annuities and annuities due, loan amortization and payments, effective annual rates versus stated rates, uneven cash flows and applications such as comparing financing options or planning savings. Many sections provide a set of problems; others ask for applications to a business decision. The paper should show each formula or calculator input and the result, explain what the result means for the decision and cite finance texts and research in APA style. Clear labeling of rates and periods is expected throughout.
How this FIN 370 Week 2 example is built
A food truck owner meets every kind of time value problem within a year of expanding, which makes the formulas practical. The paper states each decision, identifies whether it involves a single amount or an annuity and when in each period the payments fall, then shows the calculation step by step. The loan and savings problems are straightforward applications. The lease versus buy comparison discounts both options to present value so they can be compared on the same basis. The merchant cash advance shows how an offer quoted as a simple factor can hide a very high annual cost. A final section explains what the four answers mean together for the owner's plan.
FIN 370 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
The rubric for time value work usually rewards correct identification of problem type, correct use of rates and periods, accurate results and clear interpretation. Faculty check that monthly problems use monthly rates and periods, that annuities due are distinguished from ordinary annuities, that effective annual rates account for compounding and that comparisons between options discount all cash flows to the same date. Explaining what each answer means for a decision earns more than calculations alone, and testing how sensitive a result is to one assumption shows judgment. Showing formulas or calculator inputs lets graders follow the work. Clear labels, consistent rounding and APA citations of finance sources complete the grade.
FIN 370 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid
A frequent FIN 370 Week 2 error is mixing annual rates with monthly periods, which produces payments far off the mark. Convert the rate and the number of periods to match the payment frequency. Another is comparing a lease and a purchase by adding up payments without discounting, which ignores timing. Discount both to present value. Students also treat an advance's factor rate as an interest rate; convert it to an effective annual rate based on how quickly it is repaid. Check whether each payment falls at the start or the close of its period. Show your inputs, including rate, periods and timing. Finally, say what each result means for the decision.
Related FIN 370 sample papers
Other FIN 370 week samples
- FIN 370 Week 1: Financial Management and Analysis
- FIN 370 Week 3: Financial Markets and Institutions
- FIN 370 Week 4: Risk, Return and Planning
- FIN 370 Week 5: International Finance and Summary
FIN 370 Week 2 questions, answered
What does FIN 370 Week 2 usually cover?
Discounting and compounding: what a future amount is worth today, what savings grow into, loan payments, effective rates and how these settle financing and saving choices.
Where can I find a free FIN 370 Week 2 sample paper?
The food truck owner's four money decisions are worked through here with every input and result explained in the margin, and nothing is charged to read them. Send your own problem set and we will prepare a first draft free of charge.
What is the difference between an ordinary annuity and an annuity due?
An ordinary annuity pays at the end of each period; an annuity due pays at the beginning, so each payment has one more period to earn or be discounted.
What is an effective annual rate?
The annual rate that reflects compounding within the year, allowing fair comparison of rates quoted with different compounding periods or fee structures.
How do you compare leasing and buying?
Discount the cash flows of each option, including payments, down payments, maintenance and resale value, to present value at the business's borrowing rate and choose the lower cost.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All FIN 370 week samples · All courses