CCMH 506 Week 1 Psychodynamic and Adlerian Models Example

Reviewed by Lenora Whitcombe, MSN, RN · University of Phoenix · Updated

This CCMH 506 Week 1 example applies psychodynamic and Adlerian counseling models to one client, a twenty-nine-year-old paralegal in Tempe whose harsh self-criticism and low mood followed a breakup, comparing how each model explains her struggles, what the counselor would listen for and do and what research says about each approach. University of Phoenix CCMH 506 opens with psychodynamic and Adlerian models in Week 1, and CCMH/506 has graduate counselors earning an MS in Clinical Mental Health Counseling describe both models accurately and use them with a specific client. A composite counseling intern at a university community clinic presents the case. His sources are Shedler's review of psychodynamic efficacy, a meta-analysis of long-term psychodynamic therapy and an Adlerian text on theory and practice.

CourseCCMH 506 Personality Theories and Counseling Models (CCMH/506)
Week1
Paper typeCounseling theory application
Lengthabout 1,155 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramMS in Clinical Mental Health Counseling
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for CCMH 506 Week 1

1

Alana's Inner Critic Through Two Lenses: A Psychodynamic and an Adlerian Reading of One Client

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

CCMH/506: Personality Theories and Counseling Models

Week 1 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The clinic, the client and all details are composites written for a model paper; theories and research findings come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title names the symptom both models must explain.
2

Alana Brooks came to our clinic saying, "There's a voice in my head that never shuts up about how I'm failing." This term, I will apply eight counseling models to her, one each week. This paper begins with psychodynamic and Adlerian approaches.

Alana

Alana is twenty-nine, Black, the first in her family with a college degree and a paralegal at a Tempe law firm. Four months ago her partner of three years ended their relationship, saying she was "too intense." Since then she has felt low, slept poorly and stayed late at work redoing tasks she fears are flawed. She describes her mother as loving but exacting, someone who said, "You have to be twice as good," and checked her homework nightly. Her father left when she was six. She has a few close friends but has stopped calling them. She is not suicidal.

The Psychodynamic View

Psychodynamic approaches assume that much of mental life operates outside awareness, that past relationships shape present patterns and that painful feelings are often avoided in ways that cause new problems. Shedler (2010) reviewed evidence on psychodynamic therapy and identified features that distinguish its technique: attention to emotion and its expression, looking at how clients steer around painful thoughts and feelings, spotting themes that keep coming back, discussing past experiences, focusing on relationships, attending to the relationship with the therapist and exploring wishes, fears and fantasies. Shedler concluded that the effects of psychodynamic therapy were comparable to those of other evidence-based treatments and that gains tended to last and even increase after treatment ended.

What this part is doingListing the distinctive features first shows what a modern psychodynamic counselor would actually do.
3

Reading Alana Psychodynamically

A psychodynamic counselor would listen for patterns. Alana's inner critic sounds like an internalized version of her mother's checking, now turned inward. Her partner's complaint that she was too intense might connect to fear of abandonment rooted in her father's departure, a fear she manages by trying to be perfect so no one leaves. Her overwork may be a way to avoid grief about the breakup. In sessions, the counselor would notice whether Alana expects judgment from the counselor and would gently explore that expectation as it happens, since the therapy relationship offers a live view of her patterns.

Brief or Long Term?

Leichsenring and Rabung (2008) meta-analyzed studies of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, lasting at least a year or fifty sessions. For complex mental disorders, such as personality disorders, chronic conditions and multiple co-occurring problems, long-term therapy produced better outcomes than shorter treatments, with large improvements in overall functioning and symptoms.

Alana's difficulties seem less complex: a depressive reaction to loss layered on long-standing perfectionism. A briefer psychodynamic approach focused on her central relational pattern may suit her, with longer work considered if patterns prove deeply entrenched.

Alana's inner critic may be her mother's voice, kept close because it once felt like love and protection.

The Adlerian View

Carlson et al. (2006) described Adlerian therapy as holistic, goal-oriented and social. Adlerians see people as striving to belong and to feel significant, with behavior guided by goals, often outside awareness, rather than driven by the past. Each person develops a lifestyle, a characteristic way of moving toward goals based on early conclusions about self, others and life, sometimes called private logic. Psychological health shows in social interest, a sense of belonging and contribution. Therapy moves through building a relationship, assessing the lifestyle through family constellation and early recollections, fostering insight into mistaken beliefs and reorienting toward more useful goals, with encouragement throughout.

Reading Alana Adlerianly

An Adlerian counselor would ask about Alana's family constellation: an only child raised by a single mother who worked two jobs and pinned hopes on her. Early recollections would offer clues. Alana recalled, at seven, bringing home a spelling test with one error and watching her mother's face fall. Her private logic might be: "I am only worthy if I am flawless." Her goal, to secure belonging through perfection, makes sense given her history but is costing her friendships and rest. Encouragement, noticing effort and growth rather than outcomes, would counter her discouragement, and reconnecting with friends would strengthen social interest.

What this part is doingQuoting her early recollection shows how Adlerian assessment turns memory into a working belief.
4

Comparing the Models

Both models take Alana's history seriously. The psychodynamic model looks backward and inward, at feelings she avoids and patterns she repeats, and uses the therapy relationship as a tool. The Adlerian model looks forward, at the goals her behavior serves, and emphasizes encouragement, belonging and practical change. Psychodynamic work may help Alana grieve and understand her fear of abandonment; Adlerian work may help her revise the belief that worth requires perfection and reconnect with others.

