DNP 740 Week 2 Assessing Population Health Status With Data Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This DNP 740 Week 2 example assesses the health status of a defined population with data and presents the full paper in APA 7 form. Within University of Phoenix DNP 740 (catalog code DNP/740), the second week turns the population named in Week 1 into a data profile, and doctoral nursing students are expected to compare local figures with national benchmarks. The sample profiles fall-related health status for a rural county's 8,200 older adults by stacking five imperfect sources, from a statewide behavioral risk survey to ambulance run reports, emergency visits, death certificates and clinic records. It explains what each source captures and misses, converts counts into rates, handles small numbers honestly and ends with a summary that points the DNP project toward the remote townships and the oldest residents.

CourseDNP 740 Clinical Prevention and Population Health (DNP/740)
Week2
Paper typePopulation health status assessment
Lengthabout 1,156 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramDNP
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 740 Week 2

1

Six Hundred Twelve Ambulance Calls and a Survey Estimate: Building a Fall-Related Health Status Profile for a Rural County's Older Adults From Five Imperfect Data Sources

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

DNP/740: Clinical Prevention and Population Health

Week 2 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The county and figures are composites written for a model paper.

What this part is doingThe title lists the local number and the national estimate. The reader expects the paper to reconcile what different sources say.
2

Last week, I defined my population as the county's 8,200 community-dwelling adults 65 and older and identified falls as a priority. This paper builds a profile of fall-related health status from the available data, compares it with national trends and assesses what the data can and cannot tell us.

A Pyramid of Falls

Different data sources capture different levels of severity. At the base are all falls, most unreported to anyone; above them are falls with injury; then falls that bring an ambulance or emergency visit; then hospitalizations; and at the top, deaths. Each source sees one layer.

Survey Estimates

Moreland et al. (2020), analyzing national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, found that in 2018, 27.5% of adults 65 and older reported falling at least once in the past year and 10.2% reported a fall-related injury, with the percentage reporting falls rising from 2012 to 2016 before declining slightly in 2018. Our state's regional estimate for 2018 was 31%, which, applied to our population, suggests about 2,500 older residents fall each year and about 900 are injured.

Ambulance Data

Emergency medical services recorded 612 fall-related calls for adults 65 and older last year, or 75 per 1,000. Of these, 38% resulted in no transport, often lift assists where the person could not get up alone. Lift assists are an important signal: a person who cannot rise after a fall is at high risk of future harm.

Emergency Department Data

Emergency department records from the regional hospital show 214 fall-related visits by older county residents, or 26 per 1,000. About 30% resulted in admission, most for hip fractures and head injuries.

Two and a half thousand falls, six hundred calls, two hundred visits and a handful of deaths: each number is true, and none alone is the county's problem.

What this part is doingThe data are arranged by severity before any comparison, so the reader can see which layer each source captures.
3

Death Records

Death certificates recorded 11 fall deaths among county residents 65 and older over three years, an average of about 3.7 per year, or 45 per 100,000 older adults. Small numbers make annual rates unstable, so I use a three-year average.

Comparing With National Trends

Nationally, fall death rates among older adults climbed about 3% a year over the decade to 2016 (Burns & Kakara, 2018). Our three-year rate is higher than the most recent national rate I could obtain, but confidence intervals are wide.

Hospitalizations

Of the 214 emergency visits, 64 led to admission, including 29 hip fractures. Hip fractures carry high risk of lasting disability and death within a year, so this layer of the pyramid, though small, represents much of the long-term harm.

Clinic Data

Of 3,100 clinic patients 65 and older, 19% had a documented fall risk screening in the past year, and 8% had a documented fall. Screening is low, so documented falls undercount true falls among clinic patients; when patients are not asked, most falls simply never enter the record, and the clinic's picture of its own patients stays far rosier than the truth.

Subgroup Patterns

Ambulance data show that 41% of fall calls came from the two remote townships, which hold 24% of older residents. Adults 85 and older accounted for 36% of calls but 14% of the older population. Clinic data show lower screening among patients without a visit in the past six months.

Seasonal and Weekly Patterns

Ambulance calls rose in winter months and on weekends, when family members and home health aides are less available. These patterns suggest timing for outreach, such as check-in calls before winter storms and weekend volunteer visits.

Estimating Costs

Florence et al. (2018) estimated that medical costs attributable to fatal and nonfatal falls among older adults were about $50 billion in 2015, with Medicare paying $28.9 billion and Medicaid $8.7 billion for nonfatal falls. Scaling national costs by our share of the older population suggests roughly $1.3 million a year in fall-related medical costs for our county, a rough estimate but useful for making the case to local funders.

Strengths and Limits of Each Source

Survey data capture falls not reported to care but rely on recall and are available only at the regional level. Ambulance data are local and timely but miss falls handled without a call. Emergency data miss residents who use other hospitals. Death data are complete but small. Clinic data reflect only patients who come in and are screened. No source alone describes the problem; together they form a reasonable picture.

Rates Versus Counts

Counts tell the size of the workload; rates allow comparison. The two townships had more calls per 1,000 older residents than the rest of the county, even though their total counts were smaller. Presenting both to the health board avoids the mistake of directing resources only where counts are largest.

Confidence in Small Numbers

With 11 deaths over three years, a single additional death would change the rate by about 10%. For small numbers, I report counts alongside rates and avoid year-to-year comparisons that would mostly reflect chance.

