| Course | ENT 527 Opportunity Assessment and Innovation (ENT/527) |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Graduate idea generation analysis |
| Length | about 1,151 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | University of Phoenix |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ENT 527 Week 2
Forty Ideas, Then Five: Generating and Narrowing Venture Ideas Around Food Packaging Waste
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
ENT/527: Opportunity Assessment and Innovation
Week 2 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The founder, her contacts and the ideas are composites written for a model paper.
Week 1 assessed the entrepreneurial mindset of Dana, a composite operations manager at a Minneapolis snack plant who sees a problem in the single-use corrugated boxes that move among regional food producers, suppliers and grocers. Before committing to her first idea, a reusable container service, she wants to explore the range of possible ventures around the problem. This paper describes how she generated and narrowed ideas.
Prior Knowledge and Opportunity
Shane (2000) studied how several entrepreneurs discovered opportunities to use a single new technology and found that each discovered a different opportunity, shaped by their prior knowledge of markets, ways to serve them and customer problems. People do not find opportunities by searching randomly; they recognize them in areas they already understand. Baron (2006) described opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: entrepreneurs connect seemingly unrelated changes, in technology, markets or regulation, into patterns that suggest a new product or service, using mental frameworks built from experience.
Dana's experience gives her both: detailed knowledge of food packaging and shipping and a network of peers. Recent changes she has noticed include rising corrugated prices, retailers asking suppliers to report packaging waste, state laws on packaging responsibility and cheaper tracking tags for containers.
How Ideas Were Generated
Girotra et al. (2010) compared idea generation processes in experiments and found that a hybrid process, in which people first generated ideas individually and then shared and built on them as a group, produced more ideas and better top ideas than teams working together from the start, partly because groups were poorer at selecting the best ideas. Dana used a hybrid approach.
Individual generation. Over two weeks, she listed every idea she could think of related to packaging waste and cost, reaching 22 in all.
Group session. She invited four peers, packaging and logistics managers from other plants, to a two-hour session. Each first wrote ideas alone for 20 minutes, then the group shared, combined and extended them, adding 11.
Customer interviews. She interviewed ten food producers and four grocery distribution managers, asking about packaging costs, frustrations and recent changes. These conversations added seven ideas and changed several existing ones.
Three of the five ideas that survived the first filters came from interviews, not from Dana's own list.
What the Interviews Revealed
The interviews mattered more than Dana expected. A bakery producer said that wet, crushed boxes on daily routes to grocers caused about 2 percent of product to be rejected at the dock, a cost larger than the boxes themselves. A produce distributor described how retailers had started asking suppliers to report the weight of packaging they ship, with no tool to collect the data. A small salsa maker said she could not afford custom box sizes and paid to ship air in oversized cartons. Two grocery distribution managers said they would welcome fewer boxes to break down and bale. Each comment pointed to a specific pain, and several pointed to ideas Dana had not considered.
Changes That Create Openings
Dana also listed recent changes that make new ventures possible now. Corrugated prices rose about 25 percent over two years. Several states passed extended producer responsibility laws for packaging, and more are considering them. Durable plastic crates with tracking tags have fallen in price, making it practical to track who holds each container. Grocers' sustainability reports now include supplier packaging, creating demand for data. Following Baron's pattern recognition view, the ideas worth exploring sit where these changes meet the pain customers described.
Ideas That Were Dropped and Why
Several appealing ideas did not survive. Developing a new compostable packaging material required research and capital far beyond a small team. A packaging marketplace app duplicated services from large suppliers. A consulting service for large food companies faced established firms and offered no advantage from Dana's background. Recording why ideas were dropped makes it easier to revisit them if conditions change.
The Idea Clusters
The 40 ideas fell into six clusters. Reusable containers: shared pools of durable crates for routes between producers and grocers; reusable pallets with tracking. Right-sized packaging: software that recommends smaller box sizes; on-demand box-making machines for small plants. Packaging data: a service that measures and reports packaging waste for retailers' supplier requirements. Recycled materials: brokering recycled corrugated back to box makers at better prices. Shared logistics: consolidating deliveries from several small producers to cut boxes and trucks. Consulting: packaging cost reviews for small food companies.
First-Pass Filters
Dana applied three quick filters. Fit: does the idea use her knowledge and network? Customer pain: did interviewees describe the problem as costly or urgent? Feasibility: could a small team test it within six months without major capital? Ideas requiring factories or new materials science failed feasibility; several consulting ideas passed feasibility but showed weak customer pain.
Ranking the Survivors
Of the ideas that passed all three filters, Dana ranked the strongest by how often interviewees raised the underlying pain without prompting. Wet and crushed boxes on produce and bakery routes came up in nine of fourteen interviews; packaging data requests came up in five; oversized boxes in four.
Five Ideas for Screening
A shared reusable container pool for regional producer-to-grocer routes, her original idea, refined by interviews to focus on produce and bakery routes with frequent deliveries.
A packaging waste reporting service for producers facing retailer requirements.
Right-sized packaging recommendations sold as software to small food plants.
