Care Left Undone at 3 A.M.: One Question About Missed Nursing Care Asked Three Ways, Under Postpositivist, Interpretive and Critical Paradigms, and What Each Would Let a DNP Project Claim
[Student Name]
University of Phoenix
DNP/705: Philosophy, Theory, and Science for Nursing Practice
Week 2 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The unit and scenario are composites written for a model paper.
I manage a 32-bed medical unit. On a recent night shift, I found that three patients had not been turned for over four hours, one had not had a scheduled glucose check and several call lights had gone unanswered for more than ten minutes. Staff told me they were "just trying to keep up." Missed nursing care, required care that is delayed or not done, is well described in the literature, but how I study it depends on my assumptions about what kind of problem it is. This paper compares three paradigms applied to this problem.
What Paradigms Are
Weaver and Olson (2006) describe paradigms as sets of beliefs and practices shared by research communities that regulate inquiry. They distinguish positivist, postpositivist, interpretive and critical paradigms by their ontology, what reality is; epistemology, how it can be known; and methodology, how inquiry proceeds. They argue that nursing needs a critical, integrated understanding of these paradigms and caution against either treating them as incompatible or combining them carelessly.
The Postpositivist Question
Postpositivism assumes a reality that exists independently of observers but can only be known imperfectly and probabilistically. Under this paradigm, I would ask: What is the rate of missed care on our unit, and which factors, such as staffing ratios, admissions per shift or patient acuity, predict it? I would use a validated survey of missed care, staffing data and regression analysis. The results would give measurable relationships, such as the increase in missed turns associated with each additional patient per nurse.
The Interpretive Question
The interpretive paradigm assumes that reality is constructed through human meaning and experience (Weaver & Olson, 2006). Here I would ask: What is it like for nurses on our night shift to leave care undone, and how do they decide what to leave? I would interview nurses and observe shifts, analyzing their accounts for themes, and I would treat my own presence as manager as part of the data rather than something to be controlled away. The results might show that nurses prioritize tasks by visible urgency and that repositioning is dropped first because its consequences are delayed, along with the moral distress that accompanies these choices.
Postpositivism would count the missed turns; the interpretive paradigm would ask what it costs a nurse to skip them; the critical paradigm would ask who decided she had to.
The Critical Question
The critical social paradigm assumes that reality is shaped by social, political and economic structures and power, and that inquiry should expose and change inequities (Weaver & Olson, 2006). Here I would ask: Whose decisions produce the conditions in which care is missed, and whose interests do those decisions serve? I would examine staffing budgets, the hospital's decision to reduce night aides and how night nurses' voices are represented in staffing committees. The aim would be to change the conditions, not only describe them.
Ontology, Epistemology and Method Compared
Postpositivism treats missed care as an objective phenomenon measured imperfectly; knowledge comes from controlled observation; methods are quantitative. The interpretive paradigm treats missed care as an experience whose meaning varies; knowledge comes from understanding participants' perspectives; methods are qualitative. The critical paradigm treats missed care as a product of power relations; knowledge comes from dialogue and critique aimed at emancipation; methods are participatory and often mixed.
The Focus of the Discipline
Newman et al. (1991) proposed that the focus of nursing is caring in the human health experience and described three perspectives: particulate-deterministic, interactive-integrative and unitary-transformative. They argued that the unitary-transformative perspective is essential for fully explicating nursing knowledge. Missed care, seen from that focus, is not only a failure of tasks but a failure of the caring relationship, which pushes inquiry beyond counts toward meaning and context.
The Metaparadigm
Fawcett (1984) named four concepts that define the discipline's domain: the person receiving care, the environment, health and nursing itself. Each paradigm emphasizes different elements. Postpositivist inquiry into staffing emphasizes environment and nursing actions. Interpretive inquiry emphasizes the person, including the nurse as a person. Critical inquiry emphasizes environment in its social and political sense. A complete understanding of missed care touches all four concepts.
What Each Paradigm Would Produce
A postpositivist study might report that each additional admission per night shift was associated with a measurable increase in missed repositioning. An interpretive study might report that nurses describe "triaging my conscience" at 3 a.m. A critical study might produce a staffing proposal written with night nurses and presented to the budget committee. Each output is valuable, and each would persuade a different audience.
The Nurse as Researcher and Manager
As the unit's manager, my position shapes what staff will tell me. In an interpretive study, nurses may hesitate to describe missed care honestly to their supervisor. In a critical study, my own role in staffing decisions is part of what is examined. Recognizing this reflexively, as the interpretive and critical paradigms require, affects who should conduct interviews and how findings are shared.
Which Paradigm for a DNP Project
A DNP project aims to improve practice and measure outcomes, which draws heavily on postpositivist methods. But the interpretive and critical paradigms can shape the intervention and its acceptance. My project might measure missed care before and after a change in night staffing and task allocation, a postpositivist design, while using nurse focus groups to design the change, an interpretive element, and presenting findings to the staffing committee with nurses at the table, a critical element.
Choosing Measures That Fit the Paradigm
For the postpositivist part of the project, I would use a validated missed care survey and objective data such as the timing of documented turns. For the interpretive part, I would use open questions and let themes emerge rather than coding nurses' words into my categories in advance. For the critical part, success would be judged partly by whether night nurses gain a formal voice in staffing decisions, an outcome a survey alone would not capture.
Risks of Mixing Paradigms
Weaver and Olson (2006) caution against combining paradigms without recognizing their different assumptions. In my project, I will be explicit about which parts aim to measure, which aim to understand and which aim to change conditions, and I will not use interview data as if they were measurements or treat counts as if they captured meaning.
Conclusion
Missed nursing care on my unit can be studied as a measurable outcome of staffing, as an experience with moral weight for nurses or as a product of decisions about resources and power. Each paradigm asks a different question, uses different methods and supports different claims. Understanding these differences, along with the discipline's focus and metaparadigm, lets me design a DNP project that measures improvement while respecting nurses' experience and addressing the conditions that produce missed care.
References
Fawcett, J. (1984). The metaparadigm of nursing: Present status and future refinements. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 16(3), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1984.tb01393.x
Newman, M. A., Sime, A. M., & Corcoran-Perry, S. A. (1991). The focus of the discipline of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199109000-00002
Weaver, K., & Olson, J. K. (2006). Understanding paradigms used for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(4), 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03740.x
How this DNP 705 Week 2 example is structured
The DNP/705 Week 2 work usually compares philosophical paradigms in nursing inquiry. This paper keeps one practice problem constant and changes the paradigm, so that the reader sees how assumptions about reality and knowledge shape the question, the method and the conclusions. Students search this week as DNP 705 Week 2, DNP705 Wk 2 or DNP/705 Wk 2; all three are the same assignment.
DNP/705 Week 2 questions, answered
What does DNP/705 Week 2 usually ask for?
Many sections ask students to compare philosophical paradigms, such as postpositivist, interpretive and critical approaches, and to explain how they shape nursing inquiry and practice.
What is a paradigm in nursing research?
A set of beliefs and practices shared by a community of researchers that shapes what counts as reality, how knowledge is gained and which methods are used.
What is the nursing metaparadigm?
The four central concepts of the discipline identified by Fawcett: person, environment, health and nursing, which together define nursing's domain.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.