Data Quality Checks

I checked ambulance records for duplicate calls to the same address on the same day and removed 14 duplicates. I also verified that fall calls were coded consistently; some crews had used a general injury code, which I reclassified after reading the narrative.

Data Gaps

We lack local data on fear of falling, which limits activity, and on repeat fallers across sources, since records are not linked. A data-sharing agreement between emergency medical services and the clinic could identify residents with repeated lift assists.

Presenting the Profile

For the health board, I prepared a one-page pyramid graphic showing the estimated falls, injuries, calls, visits and deaths, with township and age breakdowns beside it. Board members said the pyramid made the scale of unreported falls clear for the first time.

What the Profile Suggests for Action

The concentration of calls among residents 85 and older and in remote townships points to where prevention should start. The low screening rate points to a gap in primary care. The high share of lift assists points to a group at high risk who are already in contact with a public service and could be referred.

Health Status Summary

Our older population likely experiences about 2,500 falls a year, about 900 fall injuries, more than 600 ambulance calls and around 200 emergency visits, with rates concentrated among the oldest and those in remote townships. Fall risk screening in primary care is low.

Conclusion

Combining survey, ambulance, emergency, death and clinic data produces a fall-related health status profile for our county's older adults. National surveillance places roughly one older adult in four among those who fall in a given year, and national cost data suggest substantial local costs. Each source has limits, but together they show a large burden concentrated in identifiable subgroups and low screening, which point toward where to act.

What this part is doingThe conclusion summarizes the profile and its implications. Every source cited in the paper appears in the reference list.
4

References

Burns, E., & Kakara, R. (2018). Deaths from falls among persons aged ≥65 years: United States, 2007-2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(18), 509-514. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6718a1

Florence, C. S., Bergen, G., Atherly, A., Burns, E., Stevens, J., & Drake, C. (2018). Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(4), 693-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15304

Moreland, B., Kakara, R., & Henry, A. (2020). Trends in nonfatal falls and fall-related injuries among adults aged ≥65 years: United States, 2012-2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(27), 875-881. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6927a5

What the DNP 740 Week 2 instructions ask

DNP 740 Week 2 generally asks students to describe the health status of their population using epidemiologic data. The instructions call for several sources, rates as well as counts, comparison with state or national benchmarks and a statement of gaps in what the data can show. Many sections also ask for subgroup comparisons, so the profile shows who carries the most burden, and for a short discussion of data quality or limitations. The deliverable is usually a paper of four to six pages, although some faculty accept a data brief with tables. Whatever the format, the assignment wants numbers with sources and a clear line from the numbers to what the population needs, since Week 3 will ask why the pattern exists.

How this DNP 740 Week 2 example is built

The paper begins with a severity pyramid that places every source on one layer, from unreported falls at the base to deaths at the top, so the reader knows what each number represents before comparing any of them. Survey estimates come first because they are the broadest, followed by 612 ambulance calls, 214 emergency visits, admissions for hip fracture and 11 deaths over three years. Each layer states a rate per 1,000 or per 100,000 residents. National comparisons draw on MMWR trend reports and a published estimate of medical costs. Later sections separate counts from rates, warn against reading meaning into small death counts, describe the duplicate-call cleanup and list what cannot yet be measured, such as fear of falling or repeat fallers across systems.

DNP 740 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Grading rubrics for this week usually give the heaviest weight to the quality of the data analysis: sources that are credible and current, rates that are calculated correctly, and comparisons that make sense for the population. A second block of points goes to interpretation, meaning whether the student explains what the profile shows and what it cannot show. Faculty then score organization and the clarity of any tables or figures, followed by APA format for citations and references. Students often earn full content points when each number is traceable and the limitations section is specific. They lose them when rates lack denominators, when local and national figures are compared across different age bands or years, or when the conclusion claims more than the data support.

DNP 740 Week 2 help: mistakes to avoid

Students often paste statistics into the paper without saying which layer of the problem each figure measures, so an emergency visit rate and a survey prevalence end up side by side as if they were the same thing. Another frequent problem is reporting a single year of a rare outcome, such as deaths, and treating a change of one or two cases as a trend. Leaving out limitations is costly, because the rubric expects you to know where your data are weak. Keep tables simple, label every rate with its denominator and year, and compare like with like. Finally, end with what the profile suggests for action, since the next assignment in DNP 740 will ask you to explain the causes behind the pattern you found.

Related DNP 740 sample papers

Other DNP 740 week samples

More DNP sample papers

DNP 740 Week 2 questions, answered

What does DNP/740 Week 2 usually ask for?

Many sections ask students to assess the health status of a population using epidemiologic and other data, comparing with benchmarks and identifying gaps.

Why use several data sources?

Each source captures only part of a problem; surveys capture self-reported falls, ambulance and emergency data capture injurious falls that reach care and death records capture the most severe outcomes.

How much do older adult falls cost?

A national analysis estimated that medical costs attributable to fatal and nonfatal falls among older adults were about $50 billion in 2015, most paid by Medicare.

Where can I find a free DNP 740 Week 2 sample paper?

The paper above is a complete DNP 740 Week 2 health status assessment built from five data sources, with margin notes; a free custom sample for your own population can be requested through the form on this site.

Which data sources work for a DNP/740 population assessment?

Useful sources include state behavioral risk survey estimates, emergency medical services records, hospital discharge or emergency data, vital statistics and clinic records, each chosen for the part of the problem it captures.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.