ACC 423 Week 4 Leases and Accounting Changes Example

Reviewed by Davina Cresswell, MBA · University of Phoenix · Updated

This ACC 423 Week 4 example records two leases from the lessee's side and then sorts three changes into the categories the accounting rules treat differently. Leases and accounting changes usually share week four of University of Phoenix ACC 423, and in ACC/423 the BS in Accounting student learns that both topics are about showing obligations and results consistently over time. The paper follows a composite regional trucking company. It measures a five-year lease of ten tractors as a finance lease with payments at the start of each year, measures a terminal lease as an operating lease with a single straight-line cost, applies a change from LIFO to FIFO for its parts inventory retrospectively, handles a change in depreciation method prospectively and corrects an error in last year's accrued wages as a prior-period adjustment.

CourseACC 423 Intermediate Financial Accounting III (ACC/423)
Week4
Paper typeLeases and accounting changes paper
Lengthabout 1,070 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolUniversity of Phoenix
ProgramBS in Accounting
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for ACC 423 Week 4

1

Tractors, a Terminal and Three Kinds of Change: A Finance Lease, an Operating Lease, a Switch From LIFO to FIFO and a Prior-Year Error at a Composite Regional Trucking Company

[Student Name]

University of Phoenix

ACC/423: Intermediate Financial Accounting III

Week 4 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The company and all figures are composites written for a model paper; accounting rules and research findings come from the sources listed.

What this part is doingThe title lists two leases and three changes, preparing the reader for five separate treatments.
2

A composite trucking company hauls freight for manufacturers and retailers across five states with 180 tractors and 420 trailers. It leases part of its fleet and several terminals and keeps a parts inventory for its maintenance shops. This year brought new equipment, a new approach to inventory and the discovery of a mistake in last year's books. Each of these events changes the numbers, but the rules care as much about when a change is shown as about how large it is. This paper records the leases and applies the correct treatment to each change.

A Finance Lease of Ten Tractors

The company leased ten new tractors for five years, their expected economic life, with annual payments of $260,000 due at the start of each year and ownership transferring at the end. Because ownership transfers and the term covers the tractors' economic life, the lease is a finance lease (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2016). The lessor's implicit rate, which the company can determine from the lease terms, is 7%.

Because each payment falls on the first day of its year, the stream is an annuity due. The ordinary five-period factor at 7%, 4.10020, is multiplied by 1.07 to give 4.38721. The lease liability and right-of-use asset are each about $1,140,700.

The first payment on the lease date reduces the liability to about $880,700. Over the first year, interest at 7% is about $61,600, which is accrued and paid with the second payment. The right-of-use asset is amortized over five years, about $228,100 a year. The income statement shows interest expense and amortization separately, $289,700 in total for the first year, more than the annual payment, because finance lease costs are front-loaded.

What this part is doingConverting the ordinary annuity factor to an annuity due, and showing why first-year cost exceeds the payment, covers two points graders commonly check.
3

An Operating Lease of a Terminal

The company also leased a cross-dock terminal for eight years at $180,000 a year. The lease does not transfer ownership, has no purchase option and covers a small part of the building's life, so it is an operating lease. Its balance sheet still gains an obligation and a matching asset, each measured at the present value of the eight payments, but the income statement shows a single straight-line lease cost of $180,000 a year. Behind that single figure, the liability still grows by interest each year, and the asset is written down by whatever part of the $180,000 is not interest, so both balances reach zero together at the end of the term.

A Change in Principle: LIFO to FIFO

The company has valued its parts inventory using LIFO. Management concluded that FIFO better reflects the cost of parts actually used, since the shop issues the oldest stock first, and changed to FIFO. A change in accounting principle is applied retrospectively: prior periods presented are adjusted as if FIFO had always been used (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2005).

Under FIFO, inventory at the start of this year would have been $1.8 million higher. Cost of goods sold in all prior years combined would have been $1.8 million lower, and at a 25% tax rate, income taxes $450,000 higher. The cumulative effect is added to the retained earnings balance at the start of the first year shown, $1.35 million, and last year's comparative statements are restated. A deferred tax liability of $450,000 is recognized for the difference between book inventory and its tax basis.

A Change in Estimate: Depreciation Method

The company changed its trailers from straight-line to declining-balance depreciation, because trailers lose value faster in early years than engineers had assumed. Although this looks like a change in principle, the standard treats a switch in depreciation method as a change in estimate that happens to be carried out through a new method, so it is applied prospectively. The trailers' remaining book value is depreciated under the new method from this year forward. No prior periods are restated.

What this part is doingExplaining why a depreciation method change is not restated, despite the word principle, addresses the most common misclassification.
4

An Error: Unrecorded Wages

While closing the year, the payroll team found that drivers' wages for the last week of the prior year, $240,000, had never been accrued. As a result, the prior year's wage cost was too low and its profit too high. This is an error, not a change. The prior year's statements are restated, and the opening balance of retained earnings for this year is reduced by the error net of tax, $180,000, as a prior-period adjustment. Because the wages were paid in January and charged to this year's wage expense, this year's expense is overstated by the same $240,000. The correcting entry debits retained earnings for $180,000, records the $60,000 tax effect and credits wage expense for $240,000, so both years now carry the wages they actually incurred. The payroll team has added a cutoff check to the year-end close: the last payroll period is compared with the calendar, and any days worked but not yet paid are accrued.

