Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. ACC/291 is Phoenix’s Principles of Accounting II course. It centers on the corporate side of financial accounting, liabilities, equity and cash flow, and reading a published statement well enough to judge a company. Searches like "acc/291 week 4 assignment example", "ACC291 sample paper", and "ACC/291 week samples" land on this page.
What ACC/291 is really about
ACC/291 assumes the cycle is behind you and moves to the accounts a corporation actually argues about: receivables and the allowance for the ones that will not be collected, long lived assets and depreciation choices, notes and bonds, stock issuance and dividends. Five weeks again, one course at a time, and the difficulty shifts from mechanics to judgment, because most of these accounts involve an estimate somebody has to defend. Many sections add a learning team assignment on a real company's annual report, which is the first time a lot of people open a filing and find that the statements they built by hand look nothing like the ones a corporation publishes.
Sections vary, so hold this loosely. Early weeks typically handle receivables, bad debt estimation and the asset accounts, including which depreciation method a company picks and why that choice is not neutral. Middle weeks usually move into liabilities, payroll obligations and bonds, then into stockholders equity, treasury stock and dividends. Later weeks commonly reach the statement of cash flows, which reliably separates people who memorized entries from people who understand the business, and then ratio analysis across liquidity, solvency and profitability. The final week often asks for a written analysis of one company using several years of its own numbers. The Wk drawers below line up with that pattern.
What ACC/291’s assessments ask for
Assignments in ACC/291 want the estimate defended, not just recorded. Choosing an allowance percentage, a depreciation method, or an amortization schedule means saying what the choice does to reported income and why it fits the business. Ratio work carries the same expectation: compute it, compare it against the prior year or an industry benchmark, then interpret. A current ratio of 1.4 is not a finding on its own; whether it improved, and what the company did to move it, is the finding. Written pieces usually ask you to address a reader with money at stake, an investor or a creditor, so the analysis has to end somewhere a person could act, and it has to cite the statement the numbers came from.
Where students lose points in ACC/291
The classic ACC/291 loss is the ratio table with no reader. Twelve ratios computed correctly, three years across the columns, formulas shown, and then a closing paragraph reporting that the company appears financially stable. Nothing in the table has been used to decide anything, so a rubric asking for analysis finds only arithmetic. Team versions of the same paper fail twice, because each member takes a ratio family, writes a paragraph in isolation, and the sections never speak to each other: liquidity says the company is tight, profitability says it is thriving, and no one reconciles the two. Group the ratios around one question about the company, answer it, and let the disagreements between them become the argument.
The ACC/291 drawers
ACC/291 Wk 1 assignment example
Wk 1 often opens with receivables, bad debt estimates and the allowance method. Full sample paper, annotated: Receivables, Bad Debt Estimates and the Allowance Method.
ACC/291 Wk 2 assignment example
Wk 2 typically covers long lived assets, depreciation choices and intangibles. Full sample paper, annotated: Long-Lived Assets, Depreciation Choices and Intangibles.
ACC/291 Wk 3 assignment example
Wk 3 usually moves to liabilities, bonds and stockholders equity accounts. Full sample paper, annotated: Liabilities, Bonds and Stockholders' Equity.
ACC/291 Wk 4 assignment example
Wk 4 commonly reaches the statement of cash flows and how it is built. Full sample paper, annotated: The Statement of Cash Flows and How It Is Built.
ACC/291 Wk 5 assignment example
Wk 5 typically ends with ratio analysis of one company, often a learning team paper. Full sample paper, annotated: Ratio Analysis of One Company.
Your classroom shows something else?
University of Phoenix revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a ACC/291 sample the right way
The samples are worth most when your paper involves a real filing. Look at how much of the annual report a sample quotes, how it labels the source of each figure, and how it moves from a computed number to a statement about the company's position. Then run your own company through the same sequence, because your instructor has seen the standard examples and your figures are what make the paper yours. If your section assigned a firm or a format that is not on the shelf, send the instructions and the rubric and we will write the first custom sample free, returned in 24-48h.
How these samples are written
Method, in one line: instructions first, structure from the rubric, artifacts exact. Week counts vary by course model; the catch-all row absorbs the difference. Your free request matches what your classroom actually shows.
ACC/291 questions, answered
How many ratios should a financial analysis paper include?
Fewer than most drafts use, each doing work. Four ratios that answer one question about liquidity, leverage or profitability beat a dozen presented as a list. Pick the question first, choose the measures that speak to it, and give every number a sentence of interpretation. A ratio with no sentence after it is decoration in a paper meant for a decision.
Our team split the annual report analysis by section and the grade was low. Why?
Because a company does not come apart that way. When one member reports strong margins and another reports a cash squeeze with no connection drawn, the paper contradicts itself in front of the grader. Assign each member a piece of one shared conclusion, meet once to reconcile findings that disagree, and have a single writer produce the final version.
Is it enough to say a ratio went up or down compared to last year?
That is the start, not the answer. A grader wants the cause and the consequence: what the company did, and what a lender or investor should conclude. Inventory turnover rising because a product line was discontinued means something different from turnover rising on stronger demand, and the paper has to say which one the statements support.