Consolidated deliveries for small producers to the same grocery distribution centers.
A recycled corrugated brokerage between plants and box makers.
What Changed Through the Process
The process changed Dana's view of her original idea. Interviews showed that grocers cared most about produce and bakery routes, where deliveries are frequent and boxes get wet, so the container pool was narrowed to those routes. The packaging reporting idea, which she had not thought of, surfaced because two producers said retailers now ask for packaging data they cannot easily collect.
How Dana Will Keep Generating Ideas
Idea generation does not end with a list. Dana will keep a running notebook of problems she hears from producers and grocers, review it monthly and add ideas as conditions change, such as new packaging laws. She also plans a second group session in six months with different peers, including a grocery buyer and a truck route manager, whose views were missing from the first session. Research on prior knowledge suggests that widening the circle of people she talks to widens the range of opportunities she can see, since each brings knowledge she lacks.
Conclusion
Generating ideas from a problem Dana knows well, using individual work, a peer group and customer interviews, produced 40 ideas in six clusters. Research on prior knowledge, pattern recognition and idea generation explains why her experience matters and why a hybrid process yields better ideas. Simple filters narrowed the list to five, which Week 3 will screen in depth.
References
Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs "connect the dots" to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.19873412
Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56(4), 591-605. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144
Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602
What the ENT 527 Week 2 instructions ask
The second ENT 527 paper asks MBA students to generate venture ideas. Prompts may ask students to use creativity techniques such as brainstorming, problem-based observation, trend analysis or customer interviews, explain how prior knowledge and networks shape opportunity recognition, produce a range of ideas and narrow them using simple criteria. Some versions ask students to describe the problem behind each idea. Generate ideas from a problem or field you know, show the methods used and the range of ideas produced and support the approach with research on opportunity recognition cited in APA. Explain why the ideas kept for screening were chosen over the others and what you learned along the way.
How this ENT 527 Week 2 example is built
Our model paper starts with the problem Dana knows: single-use corrugated boxes moving between regional food producers, suppliers and grocers. Research shows that people discover opportunities related to their prior knowledge, that they recognize opportunities by connecting patterns among changes in technology, markets and regulation and that generating ideas individually before pooling them produces better top ideas than group brainstorming alone. Dana generates ideas alone, then with a small group of peers, then through interviews with 14 producers and grocers. The process yields 40 ideas in six clusters: reusable containers, right-sized packaging, data on packaging use, recycled-material sourcing, shared logistics and consulting. First-pass filters on fit, customer pain and feasibility leave five for detailed screening.
ENT 527 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
Graduate graders reward idea generation that is systematic and grounded in a real problem. Strong papers describe the problem space, use several idea generation methods and report the range of ideas produced, not just the favorite. Credit goes to applying research on prior knowledge, pattern recognition and idea generation processes, to first-pass filters that are explicit and to a clear explanation of why certain ideas move forward. Graders also value ideas that come from talking with potential customers. Graders also check that dropped ideas are explained, not silently left out. Specific examples of ideas, organized presentation and APA citations complete a strong paper.
ENT 527 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid
Idea generation papers often present one idea the writer already liked and describe it as the output of brainstorming. Show the full range of ideas and how you narrowed them. Another frequent gap is generating ideas without a problem in mind; strong ideas usually start from a pain someone has. Name it. Students also rely on a single method, such as group brainstorming; combining individual work, groups and customer conversations produces better options. Some papers skip the reasons ideas were dropped; explain the filters. Finally, keep the narrowed list short enough to screen carefully next week. A tutor can help you organize ideas into clusters and choose filters that fit your situation.
Related ENT 527 sample papers
Other ENT 527 week samples
- ENT 527 Week 1: The Entrepreneurial Mindset
- ENT 527 Week 3: Assessing Opportunities
- ENT 527 Week 4: Intrapreneurship
- ENT 527 Week 5: Social Entrepreneurship
- ENT 527 Week 6: Venture Concept
More MBA sample papers
- DAT 565 Week 2: Reports and Descriptive Statistics
- ECO 535 Week 2: Platforms and Network Effects
- ENT 588 Week 2: Applying Design Thinking
- FIN 571 Week 2: Estimating Cash Flows
ENT 527 Week 2 questions, answered
What does ENT 527 Week 2 usually cover?
It usually covers generating venture ideas: creativity methods, the role of prior knowledge and networks in opportunity recognition and narrowing ideas for screening.
Where can I find a free ENT 527 Week 2 sample paper?
The ENT 527 Week 2 idea generation sample on packaging waste is above in full, at no charge.
Where do good business ideas come from?
Often from problems people know well through work or experience, combined with noticing changes in technology, markets or regulation that create new possibilities.
Is group brainstorming the best way to generate ideas?
Research suggests that having people generate ideas individually first and then combine and build on them in a group often produces better top ideas than group brainstorming alone.
How many ideas should you generate before choosing one?
Many; generating a large number increases the chance of a strong idea, and the best ones often appear only after the obvious ideas are listed.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Request this one custom, free · All ENT 527 week samples · All courses