Effect on Ratios

The new leases change the balance sheet more than the income statement. Together they add about $2.3 million of liabilities, raising total liabilities to equity from 1.4 to about 1.6. The company's lender measures its covenant on funded debt, and the loan agreement states that operating lease liabilities are excluded, so the covenant is unaffected, but the finance lease counts. The controller confirmed the effect with the lender before signing.

Disclosures

For the LIFO to FIFO change, the company discloses the nature of and reason for the change and its effects on each line of the statements. For the depreciation change, it discloses the effect on income. For the error, it discloses the nature of the error, the restatement and its effect on each prior period. Hennes et al. (2008) found that restatements classified as irregularities rather than errors were followed by higher turnover of chief executives and chief financial officers, evidence that investors and boards read these disclosures closely.

Conclusion

The trucking company's finance lease of tractors shows interest and amortization separately, while its terminal lease shows a single straight-line cost, but both are on the balance sheet. Its three changes received three treatments: a new inventory principle applied retrospectively, a depreciation method change applied prospectively and an error corrected by restatement. Weygandt et al. (2021) note that these rules exist so that readers can compare periods on the same basis, which is the purpose of each adjustment here.

5

References

Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2005). Accounting changes and error corrections (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154).

Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2016). Leases (Topic 842) (Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02).

Hennes, K. M., Leone, A. J., & Miller, B. P. (2008). The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1487-1519. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1487

Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2021). Accounting principles (14th ed.). Wiley.

What the ACC 423 Week 4 instructions ask

The ACC 423 Week 4 assignment generally asks students to account for leases and for accounting changes and error corrections. The lease portion usually covers classifying a lessee's lease as finance or operating, measuring the lease liability and right-of-use asset, recording payments, interest and amortization and sometimes the lessor's side. The changes portion asks students to distinguish changes in accounting principle, changes in estimate and error corrections and to apply retrospective, prospective or restatement treatment, including effects on retained earnings and disclosures. Students should show calculations and entries and explain the reasoning for each classification, with the lease and accounting-change standards cited in APA form.

How this ACC 423 Week 4 example is built

A trucking company leases most of what it drives and many of the buildings it works from, so both lease classifications appear naturally, and it has enough inventory and payroll for each type of accounting change to arise in one year. The finance lease is worked from present value to first-year interest and amortization. The operating lease is shown with its single straight-line cost. The changes section treats three events separately and explains why each receives different treatment: a principle change restated back to prior years, an estimate change applied only going forward and an error corrected through opening retained earnings. The paper closes with disclosures and why restatements matter to investors.

ACC 423 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go

Marks in this week tend to depend on correct lease classification and measurement and on sorting each accounting change correctly. Faculty check that the lease liability is the present value of payments at the appropriate rate, with annuity-due factors when payments are made in advance, that finance leases show interest and amortization separately and that operating leases show a single straight-line cost. For changes, a new principle is applied retrospectively, an estimate change prospectively, a change in depreciation method as an estimate change and an error as a restatement with an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Accurate entries, net-of-tax effects and cited standards complete the rubric.

ACC 423 Week 4 help: mistakes to avoid

A frequent ACC 423 Week 4 error is using an ordinary annuity factor for lease payments made at the beginning of each year. Check payment timing first, since it changes the factor. Another is recording both interest and straight-line lease cost for an operating lease; operating leases show one combined cost. In the changes portion, students often treat a change in depreciation method as a change in principle and restate prior years. Current rules treat it as a change in estimate applied prospectively. Errors are not changes at all; they are corrected by restating prior periods and adjusting opening retained earnings net of tax. Show the tax effect of each adjustment and the accounts it reaches. Finally, name the disclosure each change requires.

Related ACC 423 sample papers

Other ACC 423 week samples

More BS in Accounting sample papers

ACC 423 Week 4 questions, answered

What does ACC/423 Week 4 usually cover?

It usually covers leases, especially the lessee's finance and operating lease accounting, and accounting changes and error corrections, including retrospective and prospective treatment.

Where can I find a free ACC 423 Week 4 sample paper?

A regional trucking company example with two leases and three accounting changes is available on this page with notes in the margin. If you have a different case, send it and we will write your first draft at no charge.

How does a finance lease differ from an operating lease for a lessee?

Both bring the obligation and a matching asset onto the balance sheet; a finance lease shows interest and amortization separately, while an operating lease shows one straight-line lease cost.

How is a change in accounting principle applied?

Retrospectively, by adjusting prior periods presented as if the new principle had always been used, with the cumulative effect on earlier periods recorded in opening retained earnings.

How is an error in prior financial statements corrected?

By restating the prior statements and recording a prior-period adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings, net of tax, with disclosure of the error.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official University of Phoenix document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.