Culture

Both models need cultural care. Her mother's message, "twice as good," reflects a real response to racism, not simply a parenting style. Neither model should pathologize it. An Adlerian emphasis on social context and belonging may fit Alana's experience, and a psychodynamic counselor would need to explore how racism and being first in her family shape her inner critic.

Limits of Each Model

Each model also has limits for Alana. Psychodynamic work can feel slow to a client who wants relief now, and Alana told me she wants "tools, not just talking." Adlerian lifestyle assessment can seem intrusive early in treatment if it asks for family history before trust is built. Research on Adlerian therapy is thinner than for psychodynamic therapy, with fewer controlled trials, so I would hold its concepts as useful guides rather than proven mechanisms. Both models leave room for the skills-based work later weeks will add.

What Fits Me

I am drawn to the psychodynamic attention to patterns and the therapy relationship, and to Adlerian encouragement. With Alana, I would begin by exploring her inner critic's history while encouraging small acts of reconnection.

Questions for Supervision

Applying these models raised questions I will bring to supervision. How do I explore Alana's relationship with her mother without implying her mother was harmful? How much should I attend to her expectation that I will judge her, and when would naming it feel intrusive rather than helpful? And how do I hold the Adlerian emphasis on goals alongside the psychodynamic emphasis on feelings without confusing her?

A First Session Plan

In our next session, I will ask Alana to describe a recent moment when the inner critic was loud, what it said, how she felt and what she did next. Both models can use that material: the psychodynamic counselor would look for avoided feelings and echoes of earlier relationships, and the Adlerian counselor would look for the goal the critic serves. Starting with a concrete moment keeps the conversation grounded in her experience rather than in theory.

Conclusion

Psychodynamic and Adlerian models offer complementary readings of Alana's self-criticism: one sees an internalized critic guarding against abandonment, the other a mistaken belief that worth requires perfection. Both have research and practice support, and both suggest that understanding her history can loosen its grip.

5

References

Carlson, J., Watts, R. E., & Maniacci, M. (2006). Adlerian therapy: Theory and practice. American Psychological Association.

Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 300(13), 1551-1565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.13.1551

Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018378

What the CCMH 506 Week 1 instructions ask

In the first week of CCMH 506, students typically study psychodynamic and Adlerian approaches to personality and counseling. Prompts usually ask students to explain each model's view of personality and of how problems develop, describe the counselor's role and typical techniques, summarize research support and apply both models to a client vignette. Some versions ask students to compare the models' views of the past, the unconscious and social context. Describe what each model would focus on with the client, give examples of interventions in plain language, evaluate the evidence fairly and note which aspects of each fit the client and your own developing style. Attend to the client's culture in both readings, and cite scholarly sources in APA style.

How this CCMH 506 Week 1 example is built

Owen Whitaker, a counseling intern at a university community clinic in Tempe, sees Alana Brooks, twenty-nine, a first-generation college graduate working as a paralegal. Since a breakup, she has felt low and berates herself over small mistakes. A psychodynamic reading, drawing on Shedler's review, looks for recurring relational patterns, avoided feelings and echoes of her relationship with a demanding mother. A meta-analysis of long-term psychodynamic therapy shows benefits for complex, lasting problems. An Adlerian reading, from a text on theory and practice, explores her family constellation, early recollections and mistaken beliefs about worth, and emphasizes encouragement and social interest. Owen compares the two, notes what each offers Alana and lists questions for supervision.

CCMH 506 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go

Theory application papers earn credit for accurate descriptions of models, thoughtful application to the client and a fair reading of research. Instructors look for each model's view of personality, problems and change to be explained, for techniques to be described with a rationale, for the client's history and concerns to be used specifically and for evidence to be summarized honestly, including limits. Credit goes to comparing models clearly and to culturally aware application. Confusing the models, or listing techniques without connecting them to the client, loses points. Format the references and citations in APA style, and keep the client's own words visible in the analysis.

CCMH 506 Week 1 help: mistakes to avoid

Students often describe psychodynamic therapy as lying on a couch talking about childhood, a picture far from current practice. Another common error is presenting Adlerian therapy as a set of birth-order predictions. Some students apply both models in identical language, so the differences disappear. Others claim one model is proven or unproven without reviewing evidence. Explain each model's core assumptions, show what a counselor using it would notice and do with this client, weigh research fairly and say which parts fit the client. Working with a tutor can keep two models distinct when you apply them to one client, without losing the person in theory.

Related CCMH 506 sample papers

Other CCMH 506 week samples

More MS in Clinical Mental Health Counseling sample papers

CCMH 506 Week 1 questions, answered

What does CCMH 506 Week 1 usually cover?

Psychodynamic and Adlerian counseling models, including their views of personality, techniques and research support.

Where can I find a free CCMH 506 Week 1 sample paper?

The CCMH 506 Week 1 paper reading one client through psychodynamic and Adlerian models is printed above, free.

Is psychodynamic therapy evidence-based?

Reviews suggest its effects are comparable to other established therapies and may continue to grow after treatment ends.

What is social interest in Adlerian therapy?

A sense of belonging and concern for others that Adler saw as a sign of psychological health.

What are early recollections?

Specific early memories that Adlerian counselors explore for clues to a client's beliefs about self, others and life.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.